Israel Matzav: Israel to re-examine IDF Cast Lead investigations

Israel to re-examine IDF Cast Lead investigations

In an effort to relieve pressure from Richard Richard Goldstone, Prime Minister Netanyahu and Defense Minister Ehud Barak (pictured) have decided to assemble a small legal panel to review the transcripts of the IDF investigations into Operation Cast Lead to ensure that nothing was covered up.

The team will only use existing material, such as previously unreleased drone footage of terrorists operating behind civilian lines in Gaza, and present the findings as an internal investigation refuting the allegations put forth Goldstone Commission's report.

According to a statement released on Saturday by the Prime Minister's Office, the IDF has investigated most of the incidents and accusations of human rights abuses mentioned in the report. The newly formed team, possibly headed by Justice Minister Ya'acov Ne'eman, will ensure that the military investigation was thorough and serious and that no facts were "covered up."

Sorry guys, but this is a mistake. Either you continue to take the position that the IDF investigated, we're satisfied with their investigation, and if you're not, go appeal to the High Court of Justice (which is what I would do), or you open a full blown investigation (which would also have been a bad move). Like this, Goldstone and his friends at the 'Human Rights Council' are dissatisfied from the outset. They will attack Yaakov Ne'eman personally because he's not former Supreme Court Chief Justice Aharon Barak (Ne'eman is well to the right of Barak on the political map), and they will continue to scream when and if the review committee concludes that nothing was covered up and that no one is going to be offered up as a sacrifice to appease the 'Human Rights Council.'

In related news, Defense Minister Ehud Barak announced on Sunday that Israel would work to fight the legitimacy of the report and change the laws of warfare to fit the new reality of terrorist combat.

That too is a mistake. First, refute Goldstone. It can be done - he applied the wrong legal standard. Then when the Goldstone Report is out of the public eye, work to change the laws of war. Trying to change the laws of war now looks like an admission of guilt.

The problem here is that the cabinet is divided:

During Sunday's cabinet meeting, Netanyahu made clear that IDF soldiers and officers would not be brought before an investigatory committee. He said that the investigatory mechanisms in place today were more than sufficient to deal with the situation.

Barak - an adamant opponent of establishing an inquiry committee - issued a statement after the meeting saying, "We sent the fighters on their missions, and they deserve complete backing."

...

Chief of General Staff Lt.-Gen. Gabi Ashkenazi is also vehemently opposed to establishing an investigation committee.

Nevertheless, a number of cabinet members - Government Services Minister Michael Eitan (Likud), Welfare and Social Affairs Minister Isaac Herzog (Labor) and Minority Affairs Minister Avishay Braverman (Labor) - threw their weight behind the establishment of some kind of inquiry committee on Sunday.

Intelligence Minister Dan Meridor (Likud) and National Infrastructures Minister Uzi Landau (Israel Beiteinu) have also come out in favor of an internal Israeli investigation.

...

The most original idea came from Interior Minister Eli Yishai (Shas), who reportedly told the cabinet that rather than setting up an investigation committee, Israel should release the protocols of the cabinet meetings held during the Gaza offensive last winter, which would show the degree of care Israel took during the fighting.

What no one here seems to get is that the degree of care that the cabinet took is almost irrelevant and the politicians are not the ones on trial. The legal standard (which was also ignored by Goldstone) is how a reasonable commander in the field would have acted in a similar situation and it's the commanders and soldiers in the field whose freedom is on the line. If we could get our politicians and our media to focus on that standard, we would all be a lot better off.

Haaretz adds:

Netanyahu instructed Justice Minister Ya'akov Ne'eman to coordinate the task force, which will present its recommendations as to Israel's course of action on the Goldstone report and its ramifications.

The team will make recommendations on what should be done in the diplomatic, legal and public relations planes.

The prime minister said during the meeting that the establishment of an investigation committee was "not an option."

"IDF soldiers and officers will not be subjected to investigation," he stressed.

That sounds quite different from the way JPost had the mandate, doesn't it? Is Haaretz trying to make Israel appear more 'stubborn,' or is the mandate really more one of preparing a response to Goldstone? Given that I have stated that a commission of inquiry is an all or nothing proposition, I actually hope that Haaretz is right about this.

Ehud Olmert got away with a commission of inquiry that lacked power after the Second Lebanon War. But in that war, the IDF failed and the audience was domestic. Here, the IDF succeeded, the world's anti-Semites are out for blood, and we are unlikely to 'get away' with such a weak commission or with any commission that does not extract Israeli blood.

There's a great comment from Shahar Ilan in Haaretz about why we should not set up any commission at all.

There is no way to wage combat in Gaza without harming the civilian population, and it is obvious that the IDF did much to avoid this. We are essentially telling our commanders: Your war is never over, and even if your life was saved, your career is in danger. No deed geared toward Israel's defense will go unpunished.

IDF officers and their charges are not the only ones whose faces we are spitting in by entertaining the very idea of establishing a commission of inquiry. What message are we sending to the residents of the south? That we accept the claim that firing thousands of Qassam rockets on their heads is not a war crime, but our operation is?

One needs to be blind not to recognize the fact that the world is judging us by a double standard. It does not change the fact that the world is stronger, and sometimes we need to put our heads down and play their game.

But there also comes a time when we need to say "enough is enough." If the officers who led Operation Cast Lead end up paying for it with their careers, or even if they do not pay but their appearances before a commission of inquiry become nightmarish, this will be the real crime.

All of us will bear responsibility for it, and all of us will pay the price during the next war.

Read the whole thing.

Israel Matzav: Israel to re-examine IDF Cast Lead investigations

Love of the Land: Israel to set up judicial review of sorts.- Yea

Israel to set up judicial review of sorts.- Yea

Ted Belman
Israpundit.com
26 October 09

PM: Legal team will combat Goldstone

Instead of an inquiry committee questioning soldiers and officers about military conduct during Operation Cast Lead, Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu will put together a small team of legal experts and foreign ministry officials to reassemble and reevaluate material gathered by the the IDF in its partial investigation of the fighting against Hamas, Israel Radio reported on Monday.

The team will only use existing material, such as previously unreleased drone footage of terrorists operating behind civilian lines in Gaza, and present the findings as an internal investigation refuting the allegations put forth Goldstone Commission’s report.

In related news, Defense Minister Ehud Barak announced on Sunday that Israel would work to fight the legitimacy of the report and change the laws of warfare to fit the new reality of terrorist combat.

Barak’s comments came after a meeting Netanyahu convened in his office to weigh the ramifications of the report, proposing that a team of experts be set up to combat it.

In addition to Barak, senior officials from the Justice, Foreign and Defense ministries and the IDF were also present at the meeting, where it was decided to establish a committee to come up with effective ways to deal with the Goldstone Report.

Sunday’s meeting, according to government officials, dealt with a wide range of sensitive matters stemming from the report, such as the laws of war, diplomatic issues, international law and world public opinion.

Love of the Land: Israel to set up judicial review of sorts.- Yea

Israel Matzav: On destroying weapons-laden mosques

On destroying weapons-laden mosques

This is from the New York Times article on the Goldstone report:

Israel repeatedly accused Hamas of using mosques to shelter armed men or munitions, and a report by Israel said an attack against the Maqadmah mosque in Jabaliya had killed six known militants.

But the Human Rights Council report said the attack came during evening prayers, when some 300 men and women were in the mosque, and killed 15 people. There were no secondary explosions to indicate the presence of an arms cache.

If Israel wanted to destroy a mosque suspected as an arms cache, it should have done so in the middle of the night, Mr. Goldstone said.

If Israel destroyed a mosque full of weapons with more than 300 people inside, and only 15 people died, they must have done something to ensure that there would not be a large number of casualties. Something about this story doesn't make sense (it's paragraph 348 in the Goldstone report).

And if the 'Palestinians' were sleeping in the mosque every night (which they probably were), when would Goldstone propose that it be attacked? Of course, since Goldstone says in paragraph 36 of the report that he doesn't believe mosques were used to store weapons anyway, maybe it doesn't matter.

Read All at :

Israel Matzav: On destroying weapons-laden mosques

Love of the Land: Gaza Police Fatalities: By the Numbers

Gaza Police Fatalities: By the Numbers

Backspin/Honest Reporting

14 September 09

Should Palestinian policemen killed during Operation Cast Lead be defined as civilian casualties or combatants? The JCPA researched Gaza's cops.

343 Overall Palestinian security forces killed during the Gaza war.

286 Palestinian security forces killed during the war who were identified as terror organization members.

27 Palestinian security forces killed during the war who were undergoing infantry training.

89 Overall Palestinians killed in a December 27, 2008 air strike on an officer training course at the Gaza police HQ.

60 Palestinian policemen killed in the above attack who were members also members of Hamas.

0 Palestinians killed or wounded in incidents of "friendly fire" during the Gaza war, according to Palestinian claims.

See also Elder of Ziyon's research and The New Republic, which interviewed Palestinian and Israeli researchers on the wide divergence of civilian casualties.

Love of the Land: Gaza Police Fatalities: By the Numbers

Love of the Land: The Goldstone Show-Trial

The Goldstone Show-Trial

Melanie Phillips
The Spectator
11 September 09

In the wake of Israel’s Operation Cast Lead in Gaza at the turn of this year, the UN’s satirically named ‘Human Rights Council’ set up what purported to be an objective, fact-finding commission of inquiry under Richard Goldstone, former chief prosecutor for the International Criminal Tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda and a judge of the South African Constitutional Court.

The degree of objectivity on this Commission can be gauged from the mandate it was given by the , UNHRC, which announced it was dispatching

an urgent, independent international fact-finding mission, to be appointed by the President of the Council, to investigate all violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law by the occupying Power, Israel, against the Palestinian people throughout the Occupied Palestinian Territory, particularly in the occupied Gaza Strip, due to the current aggression, and calls upon Israel not to obstruct the process of investigation and to fully cooperate with the mission.

So this 'objective' inquiry had been told before it was even established that the guilty party in Gaza was Israel, designated by the UN as the ‘occupying power’; that it was guilty of ‘aggression’ and ‘violations of international human rights law and international humanitarian law’; and that the Palestinians of Gaza were the victims of this Israeli aggression.

Israel, of course, no longer occupies Gaza. Nor was it guilty of aggression: it was instead defending itself against the aggression of Hamas who had fired some 6000 rockets at Israeli citizens. Nor did it commit any violations of international law and human rights: it was Hamas who did so repeatedly -- not just against Israel but also the Arab inhabitants of Gaza who were used as human shields and mass hostages – and then made false accusations against Israel of committing such violations, falsehoods promulgated as true by the UN.

But the aggression and human rights violations committed by Hamas – the cause of the conflict – weren’t even to be considered by this objective, fact-finding Commission. Having been set up on the premise that Israel was guilty, it was directed to gather evidence to support the conclusion that had already been reached. As the Queen in Alice might have said, ‘verdict first, evidence afterwards’. Unless Goldstone has torn up the terms of his mandate, his Commission will possess all the objectivity of the show-trials of Stalin.

Publication of this kangaroo court’s report is imminent. There are even suggestions swirling today that it is to be published tomorrow – on the Jewish sabbath, when neither Israel nor the Jewish world can properly respond. That would be entirely in keeping with the malevolent racism and cynicism of this entire operation.

(Full Article)

Love of the Land: The Goldstone Show-Trial