Wednesday, 3 March 2010

Israel Matzav: Is it anti-Semitic or 'just' anti-Israel?

Is it anti-Semitic or 'just' anti-Israel?

The disgusting cartoon at the top of this post comes from Cologne, Germany.

A crude anti-Israel exhibit in Cologne’s Cathedral Square in the heart of the bustling pedestrian zone does not meet the criteria of inciting hate, Rainer Wolf, a spokesman for the public prosecutor in Cologne, told The Jerusalem Post on Monday.

Wolf said the public prosecutor plans to dismiss the complaint of Gerd Buurmann, a non-Jewish theater director, who filed a grievance in February, asserting a violation of Germany’s hate-crime law.

Buurmann told the Post that he was “horrified” by the decision and plans to now participate in a civil legal action against Walter Herrmann, the exhibitor of the anti-Israel exhibit.

Herrmann’s long-standing exhibit, “Cologne Wailing Wall,” has been deemed anti-Semitic by critics in the Cologne City Council and a commentator from the large daily Kölner Stadt-Anzeiger.

Buurmann initiated legal action because the exhibit shows a cartoon of a man sporting a Star of David on his bib as he devours a young Palestinian boy with a fork draped in an American flag and a knife with the word “Gaza.” A blood-filled glass next to the plate appears to symbolize the blood of the child.

Wolf, the prosecutor’s spokesman, told the Post that six or seven complaints have since been filed, ranging from private individuals to the Society for Christian-Jewish relations.

Asked whether the cartoon is an expression of modern anti-Semitism, Wolf said, it is “not a tendency of hostility toward Jews, but an actual criticism of the situation in Gaza.”

He added that the exhibitor, Walter Herrmann, seeks to “criticize” and the “cartoon is a sarcastic expression of the Israeli army in Gaza.”

Read the whole thing. Hitler and his friends would have fit right in to Cologne 2010. Hope and change same.

Although in all fairness, I have to say that I have been to Frankfurt a couple of times (once on business and once I got stuck there on my way back to Israel), and it was a lot less creepy than Vienna, for example. Apparently, there are some parts of Germany where there is shame over their role in the Holocaust, while there are other parts where they would like to pick up where Hitler left off.

Israel Matzav: Is it anti-Semitic or 'just' anti-Israel?

Israel Matzav: Some 'blockade,' isn't it?

Some 'blockade,' isn't it?

The next time someone tells you that Israel is running a 'blockade' that's starving poor Gazans, you can throw this at them.

Over the last week, a total of 595 truckloads, consisting of 13, 976 tons of humanitarian aid were transferred into the Gaza Strip from Israel via the various crossings. Likewise, ten truckloads of carnations were exported from Gaza to Europe.

Additionally, 255 medical patients and accompanying individuals from the Gaza Strip crossed into Israel and the Judea and Samaria region for medical treatment. 222 staff members of international organizations crossed into the Gaza Strip.

Essential food and humanitarian aid products, including milk powder, baby food, rice, cooking oil, flour, hygiene products and medicals supplies including a CT scanner were among the goods that crossed into Gaza this past week.

Lastly, 1,216,297 liters of diesel fuel and 992 tons of cooking gas also crossed into Gaza.

I get these statistics from the IDF daily and weekly. There is no 'blockade' except for materials like cement and metals that can be used by Hamas to make rockets (and even those - along with the rockets themselves - are being smuggled in from Egypt). No one in Gaza is starving. There is no 'humanitarian crisis.'

Just keep repeating those things. For they are the truth.

The picture at the top is trucks lined up waiting to enter Gaza. Some 'blockade,' isn't it?

Israel Matzav: Some 'blockade,' isn't it?

Israel Matzav: Generosity, Syrian style

Generosity, Syrian style

Forgetting that his country lost the Golan Heights in two aggressive wars that it started, Syrian Foreign Minister Walid Moallem has adopted 'generosity.' So long as Israel 'recognizes' that Syria is entitled to 'every last inch' of the Golan Heights, the Syrians will consider accepting payment on the installment plan and not insist on receiving the entire Golan upon signing of an agreement. Good luck with that.

"There could be stages of withdrawal, the timing of which could involve a form of normalization," he told the Guardian's Gabrielle Rifkind in December. "Half of the Golan could lead to an end of enmity; three-quarters of the Golan, to a special interest section in the US embassy in Damascus: a full withdrawal would allow a Syrian embassy in Israel."

During the interview, details of which were published on the British newspaper's Web site at the weekend, Moallem said issues such as Syria's support for terror groups would "only be answered after withdrawal."

The Syrian foreign minister stressed that while Damascus was willing to resume negotiations, "Israel needs to be ready to recognize that Syria is entitled to every inch of the Golan."

"For us the land is sacred and a matter of honor," said Moallem.

And we all know about the Arabs and their 'honor,' don't we?

For reasons I discussed on Tuesday, Israel has a far better claim to the Golan than does Syria. Combining that with Syria's intractable hostility (note that he says nothing about an Israeli embassy in Damascus, let alone 'normalization' or recognizing Israel's 'right to exist') and its support for terror groups, I wouldn't bet on an agreement being reached with Syria in your lifetimes or mine.


Israel Matzav: Generosity, Syrian style

Israel Matzav: Nasrallah speaks

Nasrallah speaks

Hezbullah Sheikh Hassan Nasrallah spoke to his supporters on Monday night - from his hiding place via a big screen. After all, the rodent never knows what might happen if he comes out of his hiding place.

Speaking through a large TV screen to mark Mohammad’s birthday as a part of the Week of Islamic Unity in the Sayyed As-Shouhadaa’ complex south of Beirut, Nasrallah claimed that Israel was indifferent to the one billion Muslims in the world, and that as well as wanting Jerusalem within its territory, it was seeking to include the "Islamic holy sites" in the recently announced Israeli national heritage plan.

“All this happens amid an Islamic and Arab silence only violated by minor denouncement statements,” Nasrallah said, adding that nobody was actually defending the Muslims’ holy sites except the Palestinians.

“Israel doesn't expect any response from the Arab street or from Arab governments. It takes into account the minority found in Lebanon and Palestine… this resistant minority has refused to surrender,” Nasrallah said of the Palestinians, adding that they don’t fear death but rather want to live with honor and dignity, according to the Al-Manar report.

Nasrallah continued to ascertain that the entire Arab nation had to thank Syria and Iran for standing by the “resistance.” “It is unacceptable to doubt Iran's intentions that aim at intervening to support the Palestinian cause,” he was quoted as saying.

The Hizbullah leader also addressed President Shimon Peres directly. "You have exited Lebanon once and for all, and I tell you, you will never be able to come back to Lebanon," he said.

“When Israel was confronted with a stern and unyielding rhetoric, it was forced to change its tone and to seek pacification on its northern border,” Nasrallah continued.

“The Israelis know very well that everything we have said can be achieved,” he added. "When we threaten Israel, we mean what we say, and Israel knows quite well that every word said would not have been iterated had there not been absolute conviction in the possibility of implementing and realizing it. What we have said is not everything, as we harbor surprises."

Nasrallah's time is coming soon. Just like his predecessor Abbas al-Moussawi. Someone got Mahmoud al-Mabhouh and someone will get Nasrallah too. Rest assured that he is unlikely to die of natural causes.

Heh.

Israel Matzav: Nasrallah speaks

Elder of Ziyon: Gaza "mud houses" and UNRWA bias

Elder of Ziyon: Gaza "mud houses" and UNRWA bias

Elder of Ziyon: The Judge Ito of Dubai

Elder of Ziyon: The Judge Ito of Dubai

Elder of Ziyon: UK fatwa against terrorism looks pretty good so far

Elder of Ziyon: UK fatwa against terrorism looks pretty good so far

Elder of Ziyon: "Mabhouh celebrated by standing on victim's corpse"

Elder of Ziyon: "Mabhouh celebrated by standing on victim's corpse"

Elder of Ziyon: "Netanyahu ready to go to Damascus"

Elder of Ziyon: "Netanyahu ready to go to Damascus"

Beware Sweet-Talking Biden,' Says Caroline Glick - Politics & Gov't - Israel News - Israel National News

Beware Sweet-Talking Biden,' Says Caroline Glick - Politics & Gov't - Israel News - Israel National News

Responding to Anti-Israel Apartheid Week - Jewish World - Israel News - Israel National News

Responding to Anti-Israel Apartheid Week - Jewish World - Israel News - Israel National News

Netanyahu a Wanted Man for Killing Terrorist, Say Dubai Police - Defense/Middle East - Israel News - Israel National News

Netanyahu a Wanted Man for Killing Terrorist, Say Dubai Police - Defense/Middle East - Israel News - Israel National News

Golan Residents on the Alert - Defense/Middle East - Israel News - Israel National News

Golan Residents on the Alert - Defense/Middle East - Israel News - Israel National News

BBC Promotes Pro-Syrian Image for British Students - Defense/Middle East - Israel News - Israel National News

BBC Promotes Pro-Syrian Image for British Students - Defense/Middle East - Israel News - Israel National News

'Women Power' for the Sake of the Land of Israel - Inside Israel - Israel News - Israel National News

'Women Power' for the Sake of the Land of Israel - Inside Israel - Israel News - Israel National News

Likud Central Committee to Discuss Freeze March 18 - Politics & Gov't - Israel News - Israel National News

Likud Central Committee to Discuss Freeze March 18 - Politics & Gov't - Israel News - Israel National News

DoubleTapper: Muslim Religious Ban On Terrorism

Muslim Religious Ban On Terrorism



The leader of a global Muslim movement has issued a fatwa, or religious edict, that he calls an absolute condemnation of terrorism.

Muhammad Tahir-ul-Qadri, a former Pakistani lawmaker, says the 600-page fatwa bans suicide bombing "without any excuses, any pretexts, or exceptions."

"They can't claim that their suicide bombings are martyrdom operations and that they become the heroes of the Muslim nation," Qadri told a press conference in London. "“No, they become heroes of hellfire, and they are heading towards hellfire.”

Qadri also slammed Osama Bin Laden's al-Qaeda network, referring to it as an "old evil with a new name" and saying it has not be challenged adequately thus far.

"There is no place for any martyrdom and their act is never, ever to be considered jihad," he said.






Tahir-ul-Qadri has issued similar, shorter decrees, but Tuesday's event in London was publicized by the Quilliam Foundation, a government-funded anti-extremism think tank and drew strong media attention.

The religious scholar is the founder of Minhaj-ul-Quran, a worldwide movement that promotes a nonpolitical, tolerant Islam. The group has hundreds of thousands of followers around the world.



DoubleTapper: Muslim Religious Ban On Terrorism

Yaacov Lozowick's Ruminations: We Were All Wrong on This, Too...

Yaacov Lozowick's Ruminations: We Were All Wrong on This, Too...

Yaacov Lozowick's Ruminations: A Tale in Arabic

A Tale in Arabic

If you've not yet read Amos Oz A Tale of Love and Darkness, do so. Stop reading this blog if you don't have time for both. It's the best book published in Israel last decade, period.

If you can't read the Hebrew original, you can now read an Arabic translation, published in Beirut.

The translation, by Israeli Arab Jamal Gnaim, was funded by the Khoury family of East Jerusalem in memory of their son George Khoury. Khoury was a promising Hebrew University law student when he was killed in a 2004 shooting attack while jogging on the university's Mt. Scopus campus.

(His killers thought he was a Jew).

Oz himself, musing on the success of the book, makes a profound point:

"Apparently the more a book is provincial, the more it is universal. When I wrote the book, I thought it would be read only by Jerusalemites from my neighborhood - I was sure that they wouldn't understand it in Tel Aviv," Oz said. "Now they're reading it in Beirut, Albania, Bulgaria and Korea. In China, for example, it was chosen as one of the best books of 2007."

Universal values are all well and fine, but they must start with real people, who live in real places, with real contexts. The power of universally significant stories or ideas is that people worldwide recognize our common humanity in diversity.


Yaacov Lozowick's Ruminations: A Tale in Arabic

Yaacov Lozowick's Ruminations: Israel's Arabs: Time to Fix their Economy

Israel's Arabs: Time to Fix their Economy

The Marker, the financial sister-paper of Haaretz, has been closely following the story of the growing attempts to integrate Israel's Arabs in the upper reaches of the economy rather than the lower ones. Some of the reportage is about interesting efforts being launched by government and establishment agencies; some is carping on how great the need and how little being done. The whole thing is beginning to look like what could be a significant change for the better, which would benefit everyone involved.

(Mostly in Hebrew, of course. Such stories don't often get published in English). Here, and follow the previous links.

Also, relating to my previous post, note that Meretz and our radical Left have very little to do with the whole matter. The correctives are coming from a center-Right government, and free-market financial players. Just like you'd expect if you recognized our far Left for what they are.

Yaacov Lozowick's Ruminations: Israel's Arabs: Time to Fix their Economy

Yaacov Lozowick's Ruminations: Meretz: Wrong for the Wrong Reasons

Meretz: Wrong for the Wrong Reasons

In last year's elections Meretz, Israel's farthest-Left Zionist party, barely squeaked into the Knesset with three MKs. Being a party of upright burghers, they set up a commission of inquiry to honestly look into the causes of their near demise, and to suggest how to avert full demise next time. Unsurprisingly, the commission was headed by a professor: probably part of the problem.

The commission made lots of scatter-shot recommendations, from disbanding into some other party (three were suggested), to figuring out what it stands for, to sending up younger representatives (as if age poses a problem in other parties).

Here's a quick thesis: the problem with Meretz isn't its positions, many of which are applied sooner or later by the parties in government, but it's tone. The folks at Meretz are profoundly convinced they're better than the rest of us, the rest of us are ghastly, and they have very little acquaintance with or empathy for the cognitive, cultural or emotional moorings the rest of us share. This is not a good way to win elections.


Yaacov Lozowick's Ruminations: Meretz: Wrong for the Wrong Reasons

Torat HaRav Aviner: Parashat Ki Tisa: Spiritual Repair

Parashat Ki Tisa: Spiritual Repair


02
מרץ
2010

[Tal Chermon p. 181]

After the sin of the Golden Calf came the spiritual repair. It is true that there are crises in the world. The world is not a plain. There are mountains and valleys. We cannot deny it. We know that there are crises, but there is no need to panic on account of them. We can overcome the crises and spiritually repair ourselves through the Divine treatment found in the world of the Torah given to us by Moshe Rabbenu. The Torah can only be properly fulfilled after first stumbling in it (Gittin 43a), and by overcoming difficulties one attains a great possession. We received a second set of the Ten Commandments and repaired our relationship with Hashem. Out of the crisis of the sin of the Golden Calf, we clarified our proper relationship to Torah and to the Divine Presence which dwells among us.


Torat HaRav Aviner: Parashat Ki Tisa: Spiritual Repair

RonMossad: One (donkey) flew over the cuckoo's nest

One (donkey) flew over the cuckoo's nest

Well Purim's over, I guess that means it's back to reality. Although in the Middle East, it's more like sur-reality...

Shmuel Rosner over at the Jerusalem Post has an interesting take on a recent Gallup survey about Israel:

Support for Israel among Americans is at a 19-year high, a February Gallup survey of American attitudes toward international affairs has found.

That's good...

The percent favoring Israel is the highest since 1991, when 64% said they supported Israel shortly after it was hit by Iraqi Scud missiles during the Gulf War.

Also good...

Well - not all Americans. While the upward trend is likely to encourage Israelis, there are also more worrisome signs in this poll. Republicans become more supportive of Israel, but with Democrats the picture is less rosy.

Uh oh...

the gap between Republican and Democratic support is higher than ever (37%!)

That's not good...

Two years ago, I wrote about another poll in which the difference was "significant": it was a mare 20%.

I wrote about this a few years ago too...when I did an overview of which party is favored by more anti-Israel groups. Guess who "won" that contest? I'll give you a hint, it wasn't the Republicans.

But back to Rosner. He gives us this chart breakdown (compiled by the same Gallup poll) by party of what countries they support:



Ok...so if I'm reading this right, Democrats as a whole support the following countries more than Israel:

France
Egypt
Russia
India
Mexico

Let's say France fine, Mexico, fine...after all who doesn't love croissants and drunken Spring Breaks, right? Ignoring for a minute my criticisms of those two countries...India, Russia and EGYPT are all more favored by Democrats than Israel.

This is the same Egypt, by the way that not even a year ago slaughtered 300,000 pigs in order to combat H1N1 flu, which at the time was still being referred to as "swine" flu. It's the same Egypt that puts its own citizens in jail when the government doesn't like what they say. The same Egypt that regularly jails the opposition every time another rigged, mockery of an election is about to take place. The same site of sectarian violence and discrimination against the native non-Muslim, Coptic Egyptians. And this is without even mentioning their treatment of Jews and Palestinians over the years. Ok, good call Democrats.

Next up, Russia.

You may remember a little issue between Russia and their neighbor Georgia from 2008 that left a few thousand people killed or injured and a hundred thousand or so people displaced in just over a week. Or maybe the First Chechen War that resulted in tens of thousands of dead and hundreds of thousands of displaced civilians. Not enough? How about the Second Chechen War (still unresolved by the way) instead? And I'm sure you already know about President/Prime Minister-for-life Putin's Stalin-emulating purges and ownership of the media, right? By the way, take a look at this before and after picture of Grozny from the FIRST Chechnya war. And by the way, the only country to offer any tangible aid to Georgia in defending itself from Russia was...you guessed it, Israel. Great job Russians. Great job Democrats.

"Oh, but Mr. Mossad," you'll cry out, "it's not the same because none of these countries are SUPPOSED to be liberal democracies like Israel is. It's not their FAULT, they just don't know any better!"

As absurd as that pathetic, apologist line of thinking is, it falls apart completely when you look at India.

Now me personally, I have a lot of respect for India. Located in a part of the world only slightly more stable than the Middle East...India is surrounded by hostile, autocratic neighbors - much in the way Israel is. India also has a very serious Islamic extremism issue, much in the way that Israel does. India has the added problems of a massive population and poverty that most Westerners just cannot even comprehend.

But let's be fair...Indians have killed more Muslims over their own version of the West Bank and Gaza in the 63 years since it became free of British rule than Israel will in 63 THOUSAND years. In fact, an overall estimate of over 500,000 killed and 14 million evicted is attributed to just the two year time-period when Pakistan was carved out of western India.

Still better than Israel, though...right Democrats? It's hardly surprising though since all the politically-correct appeasement talk has been coming out of the Left for years. What SHOULD be surprising (but unfortunately is not) is that this utter hypocrisy isn't recognized by Jews for what it is.

I swear, sometimes I feel like Jack Nicholson in One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest...



...trying to get a bunch of lunatics to agree to watching the World Series on TV.

It can't just be me though, right? There have to be other people who realize how insane this all is. How is it, that not only don't Jews question these disturbing trends - they actually EMBRACE them and try to act as if it's all part of being pro-Israel in some very cleverly intellectual way that us knuckle-dragging "neo-cons" just would never understand.

And then just to add insult to insanity we end off with this:

Americans are no more optimistic today than they were last year that peace can be reached between Israel and the Palestinians -- and they are, in fact, less optimistic than they were toward the end of the Bush administration.

There's your hope and change nonsense. Is it time to start admitting that maybe just voting the party line in the last election wasn't the best thing for Israel and Jews? Or are we, as Jews, finally ready to admit that we have a highly disturbing 2,000 year old tendency to act against our interests? It's one or the other. It can't be both, it can't be neither.

You'd have to be CRAZY to think otherwise. Right?


RonMossad: One (donkey) flew over the cuckoo's nest

Israel Matzav: 'Israel has faults, but apartheid isn't one of them' says...

'Israel has faults, but apartheid isn't one of them' says...

'Israel has its faults, but apartheid isn't one of them' says.... the Washington Post's Richard Cohen? The same guy who once called Israel a 'mistake?' Awesome.... Well, not quite (Hat Tip: Shmuel Rosner):

What can be said about others who apply the term to Israel in general? No apology has come from them -- and the way things are going, none will be forthcoming. The use of the word has become commonplace -- Google "Israel and apartheid" and you will see that the two are linked in cyberspace, as love and marriage are in at least one song. The meaning is clear: Israel is a state where political and civil rights are withheld on the basis of race and race alone. This is not the case.

The Israel of today and the South Africa of yesterday have almost nothing in common. In South Africa, the minority white population harshly ruled the majority black population. Nonwhites were denied civil rights, and in 1958, they were even deprived of citizenship. In contrast, Israeli Arabs, about one-fifth of the country, have the same civil and political rights as do Israeli Jews. Arabs sit in the Knesset and serve in the military, although most are exempt from the draft. Whatever this is -- and it looks suspiciously like a liberal democracy -- it cannot be apartheid.

The West Bank, more or less under Israeli military rule, is a different matter. But it is not part of Israel proper, and under every conceivable peace plan -- including those proposed by Israeli governments -- almost all of it will revert to the Palestinian Authority and become the heartland of a Palestinian state.

Read the whole thing. Richard still has a way to go.

Israel Matzav: 'Israel has faults, but apartheid isn't one of them' says...

Israel Matzav: Biden to meet with Jewish leaders

Biden to meet with Jewish leaders

Laura Rozen reports that Jumpin' Joe Biden and senior NSC staffers were to meet on Tuesday with 'Jewish leaders' in preparation for Biden's trip to Israel next week.

No word on who these 'Jewish leaders' might be. Did they invite J Street but exclude the National Council of Young Israel and the Zionist Organization of America again?

What could go wrong?

Israel Matzav: Biden to meet with Jewish leaders

Love of the Land: Welcome to "Just-the-Opposite Facts" Theater, Temple Mount Chapter

Welcome to "Just-the-Opposite Facts" Theater, Temple Mount Chapter


Yisrael Medad
My Right Word
01 March '10

IMRA's Aaron Lerner pointed me to this news item which informs us that Jordan has condemned what they call a "raid on holy Jerusalem site" and they further term it, but of course, a "provocation".

According the the official press agency version "Israeli forces...stormed Al Aqsa Mosque" [stormtroopers, got that?]. And what 'started' it all? Well, "Israeli police opened the Bab Al Maghareba Gate early today for the entry of zionist extremists" [but they do that every day, to everyone. it's called freedom of access and it is a fundamental legal tenet].

Don't these Arabs understand pluralistic democratic society existence?

Further, we learn that

"Jordan rejects any attempt by Israeli occupation forces to harm holy sites in the Palestinian territories," State Minister for Media Affairs and Communication Nabil Sharif told Petra. "Storming Al Aqsa is an affront to the will of the international community and such action will impede efforts to kickstart the peace process to achieve stability in the region and set up an independent, sovereign and viable Palestinian state," Sharif added.


(Read full post)


Love of the Land: Welcome to "Just-the-Opposite Facts" Theater, Temple Mount Chapter

Israel Matzav: How social networking led to the capture of Saddam Hussein

How social networking led to the capture of Saddam Hussein

Saddam Hussein was found through a precursor of social networking (Facebook was started three months after Saddam's death). Slate is doing a five-part report on how Saddam was captured. It wasn't the way most people thought it was going to be.

Let's go to the videotape.



The first installment of the article is here.

Israel Matzav: How social networking led to the capture of Saddam Hussein

Israel Matzav: Overnight music video

Overnight music video

This song, which was very popular at youth group kumsitz'es (basically like sitting around a campfire singing and telling stories but often without the campfire), brings back many fond memories. Is it really nearly 36 years since high school graduation and 31 since my last Shabbaton?

Let's go to the videotape.


Israel Matzav: Overnight music video

Love of the Land: An Intelligence Agency Misused Passports: OMG!

An Intelligence Agency Misused Passports: OMG!




Alan M. Dershowitz
Hudson New York
02 March '10

The complaints leveled against Israel by European countries and Australia, regarding the alleged misuse of passports by the Mossad in the assassination of Mahmoud al-Mabhouh, ring hollow and smack of blatant hypocrisy. Whoever did kill Mahmoud al-Mabhouh—whether it was the Israeli Mossad or someone else—clearly did have their agents use stolen or forged passports. Big deal.

Every good intelligence agency uses stolen and forged passports. The British have been especially adept at this means of spycraft. No country that uses fake passports in their intelligence operations has the moral authority to complain about the alleged misuse of passports in this case. The only ones that have a legitimate grievance are those individuals whose passports may have been misused without their knowledge.

I guess it’s the job of foreign ministries to complain publicly when other nations do what they themselves do secretly. Hypocrisy is, after all, the homage that vice pays to virtue. I’m reminded of the famous scene in Casablanca, when officer Renault declares, “I’m shocked, shocked to find that gambling is going on in here!” A croupier then approaches Renault, and hands him a roll of currency: “Your winnings, sir.”

The hypocrisy in this case seems even more blatant than usual. Is it because Israel is the alleged offender, and the world has gotten accustomed to singling out Israel for double standard condemnation?

(Read full article)



Love of the Land: An Intelligence Agency Misused Passports: OMG!

Love of the Land: Palestine: the Real Apartheid State In the Making

Palestine: the Real Apartheid State In the Making


David Bedein
Israel Behind the News
02 March '10

"Palestine" is an apartheid state in the making.

"Israel Apartheid" Week is the time to publicize that fact.

During Israel Apartheid Week, orchestrated on campuses around the globe, the time has come to put the shoe on the other foot.


In 1948, Apartheid laws institutionalized racial discrimination in South Africa & denied human rights to 25 million Black citizens of South Africa.

In 1948, the Arab League of Nations applied the Apartheid model to Palestine, and declared that Jews must be denied rights as citizens of Israel, while declaring a total state of war to eradicate the new Jewish entity, a war that continues today.

In 1948, at the directive of the Arab League of Nations, Jordan devastated the vestiges of Jewish life from Judea and Samaria, and burned all synagogues in the Jewish Quarter of Jerusalem.

In 1948, member states of the Arab League of Nations began to strip the human rights of Jews and to expel entire Jewish communities who had resided in their midst for centuries

In the mid 1960's, The Arab League of Nations spawned the PLO to organize local residents to continue the war to deny Jewish rights the right to live as free citizens in the land of Israel - well before Israel took over Judea, Samaria, and the Old City of Jerusalem in the defensive war waged by Israel in 1967.

And since its inception in 1994, the newly constituted Palestinian Authority, created by the PLO, has prepared the rudiments of a Palestinian State, modeled on the rules of Apartheid and institutionalized discrimination:

1. The right of Palestinian Arab refugees and their descendents to return to Arab villages lost in 1948 will be protected by the new Palestinian state.

2. While 20% of Israel’s citizens are Arabs, not one Jew will be allowed to live in a Palestinian State

3. Anyone who sells land to a Jew will be liable to the death penalty in the Palestinian State

(Read full article)


Love of the Land: Palestine: the Real Apartheid State In the Making

Israel Matzav: CJP of Greater Boston taking 'Judaism is Liberalism' to new extremes, donating money to Soros groups

CJP of Greater Boston taking 'Judaism is Liberalism' to new extremes, donating money to Soros groups

Growing up in Boston, CJP was THE Jewish Federation. In recent years, until 2008, the economy was good to the Boston area, and CJP apparently built up quite a sum of cash. In fact, CJP built up so much cash that it has taken the Judaism is Liberalism equation to a new extreme: CJP has been donating Jewish federation money to liberal organizations that - in many cases - have no connection to Judaism and do not support Israel. Or worse. Hillel Stavis explains.

We thought you might be interested to see just who receives the CJP's largess, ostensibly in keeping with that organization's strong support for Israel. For the latest reporting period, here are some of those recipients:

  • The American Friends Service Committee
  • Democracy Now!
  • The Unitarian Universalist Service Committee
  • The Tides Foundation
  • Media Matters
  • The New Israel Fund
  • Brit Tzedek v'Shalom
  • Physicians for Social Responsibility
  • The Workmen's Circle
  • Amnesty International

Many of these organizations have been highly critical of Israel - to say the least - some even have questioned Israel's right to exist as a Jewish State. To be fair, the CJP has also awarded grants to groups like Steven Emerson's The Investigative Project and even the David Horowitz Freedom Center. And yet, contributions to organizations like Media Matters and The Tides Foundation, whose financial clout and animus towards Israel are well known, should raise some significant eyebrows for an organization that is so self-avowedly "Pro Israel". Through George Soros' affiliated non-profits like MoveOn.org, The Open Society Institute, The Center for American Progress and through his associate, Peter Lewis, Media Matters has plenty of money to spend bashing Israel.



Israel Matzav: CJP of Greater Boston taking 'Judaism is Liberalism' to new extremes, donating money to Soros groups

Israel Matzav: English language media ignores Dubai police chief's racism

English language media ignores Dubai police chief's racism

Earlier, I reported that 'Israelis,' including dual nationals holding passports of other countries, have been banned from Dubai. In that post, I alluded to the fact that Inspector Tamim's references to 'physical features' had to relate to Jews and not just to Israelis.

Elder of Ziyon reports that Tamim's comments in the Arabic original are actually much more explicitly anti-Semitic, and that - surprise - the English language media is ignoring them.

Earlier today I reported that the Arabic-language Al Khaleej (The Gulf) newspaper quoted the head of the Dubai police as ranting about how "Israelis" have been hated since the time of Pharaoh, how "Israelis" have had mental problems for thousands of years and how UAE authorities will now start looking for Jewish facial features and names to stop them from entering the UAE.

Every single English-language news outlet has been reporting his comments as saying that he was slamming "Israelis," not Jews, and some saying that he would be looking for "Israeli" facial features, not Jewish ones.

Elder believes that the media cannot believe that anti-Semitism is a regular feature of the Arab world. I disagree. The media knows darned well that anti-Semitism is rampant, prevalent and acceptable in the Arab world. They just don't want the public to know it.


Israel Matzav: English language media ignores Dubai police chief's racism

Israel Matzav: Goldstone's last gasp?

Goldstone's last gasp?

Was Friday's UN General Assembly resolution granting five more months for Israel and the 'Palestinians' to conduct 'independent' probes of their actions in Operation Cast Lead, the last gasp of the Goldstone Report? Well, maybe (Hat Tip: Soccer Dad).

Legal attorney Nick Kaufman, who had served as a senior prosecutor at the ICC and a senior district attorney for the Jerusalem prosecution, said Israeli officials were likely safe from war crimes suits as the U.S. would probably veto such a move.

Until a month ago Kaufman, an expert on international law and rules of warfare, served as a senior lawyer in the Jerusalem prosecutor's office.

- Nick Kaufman, do you think you will represent an Israeli official, who has been charged with committing war crimes following the Goldstone report, at the international court?

Kaufman: "I don't believe so. I think the Goldstone report will receive a poor man's burial."

- You sound decisive.

" I don't understand how the United Nations Security Council has made a decision to transfer the case to the international criminal court at The Hague, because I think in any event, the United States will veto the decision."

"The UN Secretary General Ban Ki Moon said he was satisfied with the investigation Israel has conducted, but the Arab League and other unidentified countries have insisted that a new investigation be conducted in the next 5 months. I don't see it going beyond this."

"On the other hand, I don't believe the senior prosecutor, Luis Moreno-Ocampo, will yield to the Palestinians request and order an investigation against Israel: For him to accept the Palestinian request to recognize their court authority to try and judge the violations committed on their land, he would first have to recognize the Palestinian Authority as an independent country, and I cant see him making such an extreme decision. I just don't see it happening."

Kaufman goes on to say that since the Report will likely be killed anyway, there is no reason for Israel to establish an independent non-IDF inquiry. Read the whole thing.

I wonder if Richard Richard will still get to be Secretary General. Heh.

Israel Matzav: Goldstone's last gasp?

Israel Matzav: Surprise: The Left hates India for the same reason it hates Israel

Surprise: The Left hates India for the same reason it hates Israel

This analysis about the American Left's disenchantment with India rings true (Hat Tip: Instapundit).

The left is wary of India for the same reasons it remains wary of Israel: both democracies are fiercely nationalistic and unapologetically defend themselves against the “downtrodden” “other,” i.e., Islamic lunatics.

The American left simply prefers to play hardball with allies than with adversaries. Recall President Carter’s handling of Iran: the allied shah was condemned as an autocrat; the enemy Khomeini, a “holy man.” For Carter, our anticommunist allies were violators of human rights first, second, and third; the Soviets, murderers of tens of millions, were benign enough for Carter to proclaim Americans had an “inordinate fear of communism.”

Contemporaneously, the left’s is a world where dictatorial Venezuela is to be apologized for, democratic Colombia economically punished; where the fascists and racists and bus-bombers in Palestine are “misunderstood” and the democrats in Israel are Nazi brownshirts incarnate. Anti-American terrorists in Iraq, Afghanistan, Somalia, and Lebanon are euphemized as “guerrillas,” whereas pro-American militiamen are castigated as “warlords” — and on and on it goes.

Embroiling the Indians in such amoral nonsense would threaten not only our present rapport with India, but also what could potentially become the most significant American alliance with another country this century — an alliance rooted in a commonality of values, genuine companionship and affection for one another, and solidarity against the totalitarian evils of the world. The United States should welcome India’s rise. We’re largely the reason it’s occurring.

Sounds right, doesn't it?

Israel Matzav: Surprise: The Left hates India for the same reason it hates Israel

Israel Matzav: Obama's negative ratings in all States he flipped from Bush

Obama's negative ratings in all States he flipped from Bush

Heh (Hat Tip: Ace).

Barack Obama now has a negative approval rating in every state he flipped from the Bush column to his in 2008. In each of those places his level of support is now in the 44-46% range. It’s probably a good thing he doesn’t have to run for reelection this year. He can only hope things start turning around for him once the midterms are in the rear view mirror, much as they did for Bill Clinton.

I don't see it turning around. Clinton was much more of a pragmatist; Obama is more dogmatic.


Israel Matzav: Obama's negative ratings in all States he flipped from Bush

Israel Matzav: Mahmoud al-Mabhouh: The thick plottens

Mahmoud al-Mabhouh: The thick plottens

There have been more developments in the investigation into the liquidation of Hamas terrorist and arms dealer Mahmoud al-Mabhouh. Of course, none of them actually puts us any closer to solving the mystery of who was behind the liquidation, but you didn't really want to know that, did you?

The New York Times reports that two of the alleged liquidators flew to the United States after the deed was done.

That disclosure broadened the scope of an international investigation that has fostered diplomatic tensions and cast a harsh light on the methods of Israel’s intelligence service, the Mossad, which police officials here accuse of ordering the killing.

One suspect traveling on a British passport arrived in the United States on Feb. 14; the other used an Irish passport and arrived on Jan. 21, said the person, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to discuss the case. He did not say where the men entered the country, and added that there was no known record of their leaving.

Many of the 26 suspects identified in the case used stolen identities — most of them taken from people with dual citizenship living in Israel — and that appeared to be true of the two men who traveled to the United States, who used the names Roy Allan Cannon and Evan Dennings. On Friday, the Israeli newspaper Haaretz identified the real Mr. Cannon as “a 62-year-old, ultra-Orthodox father of six” who moved to Israel in 1983. Irish officials said last week that they believed that Mr. Dennings was also a victim of identity theft.

As foreign citizens, the two suspects would have been photographed and fingerprinted on arrival in the United States, and could therefore presumably be tracked. But in light of the identity theft practiced in the case, it seems possible that the men could have left the United States under false travel documents.

This report raises more questions than it answers. First, do you mean to tell me that one of the suspects who supposedly left Dubai within a day actually remained there until February 14 and Inspector Tamim missed him? Pretty shoddy police work in my book.

Second, if the US fingerprints anyone who enters and leaves the country on a foreign passport, couldn't someone also have taken the passports and duplicated them when this person was on a trip to the US, just as the Israelis have been accused of doing?

Third, is there no way to leave the US these days without being tracked? Canada? The Caribbean Islands? Mexico?

Fourth, the US is a big country - someone can find an awful lot of places to hide there.

Fifth, who is Payoneer and how are they connected to this? Someone issues American credit cards in Israel? Bring it on....

Elder of Ziyon carries a report from the Arabic press that claims that the liquidators jammed the surveillance cameras in the hotel for 19 crucial minutes between 8:24 and 8:43 pm on the night of the murder. Holy Rosemary Woods, Batman! Not only does that mean that crucial footage from the exact time of the murder liquidation is missing, but it also shows that the operatives knew they were being videotaped and didn't care about it except for certain crucial moments. Hmmm.

But perhaps the most intriguing report of all today comes from Hamas itself via Reuters. Hamas says that it believes that Egypt or Jordan caused Mr. al-Mabhouh's death.

Mahmoud Nasser, a member of Hamas' political bureau, told [al Quds al Araby] that slain commander Mahmoud al-Mabhouh was likely being tracked by agents from Jordan and Egypt prior to the January 19 killing.

Nasser said he had been given information regarding such efforts to kill Mabhouh, adding that the evidence indicated that the assassination was carried out earlier than the alleged agents had planned.

According to Nasser, Mabhouh was in possession of "dangerous" information seen as dangerous to particular Arab elements seeking to topple Islamist resistance.

Nasser oversees Hamas' ties with Iran and worked closely with Mabhouh, sometimes referred to as his deputy. Hamas raised these accusations after a prelimary investigation immediately following the murder, and match early suspicions raised by Dubai as well.

JPost adds:

Additionally, in an interview with Hamas's Al Aksa radio station from Damascus, Nasser confirmed Israeli claims that his boss had supplied weapons to Palestinian terrorists.

Nassar said Mabhouh "never stopped thinking about how to fight the [Israeli] occupation by supplying quality weapons to the Palestinian fighters. "

The aide also described how al-Mabhouh celebrated killing two Israeli soldiers in the mid-1980s by standing on one of the corpses.

Oh, and there's this:

The National [an Emirati newspaper. CiJ] also noted a business link between Payoneer, the Paypal-esque company which had issued the credit cards, and Greylock Partners, a venture capital firm. Moshe Mor, one of Greylock's founders, was reportedly an officer in the IDF's military intelligence branch.

And I did business with Moshe Mor in the early 90's. Does that make me a suspect too? What about the dozens of Israelis with whom I have worked who were officers in the IDF's military intelligence branch (probably a sizable percentage of the lawyers in Tel Aviv)?

By the way, the Associated Press reports that with all the belly-aching they have done over the use of their passports, the European countries to which the liquidators allegedly fled aren't doing a whole lot about finding the liquidators (Hat Tip: Power Line).

Maybe Inspector Tamim (which, by the way, means naive in Hebrew) should get OJ Simpson involved. I hear he's an expert at finding the real killers. Heh.


Israel Matzav: Mahmoud al-Mabhouh: The thick plottens

Israel Matzav: State Department slams Israel for housing starts in Pisgat Zev

State Department slams Israel for housing starts in Pisgat Zev

The State Department slammed Israel on Monday for approving 600 new housing starts in the Jerusalem neighborhood of Pisgat Zev.

The United States criticized Israel on Monday for authorizing 600 more housing units in the east Jerusalem neighborhood of Pisgat Ze'ev, describing the move as "counter-productive."

"We've relayed our strong concerns to the government of Israel, that this kind of activity, particularly as we try to relaunch meaningful negotiations is counter-productive and undermines trust between the parties," said State Department spokesman Philip Crowley.

Yadda, yadda, yadda. Given the number of those apartments that could eventually wind up in Arab hands, you have to wonder why the State Department bothers to object.

Israel Matzav: State Department slams Israel for housing starts in Pisgat Zev

Israel Matzav: Bari Atwan: The Thursday night war council in Damascus

Bari Atwan: The Thursday night war council in Damascus

Bari Atwan, the editor of the London-based Al-Quds Al-Arabi, writes that Thursday night's meeting in Damascus among Iranian President Mahmouhttp://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=20498788d Ahmadinejad, Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and Hezbullah chieftain Hassan Nasrallah, was a 'war council' designed to formulate plans and distribute tasks for a possible Israeli attack on any or all three of Iran, Syria and Hezbullah.

I would say it was more likely a war council designed to formulate plans and distribute tasks for a coordinated attack by all three of them on Israel.

What could go wrong?


Israel Matzav: Bari Atwan: The Thursday night war council in Damascus

Israel Matzav: The real apartheid state

The real apartheid state

David Bedein talks about apartheid and concludes that the only real apartheid state (in potential) right now is 'Palestine' (Hat Tip: Pamela Geller).

In the mid 1960's, The Arab League of Nations spawned the PLO to organize local residents to continue the war to deny Jewish rights the right to live as free citizens in the land of Israel - well before Israel took over Judea, Samaria, and the Old City of Jerusalem in the defensive war waged by Israel in 1967.

And since its inception in 1994, the newly constituted Palestinian Authority, created by the PLO, has prepared the rudiments of a Palestinian State, modeled on the rules of Apartheid and institutionalized discrimination:

1. The right of Palestinian Arab refugees and their descendents to return to Arab villages lost in 1948 will be protected by the new Palestinian state.

2. While 20% of Israel’s citizens are Arabs, not one Jew will be allowed to live in a Palestinian State

3. Anyone who sells land to a Jew will be liable to the death penalty in the Palestinian State

4. Those who murder Jews are honored on all official Palestinian media outlets.

5. Palestinian Authority maps prepared for the Palestinian State depict all of Palestine under Palestinian rule.

...

8. The right of Jewish access to Jewish holy places is to be denied in the new Palestinian State.

9. The Draft Palestinian State Constitution denies juridical status to any religion except for Islam.

10. No system which protects human rights or civil liberties will exist in a Palestinian State.

So, who is the real apartheid state? Read the whole thing.


Israel Matzav: The real apartheid state

Israel Matzav: Update: Whether to give Israelis abroad the right to vote

Update: Whether to give Israelis abroad the right to vote

You will recall that there was recently a proposal to allow Israelis who live abroad to vote. I discussed it here and here. Allison Kaplan Sommer has an update.

The proposal has not been completely without defenders. Some contend that a small and vulnerable country such as Israel can only benefit from having supportive citizens living around the world. Preserving the sense of belonging among those who live abroad, many of whom served in the army in their youth, can only be to Israel’s advantage and increase the chances that they — or their children — might someday choose to return to live in Israel.

But the pitfalls are substantial. With Israel’s fast path to citizenship owing to the Law of Return, theoretically large numbers of Jews living abroad could strategically move to Israel short-term, take up their voting rights, and return to their homes overseas with a license to vote en masse.

The irony in the situation is that from an idealogical standpoint, the natural position for the nationalist and patriotic right — the Lieberman-Netanyahu camp — would be to oppose those living overseas voting, not to propose it. One doesn’t have to be too cynical to understand that self-interest plays a role in the right’s advocacy of overseas voting. The end result of overseas voting would be increased support for the further right and more religious parties. Even if the vast majority of Israeli citizens living abroad don’t necessarily hold right-wing views, those who would be motivated to take the time and trouble to make it to the polls would be the populations of Orthodox Jews living in large cities.

For the same reason, the more international and global centrist and left-wing parties, who enjoy their prolonged stays in Paris, Cambridge, and Silicon Valley and should more naturally be cheerleading the idea of voting from abroad, are opposing it.

As you may recall, I oppose the idea of allowing absentee ballots in Israeli elections. I have a few more comments.

First, the devious notion of Orthodox Jews from abroad registering briefly for citizenship here so that they could gain the right to vote never occurred to me. It could be checked - in part anyway - by making registration to vote a trigger for starting oleh (immigrant) rights ticking and abolishing the notion that they are suspended during any extended period of time you spend abroad. But in any event, I don't see so many Orthodox Jews signing up.

What I do see is Leftist former Israelis living and working abroad feeling 'shame' over Israel's actions and voting out Right wing governments that are aggressive in the country's defense. Think Noam Chomsky, Avraham Burg and others now residing abroad who hate what this country stands for with a passion.

Besides, ideologically I cannot square the notion of a right to vote without the obligation to (at least) pay taxes. Like Allison I still vote in the US, and I also file a US tax return every year. If one day I actually earn some money, I might actually be liable for US taxes. Unlike Israelis living abroad who don't pay taxes here.

Read the whole thing.


Israel Matzav: Update: Whether to give Israelis abroad the right to vote

Israel Matzav: A ray of hope for Israel's relations with Europe

A ray of hope for Israel's relations with Europe

Dr. Zion Evrony, Israel's ambassador to Ireland, visited the town of Carrickmacross and signed the town's distinguished guest book. The town's councilors voted to remove the page in which Dr. Evrony's signature appeared. Now, Irish Foreign Minister Micheal Martin has taken the town council to task for its actions.

Irish minister Micheal Martin said the council was guilty of "disrespect".

The minister, who has just returned from a trip to Gaza, said he shared concerns about parts of Israel's track record but that he disagreed with the decision to remove Dr Zion Evrony's name from the book.

He added: "It is a basic principle of relations between states that we treat each other's diplomatic representatives with civility and respect, regardless of any policy differences."

Al-Beeb strongly implies that the reason for the town council's action was the use of Irish passports in the liquidation of Hamas murderer and arms dealer Mahmoud al-Mabhouh. But that seems doubtful in light of this.

Nevertheless, local Sinn Fein councillor Matt Carthy, who tabled the motion, said he hoped the removal of the page would send a serious message to the Israeli government.

He added: "I think if a government is responsible for a wholesale disregard for international law, then local authorities as well as our own government have a responsibility to tell them we expect a higher standard.

"Carrickmacross is a very welcoming town but it was important that we took a stand."

Mr Carthy, who took part in a protest during Ambassador Evrony's visit to the market town in January, said the decision was not a snub to all Israelis.

"Certainly any Israeli individual who wanted to visit Carrickmacross is very welcome to visit, but this was an official visit which meant our council was associated with it," he said.

And some of my best friends are Jewish.

In any event, Martin's actions give some hope for Israel's relations with Ireland. Hopefully there are other cooler heads around in Europe.

Israel Matzav: A ray of hope for Israel's relations with Europe

Israel Matzav: I get taken to task

I get taken to task

I got an email from Michael Fenenbock (which I have permission to share with you) in which he took me to task for drawing substantive conclusions about American support for Israel, particularly by Evangelical Christian, from poll numbers.

Carl,

You’re reading this as “support for Israel” and that’s backwards. You’re interpreting impersonal poll numbers through your personal prism. My friend Carl’s viewpoint is naturally Jewish centered. An Israeli centric point of view.

Drawing substantive conclusions from poll numbers can be inadvertently deceptive.

Based on a misreading of poll numbers, a Boston Globe columnist recently wrote ecstatically “Americans love Jews.” Silliness.

A Jewish academic with a commentator’s megaphone joined the chorus and trumpeted the same theme, “Americans love Jews.” Absurd.

“We love the Jews” is not what the poll respondent is saying. The poll numbers don’t reflect some heart warming fuzzy feeling for Jews. On this topic polls in America reflect the other side of the equation.

Americans dislike what they see and hear from the Muslim world and this barrage of negative images of Islam reflects in polls. An honor killing here, a plot to blow up subways there, Afghanistan, Ft. Hood, the Christmas Day bomber, a noisy and possibly nuclear Iran . . . America is assaulted hourly by charged images from the Arab and Islamic world.

The pollster forces a “this side or that side” choice. Jews or Arabs. When they choose Jews they’re saying no to the bad guys. To conclude from a “no to the bad guys” response that Americans love Jews is way off base. And, I argue, illusory and dangerous.

For Jews it’s always dangerous when we think we are not on our own. We are on our own. Our fate is in our hands. That proposition hasn’t changed in thousands of years.

We can depend only on ourselves. That is our burden and our responsibility.

Wanna take a guess at how Americans respond to more pointed questions. Strong support for a two-state solution? Jerusalem has equal significance for Jews and Islam? The State of Israel was created to deal with Jewish question after World War II? Should America be even handed? Is Iran an Arab country?

From the current political perspective, support for Israel from Christians is welcome but it’s ephemeral. I know the history of my people. I know in the end we can rely only on ourselves.

At the moment the American political divide has Republicans and conservatives supporting Israel. Not out of love for Jews, but because they view terrorism and the threat of radical Islam as a political priority. Democrats and lefties are vulnerable to charges of soft on terror and apologetic to Islam.

For the “right” in America, it’s a political position. It’s not love.

There is a story about the guy planning his escape from the Warsaw ghetto. Ghetto leaders and friends gathered as he prepared to go over the wall. “Tell the Americans,” they instructed. “Tell the Americans what’s happening here.” How’d that work out?

We can depend only on ourselves.

MF

PS - Lastly, I wonder. . . did the pollster talk to Presbyterians?

FYI. The columnist is Jacoby. A good guy but mistaken on this. The academic is Barry Rubin. Please save me from academics who think they know something about politics. The “pointy headed professor” was invented for these guys.

Do we now refer to you as “Mr. Radio Personality?”

Call me whatever you want. But I probably should get a little more experience at it first. No one has compared me to Rush Limbaugh or Howie Carr yet.

Hmmm.

I still think it ironic that God (who controls the world - think about the Purim story) is using the Evangelical Christians to press for American support for Israel at this time.


Israel Matzav: I get taken to task

Israel Matzav: 'Don't even think of bombing Iran'?

'Don't even think of bombing Iran'?

Writing in the Financial Times of London (link available only with paid subscription), former NSC and CIA official Bruce Riedel and colleague Michael O'Hanlon, both of the Brookings Institution, argue against military strikes on Iran (I do not have a paid subscription, and therefore I am only citing and commenting on the portions quoted by Laura Rozen at Politico, which I will get to in a minute).

... The strike option, however, lacks credibility. America is engaged in two massive and unpopular military campaigns in the region. Given Iran’s ability to retaliate against the US in Iraq and Afghanistan, it is simply not credible that we would use force in the foreseeable future. Tehran, Moscow and Beijing know this.

The strike option is as credible as the United States chooses to make it. Polls indicate far more support in the US for a strike against Iran than there is for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. And an American declaration that it will not strike Iran, which is essentially what Riedel and O'Hanlon are advocating, would make an Israeli strike more likely. Make no mistake about it: If Israel strikes Iran, Iran will retaliate against US forces in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Laura Rozen's comments on a potential Israeli strike against Iran are worth reading in full. But this comment was especially intriguing:

"Israel has been interested for some time in items that could hit varied targets," the Washington Institute's Patrick Clawson told POLITICO. "Hezbollah is burying a lot of stocks, and digging more tunnels. Israel needs things that will hit varied targets that are [also] useful for Iran. Israel is also interested in [items that enable] long-distance strikes" such as those Israel reportedly used to strike Hamas weapons convoys in Sudan last year. "They can quite credibly say the last time we used this was not against Iran" but for other operations, Clawson said. "It's not very surprising they would be continuing to press" for such items. Nor that the Pentagon might turn them down.

Back to Reidel and O'Hanlon:

There is also a technical reality: even a massive strike would not slow Iran’s progress towards a bomb for long. We cannot be sure we know where all existing Iranian facilities to enrich uranium are located – as the revelation of yet another previously unknown site near Qom last year reminded us. Even if we did strike most or all existing facilities, Iran can rebuild fairly fast and would surely expel inspectors and burrow further underground when building its next facilities. It would be even harder to find, and strike, those assets. ...

Maybe. Or maybe they'd be delayed two years during which Ahmadinejad and Khameni would fall and a democratic regime would accede to power that would not be interested in nuclear weapons and would not prosecute a religious war against Israel. Those who argued against striking Saddam Hussein's Osirak reactor in 1981 also claimed that he would rebuild anyway. They were wrong.

Generally, those who argue against a military strike stop 10 yards short of the finish line. After concluding that a strike would not make sense, they still tend to tolerate leaving it as a last resort. There are dangers to such an approach. Mr Obama may some day come under pressure to employ it when all else has failed – and we think this would be a mistake ...

If all else has failed, you can bet that the Israelis will strike Iran regardless of what Obama does. If anything, not leaving the military option out there will make an Israeli strike more likely and will make it much less likely that any sanctions regime (do they oppose that too?) will be effective.


Israel Matzav: 'Don't even think of bombing Iran'?
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...