Monday, 15 February 2010

Love of the Land: The U.S. Military Looks at the Middle East: Bows to the White House But Knows Its Mission, Too

The U.S. Military Looks at the Middle East: Bows to the White House But Knows Its Mission, Too


Barry Rubin
The Rubin Report
14 February '10

The Department of Defense has just released its new Quadrennial Defense Review Report for 2010. What does it say about the Middle East? Far less than you’d expect in terms of space but still some extremely important points about what might involve the United States in future wars there.

Aside from some scattered references on the need for more civilian nation-building experts, funding the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, and energy conservation efforts (that's an area, no doubt, where money could be saved), that region takes up less than two pages, about two percent, of the 97-page report.

In comparison, about one-quarter of the four-page note from the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Admiral Mike Mullen, attached to the report, spends 25 percent on the region and sounds far more sensible.

I read this gap as suggesting that the uniformed military (which prepared the admiral's note) is concerned about Iran and terrorist groups but that the text’s main body, by the secretary of defense and designed to please the White House, puts more emphasis on climate change, green energy, and the use of the military as a community-organizing type force to make civilians in places like Afghanistan more friendly to the United States.

But there are significant points of interests in both sections. Let’s start with the report itself which basically makes three points.

(Read full article)


Love of the Land: The U.S. Military Looks at the Middle East: Bows to the White House But Knows Its Mission, Too

Elder of Ziyon: Israeli tool to remove pomegranate seeds wins award

Elder of Ziyon: Israeli tool to remove pomegranate seeds wins award

Elder of Ziyon: Score one for the anti-Valentine's Day Muslims

Elder of Ziyon: Score one for the anti-Valentine's Day Muslims

Elder of Ziyon: Two US congressmen in Gaza. Or at least one.

Elder of Ziyon: Two US congressmen in Gaza. Or at least one.

Elder of Ziyon: What did Hillary Clinton say in Qatar?

Elder of Ziyon: What did Hillary Clinton say in Qatar?

Elder of Ziyon: PA official says he was framed in sex scandal

Elder of Ziyon: PA official says he was framed in sex scandal

Arrest Me if You Dare

Arrest Me if You Dare

The London Times speculates that Tzippi Livni is mulling a trip to the UK to provoke her arrest on war crimes charges.

How long would she sit in the clinker - a day? 6 hours? Her popularity would go stratospheric (due disclosure: I voted for her), the UK leaders presiding over the war in Aghanistan in which civilians are tragically being killed would be shamed to change their silly rules, Netanyahu would be forced to praise her (hee hee), and she'd still be home before Shabbat.
Originally posted by Yaacov Lozowick's Ruminations

A Lethal Obsession

A Lethal Obsession

Robert Wistrich is the archetype of the scholar. He speaks English with an Oxford accent, Hebrew like a Sabra, German like a yekke, and his French and Russian sound to me fully convincing. He probably speaks some additional languages, too. He has read any book or article relevant to his field, and the field is rather broad. He has written something like 20 books.

His newest book,A Lethal Obsession: Anti-Semitism from Antiquity to the Global Jihad just came out last month. It's more than a thousand pages long. The other day I saw a copy, and you wouldn't wish it to fall on your toe.

In spite of the title, it apparently focuses not on the longevity of Jew hatred, but on its post-Holocaust vitality. Anyone who wishes to speak with authority on this topic, must read the book, even though it will take a bit of effort. That's how one acquires authority: by working at it.

If you'd like to know about the thesis without the major effort, here's a fine review by Jeffrey Herf. (h/t Silke)

When Hitler made his famous threat to exterminate Europe’s Jews in 1939, many Western political observers did not believe he meant what he said. It was too incredible and without precedent. No political leader before had so bluntly and publicly announced his intention to engage in mass murder. And so the disgust that greeted Hitler was mixed with disbelief. But the leaders of our own time do not have the excuse of incredulity. As much as any historian can, Robert Wistrich has documented the fact that radical anti-Semitism is in earnest, that its geographic and cultural center of gravity has shifted, and that it has again become a factor in world politics. The advocates of this disgusting doctrine have the power from which to make good on their threats.

Originally posted by Yaacov Lozowick's Ruminations


DoubleTapper: The Auschwitz Album

The Auschwitz Album

Please pass this around, to help assure that people will continue to bear witness to this evil legacy

From here



DoubleTapper: The Auschwitz Album

Russia Says 'Nyet to Israel on Missile Sale to Iran - Defense/Middle East - Israel News - Israel National News

Russia Says 'Nyet to Israel on Missile Sale to Iran - Defense/Middle East - Israel News - Israel National News

Anti-Freeze in Elon Moreh: Hut Destroyed - Defense/Middle East - Israel News - Israel National News

Anti-Freeze in Elon Moreh: Hut Destroyed - Defense/Middle East - Israel News - Israel National News

Mullen: No Nukes for Iran but No Attack - Defense/Middle East - Israel News - Israel National News

Mullen: No Nukes for Iran but No Attack - Defense/Middle East - Israel News - Israel National News

Knesset Panel Approves %u201CNGO Transparency' Bill - Politics & Gov't - Israel News - Israel National News

Knesset Panel Approves %u201CNGO Transparency' Bill - Politics & Gov't - Israel News - Israel National News

Gaza Terrorists Arrest British Journalist - Defense/Middle East - Israel News - Israel National News

Gaza Terrorists Arrest British Journalist - Defense/Middle East - Israel News - Israel National News

Inflated Census Figures Show False Demographic Picture - Inside Israel - Israel News - Israel National News

Inflated Census Figures Show False Demographic Picture - Inside Israel - Israel News - Israel National News

PA in Turmoil over Sex-Corruption Scandal - Politics & Gov't - Israel News - Israel National News

PA in Turmoil over Sex-Corruption Scandal - Politics & Gov't - Israel News - Israel National News

Love of the Land: Gaza Power: Haaretz More Anti-Israel Than Ma'an

Gaza Power: Haaretz More Anti-Israel Than Ma'an


Solomon
Solomonia.com
13 February '10

No surprise. Here's how Ha'aretz headlines the story about the imminent fuel problem at the Gaza power plant: Gaza sources: Sole power plant to halt over Israel fuel blockade.

There's one major problem. The Ma'an story they use as a source is here: Authorities: Gaza Power Plant to cease functioning within hours.

(Read full post)

Related: Power Struggle Means Lights Out For Gaza


Love of the Land: Gaza Power: Haaretz More Anti-Israel Than Ma'an

APOSTASY - DISPLACED IN TIME...

APOSTASY - DISPLACED IN TIME...

February 14, 2010

The Anachronism of Apostasy
By Amil Imani

Whereas the practice of slavery enslaves the body, the dogma of apostasy ensnares the mind. Whereas slavery is a shameful practice of the past, some shameless religionists still use the doctrine of apostasy to intimidate and severely punish people who elect to choose their own belief.

Islam is extremely possessive of its subjects. It is a religion that admits anyone into its fold by the person simply uttering a one-sentence statement of faith, shahada: "I bear witness that there is no God but Allah, and Muhammad is Allah's messenger." By so saying, one becomes Muslim for life and surrenders the right to ever leave it. Anyone who leaves the Islamic fold is murtad (revert), or an apostate.

The notion of apostasy is best understood within the overall Islamic dogma. Islam forms a binding covenant with the believer. Once a person is Muslim, he and his issues are considered Muslim forever. In this covenant, Islam promises to bestow its beneficence on the faithful conditional on the person's total and unquestioned surrender to it in all matters. Some of the rewards offered by Islam to the truly obedient believer, particularly the privileged males, are of this world, as well as a great deal more promised to him in the next. If a Muslim faithful does not reap the rewards of his devotion in this world, Islam assures him of his inestimably cherished and limitless compounded rewards in the next world.

Islam demands subjugation of the individual's will to that of Allah and permeates the thinking, the actions, and the speech of Muslims by prefacing commitments they make contingent on the will of God (inshallah).

This total surrender and submission to the will and decree of Allah also absolves the individual from taking full responsibility for his conduct or honoring commitments he may make. For it is Allah who has the unquestioned authority to consummate or contravene any action or promise made by a faithful.

Within this overall framework of complete acceptance of Islam as the perfect living charter for the believer, the rules pertaining to apostasy can be better understood. Islam considers an apostate a person who unilaterally breaks the covenant he has made with the faith. An apostate is condemned as guilty of turning his back on Allah's immutable, eternal religion. Anyone who is born to Muslim parents and leaves Islam is stigmatized as murtad fitri (natural apostate) in the sense that he was born genetically Muslim and has rejected his gift of birth. And anyone who converts to Islam and later leaves it is condemned as murtad milli (a person who has turned his back to the Ummah).

The severe stricture against leaving Islam is consistent with other main principle beliefs of the religion. Islam is a faith of surrender, not one of a free will. A Muslim is to surrender his freedom of thoughts and actions to the will and dictates of Allah. The very principle of freedom is alien to the Islamic belief system.

With regard to apostasy, the two main branches of Islam, the Sunni and the Shiite, are in considerable agreement. The great majority of Muslim scholars of both major camps agree that the Quran stipulates death for the apostate.

Islam, by its very nature, is an all-encompassing belief system that proscribes and prescribes every detail of the person's and society's conduct. The Sharia law, a comprehensive code of Islamic jurisprudence, purportedly is based on the Quran and the Hadith (the reported enunciations and conduct of Muhammad).

Furthermore, Islamic societies rule by the Islamic laws of Sharia. Any new societal legislation must be harmonious with those of the Sharia, which are conclusively anti-democratic. Sharia law is in explicit contradiction with and violation of the foundation of democracy. Sharia law places the dictates and rules of Allah over the sovereignty of the people. It discriminates against non-Muslims to the extreme of disenfranchising them from their rights of citizenship, such as in the case of Baha'is being barred from jobs, higher education, worship, etc. -- not only in Iran, but also in Saudi Arabia and even Egypt. Sharia is blatantly discriminatory against women, Muslim or not. Men have greater claim to inheritance, their testimony in the court of law is worth twice that of women, and they may marry multiple women at the same time. It even stipulates different rules and privileges governing free Muslim men as opposed to slave Muslims, implicitly condoning slavery. Saudi Arabia, the flagship of Islam, was finally forced by the free world to abandon slavery, I believe, only in the late 1940s.

Apostasy is defined both in the Quran and the Sharia, and its punishment is clearly stipulated.
Those who blasphemed and back away from the ways of Allah and die as blasphemers, Allah shall not forgive them. [Qur'an 4:48]


Islamic law does not allow the freedom to choose one's religion.

Let there be no compulsion in the religion: Clearly the Right Path [i.e. Islam] is distinct from the crooked path. [Qur'an 2:256]

The Quran also specifically addresses the issue of murtad milli:

But those who reject faith after they accepted it, and then go on adding to their defiance of faith, never will their repentance be accepted; for they are those who have (of set purpose) gone astray. [Qur'an 3:90]

The Hadith further restates the provision of the Quran regarding punishment of the apostate.

The Sharia law stipulates that any Muslim who turns his back to Islam should be given a chance to revert to the religion. For an unrepentant male apostate, death is the punishment, whereas it is life imprisonment for a female apostate.

Kill whoever changes his religion. [Sahih al-Bukhari 9:84:57]

The blood of a Muslim who confesses that none has the right to be worshipped but Allah and that I am His Apostle, cannot be shed except in three cases: In Qisas for murder, a married person who commits illegal sexual intercourse and the one who reverts from Islam (apostate) and leaves the Muslims. [Sahih al-Bukhari 9:83:17]

At present, apostasy is illegal in most Islamic countries. Although execution of the apostate is not common, it does take place from time to time, usually by buttressing the "crime" with additional charges. The Islamic Republic of Iran, for instance, often adds the charge of mohareb (one who wars with God) to further legitimize its execution of apostates. A case in point pertains to the treatment of the religious minority Baha'is by the Islamic Republic. A number of Baha'is have been charged as apostates and mohareb and executed, with some of them being secretly buried in unmarked graves.

The late Ayatollah Khomeini in his Tahrir al-Wassilah adjudicates how a person's apostasy is established: "Apostasy is proven in two ways: First, the person himself confesses to his apostasy twice. Second, two just and truthful men bear witness to the person's apostasy. But women's testimonies do not prove apostasy in any case; either they bear witness individually, in a group or beside a man."

The misogynic nature of Islam is once again evident in Ayatollah Khomeini's blanket disqualification of women's testimony solely on the basis of gender.

"Apostasy -- or the formal renunciation of religion -- is already punishable in Iran with death. But now, Iran wants to make the death penalty for apostasy part of the penal code. The European Union is concerned and has asked Iran to reconsider." Who is an apostate according to the legislation? Anyone in the world, not just Iranians, born to a Muslim parent; also, any convert to Islam who leaves it. Only one parent needs to be a Muslim at the time of conception for Islam to own that child for life. Islam is Ummahist. Islam doesn't recognize nationalities or national boundaries. And these Islamist zealots are very serious. They have no sense of humor. Some say they have no sense at all, and that may be right. What they certainly have is a thirst for blood -- particularly the blood of infidels and apostates.

It is noteworthy that Islam considers the world as its Ummah, which supersedes national boundaries. Hence, Islamic clerics feel free to issue fatwa and other adjudications regarding any person, groups, or nations anywhere in the world. A celebrated case of this practice was the fatwa of Ayatollah Khomeini against the British author Salman Rushdie for his book The Satanic Verses. Hence, individual Muslims anywhere in the world take it upon themselves to carry out fatwa issued by Islamic high divines. In another high-profile case, the killing of Theo van Gough, a Dutch film director, and the recent attack on the Danish cartoonist Kurt Westergaard clearly demonstrate this primitive practice that runs counter to the civilized world's due process and has serious intimidating impact on the freedom of expression.

Free people and nations should not sacrifice their God-given liberty to please the Islamists by muzzling dissenters and even endangering their safety and their lives.

The concept and practice of apostasy is a shameful stain on the conscience of humanity. It is despicable for any belief system to stubbornly cling to the dehumanizing anachronism of apostasy while its counterpart, slavery, is already buried in mankind's graveyard of past infamy.

Page Printed from: http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/02/the_anachronism_of_apostasy.html at February 14, 2010 - 05:40:07 PM CST

Originally posted by B'NAI ELIM (Sons of the Mighty)


Love of the Land: Dr. Mordechai Kedar on "Arab Terrorism and the Myth of al Aqsa

Dr. Mordechai Kedar on "Arab Terrorism and the Myth of al Aqsa


H/T to JStreetJive
Blip.tv
09 February '10

Dr. Mordechai Kedar speaks on Arab Terrorism, the Myth of al Aqsa and Jerusalem at Temple Ahavath Torah in Stoughton, MA - (Part 1)



Dr. Mordechai Kedar on "Arab Terrorism and the Myth of al Aqsa Part 2



Related Article by Dr. Mordechai Kedar: A Jewish and Non-Legitimate State


Love of the Land: Dr. Mordechai Kedar on "Arab Terrorism and the Myth of al Aqsa

Israel Matzav: Siemens is a drop in the bucket

Siemens is a drop in the bucket

Last month, I reported that Siemens, the German telecommunications giant, had agreed to stop selling to Iran once its current orders were filled. At the time, the move was hailed for finally bringing about the process of winding down German business with Iran. But that's turned out to be false. In fact, Siemens' business in Iran is a drop in the bucket compared with the amount of business being done in Iran by other German companies.

But, as the Hamburg-based political scientist Matthias Küntzel has put it in a German-language analysis recently distributed by “Stop the Bomb,” “a single sparrow does not yet make for spring.” The analysis refers to a brochure that was published in 2009 by the Tehran-based German-Iranian Chamber of Commerce and Industry and that bears the title “Branch Offices, Representations and Agencies of German Companies in Iran.”

On Küntzel’s count, the brochure identifies no less than two hundred German companies doing business in Iran. Of these, some forty-five have permanent branch or representative offices in the country. The latter include such well-known German industrial heavyweights as BASF, Bayer, Bosch, Daimler, Lufthansa, Henkel, Siemens, and ThyssenKrupp. Several of these firms, as well as numerous smaller, lesser-known German engineering firms, specialize in activities that could readily be of relevance for the Iranian nuclear program. Küntzel has compiled a list of nearly eighty firms whose products, he suggests, could potentially have “military applications.”

While officially recorded German exports to Iran have fallen off from a high of nearly €4.5 billion in 2005, they rose by nearly 9% to just under €4 billion in 2008. Last year, they declined again by some 8%. But, as Küntzel points out, in light of the global financial crisis, this was a relatively good result. Overall, German exports fell by over 18% in 2009.

Moreover, it has long been an open secret that some German suppliers avoid unwelcome notice — and the official statistics — by shipping to Iran via the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The New York Times appears only now to be catching on. Thus the Times report cites an unnamed German business executive who knowingly observes that “Dubai is Iran’s biggest trading partner, yet Dubai produces nothing.” Dubai is one of the emirates composing the UAE. After “confessing” that German companies do business with Iran via Dubai, the anonymous source then cattily and irrelevantly adds that “the Americans” do the same — and even “the Israelis” something similar!


Israel Matzav: Siemens is a drop in the bucket

Israel Matzav: Overnight music video

Overnight music video

Tonight is the first night of Adar, and when Adar starts we increase joy.

Let's go to the videotape.


Israel Matzav: Overnight music video

Israel Matzav: Fayyad congratulates family of Hebron shahid

Fayyad congratulates family of Hebron shahid

The West's 'great white hope' for the 'Palestinians,' Salam Fayyad (pictured throwing Israeli products into a fire to keep them out of the 'Palestinian Authority') sent his condolences to the family of Faiz Faraj, a 'Palestinian' who was shot and killed near Hebron Friday night after pulling a knife on Israeli soldiers.

Palestinian Authority Prime Minister Salam Fayyad has sent his condolences to the family of Fa'iz Faraj, the terrorist who was killed when he attempted to stab IDF soldiers in Hevron Friday evening. Fayyad called Faraj a "shaheed," a martyr to the cause of Islam. "I feel pain for all those killed by the occupying forces, especially those killed by the occupiers and settler terrorists," Fayyad wrote in his condolence note.

On Friday evening, IDF soldiers in Hevron saw Faraj brandishing a knife, screaming anti-Israel epithets, and running in the direction of the troops. The soldiers called on him to stop, but Faraj refused to do so – and soldiers opened fire on him before he was able to carry out his attack, seriously injuring him. Local medics took the terrorist to a hospital in the city, where he died from his wounds. After the incident, Arabs began rioting, throwing stones at soldiers and Jewish residents of the city. Troops broke up the riot.

What could go wrong?

Israel Matzav: Fayyad congratulates family of Hebron shahid

Israel Matzav: British 'journalist' detained in Gaza

British 'journalist' detained in Gaza

Remember Alan Johnston (pictured), the BBC reporter who was 'kidnapped' and spent 114 days in Hamas custody in 2007? Well, it's happened again, except that this time there's no need to kidnap anyone. Hamas just arrested a BBC reporter.

The man was identified as Paul Martin, The arrest was confirmed by the Foreign Office, which also said it was providing consular assistance.

A Hamas spokesman said Paul Martin was arrested for violating security but further details were not given.

Reports say he was taken into custody for a fortnight while attending a court hearing.

Mr Martin has written for the BBC and the Times.

Hamas interior ministry spokesman Ehab Ghussein said: "We have confessions that the British journalist committed offences against Palestinian law, and that harms the security of the country."

How could a useful idiot from the BBC 'harm the security' of the 'country'? JPost explains.

A spokesman for a Palestinian terrorist group, the Abu Rish Brigades, said the journalist was at a Gaza courthouse Sunday to show support for a member of the brigades who was being tried on charges of providing information to Israel.

During the trial, a judge ordered the journalist to be taken into custody and held for two weeks, said the spokesman, who only gave his nom de guerre, Abu Ahmed.

Ghussein said Hamas security forces have obtained "confessions that the British journalist violated Palestinian law and the security of the state." He did not explain further.

Hamas is eager to improve its image in the West and has generally not interfered with the work of foreign journalists since seizing control of Gaza in 2007.

Hey - that's Richard Goldstone's favorite 'court system' in action. What could go wrong?

Israel Matzav: British 'journalist' detained in Gaza

Israel Matzav: Caroline Glick jumps on the Sarah Palin bandwagon

Caroline Glick jumps on the Sarah Palin bandwagon

Caroline Glick devoted much of her weekly column to Sarah Palin. Here's why:

Palin excoriated Obama on his handling of US foreign policy. Among other things, she noted that a year into his quest to appease dictators, America’s international standing is in shambles. “Israel, a friend and a critical ally, now questions the strength of our support,” she added.

Palin bellowed that on issues of foreign policy, there is no room for self-delusion. As she put it, “National security, that’s the one place where you’ve got to call it like it is.” And then, “We need a foreign policy that distinguishes America’s friends from her enemies and recognizes the true nature of the threats that we face.”

If her address wasn’t enough to convince Americans – and specifically American Jews – that Palin thinks supporting Israel and standing up to Iran are the keys to US national security, then there was her interview on Fox News Sunday. Asked how Obama can win reelection in 2012, Palin responded, “Say he decided to declare war on Iran or decided really to come out and do whatever he could to support Israel, which I would like him to do.”

And if that still isn’t enough, there is her lapel pin. The politician who leads the populist opposition to Obama decided to make her most important speech since the 2008 election wearing a pin featuring the US flag and the Israeli flag.

Caroline describes Palin's support for Israel as 'heartfelt' and looks forward to the day when Palin has enough support in the US to be able to constrain President Obumbler's ability to pressure Israel. She discusses why American Jews are reluctant to support Palin, and then discusses why they should support her anyway.

Sarah Palin’s emergence as the mouthpiece of populist opposition to Obama presents Israel’s supporters – and particularly Israel’s Jewish supporters – with an extraordinary opportunity and an extraordinary challenge. Palin’s coupling of support for Israel with her populist domestic agenda marks the first time that support for Israel has been treated as a core, populist issue. The opportunity this presents for American Jews who care about Israel is without precedent.

But of course, to make the best use of this opportunity, American Jews who support Israel have to disappoint Wieseltier. They have to acknowledge that the Left has rejected their cause and increasingly, rejects them.

Obama’s failure to prevent Iran from moving forward with its nuclear program, and his stubborn refusal to support an Israeli move to deny Iran the ability to threaten Israel and global security as a whole, place Israel and core US national security interests in unprecedented jeopardy. His fellow Democrats’ willingness to support him as he maintains this perilous course means that the Democratic ship has abandoned Israel, and strategic sanity.

Palin’s future in politics is unknowable. But what is clear enough is that today hers is the strongest single American voice opposing Obama’s foreign policy and the loudest advocate for supporting Israel and denying Iran nuclear weapons. For this she deserves the thanks and support of American Jewry.

Indeed. Read it all.


Israel Matzav: Caroline Glick jumps on the Sarah Palin bandwagon

Israel Matzav: Please support prosecution of UC Irvine students who disrupted Michael Oren

Please support prosecution of UC Irvine students who disrupted Michael Oren

The Leftists who believe that only people who agree with them have the right to speak have supplied us with contact information to try to influence officials at the University of California at Irvine to prosecute the 'students' who disrupted Israeli ambassador to the US Michael Oren.

Please note: The leftists enemies of free speech [only they have the right to speak] distributed the item below on internet calling on people to oppose the punishment of students who tried to prevent Michael Oren, the ambassador of Israel to the US from speaking at UC-IRVINE.

The item includes contact information for UC-IRVINE officials.

The item is provided so that people who support freedom of speech rather than freedom to shout down and silence can see what enemies of free speech are arguing.

[With thanks to "ActLeft, action list in Israel-Palestine" for providing the contact information to support the prosecution of the students who attempted to deny the ambassador of Israel to the US the right to speak.]

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Aw

The students who disrupted the talk of Michael Oren, the ambassador of Israel to the US, at UC-IRVINE need our support,

Begin forwarded message:

even if you're abroad, please send a note.
it is crucial that UC-IRVINE understand that pressure can come from both sides.
forward widely!

---------- Forwarded message ----------

Urgent Action Needed! Please Distribute Widely

You may have heard of the recent event at UC Irvine with Michael Oren, the ambassador of Israel to the US.

While he was invited by a student organization to speak on US-Israeli relations, the UCI Law School and the Political Science Department cosponsored the speech by Oren, a public figure who represents a state that continues to commit more human rights violations. See the MSU's statement regarding his presence on campus for more details: msuuci.com

At the event, 11 students who chose to protest by making clear and organized statements were arrested and held in a room until after the event. The school is also currently threatening to punish the students, aiming to send a political message by selective enforcement of university policies.

Contact UCI Chancellor Michael Drake NOW to declare that it is unjust to arrest these students. Supporters of the arrests are contacting administration in large numbers, and your support is needed desperately!

Ask to speak with Chancellor Drake or leave a message at: (949) 824 - 5011 and email him at: chancellor@uci.edu

Speak to the Dean of Students office, who are determining the punishment at: (949) 824-5181 and email them at: deanstu@uci.edu

Here are some important points to bring up:

· It was unjust to arrest students for simply having the courage to stand up and speak out against a man responsible for propagating the deaths of thousands of innocent people.

· Civil disobedience has historically played an instrumental role in the civil rights movement in America the eventually ensured equality and human rights for all minorities.

· Michael Oren is a representative of a state that is condemned by more UN Human Rights Council resolutions than all other countries in the world, and he should not be honored at UC Irvine.

· As concerned community members, we will not support an educational institution that threatens to punish its' students with suspension and expulsion for
standing up for their principles.

Thank you for your support.
--

------------------------------------

=======================================
ActLeft, action list in Israel-Palestine.

http://www.actleft.org

Go call today. Heh.

Israel Matzav: Please support prosecution of UC Irvine students who disrupted Michael Oren

Israel Matzav: IDF ground troops to be equipped with satellite dishes

IDF ground troops to be equipped with satellite dishes

The IDF is planning to equip all infantry and armored brigades with satellite dishes to enhance communications with the brigades behind enemy lines. The satellites will be installed on armored personnel carriers.

Under a multi-year plan recently approved by the General Staff and estimated to cost close to $100 million, the IDF is purchasing several satellite dishes that will be installed on armored personnel carriers. The very small aperture terminal (VSAT) two-way broadband satellite communications systems were developed by Gilat Satellite Networks.

The IDF’s Golani Infantry Brigade used ground-based satellite systems during Operation Cast Lead in the Gaza Strip last winter so the commander Col. Avi Peled, could hold video-conference calls with division headquarters back in Israel. The satellite dish also enables commanders to receive live video footage from unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs).

In addition to the VSAT systems, the IDF’s C4I Directorate is also purchasing a number of larger satellite dishes for the division level command and new ground terminals for the stations, which work on multiple bands.

Gilat is an Israeli company. Of course.


Israel Matzav: IDF ground troops to be equipped with satellite dishes

Israel Matzav: IAF jets come under anti-aircraft fire over Lebanon?

IAF jets come under anti-aircraft fire over Lebanon?

Lebanon is claiming this evening that its troops opened fire with anti-aircraft missiles at four IAF jets flying over southern Lebanon and the Bekaa Valley. Lebanon claims that it forced the planes out of its airspace. The IAF has apparently not commented.

The IAF frequently flies reconnaissance missions over Lebanon to monitor Hezbullah's rearmament. The rearmament violates UN Security Council Resolution 1701, which ended the 2006 Second Lebanon War.

Hmmm.

Israel Matzav: IAF jets come under anti-aircraft fire over Lebanon?

Israel Matzav: Born-again supermodel loves Israel

Born-again supermodel loves Israel

A lot of you guys in your 40's and 50's probably remember Kathy Ireland, who appeared on the cover of Sports Illustrated a few times. Kathy has become a born-again Christian and is a very strong supporter of Israel. She was here recently to make a documentary about the Sheba - Tel HaShomer Medical Center, which has the top rehabilitation unit in the country.

She’s 178 cm. with red hair and blue eyes, a former supermodel with a figure to die for and the owner, founder and CEO of a $1.4 billion lifestyle business: Kathy Ireland might just be Israel’s perfect public diplomacy ambassador.

“I love Israel, it’s very close to my heart,” says the 46-year-old born-again Christian. “Because of my faith it’s very special to me.”

Ireland was here recently to film a promotional documentary for Sheba Medical Center. Titled Holy Land Heroes, the documentary aims to expose the work being done at Sheba with wounded soldiers and victims of terror attacks.

“Holy Land Heroes is bringing awareness of these heroes of Israel to the rest of the world,” says Ireland. “I’ve had some incredible life-changing experiences spending time at the hospital meeting with patients, doctors, researchers, nurses and volunteers who are dedicated and committed to rehabilitating these heroes.”

Ireland is a passionate advocate for Israel, with an unwavering belief in the righteousness of its actions. Her faith is such that even the most adept spin doctor would be hard pressed to come up with so much positive PR.

“I think so often Israel is not fairly portrayed in the media,” she says. “Meeting with the military, the air force, [I saw] the efforts that go into the strategy of not hurting civilians and the heroic efforts of these soldiers who put themselves in harm’s way to rescue the wounded, even when the wounded might be their enemy.

“In America, we’ve been so spoiled not to have really known, our generation, what it is to be at war. But that’s changed, and really regardless of someone’s faith, it’s very apparent that if Israel is not safe, then the rest of the world is not safe.”

Read the whole thing.

I wonder whether she'd consider going into politics. She certainly sounds a lot more likable than that other 'supermodel' who's been in the news here recently.

Israel Matzav: Born-again supermodel loves Israel

Israel Matzav: Chabad House in Pune, India targeted

Chabad House in Pune, India targeted

A bomb planted at a bakery that is popular with foreigners killed nine people and wounded 60 in Pune, India on Saturday night. But it turns out that the bakery may not have been the real target of the attack. The bakery is just a few yards from the Chabad House in Pune, and according to India's Home (Interior) Minister, it was Chabad House that was once again the target.

No Jews were killed in the Pune blast, although police officials said that foreigners were targeted. Among the dead and wounded were Iranians, Sudanese and Germans.

Minister Palaniappan Chidambaram told reporters that the Beit Chabad "has been on the radar [of terrorists] for quite some time." Chidambaram arrived at the Beit Chabad shortly after the attack as the official representative of the Indian Government. Beit Chabad emissary Rabbi Betzalel Kupchik thanked him for the permanent security stationed at the Beit Chabad, and added words of encouragement for the Indian Government's fight against terrorism.

People in the Beit Chabad building when the bomb exploded said they felt the building shake, and that it took them a few moments to realize that it had actually not been hit.

I'm sure you all recall that the Chabad House in Mumbai was targeted as part of a series of terror attacks in that city in November 2008. As in that incident, this incident is being blamed on Pakistani Muslims.

The bombing came just a day after nuclear rivals India and Pakistan set a date for their first formal dialogue since the Mumbai attacks prompted New Delhi to suspend wide-ranging talks aimed at normalizing relations after six decades of hostility.

On Sunday, Hindu nationalist leaders blamed the attack in the western city of Pune on majority-Muslim Pakistan and demanded the government call off the talks, scheduled for Feb. 25 in New Delhi.

Arun Jaitley of the opposition Bharatiya Janata Party said India shouldn't restart peace talks until Pakistan stops allowing terrorists to base themselves there and punishes those involved in the Mumbai attacks.

"Terrorism and talks can't coexist," Jaitley said.

I wish Israel would learn that lesson.

By the way, there's an American connection to this attack too:

The bakery is about 200 yards (meters) from the meditation center that Home Secretary G.K. Pillai said had been surveyed by David Headley, who is facing charges in Chicago for allegedly scouting targets for the November 2008 Mumbai attack. Another senior official said Headley had also observed the Chabad House Jewish center near the bakery.

The center's rabbi, Betzalel Kupchik, told Israel's Army Radio station that four months earlier, Pune police warned him of possible attacks and stationed a guard around the clock at the center.

"We are not worried," Kupchik said. "We sleep here and eat here and hope for the best."

And in Washington, they continue to pretend that there's no longer any need for a global war on terror.

Israel Matzav: Chabad House in Pune, India targeted

Israel Matzav: Spineless ex-general claims Israel can't hit Iran

Spineless ex-general claims Israel can't hit Iran

Here's another loser from the 2006 Second Lebanon War. Maybe Amir Comrade Peretz will have something to say about the IDF this week too.

For those who don't recognize him, the man in the picture is Dan Halutz, the IDF Chief of Staff who resigned in disgrace after the Winograd Commission report came out criticizing his (lack of) performance in the Second Lebanon War. I suppose we should be grateful - at least he resigned. Peretz dragged things out for months, while Ehud Olmert, who was also criticized by Wiongrad, was forced out due to his theft of public funds more than two years after the report came out.

Halutz has told Reuters that he 'doubts' that Israel has the power to hit Iran.

Asked in a television interview about Israeli leaders' vows to "take care" of the perceived threat, ex-general Dan Halutz, who stepped down as armed forces chief in 2007, said: "We are taking upon ourselves a task that is bigger than us."

"I think that the State of Israel should not take it upon itself to be the flag-bearer of the entire Western world in the face of the Iranian threat," Halutz, whose previous military post was as air force commander, told Channel Two.

"I'm not some passer-by ... I've filled a few positions that give me a different level of information to the average person," he said without elaborating.

That ought to do wonders for our deterrence capability.

Halutz apparently doesn't understand the idea that even delaying Iran is worthwhile because things can change. He also doesn't understand the possibility that it may take an Israeli attack to get anyone else to move. In other words, he has the same problem he had in 2006: He's not a leader. He has nothing of the legacy of Nachshon ben (the son of) Aminadav.

I'd love to know how he became the IDF Chief of Staff in the first place.

Israel Matzav: Spineless ex-general claims Israel can't hit Iran

Israel Matzav: He has no shame

He has no shame

Former Prime Minister Ehud K. Olmert has written a 'tell-all' book in which, among other things, he blames Defense Minister Ehud Barak for his failure to totally incapacitate Hamas in Operation Cast Lead.

Olmert says that initial estimates of the war effort indicated that overthrowing the Hamas terror regime in Gaza was a feasible goal, that could have been accomplished in a reasonable amount of time, and with relatively few Israeli casualties. But, writes Olmert, politicians with varying interests manipulated the information presented to the government, wildly exaggerating the expected number of Israeli casualties if the IDF continued its campaign to the heart of Gaza or retook the Philadelphi route in southern Gaza. Other disinformation surrounded the amount of time the IDF would require to achieve its goals, with some "experts" claiming it would take Israel months of tough battles to finish the job. Barak, writes Olmert, was among those behind the disinformation.

In the book, Olmert writes that he did not rely on the opinions of those opposed to the operation, but that he undertook his own investigation – and after speaking to commanders in IDF's southern forces, he was convinced that Israel could, and should, deliver a stunning blow to Hamas, to the point of uprooting it from Gaza altogether. But as the operation continued and pressure mounted, both in the media and the government, Olmert writes that he let himself be persuaded to declare a ceasefire – a move, he writes, that he regrets until today.

In response, Barak made an inane comment about his own 'professionalism.'

So who was at fault for Israel's failure to finish the job? On January 14, 2009, I reported that then-Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni wanted to walk away from Gaza, while both Olmert and Barak wanted to keep on fighting. On January 15, 2009, I reported that Olmert had become a hawk and was fighting with both Barak (over his calls for a 'humanitarian cease fire') and with Livni, whom he refused to let go to Washington to get 'guarantees' against the resumption of arms smuggling. Did Livni convince Barak to stop? Keep in mind that we were three and a half weeks from elections in which Barak and Livni were both candidates and in which Olmert was not a candidate.

On January 17, 2009, only two ministers voted against the unilateral 'cease fire' that ended Operation Cast Lead. Neither of them was named Ehud K. Olmert (Roni BarOn and Eli Yishai voted against; Rafi Eitan abstained).

The truth is that Olmert did not want to win in Gaza any more than Barak or Livni did. To claim otherwise is revising history.

But it was also a war that none of our politicians really wanted to win, as Daniel Doron pointed out in Thursday's Jerusalem Post:

Only after three days of bombing did the IAF finally bomb Hamas headquarters, and it took 16 days before it bombed the residence of Hamas's top commander. This country did not exploit the surprise it achieved to kill as many top Hamas commanders as possible (just as in the past it has neglected to do so) - even though this would have most likely led to the collapse of its war machine and shortened the war.

Exploiting the surprise of the attack to the fullest would have also made unnecessary the land incursion and the many casualties it involves. Hamas could be destroyed as an effective war machine by simply killing or chasing away, in short order, many of those who operate its war machine. When we forgo such effective action, we are forced to take other, less effective actions, such as massive closures and bombardments and prolonged land incursions. These cause much greater humanitarian damage without securing victory.

While Doron's statement about not needing a ground attack may be an exaggeration, his point about not attacking the Hamas leadership the first night is well taken. Why didn't the government take full advantage of the surprise it achieved? Doron tries to explain:

Some claim that politicians become more risk averse on the eve of elections. Others blame sharp internal divisions, confusion and lack of determination that inflict the unholy trinity governing the country. Still others claim that leaders who believe that "peace must be made with enemies" make sure they survive so as to have "partners" for a deal after "teaching them a lesson." Finally there are those who claim that a crushing victory will be a great embarrassment to our leaders. "If victory was possible," the public will say, "why did you wait almost eight years before liberating us from Hamas's terror?"

There is a kernel of truth in these explanations. But every terrible mess in Israel originates in "a conception." Against all historical evidence, and against common sense, most leaders, egged on by the media, have sold themselves on the conception that "there are no wars in existence anymore that can be won like the wars of yore" (as stated by a headline to a special Ma'ariv supplement "Not By Force" preaching against seeking victory); in other words that "terror cannot be vanquished by force."

This is nonsense, of course. Almost every terrorist movement was vanquished by force, from the 11th century Assassins to the 1936 Arab Revolt, from the post World War II communist insurrections in Greece or Malaya to terrors groups in Italy, Germany, Japan, etc.

It is also absurd to claim that the IDF, which is supposed to fight several Arab armies simultaneously, cannot vanquish a ragtag guerrilla force of 20,000 fighters lacking armor or airpower. The IDF cannot win only if - like in Lebanon - it fights without a clear plan for victory and under a leadership that does not enable it to win.

Ehud Olmert was Prime Minister. Worse, he was a lame duck Prime Minister, which means that if he had really wanted to prosecute the war to the end, he could have stood up and done so and faced no adverse consequences. He has no business claiming that anyone else talked him out of doing what should have been done. The buck stopped at his desk.

But Ehud Olmert did not want to win in Gaza any more than Ehud Barak and Tzipi Livni did. To come now and claim otherwise is spineless, gutless, two-faced and shameless. In other words, it proves once again everything those of us who live here in Israel already knew about Ehud Olmert: Never in the history of this country has there been a more despicable leader. May he never hold any office in this country again.

Israel Matzav: He has no shame

Israel Matzav: Electric cars for retail sale in Israel in 2011

Electric cars for retail sale in Israel in 2011

There are going to be electric cars for retail sale in Israel in 2011 (Hat Tip: Instapundit). They will have a 350-mile range.

I wonder if they will also have a 116% purchase tax (minimum) like regular cars do here.

/sigh


Israel Matzav: Electric cars for retail sale in Israel in 2011

Israel Matzav: Huh? Danny Ayalon favors 'right of return'!

Huh? Danny Ayalon favors 'right of return'!

From an Arutz Sheva report on an interview with Deputy Foreign Minister Danny Ayalon in the London-based pan-Arabic daily Asharq-Alawsat.

Ayalon further stated he wouldn't be completely against the children and grandchildren of Arabs who fled their homes in pre-State Israel being allowed to reclaim their territory within Israel.

He commented that Israel's denial of this "right to return" was just a unrealistic as the Arab demand to freeze all construction of Jewish communities in Judea and Samaria.

You've got to be kidding!

Israel Matzav: Huh? Danny Ayalon favors 'right of return'!

Israel Matzav: J Street jaunt to Israel: All part of Hamas 54

J Street jaunt to Israel: All part of Hamas 54

The pro-Israel pro-'peace' J Street organization is bringing a bipartisan Democratic group of representatives on a a five-day jaunt to Israel, 'Palestine' and Jordan.

Representatives Lois Capps (CA-23), Bill Delahunt (MA-10), Bob Filner (CA-51), Mary Jo Kilroy (OH-15), and Donald Payne (NJ-10) will meet with Israeli, Palestinian and Jordanian government officials as well as civil society leaders to get an in-depth, on-the-ground look at the state of the peace process, and to explore the American role in bringing about regional, comprehensive peace.

“We’re excited to start bringing members of Congress to the Middle East as part of our overall effort to promote strong US leadership to achieve a two-state solution and regional, comprehensive peace,” said Jeremy Ben-Ami, Executive Director of the J Street Education Fund. “Our hope is that this and future delegations will help to open up and deepen the conversation in Congress about American policy in the Middle East and, in particular, to convey to their colleagues the urgency of the situation and the need for strong American leadership toward achieving a two-state solution.”

The Congressional mission, from February 13th to 18th, will meet with Israeli government and opposition leaders, as well as key regional leaders, including Jordanian King Abdullah II and Palestinian National Authority Prime Minister Salam Fayyad. The delegation will travel widely in Israel, the Palestinian Territories, and Jordan, taking a close look at the situation on the ground through the eyes of policy makers and civil society leaders.

The Delegation and J Street Education Fund leadership will be available to the media toward the end of the trip - with details to be announced as the schedule becomes clearer.

Jennifer Rubin points out that - surprise! - all five representatives were signers of the Hamas 54 letter to President Obama. I wonder whom they're meeting here. Hmmm.

Israel Matzav: J Street jaunt to Israel: All part of Hamas 54

Israel Matzav: North Korea sued in Puerto Rico for terror attack in Israel

North Korea sued in Puerto Rico for terror attack in Israel

In the summer of 1972, my parents sent me to Israel for the summer on a teenagers' tour. In retrospect, I'm kind of amazed that they did. I flew here on the same Sabena flight that had been hijacked seven weeks earlier and sat on the tarmac at what was then called Lod Airport for two days until it was stormed by a group of commandos from Sayeret Matkal - Israel's most elite army unit - commanded by Ehud Barak and including Binyamin Netanyahu among its participants. And three weeks after that, 26 people were killed and 72 were wounded when a group of Japanese Red Army terrorists picked up their luggage from baggage claim, took out machine guns and started firing (yes, that's how bad security was in the early '70's). The picture at the top of this post is from the aftermath of that massacre.

North Korea has taken credit for sponsoring the Red Army, and now they are going to face something that has not happened to them before, but has happened to Iran and the 'Palestinian' terror organizations: A date in an American courtroom.

The lawsuit against North Korea stems from claims it sponsored the PFLP and the Japanese Red Army, providing material support to both organizations and assistance in planning the attack.

The three terrorists arrived on an Air France flight from Paris and drew automatic guns and hand grenades, firing fired randomly at anybody in sight, after their luggage came through baggage claims.

"This attack was for Israelis what the September 11th attacks were for Americans," Ze'ev Sarig, the former manager of Lod Airport, explained in his testimony before a judge in Puerto Rico. "The attack changed how we viewed security at the airport and in Israeli civil aviation."

Nitsana Darshan-Leitner, the founder of Israeli rights group Shurat HaDin, filed the $30 million lawsuit at a U.S. federal court in Puerto Rico on behalf of 12 of the victims' families.

Preliminary hearings to examine evidence began in Puerto Rico on December 2, 2009. Israeli experts - including Sarig and various experts on terrorism - were flown in to testify at the hearings.

The claims were then translated and transferred to North Korean authorities, which, according to Darshan-Leitner, have yet to respond to the charges.

"We are currently waiting for the ruling of the federal judge in Puerto Rico," she said, adding that it might be possible to seize North Korean funds held at U.S. banks if the verdict is in the claimants' favor.

The lawsuit is in Puerto Rico because most of the victims were Christian pilgrims from there. I wonder whether the US State Department will be as adverse to collecting from North Korea as it is about collecting from Iran.


Israel Matzav: North Korea sued in Puerto Rico for terror attack in Israel

Israel Matzav: The engineers

The engineers

Emmanuel Sivan, a Professor of History at Hebrew University, explores the fascinating question of why so many terrorists seem to be engineers.
I am among those who attribute this phenomenon first and foremost to what is described as engineering thinking or an engineering mindset. The concept includes an assumption, which has been raised in psychological research, that engineering as a field of study and a profession tends to attract people who seek certainty, and their approach to the world is largely mechanistic. So they are characterized by a greater intolerance of uncertainty - a quality that is evident among extremists, both religious and secular.

Those with engineering mindsets are also characterized by an approach that requires society to operate "like clockwork" and abhors democratic politics, which requires compromises. It's clear that this is a cumulative tendency and not a stereotypical generalization.

I raised a similar thesis years ago at a Technion conference, where the presidents of similar institutions from around the world were invited to discuss "The image of the engineer in the 21st Century." A lively debate took place between supporters and opponents of the thesis. According to the organizer of the conference, the late physics Prof. Paul Singer, the number of those in favor and those opposed was about equal. If this is the case, it's possible to offer additional explanations, completing or overlapping this thesis.
Hmmm.

Read the whole thing.

By the way, the cell phones at the top are dedicated to a Hamas terrorist who was known as 'the Engineer' until one fine day in January 1996 when he answered one cell phone call too many.

Israel Matzav: The engineers

Israel Matzav: J Street mum about Hamas 54 53 50 letter

J Street mum about Hamas 54 53 50 letter

Lenny Ben David tries to get to the bottom of J Street's silence on the Hamas54 53 50 letter (Hat Tip: Jennifer Rubin).

And who appears first on the Minnesota Independent’s list of the letter’s backers? “Among the groups supporting the letter: J Street, The Holy Land Christian Ecumenical Foundation (HCEF), The American Task Force on Palestine (ATFP), The American Near East Refugee Association (ANERA), The Methodist Church, The Friends Committee on National Legislation (FCNL), and Rabbis for Human Rights.”

With the exception of the rabbis, none of J Street’s colleagues on the letter are known for their fraternal feelings toward Israel.

Is that why J Street avoids claiming credit for the letter or publicizing the fact that it trucks with some unkosher characters? Perhaps the “pro-Israel” group wanted to avoid appearing “pro-Gahttp://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=20498788za” on the eve of launching its national grassroots operation last week. Or perhaps J Street got burned over the last year when it was revealed that a large portion of its PAC funds (possibly close to 10 percent) were coming from individuals never known for being “pro-Israel.” Indeed, the most recent Federal Election Commission records (for the last quarter of 2009) suggest that the J Street PAC donors with ties to Saudi Arabia — the tarnished National Iranian American Council and the Arab-American Institute — didn’t like the publicity and are keeping their checkbooks closed.

Follow the money - it seems to explain an awful lot, doesn't it?

By the way, it's worth going to the three links at the top to check if your representatives are on the list. I know of at least three representatives that have large Jewish constituencies (Bill Pascrell from Northern New Jersey, Yvonne Clarke from Brooklyn and Elijah Cummings from Baltimore - all Democrats).

Israel Matzav: J Street mum about Hamas 54 53 50 letter

Israel Matzav: Message to Arab countries: Don't house terrorists!

Message to Arab countries: Don't house terrorists!

The Times of London posts a piece in which 'Palestinian' terrorist sympathizers are whining about recent incidents in which terrorists were killed in Damascus, Beirut and Dubai, allegedly at the hands of the Mossad.

The current spate of killings began in December when a “tourist bus” carrying Iranian officials and Hamas members exploded outside Damascus. The official report by Syria claimed that a tyre had exploded but photographs surfaced showing the charred remains of the vehicle — prompting speculation that a much larger explosion had taken place.

Several weeks later a meeting between members of Hamas, which controls Gaza, and their counterparts from Hezbollah in its southern Beirut stronghold in Lebanon was also attacked, resulting in several deaths.

Hamas had sought to cover up the incidents because it was embarrassed, a senior Palestinian official in Ramallah told The Times.

“There has been growing co-operation between Gaza and Iran. Israel can read the writing on the wall and they know that with the help of Iran, the Hamas Government in Gaza will become stronger and will fight better.

But Israel is overstepping their boundaries. Other countries don’t want to become a killing field for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.”

It's real simple. If you don't want your country to be a 'killing field' for Israel's conflict with the 'Palestinians,' don't house terrorists. Why is that so hard to understand?


Israel Matzav: Message to Arab countries: Don't house terrorists!

Israel Matzav: 'Real' anti-Semitism

'Real' anti-Semitism

British moonbat Jenny Tonge has called on Israel to set up an inquiry to disprove allegations that IDF medical personnel harvested organs in Haiti. Uri Dromi rips Tonge in a comment at the Guardian's Comment is Free section.

Attacking Israel's policies is one thing; insinuating that the army of the Jewish state is stealing organs or – as the Swedish newspaper Aftonbladet published last year, that the IDF was killing Arabs for their organs – is to repeat what antisemites were saying about the Jews in the darkest periods of history. A blood libel, in short.

Andrew Sullivan refers to this blood libel as 'real' anti-Semitism. It's not clear where Sullivan would come out on the Aftonbladet accusations, but clearly (from other things he has written) he would not regard claims that Israel targeted civilians in Operation Cast Lead last year as a blood libel.

The problem is that it is a short step from one allegation to the other, and in fact, the same people making the Haiti allegations rallied to support the Aftonbladet allegations and were in the forefront of those making the allegations about Israel targeting 'Palestinians' in Operation Cast Lead. It's almost a pity that this time the Guardian seems to have cleaned up the spills in the comment section, because many comments have been deleted that probably would prove my point. But here are some of the comments that the Guardian let stand:

ellis

12 Feb 2010, 4:16PM

the Swedish newspaper Aftonbladet published last year, that the IDF was killing Arabs for their organs

The problem was that, despite the routine outbursts (see article above) to the effect that the story was a libelous fabrication, it appeared to have a considerable amount of truth in it.

The fact that this refutation, of the charges concerning Haiti, begins by denying the Aftonbladet story gives Lady Tong's (kudos for those amazingly funny jokes about her name, by the way) an ominous validity.

jamescisv

12 Feb 2010, 4:28PM

Just when we thought we heard everything, there comes Lady Tonge, the Liberal Democrat peer, calling for Israel to set up an inquiry to disprove allegations that its medical teams in Haiti "harvested" organs of earthquake victims for use in transplants.

I'm not saying they are doing it, and I don't know how credible the accusations are, but isn't that precisely the point of setting up an inquiry?

You know, to find stuff out!?

Indeed, in the JC link at the beginning of your article, she said:

''the Israel Defence Forces were to be commended for their fantastic response to the Haitian earthquake?.

but then said:

?To prevent allegations such as these ? which have already been posted on YouTube ? going any further, the IDF and the Israeli Medical Association should establish an independent inquiry immediately to clear the names of the team in Haiti.?

Seems pretty fair to me!

Unlike, say, immediately calling this anti-Israel abuse, or antisemitism, for example!

Aliboy

12 Feb 2010, 4:35PM

So Tonge never said herself that this had happened. So she's anti-semitic when she didn't say it, is that it?

Anti-semitism is very complicated, isn't it? Nothing you can say is not anti-semitic.

Actually, all this article is is another opportunity for Dromi to pull out his accusations of anti-semitism again.

NapoleonKaramazov

12 Feb 2010, 4:38PM

The Israel organs scandal seems to be true, but apparently they also harvested from dead Israeli soldiers and civilians, and foreign workers in addition to Palestinians.

So, really it is an internal issue. Like we had with the Alder Hey organs scandal.
It happened at least 10 years ago as well.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3sWA2BxFzhQ&feature=related

BeautifulBurnout

12 Feb 2010, 4:39PM

Hang on. What evidence do we have, other than what the JC says, that Jenny Tonge said any such thing, or the context in which it was said?

I know she can be a bit extreme in her comments at times, but I can't imagine her offering up this kind of comment without it being prompted.

This is too bizarre. She is an intelligent woman.

(Still, Uri. People say the strangest things sometimes, I'll grant you that, so you might well be right. A year ago you were denying that the IDF were using white phosophorous as a weapon during Operation Cast Lead.)

But if Jenny Tonge really believes that this is something that "needs investigating" then she is off her rocker, frankly. Not to mention being extraordinarily offensive to Jews everywhere.

PhilipD

12 Feb 2010, 4:45PM

I'd rather see what she said directly before accusing her of anti-semitism. From the linked article she seems to have directly rejected the allegations and her call for an investigation was in the spirit of saying that the allegations needed to be directly addressed rather than ignored. In the context, this may have been foolish, but its easy to see how a casual answer to a direct question could have been misintepreted that way.

Mind you, I've never heard of the woman before, and a casual google does indicate that she's a bit of a wild card, to put it mildly. But accusing someone of the very serious charge anti-semitism without directly stating what they said, and in what context they said it, smacks a bit of opportunism, especially as she has a history of campaigning for Palestinians.

BeautifulBurnout

12 Feb 2010, 4:49PM

Erm... the more I look into this, the weirder it appears to be. Google "jenny tonge haiti IDF" and the only results are the JC, ynet and a variety of blogs (any links to the Torygraph are individual bloggers, not Torygraph staff) with a vested interest, shall we say. Nothing reported in anything mainstream.

Is Baroness Tonge being smeared here?

Not happy about the authenticity of this, frankly.

Blood libel is a really vile thing to do. It is up there with holocaust denial in my book. Falsely accusing someone of a blood libel on the flimsiest of evidence is inexcusable.

exiledlondoner

12 Feb 2010, 4:50PM

Yes, Jenny Tonge's brain has clearly departed this world, and moved.. well actually, I have no idea where er brain's gone....

But why oh why get Uri Dromi to write the article? As little more than a professional apologist for the Israeli Military and propagandist for Israel, he will inevitably be the main sunject of the debate - this is a man who campaigns against the investigation of things that really need investigating.

Any number of Israeli writers could have written this article - writers whose attachment to the truth was less questionable. What Jenny Tonge has said is plain wrong. You don't need someone of Mr Dromi's particular talents to write about it - his skills lie elsewhere.

I sometimes wonder whether CIF is trying to start a shouting match for more hits?

BeautifulBurnout

12 Feb 2010, 4:52PM

north

I reiterate - blood libel is vile and disgusting.

However, I am a tad concerned at the authenticity of this, or whether she was quoted out of context, because although she is a mouth-frother when it comes to I/P she is not daft enough to become imbroiled in something as stupid as this, imo. Just my two penn'orth though - I may well be wrong and will apologise if I am.

JackofDiamonds

12 Feb 2010, 4:52PM

I heard that the British army was using the bodies of dead Argentinians left over from the Falklands war to host their efforts at keeping Hitler's brain alive in a secret MI6 facility.

Now set up an impartial investigation to prove this wrong
.

But you're talking about the British not the Israelis. The Israelis are capable of anything and everything wicked - that is a given. Going to Haiti was - of course, of course - merely a pretext to steal organs - the evidence is there for all to see. Now let the Israelis get out of that. And let us not forget, that if the Israelis investigate this allegation, the investigation is suspect from the start because the Israelis cannot be trusted, they are bound to cover up their heinous crimes.

No this thing must go to the UN. A commission must be appointed to investigate these crimes. Jenny Tonge would be an ideal candidate for this commission. If the Israelis object to her taking part - it just goes to show they have something to hide. Tonge is a patron of the online newspaper that has bravely published the facts of this case - intrepid, honest, courageous Jenny - thank god for her and her newspaper.

By the way, BeautifulBurnout is marked as a 'contributor,' which I believe means that s/he writes pieces for CiF.

Those comments are all from the first page (50 comments) and there were an additional 20 or so that were deleted. We can only imagine....

By the way, Pamela Geller points out that the person who started the Haiti blood libel is a regular poster on Huffington Post. It figures.

While blood libels like stealing organs are among the most extreme, they are not far removed from claiming that Israel targeted civilians in Operation Cast Lead. Indeed, the same people are behind both allegations. Like many leftists, Andrew Sullivan can't understand that.

UPDATE 6:19 PM

Tonge has been fired as her party's spokesperson on health matters in the House of Lords, but she remains an MP.


Israel Matzav: 'Real' anti-Semitism
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...