Friday, 14 August 2009

Israel Matzav: All present and accounted for, sir

All present and accounted for, sir

The IDF announced on Thursday evening that it has accounted for all soldiers and that no soldier has been kidnapped.

The IDF on Thursday night allayed suspicions that a soldier was kidnapped after all soldiers were said to be accounted for at the end of a protracted roll call.

...

The army immediately initiated an emergency procedure roll call throughout all active units, including reservists, after a female soldier who was getting off a bus near an air force base outside the airport told her commanders that she had seen two civilians forcefully pushing a soldier into a car and then fleeing the scene. She was some distance from the scene she had witnessed, officials said, noting that she had passed a lie-detector test.

The IDF reviewed the reliability of the soldier's testimony - the only eyewitness account - while police scrambled helicopters to join ground units trying to prevent the alleged kidnappers from fleeing the region. By the evening, almost all soldiers had been accounted for.

Read All at :

Israel Matzav: All present and accounted for, sir

US delegates blame Palestinians for no peace talks - Yahoo! News

US delegates blame Palestinians for no peace talks - Yahoo! News

DoubleTapper: IDF Women

DoubleTapper: IDF Women

Thursday, 13 August 2009

PA Agency: Jewish State Threatens All of Humanity - Defense/Middle East - Israel News - Israel National News

PA Agency: Jewish State Threatens All of Humanity - Defense/Middle East - Israel News - Israel National News

Shared via AddThis

70% of Americans See Israel as Ally - Defense/Middle East - Israel News - Israel National News

70% of Americans See Israel as Ally - Defense/Middle East - Israel News - Israel National News


Shared via AddThis

Fatah's Al-Aksa Brigades Responsible for Terror Attack - Defense/Middle East - Israel News - Israel National News

Fatah's Al-Aksa Brigades Responsible for Terror Attack - Defense/Middle East - Israel News - Israel National News


Shared via AddThis

Israel Matzav: Breaking: IDF soldier kidnapped near Ben Gurion Airport; UPDATED

Breaking: IDF soldier kidnapped near Ben Gurion Airport; UPDATED

The 'Palestinian' news agency Maan is reporting that an IDF soldier has been kidnapped near Ben Gurion Airport and is being held somewhere near Bethlehem (Hat Tip: Eliyahu P).

Israeli authorities said they were investigating reports of the capture of a soldier near Ben Gurion International Airport, in the center of the country, on Thursday.

“The matter is being investigated,” a military spokesperson told Ma’an when asked about the reports.

A previously unknown group calling itself the “Al-Quds Army” claimed responsibility for the reported capture in a statement sent to Ma’an.

“A group of our resistance fighters captured an Israeli soldier near Ben Gurion Airport and withdrew along with the soldier without incident … we will provide details about the captured soldier later,” the statement said.

Reliable Israeli sources also said that a state of security alert prevailed inside Israel in response to a phone call from a soldier who said he had been captured.

Israeli forces have also set up checkpoints on roads leading into major cities, though reports conflict about the nature and intensity of the reported security measures in Israel. Heavy security checks were also imposed on the road linking Tel Aviv to city of Modi’in (part of which, Modi’in Ilit, is a settlement ) causing a traffic jam.

The website of the prominent Israeli newspaper Haaretz said security checks caused severe delays near the airport.

Some Israeli news sites reported the security measures, but said they were the result of a “specific security warning,” the nature of which the Israeli military censor may have banned from publishing.

More details when I have them.
Read All at :
Israel Matzav: Breaking: IDF soldier kidnapped near Ben Gurion Airport; UPDATED

Israel Matzav: Video: Hamas terrorist with white flag hiding among civilians

Israel Matzav: Video: Hamas terrorist with white flag hiding among civilians

Israel Matzav: Livni: 'Hundreds of thousands of Israelis' want to leave

Israel Matzav: Livni: 'Hundreds of thousands of Israelis' want to leave

Israel Matzav: Ayalon: Back channel dialogue between Avigdor Lieberman and Hillary Clinton, Livni and Abu Ala notes on Annapolis contradictory

Israel Matzav: Ayalon: Back channel dialogue between Avigdor Lieberman and Hillary Clinton, Livni and Abu Ala notes on Annapolis contradictory

Israel Matzav: Human Rights Watch plays prosecutor, judge and jury

Human Rights Watch plays prosecutor, judge and jury

Human Rights Watch, which recently raised money in Saudi Arabia by bragging about how it 'does battle' with 'pro-Israel pressure groups' claims in a report released on Thursday that Israel shot eleven unarmed 'Palestinians' waving white flags in seven different incidents during Operation Cast Lead. For good measure, most of the eleven are claimed to be women and children.

HRW said it conducted extensive investigations into each of these incidents by visiting the attack sites, examining ballistic evidence, collecting medical records, and interviewing multiple witnesses, at least three people separately for each attack. In one case, forensic pathologists examined a survivor.

While that may (and is designed to) sound impressive, I have to wonder how a forensic pathologist would examine a survivor:

Forensic pathologists determine the cause of death by examination of a cadaver. The autopsy is performed by the pathologist at the request of a coroner usually during the investigation of criminal law cases and civil law cases in some jurisdictions. Forensic pathologists are also frequently asked to confirm the identity of a cadaver.

Read All at :

Israel Matzav: Human Rights Watch plays prosecutor, judge and jury

Israel Matzav: Life Magazine photos of Israel 1948-67 Part 4: The Life and death of photographer Paul Schutzer

Life Magazine photos of Israel 1948-67 Part 4: The Life and death of photographer Paul Schutzer

This is the fourth and final installment in the collection of Life Magazine photographs of Israel 1948-67 published by Ben Atlas. They are pictures taken by Paul Schutzer, a Life Magazine photographer. Ben explains what happened to him:

Lenny wrote that Paul Schutzer “was embedded with an Israeli armored column moving into Gaza in the 1967 war. His half-track took a direct hit”. They found this film roll in the camera next to Paul Schutzer’s body. I went back to the archive and this is the last roll:

Here's a picture from the roll with Ben's caption:

You can see from the roll that Paul was taking several photos of this moving tank and then the tank takes a direct hit. Next is the direct hit on Paul Schutzer’s track and the three last photos by Paul Schutzer.

Read All at :

Israel Matzav: Life Magazine photos of Israel 1948-67 Part 4: The Life and death of photographer Paul Schutzer

Israel Matzav: 'UN discriminates against Israel' says... Susan Rice?!?

'UN discriminates against Israel' says... Susan Rice?!?

I think we can bring out the flying pig for this one.

The United States' ambassador to the United Nations, Susan Rice, criticized the UN General Assembly during a speech at NYU on Wednesday for discriminating against Israel.

Rice said the 192-nation United Nations needed reform, continued to single out Israel for criticism and let "political theater distract from real deliberation," but she also described it as an "imperfect yet indispensable institution."

"There is no substitute for the legitimacy the UN can impart or its potential to mobilize the widest possible coalitions," she said. "There is no better alternative to sharing the costs and burdens of UN peace operations and humanitarian missions around the world."

Read All at :

Israel Matzav: 'UN discriminates against Israel' says... Susan Rice?!?

Israel Matzav: Someone in San Diego gets it

Someone in San Diego gets it

This blogger describes himself as a former designer of the metro page for the San Diego Union Tribune. He also needs a job. If I owned a newspaper, I'd hire him as a features writer. He gets it.

I hate to say it, but it should come as no surprise to anyone that the man who sat in the pews at Jeremiah Wright’s church for two decades would have imbibed some of the anti-Semitism that was preached from the pulpit. In this, President Barack Obama follows the lead of noted useful idiot and terrorist tool Jimmy Carter.

Read All at :

Israel Matzav: Someone in San Diego gets it

Israel Matzav: Israel to deploy Trophy 'active protection system' in Merkava IV tanks (with video)

Israel Matzav: Israel to deploy Trophy 'active protection system' in Merkava IV tanks (with video)

Israel Matzav: Al-Guardian blames Israel for Hamas' religious repression

Al-Guardian blames Israel for Hamas' religious repression


Gaza is clearly moving in the direction of becoming a strict Islamist Caliphate like Iran and Saudi Arabia, and al-Guardian's Ben White knows who's to blame: Israel, of course.

But why is this happening now? One answer is that these developments in Gaza are a consequence of the state of siege that the tiny territory has been under – a society that has been fenced-in, starved, and seen its very fabric torn apart by unemployment and wanton military destruction. In the words of a Gaza human rights worker, isolation bred "extremism and dark ideas".

Eyad Sarraj, a prominent Gazan mental health expert and psychiatrist, noted that Hamas is focusing on the likes of "women's dress" and "segregation of the sexes, especially in public or in schools". Rather than prioritising "honesty or financial probity", the obsession is with "sex", because "these things are visible and people are easily intimidated because such issues address their traditional anxieties".

Albert Memmi wrote in The Coloniser and the Colonised the way in which the colonised can seek "refuge" in religion, offering individuals "one of the rare paths of retreat", and the group "one of the rare manifestations which can protect its original existence". It is similar to an observation made by the director of Jerusalem's Women's Centre for Legal Aid and Counselling to CNN, that in "societies suffering from long-term military conflict … 'religion and traditions become more important' and are frequently 'used to oppress'".

Read All at :

Israel Matzav: Al-Guardian blames Israel for Hamas' religious repression

Israel Matzav: Can we make this into a Republican campaign poster?

Can we make this into a Republican campaign poster?

On Wednesday, President Barack Obama called Robinson a "crusader" for women and those without a voice who "illuminated a better future for our world."

Read All at :

Israel Matzav: Can we make this into a Republican campaign poster?

Israel Matzav: Iran getting worried?

Iran getting worried?

Is Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad getting worried about an Israeli attack on his nuclear facilities? Well, it sure sounds like it. On Wednesday, Iran announced that it will introduce a resolution at the 150-nation IAEA meeting in September that will seek to ban attacks on nuclear facilities 'anywhere in the world.' Obviously, Iran is specifically worried about their own facilities being targeted by Israel.

Iran says the proposal, revealed to The Associated Press by diplomats and confirmed by a senior Iranian envoy, is not linked to veiled threats by Israel of an attack as a last resort if the international community fails to persuade Tehran to freeze its nuclear activities.

Instead, all of the diplomats said the Iranian initiative seeks support for a generally worded document prohibiting all armed attacks against nuclear installations anywhere, when 150 nations convene for the September general conference of the International Atomic Energy Agency.

Read All at :

Israel Matzav: Iran getting worried?

Israel Matzav: Mike Huckabee to speak at Shepherd's Hotel

Israel Matzav: Mike Huckabee to speak at Shepherd's Hotel

Health Care in Israel

Health Care in Israel

I got a bit of flak for writing about the American health care issue, which must have raised my appetite for more. How else to explain my decision to talk about health care in Israel?

I'm aware - believe me, I'm aware - that Israel is smaller than the US. Why, the whole country has less of a population than the larger American cities, its geographical size is smaller than some of the American metropolises, and I'm not even talking about Houston which is slowly swallowing all of southern Texas. (Which raises the interesting question why Israel so fascinates most of the world, while Houston merely gobbles up the surrounding plain. You'd think we were a superpower). I also recognize that America has three or four separate layers of government while all we've got is one, and even that one is rather inept. So I'm not saying what works in Israel might work in the US. Probably not. This post is merely to be informative, and you needn't jump down my throat.

Israel has a social security system (bituach leumi) which serves as a safety net for various things. If you can't work for a while because of health matters it kicks in. If you're permanently disabled. If you're called up to reserve duty but would like to keep on getting your salary. if you've got children under 18 it pays you a monthly stipend. It even ensures a minimal pension once you've reached 65 0r 67 (women or men) though no one could live off it. And it offers many additional useful things. In return, every adult after military service must pay a tax of a few percent, depending on income, and employers also chip in; if you're a student or unemployed you still have to pay something like $50 a month.

It's nice to have, bituach leumi, it doesn't abolish poverty or anything of the sort, and all Israeli citizens have it. Even the Arabs of East Jerusalem who are somewhere between citizens and permanent residents have it- a word about them later.

About 15 years ago we also got universal heath care, though for many of us the difference from our prior condition was not dramatic. The universal tax for this is similar to the social security one, which means that the middle class pays about 5% for each, totaling 10% beyond income tax. Or more accurately, before income tax, since everyone pays, while some 50% of workers don't pay income tax.

In return for the tax, everyone must be a member of one of three Kupot Holim, which are exactly like HMOs but different. You choose which one you wish to join, and every six months there's a period when people are allowed to switch. The kupot are not allowed to turn you down. There aren't major differences between them by now (there were back when the law was first passed); each has slightly different nuances of service, and some have better infrastructure in different parts of the country. (The one we're in apparently offers fewer doctors outside of Jerusalem, I'm told). You more or less choose your doctors from a list; many doctors are on all lists. Medications are available for a small fee, which means expensive ones are essentially free. Each visit to a specialist (not a GP) is taxed at 18 NIS, or about $5. The types of lab tests and procedures you're likely to need in a normal state of health short of catastrophic ailments are mostly covered; sometimes you need to haggle a bit with the system, but at an acceptable level.

All of this is determined by the government. There's a committee of specialists which determines what the universal coverage is, and updates it annually; the government then has the final say. Some years there's a public outcry because some expensive new medicine isn't yet on the list; in most cases it then will be sooner or later because politicians like happy voters. The universal coverage is called Sal Briut - the basket of health. We're as good as anyone with euphemisms.

The sal briut isn't bad, but it's far from perfect. So each Kupa offers supplementary plans, which cover additional stuff. These plans aren't very expensive, though if you want the full monty and have a largish family it does accumulate. Middle class folks, so far as I can tell, all have the full supplements. Once you do, you really are covered to a reasonable extent, even in case of catastrophes. There can be waiting lines but not anything a Briton wouldn't find an improvement to their NHS. If you activate the supplemental coverage even those can go away, unless you want a specific procedure with a specific surgeon who only works 32 hours a day and can't fit you in right now - but you could go to a different specialist.

I've accompanied a family member through cancer treatment a few years back (she's fine, thank God), and the Kupa did make a mild hassle about this medicine not that one, but it was a hassle for us; the patient got the treatment she needed and there was never any doubt she would. A colleague a few years ago needed a brand new medicine that had just appeared on the market so her family bought it; a year later it was already in sal briut.

People I know who enjoyed top-notch American health care tell me what they had was better than what we have; mostly they seem to be talking about the bureaucracy of being ill. There's no Mayo Clinic in Israel, and indeed some procedures at the very top of the profession can't be had here. (They can't be had in Kansas, either). But not that many. As a general rule, it's probably better to be ill here than even in most of the developed world, and certainly no worse.

Israel-Palestine conflict: can't have a post without that, can we. You did notice that I said all Israeli citizens enjoy sal briut coverage, and I'm not going to add the obvious. It's needless to say. Foreign workers, not being citizens, aren't covered; it's my understanding that if they're here legally their employers are supposed to insure them; if they're here illegally, not. There's an organization named Physicians for Human Rights. On the Israel-Palestine topic they're about as anti-Israel as you can get, but they also deal with health issues of foreign laborers, and you've got to admire them for that.

East Jerusalem's Palestinians. If they claimed Israeli citizenship before the late 1970s, they're Israelis. A large majority of them didn't, so Israel unilaterally foisted permanent residency on them, and gave them bituach leumi and health care. One of the best kept secrets of the Israel-Palestine conflict issue is that each time anyone seriously talks about partitioning Jerusalem, the Arabs of East Jerusalem get a strong case of jitters. A Palestinian state would be a great thing to have, and they agree East Jerusalem must be in it, but relinquishing Israeli social security and health coverage is something no sane person would want to do. Which is one reason some theorists of human-rights-as-a-way-of-sticking-it-to-the-Jews now claim that even once Israel leaves East Jerusalem, it must continue to pay for the locals' health care until the end of their natural life span. I spoof you not.
taken from Yaacov Lozowick's Ruminations

The Torah Revolution: Unbearable

The Torah Revolution: Unbearable

The Torah Revolution: Living a Denial

The Torah Revolution: Living a Denial

DoubleTapper: Choosing a Weapon

DoubleTapper: Choosing a Weapon

Hollywood's Jewish Avenger - The Atlantic (September 2009)

Hollywood's Jewish Avenger - The Atlantic (September 2009)

Shared via AddThis

UNIVERSAL TORAH: RE'EH

UNIVERSAL TORAH: RE'EH

By Rabbi Avraham Greenbaum

Torah Reading: RE-EH, Deuteronomy 11:26-16:17.
Haftara: Isaiah 54:11-55:5.

AND YOU SHALL CHOOSE LIFE

"See: I am setting before you today a blessing and a curse." (Deut. 11:26). Moses asks us to see and understand the most important fact about our existential condition: that we are free. Each of us is placed within a unique matrix of circumstances that set the overall parameters of our lives. Yet within those parameters, we are constantly faced with options and divergent pathways, and our task is to choose between them. Our freedom is a trial because while we may see (or imagine we see) where we want a given pathway to take us in the short-term, as time-bound humans we can never know the long-term consequences of our choices at the moment we actually make those choices.

Only G-d has perfect knowledge of all the short- and long-term consequences of the options that face us. While He gives us the freedom to make our own choices, He offers us guidance based upon His knowledge. Thus the Zohar calls the commandments of the Torah "advice". Each commandment is advice about which turn to take at each juncture in the road of life. Nothing compels us to follow the commandments: if there were any compulsion, we would not be free. G-d wants us to have the merit of choosing our destiny for ourselves -- He wants us to see and understand for ourselves, and to make wise choices. "SEE: I am setting before you a blessing and a curse" . "And you shall choose LIFE". (Deut. 30:19).

Moses was addressing the Children of Israel in the plains of Moab, where they were poised to enter the Promised Land under Joshua. Moses instructed them to perform a powerfully striking ceremony on entry into the Land. This was designed to imprint deeply in the consciousness of the nation the terms on which they would possess the Land. Six of the twelve tribes were to stand on Mount Gerizim and six on Mount Eival, while the Priests and Levites were to stand in the valley between them chanting a list of fundamental Torah prohibitions, blessing those who observe them and cursing those who violate them. (The actual performance of the ceremony is described in Joshua chapter 8.)

Our parshah of RE'EH opens with the beginning of Moses' instructions about this ceremony (Deut. 11:26-32). Further instructions and the text of the chant are given four parshas later in KI TAVO (Deut. 27:11-26. Thus we find that the main body of the book of Deuteronomy is "sandwiched" between the beginning of Moses' instructions for the ceremony of blessings and curses at the start of RE'EH and his further instructions for the ceremony given in the middle of KI TAVO. The main body of Deuteronomy is made up of the detailed commandments in many different areas of life contained in the parshiyos we read on this Shabbat and for the next three weeks.

The remainder of parshas RE'EH, the whole of parshas SHOFTIM and KI TETZE and the first part of KI TAVO thus constitute the "repetition of the law" that gives the book of Deuteronomy its name. In Torah literature, this book is called MISHNEH TORAH, "the repetition of the law", while the Greek words that make up the name Deuteronomy mean exactly the same -- the repetition of, or second law. It is not that this law is any different from the code of Exodus (as set forth in parshas MISHPATIM) or that of Leviticus (set forth in parshas KEDOSHIM). Rabbinic exegesis of Torah law in the Midrash and Talmud shows that all the different passages supplement one another and constitute a single, unified code. The law is "repeated" because it is only through MISHNEH -- constant repetition and review -- that we bring the Torah deep into our hearts and make it rule our lives.

The sandwiching of the code of Deuteronomy, the MISHNEH TORAH, between the beginning and end of the instructions for the ceremony of blessings and curses on entry into the Land comes to emphasize that keeping the Torah is the essential condition for Israel's possession of the Land. The opening parshahs of Deuteronomy set forth the fundamentals of faith and trust in G-d, love and awe and the other basic traits we are asked to cultivate. Now we come to the detailed laws of the Torah, as set forth in this and the ensuing parshahs. It was over this complete code, with its foundations and all its details, that Moses struck a Covenant with Israel in the plains of Moab, as recounted in KI TAVO, which we will read shortly before the New Year and Days of Awe.

The most striking feature of the Code as set forth in Deuteronomy compared to the laws in Exodus, Leviticus and Numbers is the constant return to the centrality of Jerusalem and the Temple in the life of the nation. "To the place that Hashem your G-d will choose from all your tribes to place His name there to dwell -- search it out and come there!" (Deut. 12:5). On conquest of the land, the Israelites were charged with totally uprooting and destroying all vestiges of Canaanite and any other kind of idolatry in order to ensure the success of the pure monotheistic order they were to establish in their place. The unity of G-d could not be revealed through the multiple shrines of the heathens "on the high mountains and on the hills and under every leafy tree". G-d's unity is revealed only when the consciousness of all Israel and of the entire world is focussed on the House of HaShem on Mount Moriah, the "Mountain of Teaching". For "the Torah will go forth from Zion and the word of HaShem from Yerushalayim".

Later in the Code of Deuteronomy (SHOFTIM, Deut. 17:8ff, etc.) we will encounter Mount Moriah as the seat of the sages and elders of the Sanhedrin, Israel's true Supreme Court, whose proper place is in the Hewn Chamber on the Temple Mount. However, in our present parshah of RE'EH, the focus is on Jerusalem and the Temple as the center of the nation's religious life, which itself is inextricably bound up with agriculture and the economy. Blessing reigns in Israel when the first-born animals and animal tithes are offered on the Temple Altar; when meat is consumed not purely out of lust, but in order to partake of peace and thanksgiving offerings; when the first-fruits are presented in the Temple; when Terumah is given to the priests and the tithe to the Levites, while the Israelites take up their second tithe to eat in holiness and purity within the boundaries of Jerusalem. "Three times in the year, all your males shall appear before the Lord your G-d." (Deut. 16:16).

Complete blessing can dwell only when the law is scrupulously observed. "ALL the word that I am commanding you, you shall guard to do: YOU MUST NOT ADD TO IT AND NOT SUBSTRACT FROM IT" (Duet. 13:1). Some of the severest sanctions in the Torah are reserved for those who encourage others to deviate from the law, such as the false prophet, those who lead whole towns astray, and notably the MEISIS ("inciter to idolatry" -- Deut. 13:2-19). The Torah insists that sanctions may be imposed only through due legal procedure -- "And you shall search out and investigate and question thoroughly" (Deut. 13:16). Nothing could be further from the Torah law on the eradication of idolatry than the practice of those who "burn their sons and daughters in fire to their gods" -- those who send young male and female suicide-terrorists to indiscriminately kill innocent men, women and children and babes in arms in the name of religion. The severity of the law of the Torah is directed not at innocents but at smooth-tongued, malicious, evil and dangerous inciters who whip up entire nations to madness.

But "You are children to HaShem your G-d": our best protection against the smooth-tongued incitement to stray from the Torah to which we are exposed every day is our own personal holiness and sanctity. Thus the laws in our parshah against incitement are followed immediately by the laws of holiness and abstention from the consumption of forbidden species of animals, which causes spiritual degradation. We are to regulate our physical appetites. We are to tithe our crops, and instead of simply eating the fruits immediately at home in order satisfy our bodily needs, we are to take a tithe (Maaser Sheni) to eat in Jerusalem "in order that you will learn to revere HaShem your G-d all the days". Self-restraint applies not only to farmers but to those involved in the money economy as well. Thus our parshah contains the laws of restraining our appetite for wealth through giving charity and loans to the needy, and remitting debts in the Sabbatical year. Again and again we are charged to remember the poor and needy, the Levite, the widow and the orphan.

Through our compassion, we will arouse the compassion of the Almighty as we prepare to enter the month of ELUL, the time of Teshuvah. love and compassion. The letters of the name of Elul are the initial letters of ANI LEDODI VEDODI LI: "I am my Beloved's and my Beloved is mine".

Shabbat Shalom!!! Chodesh Tov Umevorach!!!

Avraham Yehoshua Greenbaum

--
AZAMRA INSTITUTE
PO Box 50037 Jerusalem 91500 Israel
Website: www.azamra.org

_____________________________
Change email address / Leave mailing list: http://ymlp159.com/u.phpYMLPID=gbmbwegsguqeuguyq

Open Season on Christians in the Islamic World

Open Season on Christians in the Islamic World

Shared via AddThis

Gas Field Near Haifa Exceeds Expectations -- Again! - Good News - Israel News - Israel National News#replies#replies

Gas Field Near Haifa Exceeds Expectations -- Again! - Good News - Israel News - Israel National News#replies#replies

Shared via AddThis

Israeli Breakthru Research: No More Insulin Shots for Diabetics - Made in Israel - Israel News - Israel National News

Israeli Breakthru Research: No More Insulin Shots for Diabetics - Made in Israel - Israel News - Israel National News

Shared via AddThis

Israel Renews Effort to Find Long-Missing IDF Soldier - Defense/Middle East - Israel News - Israel National News

Israel Renews Effort to Find Long-Missing IDF Soldier - Defense/Middle East - Israel News - Israel National News

Shared via AddThis

71 Senators Tell Obama to Pressure the Arabs - Politics & Government - Israel News - Israel National News

71 Senators Tell Obama to Pressure the Arabs - Politics & Government - Israel News - Israel National News

Shared via AddThis

Wednesday, 12 August 2009

Israel Matzav: Why Obama's Iran policy will fail

Why Obama's Iran policy will fail

Here's an interesting and different take on why President Obama's 'engagement' policy in Iran will fail.

Mr. Obama's problem is that Mr. Khamenei could only have chosen Ahmadinejad because he does not want friendly talks with the U.S. He evidently calculates that without the ideology of "anti-Americanism" the regime would collapse. He is right.

Read All at :

Israel Matzav: Why Obama's Iran policy will fail

Israel Matzav: Does Hillary Clinton want to be Secretary of State?

Does Hillary Clinton want to be Secretary of State?

As I'm sure you all heard, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton 'lost it' on Monday as a result of a mistranslated question at a meeting with students in the Congo.
See Video and Read All at :
Israel Matzav: Does Hillary Clinton want to be Secretary of State?

Israel Matzav: What if the situation were reversed?

Israel Matzav: What if the situation were reversed?

Israel Matzav: Calling the 'Palestinians' bluff

Calling the 'Palestinians' bluff

If one were to assume that the Arabs did not wish to destroy the Jewish state, the main stumbling block to solving the Israeli-Arab dispute would be the 'Palestinian refugees.' This article presents itself as a recipe for resolving the 'Palestinian refugee' problem, but what it is really doing is calling the 'Palestinians' bluff. But to understand the solution, one must understand the problem. So a bit of history is in order.

Initially, the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA), which administers the refugee camps, defined Palestine refugees as persons whose normal place of residence was Palestine between June 1946 and May 1948, who lost both their homes and means of livelihood as a result of the 1948 Arab-Israeli conflict. The camps opened in 1950, in the wake of the first Arab war to destroy Israel. The precise number of Arab refugees as a result of that war is uncertain, the estimates ranging from 450,000 to 700,000. Even experts who lean toward the higher side believe that no more than 550,000 wound up in refugee camps, since some fled to families settled in other Arab countries and fleeing Bedouin resumed their nomadic life style in Jordan.

Read All at :

Israel Matzav: Calling the 'Palestinians' bluff

Israel Matzav: Rasmussen: Israel 62, Egypt 30, all others negative

Israel Matzav: Rasmussen: Israel 62, Egypt 30, all others negative

Israel Matzav: Obama's nuclear summit

Obama's nuclear summit

It looks like President Obama may have put his foot in his mouth again by making grandiose promises without thinking through how he will fulfill them. In July, Obama told the G-8 summit that we would convene a meeting in March to discuss nuclear security. The meeting ought to include all of he world's current and aspiring nuclear powers - some 25-30 nations. But whom will Obama invite? Is Israel on the list?

There’s no good choice.

Invite Israel, and open its leaders up to questions about the country’s widely reported nuclear weapons program — which the Israelis have long refused to discuss.

But leave out Israel, and the Middle Eastern nations who would seem to be a necessity at any summit discussing nuclear security would feel compelled to point to Israel’s reported efforts as a source of instability in the region.

“I see this as one giant root canal which is going to be really painful for everybody who shows up — and for everybody who doesn’t,” said Aaron David Miller, a former State Department official who worked on Arab-Israeli peace negotiations under four presidents.

“Even if you try to define the summit agenda to be nuclear terrorism and nuclear security, the people you do invite are going to bring Israel to the table, figuratively speaking, anyway,” Miller said. “They’re going to need to think this through extremely carefully.”

The summit, set for March 9 and 10, is aimed at combating nuclear terrorism, which Obama has called the “most immediate and extreme threat to global security.”

Read All at :

Israel Matzav: Obama's nuclear summit

Israel Matzav: What giving the medal of freedom to Mary Robinson says about Barack Obama

What giving the medal of freedom to Mary Robinson says about Barack Obama

Wednesday is the day that President Obama plans to bring disgrace upon the United States by presenting the medal of freedom to anti-Jewish, anti-Israel and anti-American 'human rights activist' Mary Robinson. Giving the medal to Robinson has aroused so much fury that the fact that the medal is also being presented to South African bishop Desmond Tutu - who would also fit each of the adjectives above - has gone almost unnoticed.

There were a slew of articles on Tuesday about Robinson and I'd like to highlight them and send you off to read them on your own to understand why this vile woman is completely undeserving of the United States' highest civilian honor.

This is from former US ambassador to the UN John Bolton:

Durban is not the only reason Ms. Robinson should not receive the Medal of Freedom. Over the years she has actively opposed “the security or national interests of the United States,” one of the categories of eligibility for the Medal. Those in the administration who recommended her either ignored her anti-Israel history, or missed it entirely, as they either ignored or overlooked her hostility toward America’s role in promoting international peace and security. Or perhaps they share Ms. Robinson’s views.

One example, particularly significant today given the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts, is Ms. Robinson’s strong opinions about the use of force. During the Clinton administration’s (and NATO’s) air campaign against Serbia because of its assault on Kosovo, for instance, she opined that “civilian casualties are human rights victims.” But her real objection was not to civilian casualties but to the bombing itself, saying “NATO remains the sole judge of what is or is not acceptable to bomb,” which she did not mean as a compliment.

In fact, Ms. Robinson wanted U.N. control over NATO’s actions: “It surely must be right for the Security Council . . . to have a say in whether a prolonged bombing campaign in which the bombers choose their target at will is consistent with the principle of legality under the Charter of the United Nations.” One wonders if this is also Mr. Obama’s view, given the enormous consequences for U.S. national security.

This February, asked whether former President George W. Bush should be prosecuted for war crimes, Ms. Robinson answered that it was “premature,” until a “process” such as an “independent inquiry” was established: “[T]hen the decision can be taken as to whether anybody will be held accountable.” In particular, she objected to the Bush administration’s “war paradigm” for dealing with terrorism, saying we actually “need to reinforce the criminal justice system.” Asked about Mr. Obama’s statements on “moving forward,” Ms. Robinson responded that “one of the ways of looking forward is to have the courage to say we must inquire.”

Ms. Robinson’s award shows Mr. Obama’s detachment from longstanding, mainstream, American public opinion on foreign policy. The administration’s tin ear to the furor over Ms. Robinson underlines how deep that detachment really is.

Read All at :


Israel Matzav: What giving the medal of freedom to Mary Robinson says about Barack Obama

Israel Matzav: The ugly American

The ugly American

Jonathan Tobin nails the reasons why Israelis have not responded favorably to President Obumbler's initiatives, and why the use of his rhetorical skills is not going to change anything.

THE IDEA here seems to be that if the Israeli people are sufficiently exposed to the charms of the American president, they will force Netanyahu to do as he has been told by Washington. However, the administration misunderstands the nature of its problem. Contrary to its belief, the Israeli people already understand Obama very well. His problem is that they don't buy what he's selling. Indeed, this decision to launch a PR campaign reminds one of stereotypically "ugly American" tourists who believe the proper response to foreigners who don't understand English is to merely speak English louder. The administration needs to win the trust of Israelis through more realistic policies, not a bigger megaphone.

Read All at :

Israel Matzav: The ugly American

Israel Matzav: Life Magazine photos of Israel 1948-67 Part 3

Life Magazine photos of Israel 1948-67 Part 3

The third in the series of photos from Life Magazine at Ben Atlas' blog consists of scenes of life in Israel from 1960 taken by photographer Paul Schutzer. The largest number of photos seems to come from Lag BaOmer celebrations in Meron. You can view the whole set here.

Post taken from :Israel Matzav: Life Magazine photos of Israel 1948-67 Part 3

Israel Matzav: Rump king continues to seethe

Rump king continues to seethe

Two months ago, MK Aryeh Eldad, who is not a member of the government, introduced a resolution in the Knesset declaring a simple truth: That the solution to the 'Palestinian' problem lies in the only country in the world with a population that has a majority of 'Palestinians.'

Since then, the rump king of the 'Palestinian' state has whined and seethed like a baby at the prospect that someone might actually expect him to take responsibility for the nomadic tribes whose members make up 70% of his country's population. And unfortunately, Israel has joined the crowd in attempting to soothe the brat's ego.

Last week, an Israeli security delegation visited Jordan to reassure the little boy king that it is not cooking up a plan with the United States to declare Jordan the 'Palestinian state.' But the spoiled little boy is still throwing his tantrum.
Read All at :

Israel Matzav: Rump king continues to seethe

Israel Matzav: 'What's going on in the Jewish community is a gradual move away from Obama' says... former Clinton adviser Dick Morris

Israel Matzav: 'What's going on in the Jewish community is a gradual move away from Obama' says... former Clinton adviser Dick Morris

Israel Matzav: Fatah: Out with the old and in with the new?

Fatah: Out with the old and in with the new?

The Fatah terror group has voted for new senior party leaders. Early election results show that it is the party's 'youth' that will take Fatah forward.

There are actually two reports here.

The two key players are both murderers of course: Mohamed Dahlan and Marwan Barghouti.
See Video and Read All at :

Israel Matzav: Fatah: Out with the old and in with the new?

The Torah Revolution: Oh yeah!

The Torah Revolution: Oh yeah!

What the Conflict is Really About

What the Conflict is Really About

Ethan Bronner has a forgettable article in yesterday's NYT, about how things look good in Israel these days but the Israelis are worried. Or rather, that's what the first four fifths of the article says. Near the end it veers off in the opposite direction when he approvingly cites Aluf Benn in Haaretz last week, who posited that when Israelis feel secure they see no reason to make compromises for peace. (That wasn't my reading of Ben's article, but I see how Bronner could have read it that way).

The opening of Bronners article is useful for my purposes:

Rocket fire from Gaza has markedly declined. The Lebanese border is quiet. Terrorist attacks from the West Bank are rare. The national airport processed a
record number of travelers in the first week of August. The currency is so strong that the central bank has bought billions of dollars to keep the exchange rate down.
Israel is flourishing this summer, and one might imagine its people and leaders to be breathing a sigh of relief after nearly a decade of violence and unease. That, however, is far from the case. On every front, Israel is worried that it is living a false calm that could explode at any moment. Its airwaves and public discourse are filled with menace and concern.


So Israel has managed to beat off its many foes, once again, but it still feels threatened. Perhaps because the foes are still there, nursing their wounds and brooding over their thwarted plans to get rid of us. Which is, in a way, the thesis of the unlikely Hussain Agha-Robert Malley duo, in their NYT op-ed of two days ago, or, as Jeffrey Goldberg describes it, in the latest of "their never-ending series of provocative and thoughtful op-eds".

Agha-Malley, in the unlikely case you've never heard of them, are the fellows who double-handedly saved the day for the Palestinians and their myriad appolgists at the height of their war against school-children and bus riders earlier this decade. At the time Bill Clinton's rueful but public recognition of the fact that it was the Palestinian side that had thwarted peace, was forcing the more sane among Israel's haters to admit weakness in their case. Then, in August 2001, Malley and Agha published a seminal article in the New York Review of Books which claimed that actually, no. Ehud Barak had been mean to Arafat; he hadn't really intended on letting the Palestinians have anything; and while Arafat's negotiating style wasn't pretty, the talks failed because of the Israelis. Any number of well-informed people refuted this narrative, including Malley's boss Bill Clinton, but facts interest Israel's enemies only to the extent they can be used against it; otherwise they're not important.

Jonathan Tobin has more on this here.

Perhaps they're incorrigible contrarians; perhaps they derive special pleasure from poking American Presidents in the eye. Whatever the motivation may be, over the past year the duo's line has been inching towards an acceptance of reality. In this week's op-ed the factual part of their analysis is roughly the same as mine is, believe it or not.

Over the past two decades, the origins of the conflict were swept under the carpet, gradually repressed as the struggle assumed the narrower shape of the post-1967 territorial tug-of-war over the West Bank and Gaza. The two protagonists, each for its own reason, along with the international community, implicitly agreed to deal with the battle’s latest, most palpable expression. Palestinians saw an opportunity to finally exercise authority over a part of their patrimony; Israelis wanted to free themselves from the burdens of occupation; and foreign parties found that it was the easier, tidier thing to do. The hope was that, somehow, addressing the status of the West Bank and Gaza would dispense with the need to address the issues that predated the occupation and could outlast it.

That so many attempts to resolve the conflict have failed is reason to be wary. It is almost as if the parties, whenever they inch toward an artful compromise over the realities of the present, are inexorably drawn back to the ghosts of the past. It is hard today to imagine a resolution that does not entail two states. But two states may not be a true resolution if the roots of this clash are ignored. The ultimate territorial outcome almost certainly will be found within the borders of 1967. To be sustainable, it will need to grapple with matters left over since 1948. The first step will be to recognize that in the hearts and minds of Israelis and Palestinians, the fundamental question is not about the details of an apparently practical solution. It is an existential struggle between two worldviews.
For years, virtually all attention has been focused on the question of a future Palestinian state, its borders and powers. As Israelis make plain by talking about the
imperative of a Jewish state, and as Palestinians highlight when they evoke the
refugees’ rights, the heart of the matter is not necessarily how to define a state of Palestine. It is, as in a sense it always has been, how to define the state of Israel.


This line is aggravating some of Israel's supporters. Even Jeffrey Goldberg, one of the most sofisticated and nuanced of them, is uneasy:

This reads to me like an unfortunate bit of pussy-footing. Events are moving
me into the camp of people who believe there isn't an actual solution to the
Arab-Israeli conflict, and it seems as if events are moving Agha and Malley
in this direction as well. But if they're arguing that the conflict will only
end when Israel ceases to define itself as a Jewish state, they should say it
outright. It's not an appealing notion -- that there is room in the Middle East
for twenty-three Muslim-majority states, but not room enough for one Jewish
state , but they should state it if they believe it.


Whether Agha-Malley come out and say what they think or not seems to me less important. Why do we need to care about their personal opinions? Jonathan Tobin's point is more important.

Though many will dismiss this piece as extremist fare, Malley has a history of being the thin edge of the wedge when it comes to anti-Israel polemics. Though the authors couch their article in terms that allow them to pose as peace advocates, what Agha and Malley are attempting to do is legitimize the theme that peace depends on the end of the Jewish state even within the 1949 armistice lines.


The lines of discussion are indeed becoming ever more clear, even if the team at the White House doesn't see it. The issue is the right of the Jews to sovereignty in their ancestral homeland. Not the right of the Palestinians; that has already been acepted by any fair minded person. It's the right of the Jews which is being discussed, evaluated, and in many cases rejected. This is what the Jews need firmly to keep in mind.
taken from Yaacov Lozowick's Ruminations

Ruining the World's Consensus

Ruining the World's Consensus

The Guardian's Comment is Free section hosts the Agha-Malley column published in the New York Times yesterday (post above). (Their URL is called israel-palestine-two-state-solution, which may indicate someone wasn't paying attention).

The comments start off with some very edgy statements from the small pro-Israel team that tries, valiantly and futilely, to combat the poison which infests the comments part of Comment is Free. Their task is so hopeless and frustrating that one can appreciate why they're losing their own ability to think calmly. After their comments, however, the usual irrational animosity kicks in. Irrational and dripping with malice it may be, but not necessarily incoherent. I especially liked this comment:

Justice here - the implementation of instruments of international law and respect for UN institutions (to which Israel owes its 'existential' incarnation and survival) - is not an essentially contested concept relative to any particular world-view, but carries universal precepts grounding global peace and common jurisprudence since the world started putting itself back together in 1945. The frustration of the emergence of a Palestinian state is due almost entirely to the gross delinquency of successive Israel governments and the UN Security Council in honouring the obligations of the UN's founding principles. Defaulting to the failed and destabilising formulae of partition and recidivist nationalism would constitute acknowledgement that a member state has been rewarded for wrecking the post-1945 consensus ... and it is no surprise that Israel takes all the awards in public opinion polls concerning the biggest threat to global peace.

In English: The world healed itself in 1945 by creating a New World Order, based on justice, universal values and international law. Israel's existence contradicts all these. If the World Order doesn't fully work it's because Israel has been wrecking the consensus all this time. That's why Israel is so universally hated. You bet there shouldn't be a two state solution: that would mean the Israelis won.

There's no need to argue with this hallucinatory mishmash. We do need, however, to be aware of it, to understand that many people agree with it, and to accept that it's a worldview that regards itself as drawing on universal morality and a respectful reading of history, tied together in a rational system. It draws on the Enlightenment, in other words - as all of the world's worst monstrosities these past few centuries have.
taken from Yaacov Lozowick's Ruminations

DoubleTapper: Women, Guns and Civilization

DoubleTapper: Women, Guns and Civilization

Top Ten Myths about the Middle East Conflict

Top Ten Myths about the Middle East Conflict

Jews Tired of Waiting, Plan to Move into Jerusalem Property - Inside Israel - Israel News - Israel National News

Jews Tired of Waiting, Plan to Move into Jerusalem Property - Inside Israel - Israel News - Israel National News

Terrorist Marwan Barghouti Elected to Fatah Central Committee - Defense/Middle East - Israel News - Israel National News

Terrorist Marwan Barghouti Elected to Fatah Central Committee - Defense/Middle East - Israel News - Israel National News

‘War’ at Northern Border: Beethoven vs. Raucous Street Parties - Inside Israel - Israel News - Israel National News

‘War’ at Northern Border: Beethoven vs. Raucous Street Parties - Inside Israel - Israel News - Israel National News

Tuesday, 11 August 2009

Israel Matzav: BNP Councillor's Nazi license plate

Israel Matzav: BNP Councillor's Nazi license plate

Lieberman Tells Democrats: PA Burying Peace Plan - Politics & Government - Israel News - Israel National News

Lieberman Tells Democrats: PA Burying Peace Plan - Politics & Government - Israel News - Israel National News

Hizbullah Boasts, Dismisses Talk of War - Defense/Middle East - Israel News - Israel National News

Hizbullah Boasts, Dismisses Talk of War - Defense/Middle East - Israel News - Israel National News

HRW: Too Little Too Late

HRW: Too Little Too Late

Israel Matzav: Israelis urged not to travel to Jordan, Egypt, Morocco, Kenya

Israelis urged not to travel to Jordan, Egypt, Morocco, Kenya

With the vacation season in full swing, Israel's National Security Council is urging Israelis not to travel to Jordan, Egypt, Morocco or Kenya.

According to the NSC statement, due to hostility against Israel among Jordanians, people who have the option of postponing a trip are urged to do so, with the exception of tourists having a stopover at Amman airport when flying via the national carrier, Royal Jordanian.

Read All at :

Israel Matzav: Israelis urged not to travel to Jordan, Egypt, Morocco, Kenya

Israel Matzav: Good news: Terrorist mercenaries making their way from Iraq to Gaza

Good news: Terrorist mercenaries making their way from Iraq to Gaza

With the United States winding down its war in Iraq, many of the terrorists who fought with American troops are heading for their next engagement: Gaza.

The flow of foreign terrorists to Gaza will gradually increase, defense officials forecast, as the friction between the extremist Sunni groups and U.S. forces in Iraq diminishes in advance of the expected American withdrawal. Israeli officials are of the opinion that Hamas is not particularly interested in having these foreigners enter the Strip since they do not act under Hamas instructions and are identified with even more extremist and uncompromising ideologies than Hamas itself.

Read All at :

Israel Matzav: Good news: Terrorist mercenaries making their way from Iraq to Gaza

Israel Matzav: Congress reining Obama in on Israel?

Congress reining Obama in on Israel?

Has Congress had enough of President Obama browbeating Israel? Well, maybe. There are two signs that maybe Congress has had enough.

Two weeks ago, I reported that two Senators - Even Bayh (D-Ind) and James Risch (R-Idaho) were circulating a letter among their Senate colleagues that urges President Obama to pressure the Arab countries to make peace overtures to Israel. As of last week, 44 Senators had signed on. Now, The Hill reports that a whopping 71 Senators have signed on to the Bayh-Risch letter.
Read All at :

Israel Matzav: Congress reining Obama in on Israel?

Israel Matzav: Life Magazine photos of Israel 1948-67 Part 2

Life Magazine photos of Israel 1948-67 Part 2

This is the second part of Ben Atlas' spread of Life Magazine photos of Israel from 1948-67. Like the first part, this one is also from the 1948 war.

I'm going to give you one photo with some of the fascinating detail, and then send you off to view the rest of this remarkable collection.

The caption for this one is "Arab soldiers with rifles being transported in military vehicles. March 1948." But there's more to it than that.

The photo of the arab troops packed into requisitioned civilian lorries with extempore wooden safety grills - in that they are not a standard British or US issue (and do not have French Citroen or Renault trademarks either?) - are carying rifles with muzzles projecting well over the forestock furniture. These are probably French Lebels and so a Syrian unit in spite of the British pattern '37 braces they are wearing. From 1940 to '46 French units in Syria and elsewhere would have used replacement clothing from British or US stocks. By 1948 Syria & Lebanon were independent at British (1945?) insistence which was the French gripe that led to French support of Haganah Aliyah Bet and the independence of Israel in 1948.

Secondly the status & responsibility of client state troops is politcally nice. The Arab Legion was British equipped, trained and had a lot of British field officers (majors & colonels) and its commander all, "on contract," or, "secondment." In 1920 - 46 it was the originally gendarmerie desert patrol force of the Emirate of Transjordan which the British had created within the Eastern part of the Palestine Mandate. In English English, "gendarmerie" is a nationally organised, armed but police force at the direction of civil power, local and central (state troopers in US?). Britain audited TJ's books ie approved the budget, and supplied quite a few senior civil officers all supervised by a Resident who reported to the High Commissioner in Jerusalem his immediate local senior, and directly to the Colonial Office, London. So in the 1941 Iraqi campaign and for internal security ie guard duties in Palestine 1945-47 inclusive, the Arab Legion was available (from '46, turning itself into an "army") to the British commander in Palestine or Iraq as another British unit - having formally asked for their service through usual channels from the Transjordanian government which was internally fairly independent - or had to be treated as such to keep up appearances and so political effectiveness. In 1946 the British signed a treaty with Transjordan to become the Kingdom of Jordan and so strictly an ally, rather than a dependent territory - but it depended on a pa sub of £4 ($11) million from London till the 50's when Hussein fired Glubb and the US after '56 gradually substituted for UK as it frequently has across the World since 1945, but in its own variations of retired officers on contract in Kossovo Iraq and other locations.

Read All at :

Israel Matzav: Life Magazine photos of Israel 1948-67 Part 2

Israel Matzav: Lebanon, Hezbullah and Iranian nuclear weapons

Lebanon, Hezbullah and Iranian nuclear weapons

Michael Totten travels to Lebanon again and interviews Salim al-Sayegh, the Kataeb (Phalangist) party Vice President. At one time, the Phalangists were Israel's allies in Lebanon, but today it sounds like they're just trying to survive (Hat Tip: Instapundit). Al-Sayegh makes three points regarding Israel.

First, he claims that if only, Syria would renounce its claims to Sheba Farms (Mount Dov), Israel would hand it over to the United Nations, which would in turn hand it over to Lebanon. Al-Sayegh argues that would undermine the reason for Hezbullah's existence as a 'resistance movement.' Totten tries to nudge al-Sayegh in the direction of admitting that when Israel withdrew from Lebanon to the 'blue line' in 2000, Israel, Lebanon and the United Nations all agreed that Israel had complied with UN Security Council Resolution 425 and that there was nothing more that needed to be done.

MJT: If I remember correctly, when the Israelis left South Lebanon in 2000, Hezbollah agreed that Israel had completely withdrawn to its side of the Blue Line. Only after the United Nations certified the Israeli withdrawal did Hezbollah claim Shebaa Farms was Lebanese territory under Israeli occupation. If this were true, why wouldn't Hezbollah say so in 2000 when they were negotiating with Israel over the troop withdrawal?

Salim al-Sayegh: The Israelis took Shebaa Farms from the Syrians, not from the Lebanese. The Israelis are saying they can give it to Syria. And the Syrians are saying Shebaa Farms is Lebanese. The United Nations says, according to our cards, Shebaa Farms is Syrian, not Lebanese.

Read All at :

Israel Matzav: Lebanon, Hezbullah and Iranian nuclear weapons

Israel Matzav: The issue shifts to 1948

The issue shifts to 1948

In Tuesday's New York Times, Hussein Agha and Robert Malley - former State Department Arabists in the Clinton administration - argue that a 'two-state solution' between Israel and the 'Palestinians' doesn't resolve anything.

Over the past two decades, the origins of the conflict were swept under the carpet, gradually repressed as the struggle assumed the narrower shape of the post-1967 territorial tug-of-war over the West Bank and Gaza. The two protagonists, each for its own reason, along with the international community, implicitly agreed to deal with the battle’s latest, most palpable expression. Palestinians saw an opportunity to finally exercise authority over a part of their patrimony; Israelis wanted to free themselves from the burdens of occupation; and foreign parties found that it was the easier, tidier thing to do. The hope was that, somehow, addressing the status of the West Bank and Gaza would dispense with the need to address the issues that predated the occupation and could outlast it.

Read All at :

Israel Matzav: The issue shifts to 1948

Israel Matzav: Yahrtzeits

Israel Matzav: Yahrtzeits

Israel Matzav: Lawsuit against EU demands more than 'rocketproofing'

Israel Matzav: Lawsuit against EU demands more than 'rocketproofing'

Israel Matzav: Even Israel's Left feels an existential fear

Israel Matzav: Even Israel's Left feels an existential fear

Israel Matzav: Obama will never like Israel, but....

Obama will never like Israel, but....

While I agree with Batya at Shilo Musings that President Obama will never like Israel, I'm afraid that this is a bit over the top.

Most American Jews can't comprehend the ingrained anti-Jewish feeling in the Black community. The phenomena of "projection" protects most from the paranoia which should exist. Yes, there's a rational reason American Jews should fear the Blacks, and that includes U.S. President Barack Hussein Obama and his wife, Michelle.

Read All at :

Israel Matzav: Obama will never like Israel, but....

Israel Matzav: Mary Robinson: Obama's choice

Mary Robinson: Obama's choice

In this post, I discussed whether Medal of Freedom recipient Mary Robinson was not properly vetted by the White House, or whether choosing her was a deliberate act by the Obama administration. Jennifer Rubin supplies a strong argument that President Obama deliberately chose Mary Robinson.

Neither Durban nor Robinson’s UN tenure is incidental to her career. Moreover, her rhetoric and outlook bear an uncanny resemblance to the approach taken by the Obama administration. Obama is full of invective and regret for America’s actions—be they in the war on terror or in our historic record of dealing with Iran and Central America. As for human-rights outrages in Cuba, Iran, North Korea, or China, he has been largely, if not entirely, mute. No wonder Robinson was selected.

Read All at :

Israel Matzav: Mary Robinson: Obama's choice

Israel Matzav: Tweet4Shalit

Israel Matzav: Tweet4Shalit

Israel Matzav: A worthless piece of paper?#

A worthless piece of paper?

Jordanian blogger Black Iris (who may be horrified to see a link from an Israeli blogger) shows a picture of something called the Wadi Araba mural (there's a second picture here).


The picture's description is as follows:
Artists draw a mural that calls on Jordan to cancel a 1994 peace treaty with Israel at the premises of the Islamists-dominated Professional Associations

Under the 1994 treaty with Jordan, Israel resolved its border disputes with the Hashemite Kingdom by giving up land or leasing it on a long-term basis. Israel also agreed to give Jordan millions of cubic meters of water - our most precious commodity - every year.

Read All at :

Israel Matzav: A worthless piece of paper?

Israel Matzav: 'East' Jerusalem is different from the 'West Bank' says... Steny Hoyer

'East' Jerusalem is different from the 'West Bank' says... Steny Hoyer

There may be nothing that would more concern the Obama administration than Democrats taking independent positions on issues that are important to the administration. That especially goes for Democrats in leadership positions. In that light, this story takes on added significance. The dispute between Israel and the 'Palestinians' is to the Obama administration's foreign policy as 'Obamacare' is to its domestic policy.

In an interview with the Jerusalem Post on Monday, House majority leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md) said that 'east' Jerusalem is different than the 'West Bank settlements.'
Read All at :

Israel Matzav: 'East' Jerusalem is different from the 'West Bank' says... Steny Hoyer

Knowing What You're Talking About

Knowing What You're Talking About

Barry Rubin analyzes the results of the Fatah conference by taking a close look at each of the 18 members of the new Central Committee. He's not bowled over with optimism.

I don't know if he's right. On the one hand, he kows a lot more about this than I do. On the other hand, I remember watching Mikhail Gorbachow, back in the old days, doing precisely not what any of the experts said he would do, so I'm wary of experts knowing stuff in advance.

But it is refreshing to see what an expert can do. Have a look at his piece, then tell me when was the last time you saw any analysis of anything about the Palestinians that was remotely as well-informed as this? You know what? Tell me if you know of any Western journalist who even knows all the names of these fellows.
taken from Yaacov Lozowick's Ruminations
Credits: Post based in the article: Fatah Congress Election Results: Quite Different From What You Will be Told - By Barry Rubin (http://rubinreports.blogspot.com)
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...