Tuesday, 21 July 2009

Israel Matzav: Facing veto threat, Senate removes F-22 funding

Facing veto threat, Senate removes F-22 funding

Facing a veto threat from 'America's popular President,' the US Senate has voted 58-40 to remove funding for the F-22 Raptor from the armed services appropriation bill.

The F-22, the world’s most advanced fighter, had become a flashpoint in a larger battle over the administration’s push to shift more of the Pentagon’s resources from conventional warfare to fighting insurgencies.

The plane’s supporters, who ranged from hawkish Republicans to Democrats close to organized labor, also voiced concern over the possible loss of high-paying manufacturing jobs at a time when the economy is in turmoil.

Read All at :

Israel Matzav: Facing veto threat, Senate removes F-22 funding

Israel Matzav: Why Britain hates Israel

Why Britain hates Israel

In the JPost, Robin Shepherd recounts the crescendo of anti-Israel sentiment that has been rising in Britain in the past few weeks. She asks, "why now?" and comes up with five possible answers. These include the Obumbler's election, Netanyahu's election and his appointment of Avigdor Lieberman as Foreign Minister, Foreign Secretary David Miliband's apparently preparing the ground for Britain to recognize Hamas, Israel's 'hard line' stance on Iran and Netanyahu's insistence that the 'Palestinians' recognize Israel as a Jewish state.
Read All at :
Israel Matzav: Why Britain hates Israel

Israel Matzav: Shocka: UNIFIL helped Lebanese breach border

Shocka: UNIFIL helped Lebanese breach border

Israel's ambassador to the United Nations, Gavriela Shalev, has accused UNIFIL of assisting 15 Lebanese in breaching Israel's border on Friday.

On Friday, 15 Lebanese civilians crossed illegally into Israel, shouting and waving Hizbullah flags. IDF troops spotted the group, but did not confront them as they were reportedly unarmed and returned to Lebanon minutes later, without incident.

In a letter submitted by the ambassador to UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon and the president of the United Nations Security Council, Shalev accused a contingent of Indian UNIFIL peacekeepers of having done nothing to prevent the demonstrators from crossing the border and even cooperating with the group.

"[The demonstrators] stood opposite the UNIFIL force, [which did nothing,] and worse than that, according to statements made by the organizers of the demonstration, they even cooperated with them," the letter read.

Read All at :

Israel Matzav: Shocka: UNIFIL helped Lebanese breach border

Israel Matzav: Krauthammer on India

Israel Matzav: Krauthammer on India

Israel Matzav: If we let the Gaffemeister walk the beaches of Tel Aviv, will the Obama administration love us more?

Israel Matzav: If we let the Gaffemeister walk the beaches of Tel Aviv, will the Obama administration love us more?

Israel Matzav: About the Shepherd Hotel

Israel Matzav: About the Shepherd Hotel

Israel Matzav: Holocaust denial, 'Palestinian' style

Israel Matzav: Holocaust denial, 'Palestinian' style

Israel Matzav: Some reminders about Jerusalem

Some reminders about Jerusalem

President Obumbler's efforts to stop Israeli construction at the Shepherd Hotel in Jerusalem's Sheikh Jarrah section has prompted David Hazony to send the Annointed One some reminders of why Jerusalem belongs to the Jewish people and is not up for negotiations. Here's his bottom line. Jerusalem is not just a consensus issue in Israel but also a deeply personal one.

There is no erasing the thousands of years of yearning for Jerusalem in Jewish texts, nor the heart-wrenching failure of Jewish forces to capture East Jerusalem in 1948, nor the national catharsis of its reunification in the Six Day War, nor over four decades of astonishing development and construction and tourism and flourishing of religious life for all faiths since then. The idea that now, suddenly, a new American president, speaking of “settlements,” will change this reality is not simply offensive and alienating to Israelis only but also to Jews the world over. Rather than recognize his failure in the Middle East so far, Obama is exacerbating it. Israelis do not like to be bullied, and this is far more likely to steel the Israeli public’s resolve against American pressure than weaken it.

Read All at :

Israel Matzav: Some reminders about Jerusalem

Israel Matzav: Monument to a fraud

Israel Matzav: Monument to a fraud

Israel Matzav: Mitchell denies retirement plans

Mitchell denies retirement plans

On Monday, I blogged an article by former Bush administration official Elliott Abrams that claimed that US Special Middle East envoy George Mitchell would like to retire at year's end. Foreign Policy Magazine's The Cable (a blog that is very well-connected to the Washington foreign policy establishment) reports that both Mitchell and the State Department are denying the report.

"Mitchell says [the claim] is an utter fabrication," a State Department official told Foreign Policy on behalf of Mitchell Monday. "Mitchell said, ‘I have never experienced the thought, let alone expressed it.'"

Read All at :


Israel Matzav: Mitchell denies retirement plans

Israel Matzav: 'A step too far'

Is

'A step too far'

In response to extensive ridicule, [Sarah Leah] Whitson [executive director of HRW’s Middle East and North Africa division. CiJ] and [Kenneth] Roth [HRW's executive director. CiJ] lashed out at their critics (they accused NGO Monitor of lying), but they have not offered any details to contradict this version of events or the systematic analysis exposing HRW’s targeting of Israel. They have also tried to sell a distinction between soliciting the Saudi regime for money, and wooing wealthy private individuals and Wahhabi religious officials in Saudi Arabia who, we are assured, are genuinely concerned about human rights. Right.

Read All at :
rael Matzav: 'A step too far'

Israel Matzav: Video: Sean Hannity on the first six months of the Obama administration

Israel Matzav: Video: Sean Hannity on the first six months of the Obama administration

Israel Matzav: Obama's selective meddling

Israel Matzav: Obama's selective meddling

Israel Matzav: Jordan's Abdullah II clenches his fist, revokes 'Palestinians' citizenship

Jordan's Abdullah II clenches his fist, revokes 'Palestinians' citizenship

Jordan's King Abdullah II has decided to 'help' the 'Palestinians' who have lived in Jordan for generations by revoking the Jordanian citizenship that his father gave them in 1988 to 'ensure' that they won't 'give up' their 'right of return.' The 'Palestinians' do not seem pleased.

As a preemptive measure, the Jordanian authorities recently began revoking the citizenship of thousands of Palestinians, leaving many of them in a state of panic and uncertainty regarding the future.

Read All at :


Israel Matzav: Jordan's Abdullah II clenches his fist, revokes 'Palestinians' citizenship

Israel Matzav: A debt of honor: The F-22 to Israel and Japan

A debt of honor: The F-22 to Israel and Japan

Ed Timperlake argues that the despite the Obama administration's desire to cut off production of the F-22 Raptor fighter plane (pictured) it should nevertheless be provided to Israel and Japan as a debt of honor.

America, Israel and Japan are now at a crossroad. America may not be able to sell an export version of the best fighter in the world, the F-22, to Israel and Japan. The reason is the Administration's current insistence on holding fast to a DOD-budgeted production run of F-22s that will stop soon at 187. The harsh reality of stopping F-22 production will be two American allies who are in increasing mortal danger will not have access to the absolute best when they really need America's help.

Read All at :

Israel Matzav: A debt of honor: The F-22 to Israel and Japan

Israel Matzav: 'Palestinians' reject US proposals on land swap, 'right of return'

'Palestinians' reject US proposals on land swap, 'right of return'

It's difficult to understand what sort of 'compromises' the Obama administration thinks it is going to reach with the 'Palestinians.' The 'Palestinians' have once again categorically rejected any kind of 'land swap' with Israel as part of a final 'settlement.' They have also rejected the notion that there will be no 'right of return' to the part of Israel that is within the 1949 armistice lines.
Read All at :

Israel Matzav: 'Palestinians' reject US proposals on land swap, 'right of return'

Israel Matzav: Lebanese forces on alert on Israeli border

Lebanese forces on alert on Israeli border

The Lebanese Broadcast Corporation (LBC) television network is reporting that Lebanese forces are on alert on the country's border with Israel due to the various incidents that have taken place there over the last few days.

According to the Lebanese TV station, the forces' alert level was raised in response to Israeli violations of UN Resolution 1701, which ended Israel's war with Hizbullah in the summer of 2006. The report mentioned the erection of a military outpost near Kafr Shuba, a village just outside the divided border village of Ghajar, as an example of one of these "violations."

Read All at :

Israel Matzav: Lebanese forces on alert on Israeli border

Israel Matzav: Oregon to bar teachOregon to bar teachers from wearing kippot (skullcaps) ers from wearing kippot (skullcaps)

Oregon to bar teachers from wearing kippot (skullcaps)

A newly-passed Oregon law that prohibits teachers from wearing religious clothing may prohibit teachers from wearing kippot (skullcaps) in the classroom.

The Oregon Workplace Religious Freedom Act, which was just signed by Governor Ted Kulongoski, was intended to enable workers to don religious attire such as yarmulkes, turbans, and hijabs while on the job, as well as take time off for their holy days.

Read All at :

Israel Matzav: Oregon to bar teachers from wearing kippot (skullcaps)

Israel Matzav: Friends for a rainy day

Israel Matzav: Friends for a rainy day

Israel Matzav: Why Abu Mazen fled Safed

Why Abu Mazen fled Safed




Nearly two weeks ago, I noted a confession by 'moderate' 'Palestinian' President Mahmoud Abbas Abu Mazen, whose public profile (in English) claims that he is a 'refugee,' on 'Palestinian' television that his family had voluntarily left Tzfat (Safed) in 1948, and had not been expelled by the Jews as he would have you believe. If he's a 'refugee' he (or his father) made himself one.

But Tzfat wasn't just a town where the Arab armies urged the 'people' to get out of the way so that they could drive the Jews into the Sea. The inimitable Sarah Honig recalls the background of Tzfat and why its Arab population was so fearful as to flee. (Warning: This is graphic).

Read All at :


Israel Matzav: Why Abu Mazen fled Safed

Israel Matzav: Report: US to 'allow' hotel in exchange for 'setting borders'

Israel Matzav: Report: US to 'allow' hotel in exchange for 'setting borders'

The Torah Revolution: It's getting ridiculous

The Torah Revolution: It's getting ridiculous

The Torah Revolution: Idiotic

The Torah Revolution: Idiotic

The Torah Revolution: Re: # 25 Chocko on the so called American aid to Israel

The Torah Revolution: Re: # 25 Chocko on the so called American aid to Israel

The Torah Revolution: An open message to Secretary of State Clinton

The Torah Revolution: An open message to Secretary of State Clinton

On Jerusalem

On Jerusalem

I'm way too busy these days for much blogging. Fortunately, however, there are lots of others out there still doing a fine job, and I can link to them. David Hazony, for example, who has done a great job of summarizing the issues the Obama adminstration raised earlier this week when they urgently summoned our ambassador Michael Oren to Foggy Bottom, (over the weekend apparently, so urgent it was) to reprimand him for the intention to build some apartments in Sheich Jarach.

At the same blog (Contentions), Rick Richman has dug up an interesting historical document:

Neither Resolution 242 nor 338 mentions Jerusalem, and the omission was intentional. On March 12, 1980, Arthur J. Goldberg, who was U.S. ambassador to the UN when Resolution 242 was adopted, wrote a letter to the New York Times to “set the record straight”:
Resolution 242 in no way refers to Jerusalem, and this omission was deliberate. . . . In a number of speeches at the UN in 1967, I repeatedly stated that the armistice lines fixed after 1948 were intended to be temporary. This, of course, was
particularly true of Jerusalem. . . . I made it clear that the status of Jerusalem should be negotiable and that the armistice lines dividing Jerusalem were no longer viable. In other words, Jerusalem was not to be divided again.


Personally, I have not yet written off the Obama administration in its attempt to make the world better, though my original scepticism is being reinforced steadily. One does however wonder if anyone there knows much about history.
taken from Yaacov Lozowick's Ruminations

One Man's Terrorist is... Still A Terrorist

One Man's Terrorist is... Still A Terrorist

Barry Rubin writes a standard piece against the Zeitgeist, exposing the idiocy and harmfulness of the idea that truth and justice are merely subjective constructs in the eyes of the beholder.

He's right, of course, though his column is a bit jaded: they've said it all, we've said it all, no-one's listening.

But then he gives a fine metaphor, one I suggest we use often until it becomes self evident:

Let me suggest an experiment. Take an apple or other handy piece of fruit or vegetable. Hold it in one hand. Then take a very sharp knife. Hold it in your other hand.Then, say out loud: One man’s [expletive deleted] is another man’s truth.Next, assuming that the location of the piece of fruit is a matter of personal opinion which has no relationship to spatial dimensions, slash out with the knife until you fall to the floor bleeding profusely.Congratulations, you now understand the effect of such a doctrine on the Middle East.

taken from Yaacov Lozowick's Ruminations

DoubleTapper: Pimped out Drug Cartel Guns Siezed

DoubleTapper: Pimped out Drug Cartel Guns Siezed

European Taxpayer Money for Israel's Critics

European Taxpayer Money for Israel's Critics

A number of European countries have been supporting "Breaking the Silence", an Israeli organization which collects stories about how bad the IDF is. This is actually not new; Europeans support the radical corner of Israeli society as a matter of routine, and have been doing so for many years. I know this because I'm sort of friendly with some of the people in these organizations and they're quite free with the information; my response has been to wish them luck and suggest they ratchet up their fundraising efforts, since in essence what they're doing is exporting Israeli services to Europe.

The funny thing about the report this time is that the Europeans aren't getting their money's worth. I've read many of the reports in the recent case, and they're mostly comfortably within the norm for warfare. Nothing NATO soldiers aren't routinely doing in Afghanistan. But for that, you have to know what NATO soldiers are doing in Afghanistan, on the one hand, and you need to read Hebrew, on the other. Not qualifications most Europeans are likely to have.
taken from Yaacov Lozowick's Ruminations

Fundamental Historical Baggage

Fundamental Historical Baggage

Maureeen Dowd's regular column in the NYT deals this week with the hypocrisy of Republican politicians. The content doesn't particular interest me one way or the other. It's a litany of things Dowd doesn't like abut the behavior of various Republican politicians, and it's probably very interesting if you're into the minutiae of such things; I expect - without knowing, mind you - that a similar list could be made about Democratic politicians, or British Labor ones, or German CDU ones, or Israelis of any political stripe. Polticians in democracies, rather like apparatchiks in tyrannies, are rarely paragons of moral greatness.

The reason I'm linking to her piece is because of its title: Pharisees on the Potomac. For Dowd, brought up in a Christian culture even though she herself may well be secular, agnostic, athiest or whatever, the term Pharisee resonates as a deeply negative description. It goes back 2000 years, and is so profoundly a part of her cultural conditioning she's totally unaware of it. It simply "is".

For any educated Jew, on the other hand, the same word resonates very differently. The Pharisees were the group of Jews in Judea, 2000 years ago, who came out on top of the generations of severe religious and cultural strife. The Pharisees won the cultural war against the Saducees, first and foremost, but also the essenes, the early Christians (=Minim), and various other splinter groups of the time. Which means, the Pharisees: that's US. And proud of it, too. This isn't a remote and insignificant factoid from 2000 years ago: it's how we identify ourselves whenever we deal with those 2000-year-old texts which are the living fundament of what many of us are today, in July 2009.

I'm not saying Maureen Dowd is an antisemite. She isn't. But even Maureen Dowd, an unthinking and superficial liberal in an American society which is broadly free of antisemitism, can't quite get rid of the cultural baggage she has inherited from millenia of cultural forbears.
taken from Yaacov Lozowick's Ruminations

Monday, 20 July 2009

Israel Matzav: Jews outwit Iran and Obama: Find cure for radiation sickness

Jews outwit Iran and Obama: Find cure for radiation sickness

Those darned Jews are so smart, they've outwitted Ahmadinejad and Obama: They have found a cure for radiation sickness.

The ground-breaking medication, developed by Professor Andrei Gudkov – Chief Scientific Officer at Cleveland BioLabs - may have far-reaching implications on the balance of power in the world, as states capable of providing their citizens with protection against radiation will enjoy a significant strategic advantage vis-à-vis their rivals.

Read All at :

Israel Matzav: Jews outwit Iran and Obama: Find cure for radiation sickness

Israel Matzav: 'Engage' with Khatami but not with Mort Klein

Israel Matzav: 'Engage' with Khatami but not with Mort Klein

Israel Matzav: Aren't we supposed to be allies?

Israel Matzav: Aren't we supposed to be allies?

Israel Matzav: Netanyahu blasts 'Palestinian Authority' for meeting with Iran

Netanyahu blasts 'Palestinian Authority' for meeting with Iran

Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu blasted 'Palestinian' chief bottle washer negotiator Saeb Erekat (pictured) for meeting with Iranian foreign minister Manouchehr Mottaki on Thursday in Sharm el-Sheikh.

"The Palestinian side has refused to allow the resumption of peace talks by placing pre-conditions on such a resumption," said Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu's spokesman Mark Regev, referring to the Palestinian demand that Israel declare a total settlement freeze and accept a two-state solution before negotiations can be renewed.

Read All at :

Israel Matzav: Netanyahu blasts 'Palestinian Authority' for meeting with Iran

Israel Matzav: The new impostors

The new impostors

Moshe Kempinski, whom I knew in youth group 35 years ago, rips the hypocrites from J Street, the pro-suicide lobby.

There is nothing inherently wrong in looking for commonality and initiating bridge building. In fact, the building of bridges of understanding between peoples is one of the critical goals of mankind's destiny and purpose. Yet, the collapse of identity and the slipping into the morass of blandness and anonymity has become a disaster, and an ever-present danger for the Jewish people.

Read All at :

Israel Matzav: The new impostors

Israel Matzav: Good cop?

Israel Matzav: Good cop?

Israel Matzav: Religion of Rape

Religion of Rape

This testimony from a member of the Iranian Basij appeared in Sunday's Jerusalem Post.

When he was 16, "my mother took me to a Basiji station and begged them to take me under their wing because I had no one and nothing foreseeable in my future. My father was martyred during the war in Iraq and she did not want me to get hooked on drugs and become a street thug. I had no choice," he said.

He said he had been a highly regarded member of the force, and had so "impressed my superiors" that, at 18, "I was given the 'honor' to temporarily marry young girls before they were sentenced to death."

Read All at :


Israel Matzav: Religion of Rape

Israel Matzav: Video: 'Palestinians' of Jewish origin

Israel Matzav: Video: 'Palestinians' of Jewish origin

Israel Matzav: George Orwell's advice to Barack Obama

Israel Matzav: George Orwell's advice to Barack Obama

Israel Matzav: Netanyahu to Obumbler: 'The hell you'll tell us not to build in Jerusalem'

Netanyahu to Obumbler: 'The hell you'll tell us not to build in Jerusalem'

Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu rejected a demand by the Obama administration - delivered by summoning Ambassador Michael Oren over the weekend - that Israel cease construction of a Jewish housing project on the site of the vacant Shepherd Hotel. The hotel is located in the Sheikh Jarah neighborhood just across the street (literally) from the old border with Jordan. The land was purchased privately by American investor Irving Moskowitz. It used to belong to none other than Haj Amin al-Husseini.

Jerusalem is the "unified capital of Israel and the capital of the Jewish people, and sovereignty over it is indisputable," Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu said Sunday, responding to an American demand to put an end to a housing project to be built in east Jerusalem.

Read All at :

Israel Matzav: Netanyahu to Obumbler: 'The hell you'll tell us not to build in Jerusalem'

Israel Matzav: Help keep a war hero's widow and orphans from being expelled from their home!

Israel Matzav: Help keep a war hero's widow and orphans from being expelled from their home!

Israel Matzav: Update on my flu

Israel Matzav: Update on my flu

Israel Matzav: 'Manage the conflict' says... Khaled Abu Toameh

'Manage the conflict' says... Khaled Abu Toameh

Canada's National Post has a profile of JPost's Arab affairs correspondent Khaled Abu Toameh (pictured). I urge those of you who have never read a profile of this fascinating man to do so. Although I knew most of what was in this article already, I thought Abu Toameh's take on the current state of affairs to be interesting, if not very surprising.

Read All at :

Israel Matzav: 'Manage the conflict' says... Khaled Abu Toameh

ANTI-SEMITISM HOT-BED

Anti-Semitism hot-bed

Problems grow for Jews at York University.
DAVE GORDON

After the swell of controversy at Toronto's York University recently, on the heels of the conference called Israel/Palestine: Mapping Models of Statehood and Paths to Peace on June 22-24, two anti-Semitic incidents occurred within a week.

Campus administrators reported that anti-Semitic literature was found in a bathroom of York's Scott Library on July 2. As well, Sammy Katz, Canadian campus coordinator of Hasbara Fellowships, added that there were reports of a one-foot swastika etching discovered in another school restroom on the same day. "Stuff like this happens every day at York," he lamented.

A press release was issued on July 6 by the York Federation of Students, condemning hate-filled acts in light of the July 2 incident on campus.

"We understand that York has a great number of Jewish constituents and we are greatly concerned. We oppose all forms of racism and sexism," said Krisna Saravanamuttu, president of the York Federation of Students, in an interview with the Independent. The York Federation of Students represents 49,000 undergraduate students at York University.

Saravanamuttu said the recent incidents are currently under investigation, though he could not elaborate any further on what has been found. "Violent acts of hatred such as these are an affront to student rights on campus and must be condemned," he stressed.

To publicize an earlier incident, Katz recently placed on YouTube a filmed segment of a protester at an anti-Israel demonstration at York's Vari Hall, saying, "F*** the Jews" repeatedly as a chant. When confronted by Katz, it was revealed that the protester was not enrolled as a student at York.

Katz then complained to the school's administration and security, but said such complaints fall on deaf ears and thus become a futile exercise. Security and police generally respond too late, or are mired in the school's red tape of protocols on how to deal with hate speech, Katz added.

He emphasized the importance of Jewish students being pro-active on campus to ensure future problems are minimized. "We do not want to always be reacting, looking over our shoulder to see what the other side is doing."

Meir Weinstein, director of the Jewish Defence League (JDL) of Canada said that the culmination of hate on campus over the course of the past few years should be enough of a message to pro-Israel Jewish students to enrol elsewhere and for Jewish donors to redirect their philanthropy.

"Find another university. I think it's repulsive that Jews give money to York. We looked at the board of the university. Many of them are high-profile people in the Jewish community. At the very least, they need to attach major strings to their contributions."

When the anti-Israel conference was being held, he encouraged his group, as well as others in the vicinity, to join the protest he organized at the gates of the university.

"It was to expose and confront the message of the conference, and unify the Jewish community against the conference," he said. "When you do nothing, they just get stronger. Our primary mandate is to expose and confront, and shine a magnifying glass on it so everyone can see it. You then prevent it from spreading." Nearly every major Jewish organization has issued statements against the conference since October, he added.

Few of the 50 conference speakers had academic or extensive scholarly experience teaching or writing about the conflicts in the Middle East. There was no representation from the centre-left or centre-right, reports said. Organizers carefully screened their attendees before accepting them, and some observers have suspected those who did not agree completely with their extremist positions were not welcomed.

The anti-Israel conference was co-sponsored by Queen's University and is an official U50 initiative, part of York University's 50th anniversary celebrations. Many reports have said that those attendees and speakers who offered ideas with the slightest of perceived pro-Israel tilt were ridiculed, shouted over and muffled by those in the conference room.

The conference's advisory committee included Ali Abunimah, a fellow at the Palestine Centre in Washington, D.C. He is co-founder of The Electronic Intifada, an online anti-Israel publication. According to the United Jewish Appeal's communiqué, Abunimah's group frequently condones Palestinian terrorism, using the euphemism of "resistance," and terms like "apartheid" and "racist" in reference to Israel.

"The advisory board are 90 percent those that call for a boycott of Israel on a lot of different levels or don't acknowledge Israel's right to exist or the historical rights of the Jewish people," said Weinstein.

Along with the JDL, certain pro-Israel campus groups joined to protest over the course of three days, including Hasbara at York, Hasbara Fellowships, the JDL and the Canadian Centre for Israel Activism. (Hasbara Fellowships, a program run by Aish International, educates and trains university students to be pro-Israel activists on their campuses.)

Weinstein noticed, however, a marked absence of the established Jewish student campus group, Hillel. In Ontario, he claimed, "Leadership of Hillel is a failure. The Jewish students are not a failure. They have ideals. They want to express themselves. But they aren't given the opportunity. It's disappointing that the students have to face this establishment. The students want to take a stand."

Naomi Samuel, vice-president of communications at Hasbara, concurred. "How can you not want to get involved on campus?" Entering her second year at York, she has noticed the school environment growing increasingly hostile.

"In the past year, it has not gotten any easier for Jewish students. We can't allow York to be a hotbed for anti-Semitism. Jewish students are ostracized, tormented just for wearing yarmulkes or identifying themselves outwardly as Jewish," she said. "It's really scary to walk around these halls, and impossible for anyone not here to know what it's like on campus."

Dave Gordon is a freelance writer in Toronto. His website is davegordonwrites.com.

taken from B'NAI ELIM (Sons of the Mighty)

The British Way of War

The British Way of War

The Economist apparently has a good reporter with the troops in Afghanistan. Following the detailled report I linked to the other day, here's another one, this time much of it from the Helmand valley and the field of battle itself.

War is hell. It's also complicated, and eight years after arriving in Afghanistan, the Western Allies still haven't figured out the corect way of waging this one.

Subsequent British contingents were similarly stretched out. One aim was to clear the road to the Kajaki dam to allow the refurbishment of a hydroelectric plant. Another was to retake the town of Musa Qala, abandoned by the British in 2006 despite American protests. British tactics changed with each six-month rotation of troops. One especially damaging practice was “mowing the lawn”—raiding areas repeatedly to clear out insurgents without holding the ground, exposing anyone friendly to the British to grisly retribution. Whereas the American army and marines drew up a new manual on counter-insurgency in 2006, the British have yet to revise their doctrine. They rely heavily on American thinking, without American resources.

The really significant part of the report, however, tells about efforts not to kill Afghani civilians:

The American overall commander, General Stanley McChrystal, has urged his troops to minimise civilian deaths, even at risk to themselves. It is easier said than done, as Major Giles Harris, a company commander, explained. “When we meet the bad guys, we win,” he said. But protecting civilians was “a continual challenge”. “It is the discipline required not to take the gloves off. You are asking my guardsman not to empty the magazine of his weapon into the compound wall from which he is being shot at.”


Factual. Matter of fact. Even more serious, the article repeatedly makes the point that the more British casualties, the lesser the public support at home without which the war cannot be fought. Which means, even if the soldiers do manage to let more of them get killed so that fewer Afghanis will be hurt, this may only expedite the loss of public support and - potentially catastropically - an Islamist victory.

Fiendishly complicated, and then some.

Now try to imagine what would happen if an IDF unit was facing similar conditions. This is not a hypotheticl question. On January 18th earlier this year I linked to an article that had just appeared in the Economist in which the editors asked themselves if Israel was committing war crimes in Gaza. The grudging answer was that maybe, but then again maybe not, it would depend on the specifics. And at the time I added:

Of course you might ask if the Economist regularly poses this question whenever anyone else (the UK included) goes to war, and the answer is probably no.

Actually, the answer, it appears, is a resounding no. The Economist doesn't dream of talking about its own soldiers, or their American or Nato allies, as they do about Israel. And the Economist, I remind you, isn't the Guardian.
taken from Yaacov Lozowick's Ruminations

The Torah Revolution: In response to Clinton

The Torah Revolution: In response to Clinton

Esser Agaroth - To Reclaim Jewish Property

How To Reclaim Jewish Property

27 of the Fourth Month 5769

Reclaiming Jewish Property in Jerusalem
Hillel Fendel 27 Tammuz 5769/July 19, 2009

(IsraelNN.com) With the Obama administration turning the corkscrews upon Israeli sovereignty in its capital, the spotlight focuses once again on the growing Jewish presence in neighborhoods such as Shimon HaTzaddik. Arab squatters face eviction this week.

The U.S. State Department has made an unprecedented demand upon its ally Israel to stop lawful construction in its capital – specifically, at a property owned by activist Dr. Irving Moskowitz in the eastern Jerusalem neighborhood of Sheikh Jarrah. The municipal housing plan calls for the site of the Shepherd Hotel to become a 20-unit apartment complex. Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu and other government ministers have categorically rebuffed the American ultimatum, as did Ambassador Michael Oren when he was called to the State Department to hear the U.S. demand.

Read All at :
Esser Agaroth - How To Reclaim Jewish Property



DoubleTapper: Darrell “Shifty” Powers RIP and Godspeed

[POWERSImage1.jpg]



DoubleTapper: Darrell “Shifty” Powers RIP and Godspeed

Stop Raping Israel: YeSh"A Council: Modern Day Spies (Film Review)

Stop Raping Israel: YeSh"A Council: Modern Day Spies (Film Review)

Sunday, 19 July 2009

Olmert on Settlements and Negotiations

Ehud Olmert has published his thoughts on the settlements-negotiations issue in the Washington Post. Olmert is out of power, and though he'd love to come back, he probably won't; so publishing is about the only way still open to him to bolster his legacy. This doesn't make him the most impartial of pundits. At one point in his column he veers into comic farce when describing the agreements between the US and Israel reached by his predecessor Ariel Sharon, which he continued:
Sharon reached understandings with the U.S. administration regarding the growth and building of settlements, as part of the road map. The understandings included that:
-- No new settlements would be constructed.
-- No new land would be allocated or confiscated for settlement construction.
-- Any construction in the settlements would be within current building
lines.
-- There would be no provision of economic incentives promoting settlement growth.
-- The unauthorized outposts built after March 2001 would be dismantled (a commitment that Israel, regrettably, has not yet fulfilled).

My italics. Hey Ehud, weren't you the Israeli prime minister who regretably didn't fulfill the commitment?

Still, the column does record once again how uninformed, indeed, unintelligent, the Obama administration's position on settlements has been. Denying the existence of previous agreements, and haggling about things that won't be changed anyway does rather distract from the main issue, which is the Palestinian refusal to make peace:
To this day, I cannot understand why the Palestinian leadership did not accept the far-reaching and unprecedented proposal I offered them. My proposal included a solution to all outstanding issues: territorial compromise, security arrangements, Jerusalem and refugees. It would be worth exploring the reasons that the Palestinians rejected my offer and preferred, instead, to drag their feet, avoiding real decisions. My proposal would have helped realize the "two-state solution" in accordance with the principles of the U.S. administration, the Israeli government I led and the criteria the Palestinian leadership has followed throughout the years.
I believe it is crucial to review the lessons from the Palestinians' rejection of such an offer.

taken from Yaacov Lozowick's Ruminations

Israel Matzav: Israel's Left slams Obama

Israel's Left slams Obama

The things that make this article noteworthy are where it appeared (Haaretz, Israel's Hebrew 'Palestinian' daily) and who wrote it (Yoel Marcus, one of their more Leftist writers).

With all of Obama's goodwill and all-embracing ambition, there is something naive, not to say infuriating, about his policy of rapprochement and about the whistle stops he has chosen on his travels dealing with our issue. He spoke in Turkey, he spoke in Egypt, he appeared before students in Saudi Arabia, in Paris, in England, in Ghana and in Australia. Even there the Israeli-Palestinian conflict was mentioned. His plan to begin rapprochement with Iran, which openly threatens to destroy Israel, and to reassure its fanatic leadership, which cruelly suppresses any attempt by the younger generation to get rid of the regime of the ayatollahs, is delusional.

Read All at :

Israel Matzav: Israel's Left slams Obama

DoubleTapper: IDF Women

DoubleTapper: IDF Women

Lands of the Unfree

Lands of the Unfree

Freedom House has published its report about freedom in the world, 2008. They find 42 countries and 9 territories to be Not Free, the report I've linked to focuses mostly on the 17 countries and 4 territories that are the worst of all.

The Middle East is represented by Lybia, Syria, Sudan and Saudi Arabia. (I expect Iran wil be in the report for 2009).

The Palestinians aren't on the list. Or rather, they are, higher up in the Not Free category, and while this is not only because of Israel it is partially so, and this is bad. Still, they're not in the 21 worst places to be described in the report. Which then raises the question, why do some people think the Palestinians have it worse than anyone else? And what are we to make of American, British, Argentinian or other bloggers activists and noise-makers, who willfully overlook the suffering of tens of millions of people in order to focus mainly or exclusively on Israel's crimes in denying freedom?
taken from Yaacov Lozowick's Ruminations

Bookmark for Future Use

Bookmark for Future Use

The NYT has an upbeat article about the many things that are getting better in the West Bank. I recommend bookmarking it, because sooner or later the narrative will return to form, and we'll be told about the never-ending suffering of the Palestinains, always caused by the Israelis.

I also found the frankness of the reporter refreshing (Ethan Bronner, who's actually pretty good):

Asked to explain why the West Bank’s fortunes were shifting, a top Israeli general began his narrative with a chart showing 410 Israelis killed by Palestinians in 2002, and 4 in 2008.
“We destroyed the terrorist groups through three things — intelligence, the barrier and freedom of action by our men,” he said, speaking on condition of anonymity in keeping with military rules. “We sent our troops into every marketplace and every house, staying tightly focused on getting the bad guys.”
But he added that the 2006 legislative electoral victory by Hamas, followed by its violent takeover of Gaza in 2007, led Mr. Abbas to fight Hamas. Palestinian troops have been training in Jordan under American sponsorship.

taken from Yaacov Lozowick's Ruminations

Complicated Afghanistan and Just War

Complicated Afghanistan and Just War

The war in Afghanistan is important. At the moment it's one of the main arenas of conflict with those Islamists who are willing (or forced) to fight rather than merely murder; if they aren't defeated we'll all pay a heavy price, such is their hatred of mankind and their eagerness to kill people.

But it's not a simple tale. The Economist just offered what seems to me a reasonable analysis of how muddled and complicated the country is. It's worth reading.

Being who I am, I was glumly tickled by this section:

The biggest change under General McChrystal is the instruction to reduce
civilian casualties. A “tactical directive”, issued at the start of Thrust of
the Sword, says that winning the support of the Afghans overrides all else. “We
must avoid the trap of winning tactical victories—but suffering strategic
defeats—by causing civilian casualties or excessive damage and thus alienating
the people,” he says. This may increase the danger to troops; but the greater
risk is to push Afghans into the arms of the Taliban.


We're eight (8) years into the war, and the top American general has told his forces that they really ought to be more careful and kill fewer civilians. Civilians, I remind, who may well be citizens of an ally nation, who's crime is that some nasties happen to be in their neighborhood. And the mention of this is in the Economist, a British paper. If it's also in any American publications, I assure you it's not on their front pages.

Earlier this week President Obama met with some top Jewish folks, and apparently told them Israel must think more about its policies. The next day I met a group of very intelligent American news-junky types, the kind that follow every detail of the political scene. At one point I mentioned, as an aside, that Americans have been killing thousands of civilians in their wars these past few years. They were incredulous. Did I mean mercenaries with American companies, perhaps? No, I meant American pilots in Afghanistan, American drones in Paksitan, and American Marines in Iraqi towns, most notably Faluga. They were astonished, my audience.

On a scale of human forms of waging war, the Americans really are about as good as you'll find. But the idea of their president lecturing us about how we need to be more reflective, not to say more careful, leaves me scratching my head in puzzlement.
taken from Yaacov Lozowick's Ruminations

Hostages

Hostages

Interesting difference between Israel and America.

In Israel, when our enemies hold even a single one of our people hostage, it's a national issue of strategic importance, and eventually we pay for his release with many hundreds of jailed criminals, sometimes including convicted murderers.

When the same happens to an American serviceman, we aren't even informed of his name - assuming we hear about the case at all.
taken from Yaacov Lozowick's Ruminations

Security Barrier

Security Barrier

Amos Harel at Haaretz has tried to figure out whatever happened to the Security Barrier (aka. Land-grab, Apartheid Wall, etc). The original article, written of course in Hebrew, was accompanied in the printed version by a map. The English version doesn't have the map, and if you don't know the geography quite well it's rather confusing.

The bottom line, however, is pretty clear. The barrier or its downgraded alternative take in only 4.5% of the West Bank; even some of the larger settlement blocks are outside of it.

In response, the cabinet amended the route in February 2005 to include just nine percent of the West Bank. In April 2006 an additional one percent was shaved off
by the government of Ehud Olmert. In practice, however, the route encompasses
only 4.5 percent of West Bank land. The four "fingers" in the last map (and which Israel presented at Annapolis in November 2007) were never built, not at Ariel and Kedumim (where a "fingernail" was built, a short stretch of fence east of the homes of Ariel); not at Karnei Shomron and Immanuel; not at Beit Arieh, nor south of that, at Ma'aleh Adumim. Instead, with little publicity, fences were put up to close the gaps closer to the Green Line, at Alfei Menashe instead of at Kedumim, at Elkana instead of Ariel and in the Rantis area instead of at Beit Arieh.


Keep that in mind next time someone inevitably tells you about the horrible pain the fence has inflicted on the Palestinians as it stole their lands and carved up their future state. The reality is that the fence is almost entirely on, or very near, the Green Line; with the exception of the Jerusalem area it never cuts more than a mile or two into the West Bank. Maybe three, at Elkana.
taken from Yaacov Lozowick's Ruminations

Changing Names (or not)

Changing Names (or not)

I was in Chicago a few days ago, and just about where-ever I went I saw the Sears Tower, what it's being 110 floors high and all that.

Today its name was officially changed, in accordance with the wish of a company that has rented some of its office space. If Chicagoans are anything like Jerusalemites, this will never work. Decrees changing names gratify the bureaucrats that decree them, but the populace doesn't have to follow suit merely because someone decreed.

The Jerusalem bureaucrats on both sides of the city dictated new names to the neighborhoods the other side had left behind in 1948. On the Jordanian side this seems to have worked; no Arabs clung to the names Neve Yaakov, for example, or Rova Yehudi in the Old City. On the Israeli side, however, the locals couldn't be bothered, and kept the Arab names no matter what the bureaucrats wished. Talbiye remained Talbiye, not Kommemiyut; Katamon is still Katamon, not Gonen, and so on. If you think about it, this is even a bit funny, since places such as Talbiye and Katamon were mostly invented after World War 1, which means they were Arab neighborhoods for, say, 25 years, and have been Jewish for more than 60, but the Jews still insist on calling them by their Arabic names.

It's not only language, however. Ask people where Ganei Katamon is and no-one except the immediate locals will know; ask people where Migrash Hapoel is - the soccer stadium of Hapoel -and they'll tell you exactly where it was, even though it's been gone, by now, for almost as long as it ever existed.

I don't go to Chicago very often, but I'll be very surprised if next time I'm there anyone knows where the Willis Tower is.
taken from Yaacov Lozowick's Ruminations

Uninformed Comment

Uninformed Comment

Long-term readers will remember that for a while I followed Prof. Juan Cole's popular Informed Comment blog, until I got tired of his silliness and stopped. (I even had a label in his honor, see below this post).

Though I no longer record his antics here, I still stop by his blog from time to time to see what his audience likes to hear. Yesterday he had a post that contained this fine nugget of non-truth:

Israel's war last winter on little Gaza achieved virtually none of its real (as opposed to its announced) aims. There had not been any rocket fire from Hamas against Israel during the period of cease-fire in 2008. Israel violated the cease-fire and even thereafter, no Israelis were killed in the lead-up to the invasion.


Unless perhaps there's another Gaza somewhere, from which prior to the war there was no fire at another Israel? And perhaps in that alternative universe, Hamas now does shoot at Israel in spite of the thrashing it received? That might explain it, because nothing else can.
taken from Yaacov Lozowick's Ruminations

Iron Dome is On Its Way

Iron Dome is On Its Way

The anti-Katyusha (and kassam) system being developed in Israel is approaching completion. Not there yet, but advancing well.

Hopefully it will be in place before anyone attacks Iran's nuclear instalations, if that happens, because there's no doubt such an attack will provoke Hezbullah and and Hamas to fire whatever they have.
taken from Yaacov Lozowick's Ruminations

Free Speech

Free Speech

A month late, I've stumbled across a New York Times article about how different democracies deal with limitations on free speech. Apparently, only the United States really fully means it, protecting people's right to lie, offend, and be systematically nasty; Canada, at the other end of the spectrum, doesn't even allow merely insulting talk; the Canadians apparently feel one of the responsibilites of the State is to preserve harmony. Germany, Israel and others have specific limitations based on their particular historical pasts (you can't say Nazi things in Germany, you can't sell Nazi stuff in Israel).

Personally I lean in the direction of the American method. Speech that directly incites to violence is forbidden, but nothing else. Any other system will require the authorities to decide what's "nice" and what's "not nice"; that must by definition be a subjective evaluation, very much determined by the identity of the observer.

Or, to be more specific to my world: hatred of the Jews is embedded so deeply in much of Western culture, that many shades of antisemitism are totally unrecognizable by the antisemites, who sincerely believe they're merely saying things as they are. These sentiments are profoundly potent, and yet they're never detected by "guardians of free speech". Better to let the market of ideas combat the perniciousness than have some thought police do it; the thought police, after all, would soon be understood by the antisemites simply to be tools of the Jews.
taken from Yaacov Lozowick's Ruminations

Israel Matzav: Obama's Middle East crash and burn

Israel Matzav: Obama's Middle East crash and burn

Israel Matzav: Israeli soldiers speak out on what happened in Gaza

Israel Matzav: Israeli soldiers speak out on what happened in Gaza

Israel Matzav: Swine flu or not swine flu?

Israel Matzav: Swine flu or not swine flu?

Israel Matzav: Where have all the suicide bombers gone?

Israel Matzav: Where have all the suicide bombers gone?

Israel Matzav: Breaking the Silence funded by European governments, EU and private Americans

Israel Matzav: Breaking the Silence funded by European governments, EU and private Americans

Tzipiyah.com - Parshat Matot-Masei: Living Outside of Israel



map_of_israel


In this week’s Torah portion, of the many occurrences that take place, there is one episode in particular worthy of discussion. As the entire Jewish nation was journeying through the desert and was on its way to entering the land of Israel, two and a half tribes (Reuven, Gad, and half of Menashe) of the twelve national tribes decided that they did not want a share in the land of Israel. They felt that they needed to settle in the land on the east bank of the Jordan. When they approached Moshe about their request he grew angry with them. Moshe believed that, instead of aiding the rest of the nation in the conquest of Israel, they wanted to abandon their brethren. He was also afraid that this decision of theirs might influence other tribes to back out of the war as well and forget about entering the land altogether. [Numbers: 32: 1-15]


Read All at :





Tzipiyah.com - Parshat Matot-Masei: Living Outside of Israel

Where did the Temple go?!


We are currently in the midst of a very solemn time in the Jewish calendar, the period known as the “3 weeks”, where various calamities have fallen upon our people and most notably the destruction of both of the holy Temples. The Temple wasn’t just a building; it was the tool by which G-dliness could be perceived in the world. We aren’t just mourning the loss of a spectacular building comprised of special materials and concise measurements, of the most architecturally-impressive construction ever to exist. But we are mourning the absence of peace and clarity, a world bereft of spirituality and meaning; a world in which we have even made ourselves comfortable living in, despite it being merely a place of refuge in exile.

Read All at :

Where did the Temple go?!

Posted using ShareThis

Sefer Chabibi Deepest Torah: MATTOT MASSEI: PEACE IN THE HEART

MATTOT MASSEI: PEACE IN THE HEART

by Rabbi Baruch Binyamin Hakohen Melman

"Peace is the greatest blessing. Speech is what makes us human. Keeping our word makes us close to Divine."

This week's commentary is dedicated to the memory of my holy father, I.J. Melman, whose yahrzeit is on this coming Sunday, Tammuz 27. His life was dedicated to transforming the world and making it better and closer through kindness and the promise of technology.

When he was just seven he asked his Rebbe at Chaim Berlin Yeshiva, if it is forbidden to light a fire on Shabbos, then why did G*d command Aaron to light the menorah each day, even on Shabbos, and to bring not one, but two offerings on Shabbos in the Holy Temple, in the Beit HaMiqdash? What a holy, deep question! But he was beaten for asking it and so his father took him out of yeshiva, and sent him to public school, for no one should ever hit a child for asking good questions! That is not the way of Torah! But the Torah's loss was the world's gain!

He went on to develop the first color television, the first fax machine, the infrared detectors the first satellites in space used for navigation, and night vision technology, emergency lights and computer infomatics, and was a founding member of the IEEE and the National Color Standards Commission.

This week's reading speaks about peace. About peace in the home/heart/hearth and peace in the nation. The parsha opens with an admonition to the tribal heads to tell the people that they must keep their oaths and not break their word. The spoken word is sacred.

Immediately thereafter it deals with vows made by a woman, and their possible annulment by her husband and/or father. How do these ideas connect? The linkage is the concept we call Shalom Bayit- Peace in the Home. Peace on the macro level and peace on the micro level. Peace in the national home and peace in the domestic home. Peace in the individual home between husband and wife, and peace in the House of Israel between the tribes. And most importantly, peace in the heart!
Read All at :

Sefer Chabibi Deepest Torah: MATTOT MASSEI: PEACE IN THE HEART

UNIVERSAL TORAH: MATOS

UNIVERSAL TORAH: MATOS


By Rabbi Avraham Greenbaum

Torah Reading: MATOS: Numbers 30:2-32:42

MAS'EI: Numbers 33:1-36:13.

On this Shabbos we complete our annual study of the book of BAMIDBAR (Numbers) by reading its two lengthy closing parshiyos, MATOS and MAS'EY, together. In most years these two parshiyos are read on one Shabbos to ensure that we begin reading the book of DEVARIM (Deuteronomy), with its central theme of TESHUVAH -- coming home to G-d -- on the last Shabbos prior to the fast of 9th Av commemorating the destruction of the Holy Temple.

As discussed in earlier commentaries, Genesis is the "head" of the Torah, Exodus the "arms" (the "outstretched arm" of redemption), Leviticus the "heart", Numbers the "legs" (journeying through the wilderness to reach the Land) and Deuteronomy the "mouth", trumpeting forth: "Hear O Israel!" Coming at the end of the book of Numbers, these two parshiyos show us the Children of Israel at the end of their journeying in the wilderness, assembled in the plains of Moab, facing Jericho, poised to enter the Land. It was here that Moses delivered his final discourses, which make up the book of Deuteronomy. The various Messianic themes and allusions in this week's double parshah make them appropriate reading for the central Shabbos of the Three Week period of mourning for the lost Temples, which is a preparation for the Restoration quickly in our days. [KINOT, "lamentations" = TIKUN, "rectification.]

PARSHAS MATOS

The uniqueness of the prophecy of Moses is seen in the opening words of parshas MATOS introducing the laws of vows. "And Moses spoke to the heads of the tribes of the Children of Israel saying, THIS is the word that G-d has commanded." (Numbers 30:2). There are various levels of prophecy, which may come through "a clear glass" or through a "dim glass". The latter is the case in countless verses in the prophetic literature where the prophet says "KO -- So said HaShem", indicating that the words of the prophecy are LIKE -- resemble -- the actual Truth, yet they are merely similar, an evocation of something that in itself is actually much higher. Moses himself also prophesied using the comparative expression KO, as in Exodus 11:4. However, as Rashi points out (in his comment on Numbers 30:2), unique among all the prophets, Moses also used the expression ZEH HADAVAR -- "THIS is the word", the actual word of G-d. For Moses revealed the very P'NIMIUT, the "inner essence" of G-d, like no other prophet.

* * *

WORDS AND COMMITMENTS

An important theme in Parshas MATOS is the care with which we must use words and language because of their very great power -- language is the "glass" that may either reflect or obscure the truth. "When a man wants to make a vow to HaShem or to swear an oath placing a prohibition upon himself, he must not profane his word. He must do according to all that comes forth from his mouth." (Numbers 30:3).

We live in an age when streams of verbiage flow forth at us in such quantities from all directions -- billboards, papers, magazines, TV, radio, Internet and on and on -- that we can easily become almost completely desensitized to words, their meaning and importance. We take it for granted that politicians make promises and undertakings which they have no intention of keeping; that "experts" shoot forth with torrents of instant comment which are as enduring as rotten fruit; that commercial advertising has turned the destruction of language into an art-form; that the media are filled with every kind of irreverence and unholiness.

As a medicine against this desensitization, the Torah asks us to think hard about the words we bring forth from our own mouths, and particularly the personal commitments we make. While we often focus on language as the means of communication with each other, with ourselves and with G-d, the concept of the vow is one where we use our G-d-given gift of speech to elevate ourselves spiritually. One might take a vow to dedicate something of worth to the Temple or charity, or to erect a personal boundary and abstain from some undesirable behavior that has proved a pitfall for oneself and others. The father of the vow was Jacob, when he came to Mount Moriah and had his dream of the ladder. In the morning, he set up a stone, the prototype Temple Altar, and vowed that if G-d would protect him and provide his needs, he would make this the House of G-d and tithe all he received (Genesis 28:20). [David the Messiah also swore and vowed he would not rest until he found a place and a dwelling-place for G-d, the Holy Temple -- Psalms 132:1-5.]

Because of the extreme seriousness of an oath or vow to G-d, the Torah Codes advise us not to take actual oaths or vows unless we are thoroughly conversant with the intricacies of their laws. Much of the discussion in the relevant Talmudic tractates of Nedarim, Nazir and Shavuos is bound up with careful analyses of the meanings and implications of different kinds of phraseology. The larger part of the section on vows in our parshah is taken up with special laws that apply to vows made by an unmarried, betrothed or married woman, which may be nullified by her father and/or husband. This is because vows she may make even with the best intentions could cause complications in her domestic life that might affect others (e.g. if she were to vow to abstain from certain foods or not to use cosmetics, etc.). Her freedom is circumscribed by her responsibilities to others, and the Torah gives her father and/or husband the last word on whether to uphold her vows. Indeed we should not make vows or commitments that can affect others detrimentally. The point is not to deter us from making commitments, but rather to impress upon us the care with which we should go about making them and the seriousness with which we must uphold them.

* * *

THE WAR AGAINST MIDIAN

It is significant that the final war fought by the Children of Israel prior to their entry into the land was the war for sexual morality -- to rectify the degradation of the sin of BAAL PE'OR as described at the end of parshas BALAK. The crafty Bilaam knew that sexual sin is the undoing of the holiness of Israel and the Midianites took his advice to entice the Israelites to take the short road from immorality to idolatry. The true holiness of the Land of Israel can be revealed only when the Land is cleansed of sexual immorality and degradation. [Similarly, Jacob went back to Beit El only after vengeance for the rape of Dinah and cleansing his house of idolatry, Genesis ch. 34-5.] It was to bring moral cleansing that 1000 warriors from each of the Twelve Tribes went out against the Midianites, together with Pinchas, who was weighed against all of them. Pinchas was the hero of moral cleansing ever since he killed the Prince of the Tribe of Shimon and his Midianite woman.

The warriors return from this war with war booty, which is documented in detail in our Parshah. When we overcome the war against immorality, we can reclaim the lost booty -- the energy that was degraded to the level of the animal, and which can now be elevated and used in pursuit of the holy. However, what Israel takes from the nations must be purified. It was necessary to kill the Midianite males -- the concept of the active MASHPIAH (source of influence) -- for the active immoral influence had to be destroyed. However, those women who had not "known" a male could be saved: that which is receptive to the Israelite influence can be reclaimed. The material wealth taken from the Midianites also had to be purified. A percentage had to be dedicated to the Temple, and even that which could be released for personal use had to be purified.

Our parshah is thus an important source for the laws of purification of vessels of metal, wood or other materials that had previously been in the possession of and used by non-Israelites (Numbers 31:21-4). "Every thing (literally, word) that can come into fire you must pass through the fire and it will be pure, but it must be purified with the waters of NIDAH, whileall that cannot come into fire you must pass through the water." From this are derived the laws of kashering utensils that have absorbed forbidden substances, and the laws of immersing vessels in a kosher mikveh. Rabbi Nachman of Breslov (Likutey Moharan I:4) points to the esoteric meaning of these laws, which teach how to repent for our sins. If we sinfully took our holy powers and energies and burned them up in the fires of animal lust, we must take "what came into fire" and "pass it through the fire". We must repent by confessing our sins with words of fire, burning them up with holy intensity, the fire of our passion to now rectify and elevate our energies. And so too, the pure waters of the Torah, the mikveh, purify the vessel, the body.

* * *

THE SONS OF REUVEN AND GAD'S CONDITION

Following the war with Midian, the account of the request of the tribes of Reuven and Gad to take their share of the Land in the conquered territories EAST of the River Jordan and Moses' response is written Torah proof of the Children of Israel's possession of these territories in the true "final settlement".

Were the Sons of Reuven and Gad really more interested in pasture-lands for their cattle than having a share in the Promised Land? The Aramaic Targum of Onkelos reveals what is concealed beneath the Torah verse detailing the locations east of the Jordan upon which the Sons of Reuven and Gad had set their eyes. These include MOUNT NEVO, which the Targum informs us is the burial-place of Moses (Numbers 32:3). That was what the sons of Reuven and Gad had set their eyes on. They already knew what Breslovers know about the grave of Rabbi Nachman, what Lubavitchers have learned about the Ohel of the Rebbe, what those who frequent Rabbi Shimon bar Yochai's gravesite in Meiron or the resting place of the Avot (Patriarchs) in the holy city of Hevron know. The greatest true wealth is our connection with the Tzaddikim who are the true Foundations of the Universe. The graves of the true Tzaddikim are points where the physical interconnects with the spiritual, and where we can make a connection with G-d's truth.

Even so, Moses scolded the Sons of Reuven and Gad for wanting to stay out of the Land, suggesting that they were like the Spies whose perverted use of language led the hearts of the Israelites astray. Coming after the laws of purified language -- vows and oaths -- at the beginning of our parshah, Moses' binding of the Sons of Reuven and Gad with a detailed set of conditions is another lesson in the precision with which we must use language. We have to make commitments, and we have to keep them. We must take care with the way we formulate our commitments, and care to carry them out.

The Sons of Reuven and Gad were committed to supporting their brother Israelites in conquering the Land. This should serve as a model for those who reside outside the Land, whose share in the Land is strengthened by giving support to those who live in it and fight the war there every day.

Parshas MATOS concludes with a detailed account of the territories given by Moses to the tribes of Reuven, Gad and half of Menasheh east of the River Jordan. These include all of the mountain and valley areas from north of the River Arnon, which flows into Yam HaMelach (the "Dead" Sea) up to Chavot Yair, which are the lands south east of the Kinneret (Sea of Galilee).

* * *

UNIVERSAL TORAH: MAS'EI

By Rabbi Avraham Greenbaum

Torah Reading: MAS'EI: Numbers 33:1-36:13.

Already in MATOS when Moses castigated the Sons of Reuven and Gad with being like the Ten Spies, the theme of Moses' reproof enters the Torah, and it continues in MAS'EY and in the book of Deuteronomy. After the events of the forty years wandering, which we have studied in Exodus, Leviticus and Numbers, the time has come to begin to review the lessons and reduce them to their essentials.

MAS'EY begins with a review of the forty years wandering. On the surface, the list of encampments and journeyings seems prosaic. However, the second Targum on the Torah, that of Rabbi Yonasan ben Uziel, disciple of Hillel, fills in much of the moral significance of the different staging posts in those difficult years, showing that the list itself is a form of reproof. It teaches us that there are times when we must look back, review and draw conclusions and lessons from the past. This is particularly necessary when we stand on the brink of new challenges, as in the case of the Children of Israel, who stood poised to conquer the Land.

Included in the account of the wanderings is a reference to the death of Aaron the High Priest, specifying the date of his ascent to the mountain to die -- the first day of the fifth month, which is the month of Av. This is a reminder to us that the present year is beginning to draw to a close, with only two months to go before the Day of Judgment, Rosh HaShanah, the New Year. As we proceed in the period of Repentance (the Three Weeks, followed by Elul and Tishri) we should take time to review our lives and reflect on where we are trying to go. This way we will be prepared for the challenges of the coming year -- the Conquest of the Land.

* * *

THE BOUNDARIES OF THE LAND AND ITS CONQUEST

Parshas MAS'EY provides the detailed topography of the boundaries of the Land of Israel, prefixed by G-d's commandment to the Children of Israel to destroy all the evil influences in the Land to make it a place fit for the exalted mission instituted by the Fathers of the World, Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. For Israel, with Jerusalem at its center and its eternal capital, is to be the source of Torah and Light for all the nations. "For the Torah will go forth from Zion and the Word of HaShem from Yerushalayim". The Torah warns clearly that unless all the evil influences are removed from the Land, they will be "like pins in your eyes and thorns in your sides, and they will persecute you over the land in which you are dwelling" (Numbers 33:55).

The Boundaries of the Land are given as a COMMANDMENT (Numbers 34:2). While nobody doubts that the true Land of Israel includes all the territories west of the River Jordan, few are aware of where the southern and northern borders of the biblical Promised Land actually are.

Of course the Land will only become Israel's without contest when Israel will fulfill its part of the Conditions of G-d's Covenant to give them the Land. (The section in MATOS about the Conditions with which Moses bound the Sons of Reuven and Gad is also a lesson about Conditions, to which Moses returns again and again in his discourses in Deuteronomy: "If you will do this. and if you will not.")

* * *

THE LEVITICAL CITIES AND THE CITIES OF REFUGE

Since the Levites did not have a share in the Land, they were given forty-two cities of their own up and down the Land together with all the necessary surrounding areas. The Levitical Cities indicate the distinctive nature of the Land of Israel in contrast to all other lands. It's social geography is centered upon a network of cities where people are free from the immediate requirement to make a living (the Levites received tithes) in order to devote themselves to the study and teaching of G-d's Law. Thus everyone in the Land is always near a center of study and near to someone they can ask for guidance.

The Torah's abhorrence for killing and murder iexpressed in the portion that gives the laws of unintentional manslaughter and deliberate murder (Numbers 35:9ff). Not only has our world become desensitized to language, as discussed above. It has also been desensitized to the evil of killing and murder, which are openly celebrated be terrorists as "religious acts", while the TV and movies provide an endless diet of violence to the population.

The spilling of blood is a crime against the Land, and the holiness of the Land of Israel will only shine again when we can cleanse ourselves of this terrible scourge and re-establish the Law of the Torah, which outshines and transcends all manmade laws. The Torah not only teaches the evil of killing and murder but has no compunction about imposing all necessary sanctions in order to eliminate them, including the death penalty. Even one who had committed an unintentional manslaughter had to hide himself away from the rest of society in a city of refuge, unlike today, where killers with blood on their hands are released from jail and celebrated as heroes.

"And you shall not pollute the Land in which you dwell that I dwell in its midst, for I am HaSheM dwelling among the Children of Israel" (Numbers 35:34). Speedily in our days. Amen.

Shabbat Shalom!!!

Avraham Yehoshua Greenbaum

--
AZAMRA INSTITUTE
PO Box 50037 Jerusalem 91500 Israel
Website: www.azamra.org

_____________________________
Change email address / Leave mailing list:
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...