Wednesday, 7 April 2010

RonMossad: A Tale of Two Cities: Sderot, music, rockets and you

A Tale of Two Cities: Sderot, music, rockets and you

It was the best of times, it was the worst of times...
--A Tale of Two Cities

3/18: 2, 3/19: 1, 3/20: 4, 3/21: 2, 3/22: 2, 3/23: 1, 3/26: 1, 3/27: 2, 4/1: 1, 4/2:1

--number of rockets fired into Israel by day from Gaza in the past two weeks


My town:

It's beautiful, quiet Spring morning in the Northeast. The rivers are receding after the recent Old Testament-style floods. The recent cold snap has ended, the sun is shining and the skies are blue. As I lay in bed with the sun streaming in through the windows and hear the Easter weekend traffic motoring along slowly, it's easy to be almost hypnotized at how peaceful it is. What should I do today? Whatever it is, it has to be outside and on a day like today it seems as though anything is possible...

***********

Your town:

It's beautiful, quiet Spring morning in Sderot. The heavy rains of the winter and desert flooding are fading into distant memory, the sun is shining and the skies are blue. As I lay in bed with the sun streaming in through the windows and hear the Passover weekend traffic motoring along slowly I think to myself how lucky I am to wake up in such a beautiful town. What should I do today? Whatever it is, it has to be outside and on a day like today it seems as though anything is possible...

***********

My town:

...something occurs to me as I get up to pour myself a bowl of cereal, something in the back of my mind...but I push it away...I don't want anything to disturb my quiet haze...what should I do? Walk to the park? Hike along the river? But something keeps nagging me and I can't ignore it...something I forgot...but I really don't want to think about it I'd much rather think about how to spend this beautiful day...

***********

Your town:

...something occurs to me as I get up to go make myself a cup of coffee...something in the back of my mind...no I don't want to think about that...I won't on a day like today...so what SHOULD I do today, anyway? Go to beach? Ugh, with all the holiday travelers it's going to be packed. Was that what was bothering me? No that's not it...and I'm not going to think about it anymore today...I'm not going to let it disturb this beautiful, peaceful day...Still it's nagging me, but in my just-woken-up haze I can barely remember what it is...

***********

My town:

Taxes! TAXES! That's what it was! I forgot to do my taxes and they're due in just a few days! Well no matter I'll just do them later tonight - no way I'm wasting a day like THIS to look at some boring forms! Thank God I remembered though, it could have been a disaster if I had forgotten!

***********

Your town:

CODE RED CODE RED CODE RED CODE RED CODE RED CODE RED CODE RED CODE RED CODE RED CODE RED CODE RED CODE RED CODE RED CODE RED CODE RED CODE RED CODE RED CODE RED CODE RED CODE RED CODE RED CODE RED CODE RED CODE RED AIR RAID SIREN AIR RAID SIREN AIR RAID SIREN AIR RAID SIREN AIR RAID SIREN AIR RAID SIREN AIR RAID SIREN AIR RAID SIREN AIR RAID SIREN AIR RAID SIREN CODE RED CODE RED CODE RED CODE RED CODE RED CODE RED CODE RED CODE RED CODE RED CODE RED CODE RED CODE RED CODE RED CODE RED CODE RED CODE RED CODE RED CODE RED CODE RED CODE RED CODE RED CODE RED CODE RED CODE RED CODE RED CODE RED CODE RED CODE RED AIR RAID SIREN AIR RAID SIREN AIR RAID SIREN AIR RAID SIREN


Oh that's what it was, I almost forgot...I haven't had a quiet, peaceful day like I was imagining in OVER EIGHT YEARS. Why should today be any different? Back into the bomb shelter for another game of "dodge-rocket" with my family.


***********





Welcome to Sderot, Israel, population approximately 20,000. The scene you just read is one that has been repeated basically on a daily basis since March, 2002. Not-so-surprisingly, up to 94% of the children who live in Sderot suffer from Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). But in addition to holding the dubious title of "most bombed city on earth", Sderot has been an incredible musical and cultural center for all of Israel. An incredible amount of singers and songwriters hails from this hard-scrabble town, including Kobi Oz of the band Teapacks. You may have heard of them during the "Push the Button" controversy at the 2007 Eurovision contest.



But Sderot isn't just a thumbtack on a google map showing the latest rocket strike in the perpetual hell of Middle East reality. It's a real city with real people that I had the privilege of visiting this past January. Palestinians fired four mortars at us while I was there. Luckily their aim was off and the mortars all landed in their own territory - no code red for me.

The tension while walking in the street however, was palpable and I couldn't help subconsciously looking around for somewhere within 15 seconds to take shelter if the alarm did go off. Most of the bus stops in the area have been converted into bomb shelters and many buildings have them built-in but there were several stretches when it was clear I would not be able to get anywhere indoors within 15 seconds.

Knowing that thousands upon thousands of rockets and mortars have crashed into the very streets I was now walking made me think about the people who stood on the same ground I was now on. Someone, probably several people, had been standing where I was now during a Code Red and had to hope to God or whatever higher power they believed in that they would be spared. This was a sobering thought indeed.

Eventually I arrived at the Sderot Media Center where I met several residents of the town and spoke to them about life in the shadow of Gaza. Without realizing it, the tension I felt when I was in the street left me the whole time I was in their presence. Despite the unbelievable living conditions these people are forced to endure, I was mesmerized by the charm and overall quiet of the city.

The people I spoke to, while obviously upset about the situation, didn't act like they were jumpy or nervous or miserable...the whole place just seemed so NORMAL. Being there reminded me of the sleepy New Jersey town I grew up in...which made it all the more frustrating to know that this quiet calm had just been shattered the day before by a rocket attack and unbeknownst to me at the time had almost been shattered four times while I was there.

If you follow Israeli news you read a lot about traumatized residents of Sderot with PTSD or children that have developed panic attacks as a result of incessant Code Red alerts...but in a way, seeing how relatable the people were, affected me more than reading about victims of attacks. These people aren't superheroes, they're just regular human beings like you and me who want nothing more complicated than to be able to get out of bed in the morning WITHOUT BEING SHOT AT BY A BUNCH OF IRANIAN-FUNDED, OVERSIZED BAZOOKAS.

They have jobs, they drink tea, they send their children to school, they go out drinking (a local pub was selected by Haaretz as serving the "best cocktail" in Israel), they even produce the Bissli snacks - popular with so many American Jews - at the Osem plant right outside town. In short, this could be quiet rural town in South Jersey or Pennsylvania or Michigan or Kansas or Oklahoma or wherever. You could have had the luck of being born here instead of wherever you grew up.



The only difference is that if you had been born here, this what would be falling on your head on a nearly daily basis for the past eight straight years. This is what would have been raining down on you 20, 30, 50, A HUNDRED times per DAY before your government finally decided to act against the perpetrators. This is what the rest of the world would expect you to endure falling on you as you drove to work or waited with your child for the bus or lay in bed considering what to do with your holiday weekend.

By the way, these rockets don't just fall from the sky, they EXPLODE on impact and send shrapnel (in addition to ball bearings, nails, screws and other potential projectiles that our Palestinian friends pack into these explosives) flying in every direction. These rockets, "crude" as they may be described in Palestinian mythology, are specifically designed to injure or end as many human lives as possible. That they don't kill more people is a testament to the preparedness of the townspeople to react to these attacks.

For example, take this playground that I saw while I was there...




This is the "Heritage Legacy Park of Good Wishes" - built with money that was donated by Americans. It sure looks like a fun place for kids to play, with colorful caterpillars and castles and everything else an imaginative child could want. In the setting sun it all seemed so peaceful...so normal...until it was pointed out to me by my friend that these caterpillars and castles were actually built as BOMB shelters. This project was part of a $9 million campaign to create bomb-proof places for children to play. Park of "good wishes" indeed...

And this is really a perfect illustration of what's wrong with the attitudes of pretty much everyone who doesn't actually live in Sderot. Everyone I talked to was (understandably) at the point of infuriation that even well-meaning people who are trying to help are actually perpetuating the problem.

After all, rockets rain down on an innocent civilian population and the answer is...to build prettier bomb shelters? Better early warning systems? Teaching people how to manage their lives more effectively as they live under bombardment?? This isn't an earthquake or hurricane zone or an area that's somehow prone to regularly occurring meteor showers! This isn't some natural disaster that people need to learn how to live with better! Just STOP THE ROCKETS.

Imagine if your home was repeatedly the target of armed robberies. You call the police to tell them that your home is being invaded on a daily basis and instead of them coming to arrest the perpetrators they tell you get a stronger safe to keep your jewelry in, so as to discourage the bandits from coming back. Would you tolerate that? Of course not! It's INSANE to expect people to live like this.

No more bomb shelters. No more early warning systems. No more Code Reds. No more fake condemnations by the outside world. No more SILENCE from the Obama administration.

And the announcement of the settlements the very day that the vice president was there was insulting.
--Hillary Clinton


Oh my mistake, maybe we're better off when you don't say anything. Do you know what's really insulting though? All this controversy from the entire world that is directed at Israel over...building an apartment building...but while Biden and Hillary were STILL in the process of scolding the Israelis over their evil real estate plans there was yet another rocket attack into non-settlement, Israel-proper.

But hey, no one got killed so no harm, no foul right? ISRAEL on the other hand...how DARE they exercise their sovereignty over territory that they annexed over 40 years ago. And as world leaders raced each other to condemn Israeli architecture in ever more flowery and grandiose language, poor Manee Singmueangphon had the misfortune of working in a greenhouse that a random Qassam crashed into, killing him and injuring dozens other Thai workers.


Singmueangphon had children back in Thailand that he was working in Israel to support


Really though, what other country in the world is expected to endure daily attacks on its own citizens...yet a new housing project becomes an INTERNATIONAL incident? Oh and God forbid if Israel actually eliminates a terrorist mastermind...nevermind rocket attacks, the Mossad stands accused of the high crime of PASSPORT FORGERY. What a joke!

In other news, over 300 people were slaughtered in the Congo over a span of 3 days in December and you didn't even know about it. Oh and 700 children died there today (and yesterday and the day before that...) of starvation due to the fighting. But ISRAEL is on the front pages of every newspaper because they stopped a murderer from killing more people and built an apartment building in their capital! It's complete insanity and yet we all are complicit in it by our silence.

Thankfully the residents of Sderot are imaginative, creative and resourceful enough to take care of themselves. My friends at the Sderot Media Center told me about the innovative programs they have to help the Sderot residents who suffer from PTSD. There are theater, movie, music and poetry programs that encourage children and adults to express their feelings through art. It's not much of a surprise that a city with such a rich musical and cultural history would produce such beautiful art about a decidedly un-beautiful situation. There's also a documentary called Sderot: Rock in the Red Zone about how the Sderot youth are finding ways to express their pain and suffering to the rest of the world.



But why should this be? Why do we need awareness concerts and social media therapy and playground bomb shelters? Why does this situation even need to exist? How can we abandon these human beings...these mothers, fathers, sons, daughters...and allow them to be victimized like this?

We, all of us, need to stand up and make it clear that we will not play by the rules our "friends" try to impose on us as long as these people are subjected to this daily hell. What are we arguing about here, honestly? Apartment complexes? Passport forgeries? These people have been subjected to a DAILY state of terror for over EIGHT YEARS. This is ridiculous already!

You want Israel to sit down at the table and talk with murderers like Hamas? Get them to stop the rockets. You want less restrictions on Palestinian movement in the West Bank? Stop the rockets. You want settlement freezes and "confidence-building" measures? STOP THE ROCKETS. Oh and how about releasing Gilad Shalit (after his 4th Passover in captivity) too?

No progress should be made, no concessions offered, no goodwill gestures, nothing done until they STOP THE ROCKETS. No one should be able to guilt-trip you into feeling bad for the (self-imposed) terrible situation the Palestinians are living under in Gaza either. Even the frequently Israel-bashing Human Rights Watch places the blame for the rockets SQUARELY on Hamas "leadership's" shoulders. I'm sorry that innocent Palestinians suffer in Gaza on a daily basis but you know what? It's not my problem. THEIR government which THEY elected and therefore represents THEM allows this situation to continue.

But if they just STOPPED THE ROCKETS - none of this would happen. Action/reaction, cause/effect, behavior/consequence. Enough with the complaining, the apologies, the demands and the excuses...just STOP

THE

ROCKETS.

And to the people of Sderot...keep making your movies and your music and know that even though we're very far away, WE DO HEAR YOU.


RonMossad: A Tale of Two Cities: Sderot, music, rockets and you

Obama will Shy Away from Nuclear Crisis with Israel - A7 Exclusive Features - Israel News - Israel National News

Obama will Shy Away from Nuclear Crisis with Israel - A7 Exclusive Features - Israel News - Israel National News

Everyone Loves Israel's Stock Market - Good News - Israel News - Israel National News

Everyone Loves Israel's Stock Market - Good News - Israel News - Israel National News

This Week's Aid to Gaza - Inside Israel - Israel News - Israel National News

This Week's Aid to Gaza - Inside Israel - Israel News - Israel National News

Gaza Terrorists Break Pledge, Bombard Negev with Mortars - Defense/Middle East - Israel News - Israel National News

Gaza Terrorists Break Pledge, Bombard Negev with Mortars - Defense/Middle East - Israel News - Israel National News

Anti-Semitic Attacks Hit New York Synagogues - Jewish World - Israel News - Israel National News

Anti-Semitic Attacks Hit New York Synagogues - Jewish World - Israel News - Israel National News

Israel Distributes Gas Masks Nationwide - Defense/Middle East - Israel News - Israel National News

Israel Distributes Gas Masks Nationwide - Defense/Middle East - Israel News - Israel National News

MK Hotovely Says It's Time to Confront America - Politics & Gov't - Israel News - Israel National News#replies

MK Hotovely Says It's Time to Confront America - Politics & Gov't - Israel News - Israel National News#replies

Israel Matzav: Overnight music video

Overnight music video

Here's Yeedle Werdyger singing Shimu (Listen).

Let's go to the videotape.



Israel Matzav: Overnight music video

Love of the Land: American Jews, take a stand

American Jews, take a stand


Fresnozionism.org
04 April '10

It’s time for Jewish Americans to stand up.

Does the state of Israel have special meaning for them, or is it just another foreign country? They should decide.

This is because the Jewish community in the US, for whatever reasons, has an influence that’s much greater than numbers (about 6.5 million) would indicate. And it’s become urgent to exert this influence in a positive direction and in a coordinated way.

It’s beginning to be clear that the relatively pro-Israel policy that the US has followed since 1967 — I say this even though I know that there have been ups and downs in this period, that some influential institutions (the State Department) have always been less than friendly, etc. — is coming to an end.

This isn’t surprising. Since before 1948, the proponents of a Jewish state have struggled against opposition from the Arabs and from antisemites, and the founding of the state didn’t make it go away — on the contrary. Israel’s history for the past 62 years can be seen as a series of attempts to eliminate it. Its enemies have tried various approaches, but in recent years have realized that a regional military confrontation alone won’t achieve their goal.

Israel’s enemies have come to understand that in order to win they must isolate Israel and remove the international support that has, over the years, allowed this small nation to prevail militarily over the much larger Arab armies. As everyone knows, the goal is to delegitimize Israel, to demonize her, and to split her supporters away from her. Their desired practical results are these:

(Read full post)

Love of the Land: American Jews, take a stand

Israel Matzav: Obama limits US use of nukes

Obama limits US use of nukes

On Monday, President Obama announced new limits on US use of nuclear weapons.

Discussing his approach to nuclear security the day before formally releasing his new strategy, Mr. Obama described his policy as part of a broader effort to edge the world toward making nuclear weapons obsolete, and to create incentives for countries to give up any nuclear ambitions. To set an example, the new strategy renounces the development of any new nuclear weapons, overruling the initial position of his own defense secretary.

Mr. Obama’s strategy is a sharp shift from those adopted by his predecessors and seeks to revamp the nation’s nuclear posture for a new age in which rogue states and terrorist organizations are greater threats than traditional powers like Russia and China.

It eliminates much of the ambiguity that has deliberately existed in American nuclear policy since the opening days of the Cold War. For the first time, the United States is explicitly committing not to use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear states that are in compliance with the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, even if they attacked the United States with biological or chemical weapons, or launched a crippling cyberattack.

Those threats, he argued, could be deterred with “a series of graded options” -- a combination of old and newly designed conventional weapons.

“I’m going to preserve all the tools that are necessary in order to make sure that the American people are safe and secure,” Mr. Obama said during the interview in the Oval Office.

White House officials said that the new strategy will leave open the option of reconsidering the use of nuclear retaliation against a biological attack, if the development of such weapons reaches a level that makes United States vulnerable to a devastating strike.

As I noted earlier, the President ducked questions regarding Israel as part of the same interview.

This is scary. The President of the United States lives in an alternate reality. What could go wrong?

Israel Matzav: Obama limits US use of nukes

Israel Matzav: Disney World it wasn't

Disney World it wasn't

15-year old Muhammad Farmawi, who, it was claimed last week, was killed by Israeli troops in Gaza but then found alive in an Egyptian prison, got a rude awakening about prison conditions in the Arab world.

“We were collecting small stones near the Gaza International Airport when we heard gunfire,” the boy told local reporters. “As soon as we heard the gunfire, we ran toward the border with Egypt.”

Farmawi said that he and his friends discovered an underground tunnel and decided to hide inside it.

“It was a short tunnel,” he recounted. “We started crawling inside it until we saw light.”

Emerging from the opening, the teenagers discovered that they were in the middle of an agricultural field on the Egyptian side of the border. Within minutes, they were surrounded by Egyptian border guards who handcuffed and blindfolded them before taking them to prison.

According to Farmawi, who spent three days in prison, the Egyptian soldiers and policemen beat him and his friends with clubs and electric wires and forced them to sleep on the floor without mattresses or blankets.

“In addition to the beatings and verbal abuse, they gave us rotten food to eat,” he said.

Over the weekend, the Egyptians released Farmawi and 12 other teenagers, as well as five fishermen who had entered Egypt illegally, and handed them over to the Hamas-controlled security forces in the Gaza Strip.

...

Asked if he would ever consider returning to Egypt, the teenager replied: “After what happened to me in Egyptian prison, I won’t go back there even if they offered me $1 million.”

If he'd been in an Israeli prison, he'd have had three gourmet Kosher meals daily, a comfortable bed and phone and television privileges, in addition to Red Cross and family visitations. Maybe that's why the 'Palestinians' don't mind going to Israeli prisons.

Israel Matzav: Disney World it wasn't

Israel Matzav: Saudi cleric to visit Jerusalem?

Saudi cleric to visit Jerusalem?

A Saudi cleric announced on his television show on Sunday that he would be broadcasting his next program next week from Jerusalem.

A Saudi Arabian cleric announced on television on Sunday he will make an unprecedented visit to Jerusalem next week as part of an intensive Arab world effort to claim Muslim ties to the city, which Arabs envision as the capital of an independent Palestinian Authority country.

The Israeli Foreign Ministry said no applications have been made for a visa for the cleric, Sheikh Mohammed al-Areefi, and that they know nothing about his announcement.

Al-Areefi told his viewers that he would broadcast his next show from Jerusalem to discuss Muslim claims to the city. Saudi Arabia bans travel to Israel and is one of the most fundamentalist Muslim countries.

Given that Israelis are not allowed into Saudi Arabia, I see no reason to let this guy in. But unfortunately, it seems that if he applies for a visa, the Israeli government will grant it.

He said he was not afraid of any "treachery from the Jews," as he had put his trust in God. Israeli Foreign Ministry spokesman Yigal Palmor said while he was not familiar with the case, Al-Areefi could apply for a visa from the consulate in Amman.

"Throughout the years many people from countries like Libya, Indonesia and other countries that don't have relations with Israel have visited Jerusalem," he said. "All these visits were naturally coordinated with Israeli authorities," the spokesman said.

Stupid Jews.


Israel Matzav: Saudi cleric to visit Jerusalem?

Israel Matzav: Anti-Semitism in Canada moves up a level

Anti-Semitism in Canada moves up a level

Baron Bodissey passes on a Facebook entry from a student named Nick at Carleton University in Ottowa.

Tonight I went out to the bars downtown. It was a great night with my roommate Mark Klibanov. Around 1:45am, as we were leaving the bar, and we heard the shout of “Zionist” in Arabic. As it stands now, we weren’t sure if the shouts were directed at myself, a known a supporter of Israel, or Mark, an actual Israeli.

Quickly, we both responded that yes we were Zionists. All of a sudden we were surrounded by 10-15 men who began to shout at us in Arabic. We tried to back out and run away. All of a sudden, I was struck in the back of the head. I’m not sure if it was a fist, a rock or a pipe but it left me dazed and bleeding.

We quickly ran back to the bar and stood beside the bouncers. The crowd of anti-Israel thugs dispersed.

About 10 minutes later, assuming that it was safe, we began to walk home. We were walking through a parking lot when a car pulled up next to us. The driver shouted “I f***ing hit you, you Jew.”

Continue reading here.

Ottowa is not far from Toronto. In 2008, it was disclosed that a Hezbullah terror cell had tracked an El Al crew that was staying in Toronto. The area has more than its share of Islamist terror sympathizers. And Ottowa isn't too far from Dearbornistan and the rest of the Detroit area either.

It sounds like those Jewish Defense League people who ran the demonstration last week in Mississauga have their work cut for them in that area.


Israel Matzav: Anti-Semitism in Canada moves up a level

Israel Matzav: It's come to this

It's come to this

It's amazing how much Israel's relations with Turkey have deteriorated since Tayyip Erdogan stormed past Shimon Peres in Davos sixteen months ago. Turkey is now threatening war.

Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan warned Israel against responding to rocket attacks from the Gaza strip.

In an interview with the Turkish TV station TRT Erdogan said that Turkey will not stand idly by if Israel carries out another campaign inside the Gaza Strip.

Israel, in a sharply worded response to Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s latest rhetorical slam, advised him on Monday night “not to turn into another extreme leader such as Hugo Chavez.”

Erdogan should not try to integrate his country into the Arab world at Israel’s expense, a Foreign Ministry official said, in a rare direct response to one of Erdogan’s now almost routine attacks on Israel.

The official, reading from a ministry response, said Israel was not looking for a confrontation with any country, including Turkey. But, he said, the impression being created is that Erdogan wants to integrate his country into the Arab world “on Israel’s back.”

“We suggest he look for a more creative way to integrate both into the Muslim and Western worlds,” the official said, and “not to turn into another extreme leader such as Hugo Chavez.”

The official said Israel hoped that in light of Erdogan’s professed concern for Muslims all around the world, he would express sorrow at the long line of murders of innocent Pakistanis and Iraqis by terrorist organizations.

What could go wrong?


Israel Matzav: It's come to this

Israel Matzav: Video: Budapest and the dumb blonde

Video: Budapest and the dumb blonde




Some of you have been following me long enough to remember the days when I regularly posted blonde jokes. Here's one of them.

Let's go to the videotape (Hat Tip: Mrs. Carl).




Heh.



Israel Matzav: Video: Budapest and the dumb blonde

Israel Matzav: The morning after

The morning after

I never did see The Poseidon Adventure, but I remember the theme song quite well - it came out while I was smack in the middle of high school... learning Geometry (which I begged off teaching my 10th grade daughter today, telling her that all I remembered from 38 years ago was that we got the first teacher fired and that the second teacher was a guy named Steve who used to take us out to shoot hoops when he wasn't in the mood to teach).

But let's go to the videotape.



That's all by way of introduction to a very serious question posed by Gabriel Schonfeld: What will the US say the day after an Iranian nuclear test?

One question that should be asked is what we will say the day after Iran tests its first nuclear device. Back in 1935, the great historian John W. Wheeler-Bennett wrote a brilliant book called The Pipe Dream of Peace: The Story of the Collapse of Disarmament. It was a history of the General Disarmament Conference that opened in 1932 and dragged on ineffectually for more than two years even as shattering events unfolded all around. In the preface to this book, Wheeler-Bennett reflected on the appointment of Adolf Hitler as Chancellor of Germany. His words are pertinent to the picture unfolding before our eyes:
The role of Cassandra carries little satisfaction for those who play it, and now that the worst has happened and the blackest forebodings are justified, there is no time for repining. The milk has been spilt. It was worth while to try every expedient up the last moment, but it is fatal to be content now to say, "We told you so."
Wheeler-Bennett was profoundly right and profoundly wrong at once. His blackest forebodings were justified. But the worst had certainly not yet happened. That was to come in forms unimaginable.

If the Islamic fanatics running Iran get the bomb, our blackest foreboding will also be justified. But the worst will certainly not yet have happened. The imagination recoils at what might follow.
Indeed, it does. That's why I believe that Israel must find the courage to act against Iran. Before it's too late.
Israel Matzav: The morning after

Israel Matzav: Offending Hitler's favorite Arab?

Offending Hitler's favorite Arab?

Michael Ledeen on why the Obama administration is so incensed by the construction of 20 Jewish housing units on the site of the Shepherd Hotel in Jerusalem's Shimon HaTzadik neighborhood.

Watch it here.

Israel Matzav: You can keep Mecca and Medina

You can keep Mecca and Medina

The head of 'Palestinian Islamic Jihad' claims Israel wants hegemony over the entire Muslim world.

Islamic Jihad's secretary-general in Palestine on Sunday described Israeli measures in Jerusalem as representing the last opportunity for the Muslim and Arab world to support the holy city against occupation.

"Israel is not acting in secret. Every Israeli plot and action is being carried out publicly," Ramadan Shallah said in a telephone address to participants at a festival held in Istanbul, Turkey to show solidarity with Jerusalem.

"If Israel succeeds in realizing its goals of annexing and Judaizing Jerusalem, that will pave the way to controlling every capital in the Arab and Islamic world including Ankara, Cairo, Damascus, Amman, Riyadh, and others. Israel could even work its way toward Mecca and Medina," he said.

Read your bible, man. All we want is from the Euphrates to the Mediterranean. Heh.

Much more here.


Israel Matzav: You can keep Mecca and Medina

Israel Matzav: Israel and the post-modern American Presidency

Israel and the post-modern American Presidency

Victor Davis Hansen deconstructs President Obama's post-modern Presidency, explaining why none of us understand that it's all about alternate realities, relativism, speaking 'truth to power' (a phrase that I don't recall hearing before Obama took office), the absence of objective standards of truth and falsehood, and of course, redistributive change (you did all realize that's what he meant by change during the campaign two years ago, didn't you?).

The same doubletalk permeates the foreign policy arena, where nations are judged by different standards, since, after all, some nations are oppressed while others are Western capitalists who have created wealth for themselves by being oppressors. I will stick to the Israel part of the equation, but to really appreciate it, you should read the whole thing.

Finally, examine foreign policy. Now many of us are upset that we court enemies and shun friends, and seem to be reaching out to the most authoritarian regimes imaginable, whether Putin’s Russia, or Iran, or Venezuela. Well, once again, that is only because you construct reality on the norms predicated upon your own comfortable globalized privilege — that, in fact, as Obama thankfully grasps, is a result of thousands of daily oppressions, both here and abroad, of which you are not even aware.

...

[W]hat Obama has done is “contextualized” the world, and “located,” as it were, the seemingly hostile anti-American rhetoric of “enemies” into a proper race/class/gender narrative.

And what he has found is that nationalism and the construct of the state have fooled us into thinking that there are “allies” and “enemies,” when, in fact, these are mere labels used by the privileged to “exaggerate” “difference” that only enhances Western entrenched economic, racial, cultural and political hegemonies.

Once, thanks to Obama, we “unpack” that “reality,” then we can see that most Americans have much in common with Venezuelans, Russians, Iranians, Syrians and others who likewise struggle against the same enemies that brought us the 2008 Wall Street meltdown and now oppose health care reform, cap and trade, amnesty, and the take over of the automobile, banking, and insurance industries.

So a postmodernist looks at the Falklands and does not rely on archaic notions of “sovereignty” or a “history” of a prior war. Instead, one sees a postcolonial power once more claiming “ownership” of a far distant island, proximate to a Latin American people, with long experience with European and American economic and political exploitation. Presto — we are now “neutral,” which means we don’t see anything intrinsically convincing in Britain’s claims to the Falklands.

Note Israel. What are we to make of the Netanyahu humiliating smack down, the seeming indifference over the Iranian nuclear program, the nominations and appointments on the Middle East front of a Freeman or Power, the reach out to Syria and Iran, the interview with al Arabiya and the Cairo speech, the bow to a Saudi royal, the ritual trashing of George Bush juxtaposed to the praise of a Saudi king, the strange past outbursts of Obama advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski about hypothetically shooting down Israeli planes on their way to Iran, the ranting about Jews from the former spiritual advisor Wright, etc.

In short, the answer is that Israel is a construct of Western privilege — its democratic, capitalist, and Western customs hinge on the oppression of a vast “other” that is far more egalitarian, socialist, and antithetical to Western consumer-capitalism with all of its pathologies of race, class, and gender exploitation.

In that context, in archaic fashion, we struggle to damn any effort to end such hegemony and empower the voices of the oppressed. We are not, in fact, “allied” to Israel, but properly speaking instead should be to the underprivileged in the Gaza slums, to those without health care on the West Bank, and, yes, to the progressive Israelis of noble spirit who are trying to battle the reactionary Likudniks and instead do something about the tentacles of their own discriminatory state, whose capital is derived from exploited labor and resources of a silenced other.

Hanson drips sarcasm and manages to let Obama's pompousness come through his writing. But this sure explains a lot, doesn't it? It fits with Hanson's description from a year ago of Obama's personal moral compass:

a genuine feeling that Israel is an aggressive, Western imperialist power exploiting indigenous people of color who simply wish to be free--in other words, the Rev. Wright-Bill Ayers-Rashid Khalidi view of the Middle East.


Israel Matzav: Israel and the post-modern American Presidency

Israel Matzav: Israel becomes a big issue in Florida 19

Israel becomes a big issue in Florida 19

I suppose this was inevitable.

There's a special election in Florida's 19th Congressional district next Tuesday. Florida 19 includes large parts of Broward and Palm Beach counties (I've been there myself - went to a meeting in Boca Raton about ten years ago and have flown out of West Palm Beach's less expensive airport several times), which have large Jewish populations. The district was represented for the last 13 years by Obama confidant Bob Wexler, who resigned in October to head up J Street's 'think tank.' Wexler, to whom I have referred as an Obama kapo, was convinced last July that Israel would say yes to a 'settlement freeze.'

The election pits Democrat Ted Deutch, Republican Ed Lynch and Independent Jim McCormack against each other. Last Thursday, there was a contest in the Orlando Sentinel to see which one was more pro-Israel.

Causes related to Israel were a central part of Democrat Ted Deutch’s civic activities before he was elected to public office.

“I have spent my entire adult life as a leader, as a national leader in the pro-Israel community. I have been to Israel many times. I understand from these visits and from my involvement in the community, the threats that Israel faces,” he said.

“This is something that I care about deeply. That I have for my entire life. I look forward to being a leader on preserving the U.S.-Israel relationship and Israel’s security in Congress, just as I have been a leader on these issues in the community.”

...

Republican Ed Lynch said he’d be far better on Israel than Deutch, who is Jewish.

“Jewish people are able to understand that just because someone’s Jewish does not mean that they have the best interests of Israel in mind and just because someone isn’t Jewish doesn’t mean that they don’t,” he said.

“I’m the only candidate that will stand up and take the tough stance that America needs to take with regards to Israel. I’m the only candidate who will say Israel needs to be able to defend herself. And I’m the only candidate to say with friends like America, Israel doesn’t need any enemies. And we are doing Israel a great injustice,” he said.

“We have countries that threaten to kill Israel, that threaten to kill us, like Iran, and we impose wimpy sanctions on them [and create a] situation where Israel cannot defend herself.”

...

Here’s how Jim McCormick, who is running with no party affiliation, answered the question, Why are you best on the issue of Israel?

“One of the reasons why is although I’m not Jewish, I think that Israel is and always has been and always should be one of our greatest democratic allies. They are in an area that still believes in beheadings and no women’s rights. Here we have this democratic beacon of hope and we should be standing behind them. But at the same time one of our biggest problems is that we have always told them what to do.

“They cannot grow as a nation, mature if we are always standing behind them telling them what to do…. We really do need to step back from them. We really do need to let the rest of the world know, the Middle East know, we will back her financially, militarily should the need be.”

McCormick said the U.S. needs to work harder for sanctions against Iran. “A military option is a long way off. I think we have plenty of diplomatic and economic options, but I think that no option should be taken off the table.”

On Sunday, there was a debate on This Week in South Florida and the Israel issue exploded. Here's part of that debate.

Let's go to the videotape.



Note that what Lynch is defining as 'sanctions against Israel' is the Obama administration's de facto embargo on weapons sales to Israel.

In statements issued by both sides on Monday to the Orlando Sentinel, Deutch pretends that embargo does not exist and instead focuses on Lynch's use of the word 'sanctions.' Here's Deutch:

On the show, Ed Lynch made the appalling claim that the United States has imposed sanctions against Israel and that the sanctions against Israel are greater than those imposed on Iran. These remarks were made just days after Lynch told the South Florida Sun Sentinel that "with friends like America, Israel doesn’t need any enemies." State Senator Ted Deutch released the following statement in reaction to Ed Lynch's outrageous remarks.

"Ed Lynch's repeated disparagement of the relationship between Israel and the United States displays a dangerous level of ignorance on an issue that so many residents of Florida's 19th district care about deeply," said Deutch. "His appalling claim that the United States has imposed sanctions on Israel, sanctions that are tougher than those imposed on Iran, is an affront to so many pro-Israel activists who have worked tirelessly to exert real economic pressure on Ahmadinejad's regime and to sustain the overwhelming bipartisan support for the strongest possible U.S.-Israel relationship, a strategic relationship benefiting both Israel and America.

"I firmly believe that an undivided Jerusalem is and shall remain the capital of the Jewish State of Israel and that the United States should exert pressure on the Palestinians to halt incitement and return to the negotiating table without precondition, just as the Israeli government has. But questioning the commitment of our entire nation to Israel's security by fabricating statements about newly-imposed sanctions shows that Mr. Lynch's interest in Israel's security is political above all else. Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu has himself come forward to denounce recent political attacks and to reinforce the fact that momentary disagreements of opinion between friends do not threaten the longstanding relationship between our two nations. It is dangerous for my opponent to lead the world to believe that America is now in some way an enemy of the Jewish state. I hope Mr. Lynch will join my longstanding efforts to impose crippling sanctions against Iran in order to prevent the bellicose regime of Ahmadinejad from becoming a nuclear power."

And here's Lynch's response.

Imagine if a foreign government told the United States that we could no longer have building construction in Washington D.C. for either residential or commercial purposes. Making matters worse, the failure to obey such an order would result in the loss of important military contracts for aircraft that were critical to our national security. As arrogant and absurd a power play as this sounds, this is exactly what the Obama Administration has told the Israeli Government, and Senator Ted Deutch's silence on this important matter is telling, signaling his agreement with President Obama.

The Obama administration has continued to single out Israel and Prime Minister Netanyahu for diplomatic humiliation while it goes about marginalizing our historic and strategic relationship with Israel at such a critical time. From his Secretary of State's dressing down of Prime Minister Netanyahu, to the President's own disrespectful treatment by refusing to dine with PM Netanyahu while he was his guest in the White House, there is simply no justification for such pettiness and antipathy towards Israel. This conduct comes from a President who as a candidate advertised himself as a person that would talk to any world leader, anytime, and anyplace, supposedly to make our enemies less confrontational and the world more secure. Instead, as President Obama cozies up to thuggish foreign dictators such as Hugo Chavez, he has abandoned Israel and placed it on a par with its mortal enemies such as Iran- simply naïve and unacceptable conduct, displaying an arrogance that is unbefitting of an American President towards a democratic ally.

"While Ted Deutch will 'defend' Israel with mere rhetoric, the person he needs to defend Israel from is his own President that he continues to support. Saying you are a "friend" of Israel has much more to do than being its tourist or boasting that you've met with countless Israeli leaders. Friends tell friends the truth. The truth is that President Obama, the same president Ted Deutch says he supports, is the most anti-Israeli President in this country's history, but Ted will not speak the truth. President Obama's approval rating amongst Israelis is about 5%. Senator Deutch has continued to avoid answering all of the hard questions about Israel throughout the entire campaign, and voters should realize that this evasiveness is both weakness and opportunism- there is already too much of that kind of unprincipled conduct in Congress," said Edward Lynch, candidate for Congress in Florida's 19th Congressional District.

As you may recall, Lynch answered my non-standard questions that are designed to flesh out the extent of a candidate's support for Israel. If Ted Deutch or Jim McCormick wants to answer them, I'd be happy to post the answers. But as far as I can tell, Ed Lynch is the most pro-Israel candidate in Florida 19.


Israel Matzav: Israel becomes a big issue in Florida 19

Israel Matzav: French conclude Israeli-Syrian talks 'unlikely'

French conclude Israeli-Syrian talks 'unlikely'

With talks of 'neutral' France replacing Islamist Turkey as a go-between for Israel and Syria, French President Nicolas Sarkozy sent senior diplomats to the two countries to see whether there is anything to be discussed between them. The unsurprising conclusion: There's nothing to talk about.

Israeli diplomats and senior Jerusalem officials told Haaretz that the authors of the report were Patrice Paoli, director of the North Africa and Middle East desk at the French Foreign Ministry, and Nicolas Gallas, a special adviser to Sarkozy on Middle East affairs.

The two senior French diplomats visited Israel during the second week of March, which coincided with U.S. Vice President Joe Biden's visit. They met with Intelligence and Atomic Energy Minister Dan Meridor, National Security Adviser Uzi Arad, and individuals who had been involved in the indirect negotiations with Syria conducted by the Olmert government through Turkish mediation.

In their report, the French diplomats told Sarkozy that they believe meaningful negotiations between Israel and Syria are not possible in the near future due to the two country's considerable mutual suspicion and lack of readiness to make any kind of compromise. In their opinion, Israel is not ready to fully withdraw from the Golan Heights, while Syria is not prepared to cut ties with Iran and Hezbollah.

Well, that won't stop the Obumbler from trying to force a deal. Sarko just isn't determined enough. Heh.


Israel Matzav: French conclude Israeli-Syrian talks 'unlikely'

Israel Matzav: Michael Oren is full of it

Michael Oren is full of it

I have a lot of respect for Michael Oren, Israel's ambassador to the United States and a contemporary of mine at Columbia. Oren is a brilliant historian who has done well representing Israel's interests in Washington thus far (my own misgivings about him notwithstanding). But he was totally full of it in this interview with CNN on Sunday.

Israel's Ambassador to the U.S., Michael Oren, on Sunday described the ties between Israel and the U.S. as 'great.'

In an interview with CNN, reporter Cindy Crowley said "I literally need a one-word answer. The state of U.S.- Israeli relations is..."

"Great," Oren replied.

The envoy also said that conditions for renewing peace talks with the Palestinians are as good as they have been in some time, and that Israel is prepared to make difficult decisions in order to achieve peace.

Hey Michael, if things are so wonderful, why are we being forced to make another round of unilateral 'concessions' to the 'Palestinians'?

UPDATE 5:26 PM

Based on the comments, perhaps I should clarify that I'm sure Michael Oren is as aware as I am that he is lying through his teeth, and that he probably does feel that he does not have a choice.

But that doesn't change the fact that he's lying.

UPDATE 6:12 PM

More here.

Israel Matzav: Michael Oren is full of it

Israel Matzav: 'You were right about Obama'

'You were right about Obama'

Professor William Jacobson recounts a conversation with a friend who had been an Obama supporter (Hat Tip: Instapundit).

I haven't spoken to my friend in many months, probably since the fall or summer. So I was pleased when his name showed up as an incoming call on my cell phone, although I wondered how we would dance around the subject of Him.

The first sentence out of his mouth was, "Let's get it out of the way, you were right about Obama."

Not being satisfied with mere contrition, I asked him whether he was bs-ing me, and he said no, he meant it.

My friend spends half the year in Florida along with his similarly ancient friends. He's predicting a "Republican sweep" in November, although his dissatisfaction with Obama is not the result of a conversion to conservatism. He feels that Obama broke so many promises, and "he's just another politician."

If Obama has lost my friend, the Frank Rich-loving, Sarah Palin-hating greedy Democratic geezer that he is, the Democrats are in deep electoral trouble.

From your lips to God's ears.

And please allow me to add with respect to Israel that I told you so.

Israel Matzav: 'You were right about Obama'

Israel Matzav: Obama's 'home country'

Obama's 'home country'

I'm not looking to raise a birther discussion, but note how easily Michelle refers to a country other than the United States as Barack Obama's 'home country.'

Let's go to the videotape.



Well, if Kenya is his 'home country,' it would sure go a long way in explaining why he hates Britain so much.

I endorse Gabe's comments on the birther issue and ask that you not get into it in the comments.

Israel Matzav: Obama's 'home country'

Israel Matzav: Obama calls nuclear weapons capable Iran 'inevitable'

Obama calls nuclear weapons capable Iran 'inevitable'

After fifteen months of standing around doing nothing, Barack Hussein Obama has now declared a 'nuclear weapons capable' Iran to be 'inevitable.'

Q. Let me ask, on Iran specifically, we know obviously that they’re rich in uranium. Do you believe that they at this point are — have an active weapons development program, as well — they’re trying to develop a weapons capacity?

A. Rather than speculate, let’s say what we know. We know that they have involved themselves in nuclear activities that are specifically prohibited by U.N. Security Council resolutions; that they have specifically failed to disclose their activities in a timely fashion to the I.A.E.A. and relevant international bodies. We know that they have pursued nuclear weapons in the past, and that the current course they’re on would provide them with nuclear weapons capabilities.

You combine those facts, and the message that we are sending is that this behavior is unacceptable. It is outside of the rules of the road that the international community has observed. They have an opportunity to correct these — what I consider to be a misguided approach.

I’ve said publicly that we don’t begrudge any country obtaining nuclear energy for peaceful civilian purposes. But Iran has not considered itself bound in many ways by the basic precepts of the NPT, or has violated them on several occasions.

And so we are going to continue to try to isolate any countries that are operating outside of that approach.

But don't expect Neville Obumbler to do anything about it.

Q. Mr. President, you raise a critical question there when you said “nuclear weapons capabilities.” You have said before you could not live with a nuclear weapon state in Iran, and many members of your administration have said that. People have been less specific about whether you could live with a nuclear-capable Iran, an Iran that runs right up to the edge.

A. I’m not going to parse that right now. I think it’s safe to say that there was a time when North Korea was said to be simply a nuclear-capable state until it kicked out the I.A.E.A. and become a self-professed nuclear state. And so rather than splitting hairs on this, I think that the international community has a strong sense of what it means to pursue civilian nuclear energy for peaceful purposes versus a weaponizing capability.

And a weaponizing capability is obviously significant as we evaluate whether or not Iran or any other country is serious about these issues.

So when Iran declares that it has nuclear weapons, Obama will shake his finger at them and say "Nu, nu, nu." Unless those pesky Israelis actually decide to stand up for themselves.

Q. The Israelis have a very clear view on this — they say that a weapons-capable state they also couldn’t live with. After your conversations with them over the past 15 months you’ve been in office, do you believe that if Iran stays on the current course and gets to a nuclear weapons capability, they would come to the determination that they would need to use either military action or something beyond sanctions?

A. I’m not going to speculate on Israeli decision-making. I think the United States and Israel and the P5-plus-1 and the international community generally has been very concerned about Iran’s actions and statements over the last several years. And we want to send a very strong message both through sanctions, through the articulation of the Nuclear Posture Review, through the nuclear summit that I’m going to be hosting, and through the NPT review conference that’s going to be coming up, that the international community is serious about Iran facing consequences if it doesn’t change its behavior.

In a prescient editorial on Monday, the Wall Street Journal accused Obama of being 'unserious' about stopping Iran ('Indifferent' might have been a better choice of words. 'Unserious' assumes he'd rather they not be nuclear weapons capable, but won't take serious action to stop them; indifferent means he just doesn't care). The Journal - correctly - dismissed the possibility of sanctions on Iran having any effect.

The Iranians have good reason to think they have little to lose from continued defiance. Tehran's nuclear negotiator emerged from two days of talks in Beijing on Friday saying, "We agreed, sanctions as a tool have already lost their effectiveness." He has a point.

The Chinese have indicated that the most they are prepared to support are narrow sanctions on Iran's nuclear program of the type Tehran has already sneered at. As the Journal's Peter Fritsch and David Crawford reported this weekend, the Iranians continue to acquire key nuclear components from unsuspecting Western companies via intermediaries, including some Chinese firms.

Yet the Administration still rolls the sanctions rock up the U.N. hill, in a fantastic belief that Russian and Chinese support is vital even if the price is sanctions that are toothless. French President Nicolas Sarkozy urged Mr. Obama a year ago to move ahead with sanctions even without the Russians and Chinese, but Mr. Obama insisted he needed both. A year later, everyone except apparently Mr. Obama can see who was right.

The Administration also argued upon taking office that by making good-faith offers to Iran last year, the U.S. would gain the diplomatic capital needed to steel the world for a tougher approach. Yet a year later the U.S. finds itself begging for U.N. Security Council votes even from such nonpermanent members as Brazil and Turkey, both of which have noticeably improved their ties with Iran in recent months.

The U.S. can at this point do more unilaterally by imposing and enforcing sanctions on companies that do business in Iran's energy industry. But so far the Administration has shown considerably less enthusiasm for these measures than has even a Democratic Congress.

As for the potential threat of military strikes to assist diplomacy, Defense Secretary Robert Gates has made his doubts about their efficacy very public. The President's two-week public attempt to humiliate Benjamin Netanyahu has also considerably lessened the perceived likelihood of an Israeli strike on Iran, thereby further diminishing whatever momentum remains for strong sanctions.

The only point the Journal missed was its claim that Obama "can't or won't admit publicly" that he believes that a nuclear Iran is inevitable. He has now admitted it.

The ball is in Prime Minister Netanyahu's court. He has to decide whether when to act. He needs all Israelis to get behind him to resist the inevitable pressure that will follow a strike on Iran to allow a 'Palestinian state' to be carved out of our mid-section as a permanent danger to our survival. But an Iran with nuclear weapons will also be a permanent danger to our survival whether or not they are used. Consider this statement by Ahmadinejad on Saturday:

Ahmadinejad, referring on Saturday to escalating tensions in the Gaza Strip, said IDF action would “cost” Israel “too much.”

“I say to the Zionists and their supporters that they have already committed enough crimes,” he told an Iranian crowd. “A new adventure in Gaza will not save you, but hasten your demise.”

Soon, Hamas rockets will God forbid start raining down on Israel, with Iranian nuclear weapons that will act as a deterrent against Israeli retaliation.

There is no choice.


Israel Matzav: Obama calls nuclear weapons capable Iran 'inevitable'

Israel Matzav: Moshe Arens on US - Israel relations

Moshe Arens on US - Israel relations

Moshe Arens, now aged 84, has served Israel Defense Minister and as ambassador to the United States. He's one of our clearest thinking, sharpest and most articulate spokesman, and he doesn't pull any punches.

Ruthe Blum-Leibowitz has some of the best conservative political yichus (lineage) that this country has to offer. She is the daughter of Norman Podhoretz, the sister of John Podhoretz, and the sister-in-law of Elliott Abrams, who was a national security adviser to President Bush.

Leibowitz interviewed Arens for Pajamas Media in two parts: Part One and Part Two. There's so much here that you simply must read both parts completely.

The only thing I even question is Arens' assertion that there is no connection between Obama's non-policy on Iran and his policy on Israel.

I wonder if Ruthe has ever tried getting Misha and Elliott together for a chat....

Anyway, read both parts.

Israel Matzav: Moshe Arens on US - Israel relations

Israel Matzav: Obama Israel to attack Iran?#links#links#links

Obama wants Israel to attack Iran?

Jennifer Rubin makes a plausible case that the Obama administration is leaving Israel no choice but to attack Iran.

The abject lack of seriousness from the Obama administration — its disinclination to even suggest the use of force or to aid the Green Movement in any meaningful way — has not gone unnoticed either here or in Israel. At the AIPAC conference, the contrast between Hillary Clinton’s platitudinous “unacceptable” formulation and Tony Blair’s “whatever it takes” phraseology was hard to ignore. And, as Kristol points out, even doves in Israel like Ephraim Sneh, a former deputy defense minister, are talking about the need for an Israeli strike on Iran this year, absent the implementation of “crippling sanctions.” (”An Israeli military campaign against Iran’s nuclear installations is likely to cripple that country’s nuclear project for a number of years. The retaliation against Israel would be painful, but bearable.”)

We can speculate as to whether the Obami’s assault on Netanyahu over the Jerusalem housing permit was meant to stymie Israel’s plans for such action. If so, this is yet another gross error in judgment by the Obami, who have an exaggerated sense of their own ability to bully those who interfere with their plans. As fraught with peril as an Israeli military operation might be and as unseemly as it might be for the U.S. to stand idly by – ignoring its role as leader of the West and shrinking from its international responsibilities – Israel, if faced with the prospect of a nuclear-armed Iran and a recalcitrant U.S. administration, will have no choice but to act in its own defense. Netanyahu said it clearly last month, no doubt to put the administration as well as the mullahs on notice. (”The future of the Jewish state can never depend on the goodwill of even the greatest of men. Israel must always reserve the right to defend itself.”)

By publicly savaging the Israeli government and making apparent just how not solid is the current relationship between the U.S. and Israel, the Obami are encouraging, not dissuading, the Israeli government to take matters into its own hands. Given the treatment by the Obama administration, what Israeli government could place its trust and the fate of the Jewish state in the Obami’s hands? It would be foolish and irresponsible — and the Israelis are neither.

All true. But does Obama not know what he is doing? Is he such a fool that he would place Israel in a position where it feels that it has to attack Iran? Or is there another reason for his actions?

I believe that there's a method behind Obama's madness. From Day One of his administration, Obama has articulated only two foreign policy goals. In order of importance, one is the creation of a 'Palestinian state' and the other is bringing about nuclear disarmament. Obama went a long way toward the second goal on Monday by effectively announcing that America would no longer use its nuclear weapons even in its own defense. But the first and most important goal is what's at stake in Iran.

Obama is betting that Israel will attack Iran rather than risk seeing itself destroyed. And when the World heaps opprobrium on Israel for that attack, Obama will lead it. He will not only abandon Israel in the United Nations. He will insist on attacking it. The price of ending that attack will be a 'Palestinian state' on Obama's the 'Palestinians' terms.

So Prime Minister Netanayhu is left with a Hobson's choice: Allow Iran to obtain nuclear weapons and Israel will be destroyed God forbid. Attack Iran and even if he succeeds, the price will be the creation of a 'Palestinian state' that will attempt to destroy us.

For Obama, it is truly a 'win-win' situation - a 'teachable moment.' Israel, like the Jews in Monday's Torah reading, is trapped between the raging sea Iran and the Egyptian army Obama and the 'Palestinians' (see Exodus 14). We must advance into the sea attack Iran and then only God can save us.

What could go wrong?


Israel Matzav: Obama wants Israel to attack Iran?

Israel Matzav: A central tenet of enlightened progressivism

A central tenet of enlightened progressivism

Noah Pollak explains how the New York Times decides what goes on the front page:

The reason, I think, is because the Times is a left-wing paper and adheres to one of the central tenets of enlightened progressivism: people who can be identified as Third World, or who are not members of the Judeo-Christian/European world, must not be held to the same standards to which white, First World people are held. This double-standard — it is the racism of the enlightened — pervades the treatment of different cultures and religions in the strongholds of Western liberalism, that is, in the media, academia, and the “human rights” community.

The fact of the matter is that the most violent and genocidal kinds of anti-Semitic (and anti-Christian, and anti-American) hate speech are commonplace in the Muslim Middle East, yet are covered in the West only by boutique outlets such as MEMRI and Palestinian Media Watch. But when a white, Christian, European makes a statement that really is far more insensitive and dumb than it is anti-Semitic, not only does it land on the front page of the New York Times, but it is given sensational media coverage throughout the western world. The key factor is not the offense itself — it is the religious or cultural identity of the person who has committed the offense.

More here.

The picture is Hamas strongman Mahmoud al-Zahar.


Israel Matzav: A central tenet of enlightened progressivism
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...