'Father of disengagement' hopes 'Palestinians' won't give in to 'radicals'

YNet publishes the first part of a two-part op-ed by Scheuftan, in which he seems to be doing some wishful thinking about 'Palestinian' support for terrorism. Survey after survey has shown that most 'Palestinians' support terrorism. Some of them may 'only' support it when the targets are 'settlers' or soldiers (not engaged in battle), but the bottom line is that most of them support it.
Here's Schueftan's wishful thinking:
The essence here is not the violence and demagoguery of the radicals, but rather, the defeatism of the responsible elements. The problem has to do with Palestinian society’s political culture. Had Fayyad and Abbas been able to rely on the support of a responsible public for their constructive policy, they could have isolated the radicals and clung to their path. However, they give in to the radicals, because the public becomes addicted to the false message of those who brought generations of destruction, distress, and impasse upon them.
In other words, Scheuftan is arguing that there's a silent majority that favors an accommodation with Israel. As we say in Hebrew, lo dubim v'lo ya'ar - no bears and no forest. Meaning there's no such thing.
Israel Matzav: 'Father of disengagement' hopes 'Palestinians' won't give in to 'radicals'
No comments:
Post a Comment