Wednesday, 14 October 2009

Tragi-Comedy with Great Grandchildren

Tragi-Comedy with Great Grandchildren

Stalin's great grandson is having a public - and apparently legal - spat with Krushchev's great granddaughter.

Funny how who you are dictates how you see the world - or not funny. Rational and empiric investigation, anyone?
Originally posted by Yaacov Lozowick's Ruminations

Love of the Land: Fatah cools on Obama and Mitchell

Fatah cools on Obama and Mitchell


Ben Smith
Politico
13 October 09

Peace process prospects seem to be getting grimmer, as an internal memo of Fatah -- the favored Palestinian leadership -- leaks to the AP:

An internal document circulated among members of Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas' political party says all hopes placed in the Obama administration "have evaporated" because of alleged White House backtracking on key issues to the Palestinians.

The Fatah Party memorandum, obtained Tuesday by The Associated Press, accuses the United States of backing off from its demands that Israel freeze settlement construction and failing to set a clear agenda for new Mideast peace talks.

It wasn't immediately clear whether the Oct. 12 document reflected Abbas' views or was intended to be leaked as Fatah's attempt to pressure President Barack Obama to bear down harder on Israel.

The document said the Palestinians have lost hope in Obama and accused the American leader of caving in to pressure from pro-Israel lobbyists in Washington.

"All hopes placed in the new U.S. administration and President Obama have evaporated," said the document issued by Fatah's Office of Mobilization and Organization. The department is headed Fatah's No. 2, Mohammed Ghneim.

Obama, it claimed, "couldn't withstand the pressure of the Zionist lobby, which led to a retreat from his previous positions on halting settlement construction and defining an agenda for the negotiations and peace."

The memo seems to strengthen the argument that opening with a strong public stand on settlements -- voiced most firmly by Clinton -- was a tactical American mistake, hardening the Palestinian line even as Mitchell negotiated a compromise with the Israelis.

Related: What's the Point



Love of the Land: Fatah cools on Obama and Mitchell

Swastika and %u2018Obama%u2019 Carved in US Golf Course - Jewish World - Israel News - Israel National News

Swastika and %u2018Obama%u2019 Carved in US Golf Course - Jewish World - Israel News - Israel National News

Shared via AddThis

Turkey Tightens Syrian-Iranian Axis after Snubbing Israel - Defense/Middle East - Israel News - Israel National News

Turkey Tightens Syrian-Iranian Axis after Snubbing Israel - Defense/Middle East - Israel News - Israel National News

Shared via AddThis

Hizbullah Defies Map, Claims Blast Was Outside UNIFIL Zone - Defense/Middle East - Israel News - Israel National News

Hizbullah Defies Map, Claims Blast Was Outside UNIFIL Zone - Defense/Middle East - Israel News - Israel National News

Shared via AddThis

Civil Rights Group: Why No Response to Distancing Orders? - Defense/Middle East - Israel News - Israel National News

Civil Rights Group: Why No Response to Distancing Orders? - Defense/Middle East - Israel News - Israel National News

Shared via AddThis

Joyous and Efficient Welcome for 200 New Olim - Inside Israel - Israel News - Israel National News

Joyous and Efficient Welcome for 200 New Olim - Inside Israel - Israel News - Israel National News

Shared via AddThis

Ancient Artisans' Footprints Discovered Beneath Lod Mosaic - Inside Israel - Israel News - Israel National News

Ancient Artisans' Footprints Discovered Beneath Lod Mosaic - Inside Israel - Israel News - Israel National News

Shared via AddThis

IDF Releases Video of Hizbullah Arms Smuggling - Defense/Middle East - Israel News - Israel National News

IDF Releases Video of Hizbullah Arms Smuggling - Defense/Middle East - Israel News - Israel National News

Shared via AddThis

RubinReports: The Common Theme: Stomp on Obama’s Policies Because He Won’t Do Anything About It

The Common Theme: Stomp on Obama’s Policies Because He Won’t Do Anything About It

By Barry Rubin

Note two developments of the last day which have a common theme. First, Secretary of State Hilary Clinton’s visit to Moscow failed to move the Russians regarding sanctions on Iran. A short while ago, the New York Times listed as one of President Barack Obama’s great achievements that he got Russia to consider—not agree but consider—higher sanctions on Iran. Now it is clear that Russia has no intention of supporting Obama’s efforts.

This comes after the U.S. unilateral concession not to build missile sites in the Czech Republic and Poland, an action taken without fully consulting these allies and on the anniversary of the Russian invasion of Poland.

Second, while nothing may come of it in the end, Fatah (which controls the Palestinian Authority, PA) signed a unity deal with Hamas after the United States publicly stated that it opposed such a step. This comes immediately after the PA’s reversal—against U.S. wishes—to try to get massive international sanctions against Israel for alleged—and phony—“war crimes.”

Will the Obama Administration react to these slaps? Because clearly knowing that you can cross the United States with no consequences is leading countries to step on U.S. interests and policies.
How many examples are needed to make the administration learn this lesson?

One final point. Regarding the debate on the Goldstone report discussion in the UN. Basically, what happened is that a radical, antisemitic terrorist group seized control of the Gaza Strip through violence (no international response); then attacked Israel through rockets, mortars, and cross-border raids (no international response); then broke a ceasefire and restarted the war (no international response).

Israel defended itself in the only way it could--especially given the lack of any international effort. Hamas used human shields, turned homes and mosques into firing positions, and put its military headquarters in a hospital. Then there was an international response: to send a commission many of whose members had already made up their minds to hear witnesses who were almost all Hamas supporters or at least people who sought Israel's destruction. Without donig any independent investigation of its own, the commission then condemned Israel for "war crimes."

This report has now gone to an international body which is chaired by Libya and where the largest voting bloc is led by Sudan, and whose Human Rights Committee is run largely by countries like Iran, Russia, and Algeria. The charge to demonize Israel and put sanctions against it is led by the Palestinian Authority, its supposed negotiating partner for peace and the victim of Hamas's murders and tortures which--by the way--is trying harder to make a deal with Hamas than with Israel.

Sanity check, anyone?
RubinReports: The Common Theme: Stomp on Obama’s Policies Because He Won’t Do Anything About It

RubinReports: Iran’s Plan to Beat Sanctions

Iran’s Plan to Beat Sanctions

By Barry Rubin

Iran is sneering at the possibility that one day during the remainder of this century, the United States and European countries will put some form of sanctions on Iran to try to stop its nuclear weapons’ program.

At the Friday prayer sermon in Tehran—the most important forum in the country—on October 9, Ayatollah Ahmad Khatami, the event’s leader, said of the Geneva talks between Iran and the United States plus other important countries:

"The meeting was a great victory for the Islamic Republic of Iran to such an extent that even the Western and Zionist media had to admit defeat....Prior to the talks, they used to speak of suspension and sanctions against Iran, but after the talks, there has not been any word of suspension or sanctions, rather, Iran's package of proposals was the axis."

While it is not true there hasn’t been any talk of sanctions, there have been no major advances in plans for them either.

Supposedly the secret weapon—of the West, not Iran—will be to restrict the sale of gasoline and other refined petroleum products to Iran, which can’t make its own. Yet while this idea is being pressed by the U.S. Congress and discussed at length among the Western states, it is already becoming outdated. That is, it’s already clear three to six months before such restrictions are imposed—and yes, it would be better to have them than to do nothing—they are outdated and will be ineffective.

Iran’s leaders are confident of breaking any embargo or sanctions. When you hear their plans you can well believe them:

--Use China, Russia, and other countries that will violate sanctions in exchange for money. China and Russia will water down sanctions and then, whether or not they promise to adhere to them, will circumvent restrictions put on trade with Iran.

--Reduce subsidies for fuel to cut down on consumption.

--Employ the big gasoline stockpile Iran has been building just for this purpose.

--Put into production the huge new refinery the Chinese have built for them.

--Use the fact that there is an international recession plus surplus refining capacity to find companies eager to sell them gasoline and other fuel products.

And, of course, the more time Tehran has before sanctions are invoked, the more prepared it will be to defeat U.S. efforts.

I hate to say this but I’m betting on Tehran.


RubinReports: Iran’s Plan to Beat Sanctions

Israel Matzav: Overnight music video

Israel Matzav: Overnight music video

Love of the Land: Legitmizing Terrorist Organizations Will Not Make Them Placid Rulers

Legitmizing Terrorist Organizations Will Not Make Them Placid Rulers


JINSA Report #930
jinsa.org
09 October 09

[The Nobel Committee gave the Peace Prize to President Obama because he can visualize a world without nuclear weapons -or because he isn't President Bush. Big deal. Since they gave it to Yasser Arafat, it hasn't been worth "a bucket of warm spit," to paraphrase John Nance Garner.]

The more important story in today's paper is the public emergence in the Administration of the idea that "political wings" of terror organizations should be recognized as legitimate. Accordingly, the Taliban wouldn't need to be defeated, just de-fanged. The Washington Post cites a "senior administration official" saying, "The Taliban is a deeply rooted political movement in Afghanistan, so that requires a different approach than al Qaeda." Hezbollah's political ascendance in Lebanon was referred to by "some inside the White House" as a positive transformation from a terrorist organization to a political party. Hamas, no doubt, is not far behind.

Press Secretary Gibbs pointed out, "There is clearly a difference between" the Taliban and "an entity that, through a global, transnational jihadist network, would seek to strike the U.S. homeland...the Taliban are, obviously, exceedingly bad people that have done awful things...Their capability is somewhat different, though, on that continuum of transnational threat."

There are three underlying assumptions: 1) there are separate and identifiable political and military "wings," the former of which can be persuaded to give up the latter; 2) no matter what crimes an organization commits-against its own people or other people-if some portion of its leadership agrees to participate in politics, the United States will accept it as legitimate; and 3) if it doesn't threaten Americans at home, we don't care who else it threatens.

The first is demonstrably untrue. Chickens have "wings," terrorist organizations have a political leadership that uses military force to impose itself on its own people and make war on others. Hezbollah and Hamas emerged as political players precisely when they had the military force to impose themselves on the Lebanese and Palestinian people respectively-and to make war on Israel. Fatah, before Hamas, did the same. It is unclear in the case of the Taliban who the political leaders are and how/why they should give up their arms. The Taliban is enormously unpopular inside Afghanistan; its ability to terrorize the locals is the only reason it is taken seriously by the United States in the first place.

The second speaks ill of the U.S. government. We used to be (sometimes rightly) accused of cozying up to dictators and ignoring the people they abused at home. The Bush administration tried the opposite approach in Iraq-freeing the Iraqi people from a dictator who was killing people in horrifying numbers, to judge from the mass graves uncovered. Critics condemned "nation building" as colonialist and our efforts in Iraq as "occupation." The current administration has returned to American form-declining to meet the Dalai Lama as a nod to China; playing footsie with Venezuela, Nicaragua, Egypt and Cuba; and now suggesting we could live with the Taliban even if the Afghans would be returned to the decade-long nightmare from which the United States rescued them in 2001.

The third is shortsighted in the extreme, for two reasons: First, because they haven't doesn't mean they won't. There was a time before al Qaeda could strike us in our homeland. Hezbollah, until 9-11, had killed more Americans than any other terrorist organization-and never killed one of us here at home. Terrorist organizations are parasites that need organisms upon which to feed as they grow in size and capability. The United States is not just at war with al Qaeda, or the Taliban-or Hezbollah, for that matter. We are at war with terrorists and the states that harbor and support them. To the extent that we help terrorist organizations BECOME the states that harbor and support terrorist organizations, we ensconce permanent sources of nutrition for the parasites. Lebanon cannot escape Hezbollah; the Palestinians will never escape Hamas if the United States and the EU engage it; Afghanistan will never escape the Taliban if we legitimize them in government.

Which is the second reason that considering threats only to the American homeland is shortsighted. The ideologically like-minded come together to attack "the other." Hezbollah, armed and trained by Iran, threatens the Lebanese people, Israel, Egypt and Jordan. Hamas, increasingly allied with Iran, threatens Jordan as well as Israel. Venezuela and Iran support the FARC, which threatens Colombia. The Taliban, with its military and ideological links to al Qaeda, threatens the Afghan people and Pakistan.

If we consider threats to our friends or allies to be irrelevant to us, at some point they will find it worthless-or dangerous-to be our friends or allies.

Love of the Land: Legitmizing Terrorist Organizations Will Not Make Them Placid Rulers

Love of the Land: The Contempt of Iran for America

The Contempt of Iran for America

Melanie Phillips
The Spectator
14 October 09


This is what Ayatollah Ahmad Khatami
said at last Friday’s prayer meeting in Tehran about the Geneva talks between Iran and the UN Security council big five plus Germany:


‘The meeting was a great victory for the Islamic Republic of Iran to such an extent that even the Western and Zionist media had to admit defeat....Prior to the talks, they (Westerners) used to speak of suspension and sanctions against Iran, but after the talks, there has not been any word of suspension or sanctions, rather, Iran's package of proposals was the axis.’


Ayatollah Khatami is correct. As a result of this grovelling, America and the west are now so weakened that the Ayatollah also felt emboldened to threaten Israel once again with extinction, this time with a ‘third intifada’ over the spurious claim that Israel has attacked the al Aqsa mosque (an incitement which so far has failed to ignite the Palestinians) -- even as Iran moves serenely onwards towards finally checkmating America with its nuclear weapon.


This is the outcome of Obama’s hand of friendship. This is why Obama received the Nobel Appeasement Prize.


Related: Supreme Iranian Leader Mocks America



Love of the Land: The Contempt of Iran for America

Love of the Land: Short History of Israel-Palestinian Conflict: 1929, 2000, 2009, Anti-Jewish Rumors over the Temple Mount Lead to Palestinian Riots

Short History of Israel-Palestinian Conflict: 1929, 2000, 2009, Anti-Jewish Rumors over the Temple Mount Lead to Palestinian Riots


Barry Rubin
The Rubin Report
13 October 09

In August 1929, wild rumors that Jews had attacked Arabs, cursed the name of Islam’s founder, and were about to seize the Temple Mount led to inflammatory sermons in mosques, followed by massive Arab riots. More than 105 Jews were killed by Arabs; not a single Arab was killed by a Jew.

The exact same thing happened—albeit with far fewer casualties—in 2000, 2009, and at several points in between. The pattern tells a great deal about why the conflict doesn’t end and in fact stays a great deal the same.

The worst single incident took place in Hebron, where scores of Jews were murdered or wounded. Some were saved by Arab neighbors. The remaining Jews had to flee Hebron, never to return. Their property was taken by the Arab residents.

True, there had been a right-wing Jewish demonstration at which slogans were chanted claiming ownership of the Western Wall (the surviving part of the retaining wall of the ancient Jewish Temple) but there had been no violence against Arabs.

Almost exactly 80 years later, the visit of a French tourist group to the Temple Mount set off wild rumors that Jews were going to seize the Temple Mount. Passions were inflamed by Islamic clerics who were appointees of the Palestinian Authority and organized by Fatah, Hamas, and Hizb al-Tahrir,

Again, days of rioting were set off. But no Jews were killed because they were defended by Israel’s security forces, not British police (as had been the case in 1929). No Arabs were killed because of the restraint exercised by Israeli police. One can imagine if parallel events had taken place in an Arabic-speaking country. Naturally, there will be no international praise for this restraint.

The Western Wall and the rest of the Old City of Jerusalem was captured by Jordanian forces in the 1948 war. All synagogues were torn down or turned into other facilities; all Jewish residents were expelled.

In 1967, Israeli forces captured the Old City in the Six-Day war of that year. No Arab residents were expelled; no mosques or churches were closed down. On the contrary, there was a massive Arab migration to the city which greatly increased the Muslim population there.

Even though the Temple Mount is the holiest place—I would argue the only legitimate Holy Place—for Jews, it was left under Arab Muslim supervision. Jewish prayer was forbidden up there by Israel’s authorities, both to avoid provoking Muslims and also in line with a rabbinic forbidding of doing so lest the Temple’s space be defiled.

The al-Aqsa Mosque and Dome of the Rock were also under Arab Muslim control. The area was closed to Muslim prayer only during periods of violence and opened thereafter as soon as possible.

In 2000, a brief tour of the Temple Mount by Ariel Sharon—he merely walked through for about an hour, looked around, and then left—was the rationale used to set off an intifada that lasted for about five years and cost several thousand lives.

Afterward, Marwan Barghouti, leader of Fatah on the West Bank, described in detail how he used this as an excuse to set off the uprising. This violence took place about the time that President Bill Clinton, with Israeli agreement, proposed the creation of an independent Palestinian state which would, among other things, control most of east Jerusalem.

All of these things are points of fact, yet thoroughly neglected ones internationally. Both Israel and the Palestinians claim the Old City and there have been a wide variety of plans to solve this problem. Basically, however, the issue is not really closer to solution than it was in that far distant past.

The salient fact is that 80 years after the 1929 riots the same scenario has prevailed of demonization and lies about Jews, deliberately inflamed by Arab political and religious forces, has led to massive Arab violence.

If you want to know why the conflict has not been resolved over such a long time, examine the different behavior of the two sides.


Love of the Land: Short History of Israel-Palestinian Conflict: 1929, 2000, 2009, Anti-Jewish Rumors over the Temple Mount Lead to Palestinian Riots

IRON MAN COVERS




BATTLEFIELD ACTION





Tuesday, 13 October 2009

Why Bin Laden Really Turned to Terrorism

Why Bin Laden Really Turned to Terrorism

Shared via AddThis

Samaria Dilemma: Relating to IDF that Expels Jews - Inside Israel - Israel News - Israel National News

Samaria Dilemma: Relating to IDF that Expels Jews - Inside Israel - Israel News - Israel National News

Shared via AddThis

With Checkpoints Down, Weapons Flow Freely - Defense/Middle East - Israel News - Israel National News

With Checkpoints Down, Weapons Flow Freely - Defense/Middle East - Israel News - Israel National News

Shared via AddThis

IDF Tells Soldiers: Don't Kill Firebombers - Defense/Middle East - Israel News - Israel National News

IDF Tells Soldiers: Don't Kill Firebombers - Defense/Middle East - Israel News - Israel National News

Shared via AddThis

MK: Don't Freeze Lives of 'Settler' Children - Education - Israel News - Israel National News

MK: Don't Freeze Lives of 'Settler' Children - Education - Israel News - Israel National News

Shared via AddThis

Goldstone Effect: PA in Turmoil over UN Delay - Defense/Middle East - Israel News - Israel National News

Goldstone Effect: PA in Turmoil over UN Delay - Defense/Middle East - Israel News - Israel National News

Shared via AddThis

Record 900 Births in One Month in Bnei Brak Hospital - Good News - Israel News - Israel National News

Record 900 Births in One Month in Bnei Brak Hospital - Good News - Israel News - Israel National News

Shared via AddThis

Sanhedrin Sponsors Unique Bedouin-Jewish Get-Together - Inside Israel - Israel News - Israel National News

Sanhedrin Sponsors Unique Bedouin-Jewish Get-Together - Inside Israel - Israel News - Israel National News

Shared via AddThis

Israel Matzav: Video: Explosion in Hezbullah ammo dump in Lebanon

Video: Explosion in Hezbullah ammo dump in Lebanon

You may recall that Monday night I reported that there was an explosion in a Hezbullah ammunition dump private home in a village near Tyre in southern Lebanon. Five people were killed.

A few minutes after the explosion, the IAF got an aerial video of the scene.

The video shows Hezbullah closing off the area, driving in 2 trucks and removing items which appear to be different types of rockets and other weaponry. They then drove the trucks to a village 4 km away, and to a building which is a known Hezbullah weapons storehouse.

Only after Hezbullah had cleaned out the explosion site did they allow UNIFIL and the Lebanese army to go in.

The IDF gave UNIFIL the video to help them investigate the matter.

You may recall that there was a similar explosion in a Hezbullah warehouse on July 15.

Obviously, this is a blatant violation of UN Security Council Resolution 1701, which ended the Second Lebanon War in 2006, but rumor has it that there are hundreds of ammunition dumps like this one in homes throughout southern Lebanon.

Let's go to the videotape.





Israel Matzav: Video: Explosion in Hezbullah ammo dump in Lebanon

Israel Matzav: Obama strikes out again: Lavrov says Iran sanctions 'counterproductive'

Obama strikes out again: Lavrov says Iran sanctions 'counterproductive'

Oops.

Barack Obama may have thought he was buying Russian cooperation on Iran when he abandoned the United States' allies in Poland and the Czech Republic. But he was wrong.

Secretary of State Clinton met Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov in Moscow on Tuesday, and Lavrov says that sanctions against Iran would be 'counterproductive.'

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said on Tuesday that the threat of sanctions against Iran would be counterproductive, resisting US efforts to win agreement for measures if Iran fails to prove its nuclear program is peaceful.

Lavrov spoke following talks with US Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, who is trying to gauge Moscow's willingness to join the US in imposing sanctions if Iran fails to come clean on its nuclear activities.

Lavrov said Russia's position is that under current conditions even the threat of sanctions against Iran would be counterproductive.

Clinton said the US agreed it was important to pursue diplomacy with Iran.

"At the same time ... we have always looked at the potential of sanctions in the event we are not successful" in persuading Iran to comply, she said at a joint news conference.

What could go wrong?

Israel Matzav: Obama strikes out again: Lavrov says Iran sanctions 'counterproductive'

AIR ACE PICTURE LIBRARY




Israel Matzav: Erdogan's complaint: 'The world blamed Islam for Islamic terror'

Israel Matzav: Erdogan's complaint: 'The world blamed Islam for Islamic terror'

WONDER WOMAN COVERS 3







Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...