Wednesday, 3 March 2010

Israel Matzav: 'Israel has faults, but apartheid isn't one of them' says...

'Israel has faults, but apartheid isn't one of them' says...

'Israel has its faults, but apartheid isn't one of them' says.... the Washington Post's Richard Cohen? The same guy who once called Israel a 'mistake?' Awesome.... Well, not quite (Hat Tip: Shmuel Rosner):

What can be said about others who apply the term to Israel in general? No apology has come from them -- and the way things are going, none will be forthcoming. The use of the word has become commonplace -- Google "Israel and apartheid" and you will see that the two are linked in cyberspace, as love and marriage are in at least one song. The meaning is clear: Israel is a state where political and civil rights are withheld on the basis of race and race alone. This is not the case.

The Israel of today and the South Africa of yesterday have almost nothing in common. In South Africa, the minority white population harshly ruled the majority black population. Nonwhites were denied civil rights, and in 1958, they were even deprived of citizenship. In contrast, Israeli Arabs, about one-fifth of the country, have the same civil and political rights as do Israeli Jews. Arabs sit in the Knesset and serve in the military, although most are exempt from the draft. Whatever this is -- and it looks suspiciously like a liberal democracy -- it cannot be apartheid.

The West Bank, more or less under Israeli military rule, is a different matter. But it is not part of Israel proper, and under every conceivable peace plan -- including those proposed by Israeli governments -- almost all of it will revert to the Palestinian Authority and become the heartland of a Palestinian state.

Read the whole thing. Richard still has a way to go.

Israel Matzav: 'Israel has faults, but apartheid isn't one of them' says...

Israel Matzav: Biden to meet with Jewish leaders

Biden to meet with Jewish leaders

Laura Rozen reports that Jumpin' Joe Biden and senior NSC staffers were to meet on Tuesday with 'Jewish leaders' in preparation for Biden's trip to Israel next week.

No word on who these 'Jewish leaders' might be. Did they invite J Street but exclude the National Council of Young Israel and the Zionist Organization of America again?

What could go wrong?

Israel Matzav: Biden to meet with Jewish leaders

Love of the Land: Welcome to "Just-the-Opposite Facts" Theater, Temple Mount Chapter

Welcome to "Just-the-Opposite Facts" Theater, Temple Mount Chapter


Yisrael Medad
My Right Word
01 March '10

IMRA's Aaron Lerner pointed me to this news item which informs us that Jordan has condemned what they call a "raid on holy Jerusalem site" and they further term it, but of course, a "provocation".

According the the official press agency version "Israeli forces...stormed Al Aqsa Mosque" [stormtroopers, got that?]. And what 'started' it all? Well, "Israeli police opened the Bab Al Maghareba Gate early today for the entry of zionist extremists" [but they do that every day, to everyone. it's called freedom of access and it is a fundamental legal tenet].

Don't these Arabs understand pluralistic democratic society existence?

Further, we learn that

"Jordan rejects any attempt by Israeli occupation forces to harm holy sites in the Palestinian territories," State Minister for Media Affairs and Communication Nabil Sharif told Petra. "Storming Al Aqsa is an affront to the will of the international community and such action will impede efforts to kickstart the peace process to achieve stability in the region and set up an independent, sovereign and viable Palestinian state," Sharif added.


(Read full post)


Love of the Land: Welcome to "Just-the-Opposite Facts" Theater, Temple Mount Chapter

Israel Matzav: How social networking led to the capture of Saddam Hussein

How social networking led to the capture of Saddam Hussein

Saddam Hussein was found through a precursor of social networking (Facebook was started three months after Saddam's death). Slate is doing a five-part report on how Saddam was captured. It wasn't the way most people thought it was going to be.

Let's go to the videotape.



The first installment of the article is here.

Israel Matzav: How social networking led to the capture of Saddam Hussein

Israel Matzav: Overnight music video

Overnight music video

This song, which was very popular at youth group kumsitz'es (basically like sitting around a campfire singing and telling stories but often without the campfire), brings back many fond memories. Is it really nearly 36 years since high school graduation and 31 since my last Shabbaton?

Let's go to the videotape.


Israel Matzav: Overnight music video

Love of the Land: An Intelligence Agency Misused Passports: OMG!

An Intelligence Agency Misused Passports: OMG!




Alan M. Dershowitz
Hudson New York
02 March '10

The complaints leveled against Israel by European countries and Australia, regarding the alleged misuse of passports by the Mossad in the assassination of Mahmoud al-Mabhouh, ring hollow and smack of blatant hypocrisy. Whoever did kill Mahmoud al-Mabhouh—whether it was the Israeli Mossad or someone else—clearly did have their agents use stolen or forged passports. Big deal.

Every good intelligence agency uses stolen and forged passports. The British have been especially adept at this means of spycraft. No country that uses fake passports in their intelligence operations has the moral authority to complain about the alleged misuse of passports in this case. The only ones that have a legitimate grievance are those individuals whose passports may have been misused without their knowledge.

I guess it’s the job of foreign ministries to complain publicly when other nations do what they themselves do secretly. Hypocrisy is, after all, the homage that vice pays to virtue. I’m reminded of the famous scene in Casablanca, when officer Renault declares, “I’m shocked, shocked to find that gambling is going on in here!” A croupier then approaches Renault, and hands him a roll of currency: “Your winnings, sir.”

The hypocrisy in this case seems even more blatant than usual. Is it because Israel is the alleged offender, and the world has gotten accustomed to singling out Israel for double standard condemnation?

(Read full article)



Love of the Land: An Intelligence Agency Misused Passports: OMG!

Love of the Land: Palestine: the Real Apartheid State In the Making

Palestine: the Real Apartheid State In the Making


David Bedein
Israel Behind the News
02 March '10

"Palestine" is an apartheid state in the making.

"Israel Apartheid" Week is the time to publicize that fact.

During Israel Apartheid Week, orchestrated on campuses around the globe, the time has come to put the shoe on the other foot.


In 1948, Apartheid laws institutionalized racial discrimination in South Africa & denied human rights to 25 million Black citizens of South Africa.

In 1948, the Arab League of Nations applied the Apartheid model to Palestine, and declared that Jews must be denied rights as citizens of Israel, while declaring a total state of war to eradicate the new Jewish entity, a war that continues today.

In 1948, at the directive of the Arab League of Nations, Jordan devastated the vestiges of Jewish life from Judea and Samaria, and burned all synagogues in the Jewish Quarter of Jerusalem.

In 1948, member states of the Arab League of Nations began to strip the human rights of Jews and to expel entire Jewish communities who had resided in their midst for centuries

In the mid 1960's, The Arab League of Nations spawned the PLO to organize local residents to continue the war to deny Jewish rights the right to live as free citizens in the land of Israel - well before Israel took over Judea, Samaria, and the Old City of Jerusalem in the defensive war waged by Israel in 1967.

And since its inception in 1994, the newly constituted Palestinian Authority, created by the PLO, has prepared the rudiments of a Palestinian State, modeled on the rules of Apartheid and institutionalized discrimination:

1. The right of Palestinian Arab refugees and their descendents to return to Arab villages lost in 1948 will be protected by the new Palestinian state.

2. While 20% of Israel’s citizens are Arabs, not one Jew will be allowed to live in a Palestinian State

3. Anyone who sells land to a Jew will be liable to the death penalty in the Palestinian State

(Read full article)


Love of the Land: Palestine: the Real Apartheid State In the Making

Israel Matzav: CJP of Greater Boston taking 'Judaism is Liberalism' to new extremes, donating money to Soros groups

CJP of Greater Boston taking 'Judaism is Liberalism' to new extremes, donating money to Soros groups

Growing up in Boston, CJP was THE Jewish Federation. In recent years, until 2008, the economy was good to the Boston area, and CJP apparently built up quite a sum of cash. In fact, CJP built up so much cash that it has taken the Judaism is Liberalism equation to a new extreme: CJP has been donating Jewish federation money to liberal organizations that - in many cases - have no connection to Judaism and do not support Israel. Or worse. Hillel Stavis explains.

We thought you might be interested to see just who receives the CJP's largess, ostensibly in keeping with that organization's strong support for Israel. For the latest reporting period, here are some of those recipients:

  • The American Friends Service Committee
  • Democracy Now!
  • The Unitarian Universalist Service Committee
  • The Tides Foundation
  • Media Matters
  • The New Israel Fund
  • Brit Tzedek v'Shalom
  • Physicians for Social Responsibility
  • The Workmen's Circle
  • Amnesty International

Many of these organizations have been highly critical of Israel - to say the least - some even have questioned Israel's right to exist as a Jewish State. To be fair, the CJP has also awarded grants to groups like Steven Emerson's The Investigative Project and even the David Horowitz Freedom Center. And yet, contributions to organizations like Media Matters and The Tides Foundation, whose financial clout and animus towards Israel are well known, should raise some significant eyebrows for an organization that is so self-avowedly "Pro Israel". Through George Soros' affiliated non-profits like MoveOn.org, The Open Society Institute, The Center for American Progress and through his associate, Peter Lewis, Media Matters has plenty of money to spend bashing Israel.



Israel Matzav: CJP of Greater Boston taking 'Judaism is Liberalism' to new extremes, donating money to Soros groups

Israel Matzav: English language media ignores Dubai police chief's racism

English language media ignores Dubai police chief's racism

Earlier, I reported that 'Israelis,' including dual nationals holding passports of other countries, have been banned from Dubai. In that post, I alluded to the fact that Inspector Tamim's references to 'physical features' had to relate to Jews and not just to Israelis.

Elder of Ziyon reports that Tamim's comments in the Arabic original are actually much more explicitly anti-Semitic, and that - surprise - the English language media is ignoring them.

Earlier today I reported that the Arabic-language Al Khaleej (The Gulf) newspaper quoted the head of the Dubai police as ranting about how "Israelis" have been hated since the time of Pharaoh, how "Israelis" have had mental problems for thousands of years and how UAE authorities will now start looking for Jewish facial features and names to stop them from entering the UAE.

Every single English-language news outlet has been reporting his comments as saying that he was slamming "Israelis," not Jews, and some saying that he would be looking for "Israeli" facial features, not Jewish ones.

Elder believes that the media cannot believe that anti-Semitism is a regular feature of the Arab world. I disagree. The media knows darned well that anti-Semitism is rampant, prevalent and acceptable in the Arab world. They just don't want the public to know it.


Israel Matzav: English language media ignores Dubai police chief's racism

Israel Matzav: Goldstone's last gasp?

Goldstone's last gasp?

Was Friday's UN General Assembly resolution granting five more months for Israel and the 'Palestinians' to conduct 'independent' probes of their actions in Operation Cast Lead, the last gasp of the Goldstone Report? Well, maybe (Hat Tip: Soccer Dad).

Legal attorney Nick Kaufman, who had served as a senior prosecutor at the ICC and a senior district attorney for the Jerusalem prosecution, said Israeli officials were likely safe from war crimes suits as the U.S. would probably veto such a move.

Until a month ago Kaufman, an expert on international law and rules of warfare, served as a senior lawyer in the Jerusalem prosecutor's office.

- Nick Kaufman, do you think you will represent an Israeli official, who has been charged with committing war crimes following the Goldstone report, at the international court?

Kaufman: "I don't believe so. I think the Goldstone report will receive a poor man's burial."

- You sound decisive.

" I don't understand how the United Nations Security Council has made a decision to transfer the case to the international criminal court at The Hague, because I think in any event, the United States will veto the decision."

"The UN Secretary General Ban Ki Moon said he was satisfied with the investigation Israel has conducted, but the Arab League and other unidentified countries have insisted that a new investigation be conducted in the next 5 months. I don't see it going beyond this."

"On the other hand, I don't believe the senior prosecutor, Luis Moreno-Ocampo, will yield to the Palestinians request and order an investigation against Israel: For him to accept the Palestinian request to recognize their court authority to try and judge the violations committed on their land, he would first have to recognize the Palestinian Authority as an independent country, and I cant see him making such an extreme decision. I just don't see it happening."

Kaufman goes on to say that since the Report will likely be killed anyway, there is no reason for Israel to establish an independent non-IDF inquiry. Read the whole thing.

I wonder if Richard Richard will still get to be Secretary General. Heh.

Israel Matzav: Goldstone's last gasp?

Israel Matzav: Surprise: The Left hates India for the same reason it hates Israel

Surprise: The Left hates India for the same reason it hates Israel

This analysis about the American Left's disenchantment with India rings true (Hat Tip: Instapundit).

The left is wary of India for the same reasons it remains wary of Israel: both democracies are fiercely nationalistic and unapologetically defend themselves against the “downtrodden” “other,” i.e., Islamic lunatics.

The American left simply prefers to play hardball with allies than with adversaries. Recall President Carter’s handling of Iran: the allied shah was condemned as an autocrat; the enemy Khomeini, a “holy man.” For Carter, our anticommunist allies were violators of human rights first, second, and third; the Soviets, murderers of tens of millions, were benign enough for Carter to proclaim Americans had an “inordinate fear of communism.”

Contemporaneously, the left’s is a world where dictatorial Venezuela is to be apologized for, democratic Colombia economically punished; where the fascists and racists and bus-bombers in Palestine are “misunderstood” and the democrats in Israel are Nazi brownshirts incarnate. Anti-American terrorists in Iraq, Afghanistan, Somalia, and Lebanon are euphemized as “guerrillas,” whereas pro-American militiamen are castigated as “warlords” — and on and on it goes.

Embroiling the Indians in such amoral nonsense would threaten not only our present rapport with India, but also what could potentially become the most significant American alliance with another country this century — an alliance rooted in a commonality of values, genuine companionship and affection for one another, and solidarity against the totalitarian evils of the world. The United States should welcome India’s rise. We’re largely the reason it’s occurring.

Sounds right, doesn't it?

Israel Matzav: Surprise: The Left hates India for the same reason it hates Israel

Israel Matzav: Obama's negative ratings in all States he flipped from Bush

Obama's negative ratings in all States he flipped from Bush

Heh (Hat Tip: Ace).

Barack Obama now has a negative approval rating in every state he flipped from the Bush column to his in 2008. In each of those places his level of support is now in the 44-46% range. It’s probably a good thing he doesn’t have to run for reelection this year. He can only hope things start turning around for him once the midterms are in the rear view mirror, much as they did for Bill Clinton.

I don't see it turning around. Clinton was much more of a pragmatist; Obama is more dogmatic.


Israel Matzav: Obama's negative ratings in all States he flipped from Bush

Israel Matzav: Mahmoud al-Mabhouh: The thick plottens

Mahmoud al-Mabhouh: The thick plottens

There have been more developments in the investigation into the liquidation of Hamas terrorist and arms dealer Mahmoud al-Mabhouh. Of course, none of them actually puts us any closer to solving the mystery of who was behind the liquidation, but you didn't really want to know that, did you?

The New York Times reports that two of the alleged liquidators flew to the United States after the deed was done.

That disclosure broadened the scope of an international investigation that has fostered diplomatic tensions and cast a harsh light on the methods of Israel’s intelligence service, the Mossad, which police officials here accuse of ordering the killing.

One suspect traveling on a British passport arrived in the United States on Feb. 14; the other used an Irish passport and arrived on Jan. 21, said the person, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to discuss the case. He did not say where the men entered the country, and added that there was no known record of their leaving.

Many of the 26 suspects identified in the case used stolen identities — most of them taken from people with dual citizenship living in Israel — and that appeared to be true of the two men who traveled to the United States, who used the names Roy Allan Cannon and Evan Dennings. On Friday, the Israeli newspaper Haaretz identified the real Mr. Cannon as “a 62-year-old, ultra-Orthodox father of six” who moved to Israel in 1983. Irish officials said last week that they believed that Mr. Dennings was also a victim of identity theft.

As foreign citizens, the two suspects would have been photographed and fingerprinted on arrival in the United States, and could therefore presumably be tracked. But in light of the identity theft practiced in the case, it seems possible that the men could have left the United States under false travel documents.

This report raises more questions than it answers. First, do you mean to tell me that one of the suspects who supposedly left Dubai within a day actually remained there until February 14 and Inspector Tamim missed him? Pretty shoddy police work in my book.

Second, if the US fingerprints anyone who enters and leaves the country on a foreign passport, couldn't someone also have taken the passports and duplicated them when this person was on a trip to the US, just as the Israelis have been accused of doing?

Third, is there no way to leave the US these days without being tracked? Canada? The Caribbean Islands? Mexico?

Fourth, the US is a big country - someone can find an awful lot of places to hide there.

Fifth, who is Payoneer and how are they connected to this? Someone issues American credit cards in Israel? Bring it on....

Elder of Ziyon carries a report from the Arabic press that claims that the liquidators jammed the surveillance cameras in the hotel for 19 crucial minutes between 8:24 and 8:43 pm on the night of the murder. Holy Rosemary Woods, Batman! Not only does that mean that crucial footage from the exact time of the murder liquidation is missing, but it also shows that the operatives knew they were being videotaped and didn't care about it except for certain crucial moments. Hmmm.

But perhaps the most intriguing report of all today comes from Hamas itself via Reuters. Hamas says that it believes that Egypt or Jordan caused Mr. al-Mabhouh's death.

Mahmoud Nasser, a member of Hamas' political bureau, told [al Quds al Araby] that slain commander Mahmoud al-Mabhouh was likely being tracked by agents from Jordan and Egypt prior to the January 19 killing.

Nasser said he had been given information regarding such efforts to kill Mabhouh, adding that the evidence indicated that the assassination was carried out earlier than the alleged agents had planned.

According to Nasser, Mabhouh was in possession of "dangerous" information seen as dangerous to particular Arab elements seeking to topple Islamist resistance.

Nasser oversees Hamas' ties with Iran and worked closely with Mabhouh, sometimes referred to as his deputy. Hamas raised these accusations after a prelimary investigation immediately following the murder, and match early suspicions raised by Dubai as well.

JPost adds:

Additionally, in an interview with Hamas's Al Aksa radio station from Damascus, Nasser confirmed Israeli claims that his boss had supplied weapons to Palestinian terrorists.

Nassar said Mabhouh "never stopped thinking about how to fight the [Israeli] occupation by supplying quality weapons to the Palestinian fighters. "

The aide also described how al-Mabhouh celebrated killing two Israeli soldiers in the mid-1980s by standing on one of the corpses.

Oh, and there's this:

The National [an Emirati newspaper. CiJ] also noted a business link between Payoneer, the Paypal-esque company which had issued the credit cards, and Greylock Partners, a venture capital firm. Moshe Mor, one of Greylock's founders, was reportedly an officer in the IDF's military intelligence branch.

And I did business with Moshe Mor in the early 90's. Does that make me a suspect too? What about the dozens of Israelis with whom I have worked who were officers in the IDF's military intelligence branch (probably a sizable percentage of the lawyers in Tel Aviv)?

By the way, the Associated Press reports that with all the belly-aching they have done over the use of their passports, the European countries to which the liquidators allegedly fled aren't doing a whole lot about finding the liquidators (Hat Tip: Power Line).

Maybe Inspector Tamim (which, by the way, means naive in Hebrew) should get OJ Simpson involved. I hear he's an expert at finding the real killers. Heh.


Israel Matzav: Mahmoud al-Mabhouh: The thick plottens

Israel Matzav: State Department slams Israel for housing starts in Pisgat Zev

State Department slams Israel for housing starts in Pisgat Zev

The State Department slammed Israel on Monday for approving 600 new housing starts in the Jerusalem neighborhood of Pisgat Zev.

The United States criticized Israel on Monday for authorizing 600 more housing units in the east Jerusalem neighborhood of Pisgat Ze'ev, describing the move as "counter-productive."

"We've relayed our strong concerns to the government of Israel, that this kind of activity, particularly as we try to relaunch meaningful negotiations is counter-productive and undermines trust between the parties," said State Department spokesman Philip Crowley.

Yadda, yadda, yadda. Given the number of those apartments that could eventually wind up in Arab hands, you have to wonder why the State Department bothers to object.

Israel Matzav: State Department slams Israel for housing starts in Pisgat Zev

Israel Matzav: Bari Atwan: The Thursday night war council in Damascus

Bari Atwan: The Thursday night war council in Damascus

Bari Atwan, the editor of the London-based Al-Quds Al-Arabi, writes that Thursday night's meeting in Damascus among Iranian President Mahmouhttp://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=20498788d Ahmadinejad, Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and Hezbullah chieftain Hassan Nasrallah, was a 'war council' designed to formulate plans and distribute tasks for a possible Israeli attack on any or all three of Iran, Syria and Hezbullah.

I would say it was more likely a war council designed to formulate plans and distribute tasks for a coordinated attack by all three of them on Israel.

What could go wrong?


Israel Matzav: Bari Atwan: The Thursday night war council in Damascus

Israel Matzav: The real apartheid state

The real apartheid state

David Bedein talks about apartheid and concludes that the only real apartheid state (in potential) right now is 'Palestine' (Hat Tip: Pamela Geller).

In the mid 1960's, The Arab League of Nations spawned the PLO to organize local residents to continue the war to deny Jewish rights the right to live as free citizens in the land of Israel - well before Israel took over Judea, Samaria, and the Old City of Jerusalem in the defensive war waged by Israel in 1967.

And since its inception in 1994, the newly constituted Palestinian Authority, created by the PLO, has prepared the rudiments of a Palestinian State, modeled on the rules of Apartheid and institutionalized discrimination:

1. The right of Palestinian Arab refugees and their descendents to return to Arab villages lost in 1948 will be protected by the new Palestinian state.

2. While 20% of Israel’s citizens are Arabs, not one Jew will be allowed to live in a Palestinian State

3. Anyone who sells land to a Jew will be liable to the death penalty in the Palestinian State

4. Those who murder Jews are honored on all official Palestinian media outlets.

5. Palestinian Authority maps prepared for the Palestinian State depict all of Palestine under Palestinian rule.

...

8. The right of Jewish access to Jewish holy places is to be denied in the new Palestinian State.

9. The Draft Palestinian State Constitution denies juridical status to any religion except for Islam.

10. No system which protects human rights or civil liberties will exist in a Palestinian State.

So, who is the real apartheid state? Read the whole thing.


Israel Matzav: The real apartheid state

Israel Matzav: Update: Whether to give Israelis abroad the right to vote

Update: Whether to give Israelis abroad the right to vote

You will recall that there was recently a proposal to allow Israelis who live abroad to vote. I discussed it here and here. Allison Kaplan Sommer has an update.

The proposal has not been completely without defenders. Some contend that a small and vulnerable country such as Israel can only benefit from having supportive citizens living around the world. Preserving the sense of belonging among those who live abroad, many of whom served in the army in their youth, can only be to Israel’s advantage and increase the chances that they — or their children — might someday choose to return to live in Israel.

But the pitfalls are substantial. With Israel’s fast path to citizenship owing to the Law of Return, theoretically large numbers of Jews living abroad could strategically move to Israel short-term, take up their voting rights, and return to their homes overseas with a license to vote en masse.

The irony in the situation is that from an idealogical standpoint, the natural position for the nationalist and patriotic right — the Lieberman-Netanyahu camp — would be to oppose those living overseas voting, not to propose it. One doesn’t have to be too cynical to understand that self-interest plays a role in the right’s advocacy of overseas voting. The end result of overseas voting would be increased support for the further right and more religious parties. Even if the vast majority of Israeli citizens living abroad don’t necessarily hold right-wing views, those who would be motivated to take the time and trouble to make it to the polls would be the populations of Orthodox Jews living in large cities.

For the same reason, the more international and global centrist and left-wing parties, who enjoy their prolonged stays in Paris, Cambridge, and Silicon Valley and should more naturally be cheerleading the idea of voting from abroad, are opposing it.

As you may recall, I oppose the idea of allowing absentee ballots in Israeli elections. I have a few more comments.

First, the devious notion of Orthodox Jews from abroad registering briefly for citizenship here so that they could gain the right to vote never occurred to me. It could be checked - in part anyway - by making registration to vote a trigger for starting oleh (immigrant) rights ticking and abolishing the notion that they are suspended during any extended period of time you spend abroad. But in any event, I don't see so many Orthodox Jews signing up.

What I do see is Leftist former Israelis living and working abroad feeling 'shame' over Israel's actions and voting out Right wing governments that are aggressive in the country's defense. Think Noam Chomsky, Avraham Burg and others now residing abroad who hate what this country stands for with a passion.

Besides, ideologically I cannot square the notion of a right to vote without the obligation to (at least) pay taxes. Like Allison I still vote in the US, and I also file a US tax return every year. If one day I actually earn some money, I might actually be liable for US taxes. Unlike Israelis living abroad who don't pay taxes here.

Read the whole thing.


Israel Matzav: Update: Whether to give Israelis abroad the right to vote

Israel Matzav: A ray of hope for Israel's relations with Europe

A ray of hope for Israel's relations with Europe

Dr. Zion Evrony, Israel's ambassador to Ireland, visited the town of Carrickmacross and signed the town's distinguished guest book. The town's councilors voted to remove the page in which Dr. Evrony's signature appeared. Now, Irish Foreign Minister Micheal Martin has taken the town council to task for its actions.

Irish minister Micheal Martin said the council was guilty of "disrespect".

The minister, who has just returned from a trip to Gaza, said he shared concerns about parts of Israel's track record but that he disagreed with the decision to remove Dr Zion Evrony's name from the book.

He added: "It is a basic principle of relations between states that we treat each other's diplomatic representatives with civility and respect, regardless of any policy differences."

Al-Beeb strongly implies that the reason for the town council's action was the use of Irish passports in the liquidation of Hamas murderer and arms dealer Mahmoud al-Mabhouh. But that seems doubtful in light of this.

Nevertheless, local Sinn Fein councillor Matt Carthy, who tabled the motion, said he hoped the removal of the page would send a serious message to the Israeli government.

He added: "I think if a government is responsible for a wholesale disregard for international law, then local authorities as well as our own government have a responsibility to tell them we expect a higher standard.

"Carrickmacross is a very welcoming town but it was important that we took a stand."

Mr Carthy, who took part in a protest during Ambassador Evrony's visit to the market town in January, said the decision was not a snub to all Israelis.

"Certainly any Israeli individual who wanted to visit Carrickmacross is very welcome to visit, but this was an official visit which meant our council was associated with it," he said.

And some of my best friends are Jewish.

In any event, Martin's actions give some hope for Israel's relations with Ireland. Hopefully there are other cooler heads around in Europe.

Israel Matzav: A ray of hope for Israel's relations with Europe

Israel Matzav: I get taken to task

I get taken to task

I got an email from Michael Fenenbock (which I have permission to share with you) in which he took me to task for drawing substantive conclusions about American support for Israel, particularly by Evangelical Christian, from poll numbers.

Carl,

You’re reading this as “support for Israel” and that’s backwards. You’re interpreting impersonal poll numbers through your personal prism. My friend Carl’s viewpoint is naturally Jewish centered. An Israeli centric point of view.

Drawing substantive conclusions from poll numbers can be inadvertently deceptive.

Based on a misreading of poll numbers, a Boston Globe columnist recently wrote ecstatically “Americans love Jews.” Silliness.

A Jewish academic with a commentator’s megaphone joined the chorus and trumpeted the same theme, “Americans love Jews.” Absurd.

“We love the Jews” is not what the poll respondent is saying. The poll numbers don’t reflect some heart warming fuzzy feeling for Jews. On this topic polls in America reflect the other side of the equation.

Americans dislike what they see and hear from the Muslim world and this barrage of negative images of Islam reflects in polls. An honor killing here, a plot to blow up subways there, Afghanistan, Ft. Hood, the Christmas Day bomber, a noisy and possibly nuclear Iran . . . America is assaulted hourly by charged images from the Arab and Islamic world.

The pollster forces a “this side or that side” choice. Jews or Arabs. When they choose Jews they’re saying no to the bad guys. To conclude from a “no to the bad guys” response that Americans love Jews is way off base. And, I argue, illusory and dangerous.

For Jews it’s always dangerous when we think we are not on our own. We are on our own. Our fate is in our hands. That proposition hasn’t changed in thousands of years.

We can depend only on ourselves. That is our burden and our responsibility.

Wanna take a guess at how Americans respond to more pointed questions. Strong support for a two-state solution? Jerusalem has equal significance for Jews and Islam? The State of Israel was created to deal with Jewish question after World War II? Should America be even handed? Is Iran an Arab country?

From the current political perspective, support for Israel from Christians is welcome but it’s ephemeral. I know the history of my people. I know in the end we can rely only on ourselves.

At the moment the American political divide has Republicans and conservatives supporting Israel. Not out of love for Jews, but because they view terrorism and the threat of radical Islam as a political priority. Democrats and lefties are vulnerable to charges of soft on terror and apologetic to Islam.

For the “right” in America, it’s a political position. It’s not love.

There is a story about the guy planning his escape from the Warsaw ghetto. Ghetto leaders and friends gathered as he prepared to go over the wall. “Tell the Americans,” they instructed. “Tell the Americans what’s happening here.” How’d that work out?

We can depend only on ourselves.

MF

PS - Lastly, I wonder. . . did the pollster talk to Presbyterians?

FYI. The columnist is Jacoby. A good guy but mistaken on this. The academic is Barry Rubin. Please save me from academics who think they know something about politics. The “pointy headed professor” was invented for these guys.

Do we now refer to you as “Mr. Radio Personality?”

Call me whatever you want. But I probably should get a little more experience at it first. No one has compared me to Rush Limbaugh or Howie Carr yet.

Hmmm.

I still think it ironic that God (who controls the world - think about the Purim story) is using the Evangelical Christians to press for American support for Israel at this time.


Israel Matzav: I get taken to task

Israel Matzav: 'Don't even think of bombing Iran'?

'Don't even think of bombing Iran'?

Writing in the Financial Times of London (link available only with paid subscription), former NSC and CIA official Bruce Riedel and colleague Michael O'Hanlon, both of the Brookings Institution, argue against military strikes on Iran (I do not have a paid subscription, and therefore I am only citing and commenting on the portions quoted by Laura Rozen at Politico, which I will get to in a minute).

... The strike option, however, lacks credibility. America is engaged in two massive and unpopular military campaigns in the region. Given Iran’s ability to retaliate against the US in Iraq and Afghanistan, it is simply not credible that we would use force in the foreseeable future. Tehran, Moscow and Beijing know this.

The strike option is as credible as the United States chooses to make it. Polls indicate far more support in the US for a strike against Iran than there is for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. And an American declaration that it will not strike Iran, which is essentially what Riedel and O'Hanlon are advocating, would make an Israeli strike more likely. Make no mistake about it: If Israel strikes Iran, Iran will retaliate against US forces in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Laura Rozen's comments on a potential Israeli strike against Iran are worth reading in full. But this comment was especially intriguing:

"Israel has been interested for some time in items that could hit varied targets," the Washington Institute's Patrick Clawson told POLITICO. "Hezbollah is burying a lot of stocks, and digging more tunnels. Israel needs things that will hit varied targets that are [also] useful for Iran. Israel is also interested in [items that enable] long-distance strikes" such as those Israel reportedly used to strike Hamas weapons convoys in Sudan last year. "They can quite credibly say the last time we used this was not against Iran" but for other operations, Clawson said. "It's not very surprising they would be continuing to press" for such items. Nor that the Pentagon might turn them down.

Back to Reidel and O'Hanlon:

There is also a technical reality: even a massive strike would not slow Iran’s progress towards a bomb for long. We cannot be sure we know where all existing Iranian facilities to enrich uranium are located – as the revelation of yet another previously unknown site near Qom last year reminded us. Even if we did strike most or all existing facilities, Iran can rebuild fairly fast and would surely expel inspectors and burrow further underground when building its next facilities. It would be even harder to find, and strike, those assets. ...

Maybe. Or maybe they'd be delayed two years during which Ahmadinejad and Khameni would fall and a democratic regime would accede to power that would not be interested in nuclear weapons and would not prosecute a religious war against Israel. Those who argued against striking Saddam Hussein's Osirak reactor in 1981 also claimed that he would rebuild anyway. They were wrong.

Generally, those who argue against a military strike stop 10 yards short of the finish line. After concluding that a strike would not make sense, they still tend to tolerate leaving it as a last resort. There are dangers to such an approach. Mr Obama may some day come under pressure to employ it when all else has failed – and we think this would be a mistake ...

If all else has failed, you can bet that the Israelis will strike Iran regardless of what Obama does. If anything, not leaving the military option out there will make an Israeli strike more likely and will make it much less likely that any sanctions regime (do they oppose that too?) will be effective.


Israel Matzav: 'Don't even think of bombing Iran'?

Israel Matzav: Farrakhan: 'Obama's difficulties started when he stood up to the Jewish lobby'

Farrakhan: 'Obama's difficulties started when he stood up to the Jewish lobby'

Speaking to 20,000 people at Chicago's United Center on Sunday night, Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan railed that President Obama's difficulties started when he stood up to the 'Jewish lobby.'

[I]n a 3½-hour Saviours' Day speech Sunday, Farrakhan said Obama's current political difficulties began when he stood up to the Jewish lobby during an Oval Office meeting.

"When they left the White House, his problems began," Farrakhan said.

"The Zionists are in control of the Congress."

Referring to Obama's chief economic advisers Timothy Geithner, Henry Paulson and Larry Summers, Farrakhan said, "Who does he have around him? The people from Goldman Sachs."

The "bloodsuckers of the poor" were rewarded with a bailout, he said.

Anti-Defamation League Director Abraham Foxman responded: "Anybody who thought the old Farrakhan was gone: He never was. It's the same Farrakhan: ugly and anti-Semitic. With age, he doesn't get milder, he gets uglier."

Curiously, the Sun Times notes that

Obama distanced himself from Farrakhan before the presidential election because of Farrakhan's long history of anti-Semitic remarks.

Just like he 'distanced himself' from Farrakhan's friend Jeremiah Wright.

I can no more disown him than I can disown the black community. I can no more disown him than I can my white grandmother — a woman who helped raise me, a woman who sacrificed again and again for me, a woman who loves me as much as she loves anything in this world, but a woman who once confessed her fear of black men who passed by her on the street, and who on more than one occasion has uttered racial or ethnic stereotypes that made me cringe.

- Barack Obama on his mentor Rev. Wright, 3/18/08

I'd bet Obama feels the same way about Farrkhan.

What could go wrong?


Israel Matzav: Farrakhan: 'Obama's difficulties started when he stood up to the Jewish lobby'

Israel Matzav: The California Republican Senate race

The California Republican Senate race

The New York Times has a fair, but inadequate with respect to Israel, summary of the California Republican Senatorial primary race here. It makes Tom Campbell out to be a RINO with whom the Times could live, it dismisses Carly Fiorina (and incumbent Democrat Barbara Boxer) as 'in trouble' and former Assemblyman Chuck Devore (pictured) as an 'unknown.'

Interestingly, blogger Mickey Kaus is apparently joining the race (Hat Tip: Memeorandum). Kaus would run on the Democratic side.

A quick search of Kaus' blog came up with this about Israel. Once he officially announces, I can send him the questions.


Israel Matzav: The California Republican Senate race

Israel Matzav: Hope and change, Egyptian style

Hope and change, Egyptian style

I'm not convinced he'd be much of an improvement from Israel's perspective, but for what it's worth, former IAEA chief Mohamed ElBaradei, the honorary father of the Iranian nuclear bomb, may be seeking the Presidency of Egypt.

"I would only run if people coalesce around me," said ElBaradei, who has spent years based abroad.

Speaking at his home on Cairo's outskirts, he said he could keep up momentum for his call for change "from wherever I am".

[...]

Asked about his view on a possible bid by Gamal Mubarak, ElBaradei said: "I believe the current system is not free and fair, and, whoever would run under the current system, I would make it very clear that this is not democracy as it should be."

[...]

Asked if his supporters should take to the streets, ElBaradei said: "People are talking about all sorts of things and they might go to civil disobedience if there is no change."

Hmmm.

Israel Matzav: Hope and change, Egyptian style

Israel Matzav: It's time to bomb Iran

It's time to bomb Iran

In a fabulously entertaining column (do not read this on your computer screen with a drink in your mouth), Conrad Black tells us exactly how to deal with Iran.

There is now an industry of talk-show, official-deliberative, and anonymous-expert comment dismissing force as an option. We are endlessly told that the Tehran regime would be strengthened by an attack on its nuclear facilities; that an attack would fail militarily and unite all Iranians behind their government. The famous “Arab street,” now extending throughout Islam and doubtless on, via Peoria, to Antarctica, would erupt. We should let Iran’s dismal theo-thugocracy stew in its own juice, and we must not be rattled by Iranian nuclear weapons. It is all a little like the arguments that before invading Iraq in 2003, we had to capture bin Laden, end the Israel-Palestine conflict, and try “smart sanctions” (which meant smart for France and porous for Iraq) for at least five years.

There are always a thousand reasons not to do anything. As Woodrow Wilson said of the anti-submarine war in 1917, “Nothing was ever done so systematically as nothing is being done now.” Iran has made a total mockery of attempts at good-faith negotiations, has played peek-a-boo about its nuclear ambitions (just as Saddam did), is being indulged for mischievous reasons by China and Russia, is the world’s leading terrorist-supporting country, and has constantly espoused and threatened the destruction of Israel.

If China and Russia join in comprehensive sanctions — which have never worked, but have rarely been tried and have acceded to some legitimacy as an intermediate step — they should be given an opportunity to produce a change of nuclear course in Iran. If Russia and China do not join, or if they do and the sanctions don’t work as Iran approaches a nuclear capability, then the U.S., France, Germany, the U.K., and any responsible country that wishes to join (though perhaps not Israel) should attack Iran’s nuclear facilities as firmly and repeatedly as necessary, and, of course, as antiseptically as possible in terms of avoidance of collateral damage.

The problems of the Tehran government would multiply, the U.S. would cease to be seen as a paper tiger, the Western alliance would come back to life, the Arab powers could be persuaded to take a stronger line against Iranian incursions in their region (especially by Hamas and Hezbollah), and the derelict peace process with the Palestinians might even be invigorated. Iran would lose its ability to meddle successfully in Iraq, including through the egregious former protégé of the Pentagon and of Richard Perle, Ahmad Chalabi. The streets of the world would be as calm as they were after the anti-nuclear strikes on Iraq and Syria, and The New York Review of Books might even cease to represent the Khomeini revolution as a great democratic breakthrough with some resemblance to 1776.

The excruciating series of humbling acts that the Obama administration has called “engagement” could yet turn to account, as stern measures from Obama will be much harder to portray as naked aggression than the armed virility of George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, the magnificently mustachioed John Bolton, et al. Bush’s promotion of democracy, which was fine as long as it didn’t unsettle America’s undemocratic allies, would be a clear success if plausible elections are regularly held across the quadrifecta of former hostile states and Afghanistan. Those formerly closed gates would be portals of opportunity, an immense international geopolitical success, and hailed bipartisanly within the U.S., as militant Islam is decisively defeated and moderate Islam enhanced.

Read it all.

Israel Matzav: It's time to bomb Iran

Israel Matzav: Hezbullah asks 'Lebanese authorities' to make sure Israelis barred

Hezbullah asks 'Lebanese authorities' to make sure Israelis barred

Hezbullah has asked 'Lebanese authorities' (are there any that aren't affiliated with Hezbullah these days?) to step up measures at border crossings to make sure that no would-be assassins Israelis carrying other countries' passports enter the country. They have also taken unspecified measures to increase security around Hezbullah leader Hassan Nasrallah.

I wonder if they found any Israeli bloggers up there lately. Hmmm.


Israel Matzav: Hezbullah asks 'Lebanese authorities' to make sure Israelis barred

Israel Matzav: Ontario found

Ontario found

I'd like to give a shout-out to the Jewish communities of Toronto (one of whose members is shown here), Ottowa and other cities in Ontario for being the 'activists' referred to by Evelyn Gordon who brought about the stunning vote she describes condemning Israel Apartheid Jewish Genocide Week.

[T]he provincial legislature of Ontario, Canada, voted unanimously to condemn this extravaganza, because it “serves to incite hatred against Israel, a democratic state that respects the rule of law and human rights, and … diminishes the suffering of those who were victims of a true apartheid regime in South Africa.”

Two things make this decision remarkable. One is that Ontario has long been a hotbed of anti-Israel activity. For instance, its largest labor union, the Ontario chapter of the Canadian Union of Public Employees, enthusiastically promotes BDS; in 2006, the chapter voted to boycott Israel until it accepts a Palestinian “right of return,” otherwise known as committing demographic suicide. Thus Ontario legislators defied a powerhouse vote machine over an issue with little political traction, just because they thought it was right.

The second is that not long ago, Canada’s foreign policy was hostile to Israel. In October 2000, for instance, days after the intifada erupted, Canada voted for a UN Security Council resolution condemning Israel for the violence, without a word of blame for the Palestinians. And that vote was typical, not exceptional. Thus the Ontario decision represents a sharp turnabout in a fairly short period of time.

The man primarily responsible for the change is undoubtedly Canada’s Conservative prime minister, Stephen Harper, who has turned his country into one of Israel’s most reliable supporters.

...

But Harper’s revolution alone cannot explain the Ontario vote. The Conservatives have only 24 seats in Ontario’s parliament; the rival Liberal Party, which has no reason to toe Harper’s line, has 71. Yet Liberals who, as one noted, normally disagree with Conservatives over almost everything united with them on this.

Read the whole thing. And if you're a member of Ontario's Jewish community, be proud.


Israel Matzav: Ontario found

Israel Matzav: Israelis barred from Dubai

Israelis barred from Dubai

Speaking of Dubai (seriously this time), in a move that will undoubtedly hurt sales at its airport duty free shop (pictured below - Israelis shop duty free shops around the world 24/7. I've actually been in European airports in the middle of the night and seen Israelis furious that the duty free shops were closed!), Dubai has barred all Israelis from the Emirate - even those carrying a second passport.


Haaretz worries who might be included in the ban.
"We will not allow those who hold Israeli passports into the UAE no matter what other passport they have," Tamim said.

He did not explain what procedures would be used to identify the Israeli visitors, except that the police will "develop skills" to recognize Israelis by "physical features and the way they speak."

It was also unclear if the measure would apply to Israeli athletes competing in international sports events in the Emirates and how it could affect Israel's participation in international meetings here.

It was unclear if the measure would apply to Israeli athletes competing in international sports events being held there, such as tennis player Shahar Peer, a recent semifinalist in the local WTA tennis tournament.
I suppose they could look at cartoons in any Arab newspaper to find out what Jews look like. Fortunately for the tennis federation, the tournament just ended so they have another year to decide whether to ban Shahar Pe'er again. But least you have any doubts, they're not just on the lookout for 'Israelis.' They're looking for Jews.
After announcing the ban on Israelis with dual nationality, Dubai’s police chief, Lt.-Gen. Dahi Khalfan Tamim, said on Monday that authorities in the Gulf emirate would be on the lookout for “Jews.”

A Channel 2 News broadcast Monday night showed Tamim pointing at his own face and saying, “We know how to recognize them.” The United Arab Emirates will “deny entry to anyone suspected of having Israeli citizenship,” he said, adding that Israelis with dual nationality would be denied entry.
Mind you, officially Israelis aren't supposed to go to Dubai anyway, but that's yet another rule that's disregarded.

I guess we'll just have to call Mr. Phelps the next time a Jew wants to go to Dubai. Here's Part 4 of that Mission Impossible episode. For those who missed the previous installments, Part 1 is here, Part 2 is here and Part 3 is here.

Let's go to the videotape.

Israel Matzav: Israelis barred from Dubai

Israel Matzav: Dubai identifies five suspects from New York

Dubai identifies five suspects from New York

Dubai has identified five more suspects in the liquidation of Hamas murderer and arms dealer Mahmoud al-Mabhouh. They were traveling on the American passports of residents of Monsey, Williamsburg and Boro Park in New York.

More details here.

Heh. Can't wait to hear Richard Silverstein's reaction.

Israel Matzav: Dubai identifies five suspects from New York

Israel Matzav: From Skinhead to Shochet

From Skinhead to Shochet

Pinchas - formerly Pawel - went from being a Neo-Nazi to being an ultra-Orthodox Jew after his wife discovered that both she and he were actually Jews whose parents attempted to shield them from their roots in post-War Poland.

Today, though, Michael Schudrich, the chief rabbi of Poland, said he considered Poland the most pro-Israel country in the European Union. He said the attitude of Pope John Paul II, a Pole, who called Jews “our elder brothers,” had finally entered the public consciousness.

Ten years after the revelation that 1,600 Jews of the town of Jedwabne were burned alive by their Polish neighbors in July 1941, he said the national myth that all Poles were victims of World War II had finally been shattered.

“Before 1989 there was a feeling that it was not safe to say, ‘I am a Jew,’ ” Rabbi Schudrich said. “But two decades later, there is a growing feeling that Jews are a missing limb in Poland. The level of anti-Semitism remains unacceptable, but the image of the murderous Pole seared in the consciousness of many Jews after the war doesn’t correspond to the Poland of 2010.”

...

Pawel joined the army and married a fellow skinhead at age 18. But his sense of self changed irrevocably at the age of 22, when his wife, Paulina, suspecting that she had Jewish roots, went to a genealogical institute and discovered Pawel’s maternal grandparents on a register of Warsaw Jews, along with her own grandparents.

When Pawel confronted his parents, he said, they broke down and told him the truth: his maternal grandmother was Jewish and had survived the war by being hidden in a monastery by a group of nuns. His paternal grandfather, also a Jew, had seven brother and sisters, most of whom had perished in the Holocaust.

“I went to my parents and said, ‘What the hell’? Imagine, I was a neo-Nazi and heard this news? I couldn’t look in the mirror for weeks,” he said. “My parents were the typical offspring of Jewish survivors of the war, who decided to conceal their Jewish identity to try and protect their family.”
Read the whole thing. Robert Avrech has more here.

For those wondering about my title who have not clicked through, Pinchas is now studying to be a shochet (ritual slaughterer). He says he is good with knives.

Israel Matzav: From Skinhead to Shochet

Israel Matzav: Let's be honest with the 'Palestinians'

Let's be honest with the 'Palestinians'

Jennifer Rubin suggests that President Obama should be honest with the 'Palestinians.'

Obama began his foray into the Middle East by declaring that it was essential to speak “honestly” with the parties and to say the same thing in public and private. Fair enough. But alas, he seems to have reserved all that honesty for the Israelis, for whom heritage programs, apartment buildings, and the blockade of Gaza are all taken as offenses against Palestinian sensibilities.

...

Rather than telling them that they’re victims of illegal settlements, Obama might do well to tell the Palestinians that they’re prisoners of their own victimology. And then, yes, when real honesty is in play, we might make some headway on that peace process.

I'd go a step further and tell the 'Palestinians' that their entire 'existence' as a separate 'people' was created by their Arab brethren as a means of vitiating the Jewish State's existence, and that they'd be better served by owning up to the truth and looking to those Arab brethren for solutions to their situation.

Israel Matzav: Let's be honest with the 'Palestinians'

Israel Matzav: Want to buy a Gaza smuggling tunnel?

Want to buy a Gaza smuggling tunnel?

The price of Gaza smuggling tunnels has dropped and there's now a clearance sale on them. Find out why here.


Israel Matzav: Want to buy a Gaza smuggling tunnel?
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...