Friday, 16 January 2009

BUT IS IT A CRIME ?



The economist isn't antisemitic, and it isn't Zionist, either. It does it's best to be factual and thoughtful in a rational way. Personally, I think its line could afford to be a bit more understanding of Israel's situation, but that's just me. And of course, there's an advantage to the fact that you can't plausibly see them as pro-Israel: it enhances their reliability when they land on Israel's side of an argument.


As seems sort of to happened on the issue of war crimes. Somebody at the Economist went looking for British experts on the laws of war and civilian casualties, and came back with the understanding that what Israel is doing in Gaza may include war crimes, but only in specific cases, once they've been investigated. The fact of killing civilians itself - while tragic and horrific - is not illegal, and there are even indications Israel is making an effort not to cross red lines.


Of course you might ask if the Economist regularly poses this question whenever anyone else (the UK included) goes to war, and the answer is probably no. What that means, however, is moot. It could easily be an antipathy to Israel; but it just as easily could be an antipathy to the screeches of the Guardian and its ilk.


Ah, yes: it is indeed sweet when the Economist is more on our side than our own so-called human rights organizations, ACRI and their ilk.
taken from : Yaacov Lozowick's Ruminations (http://yaacovlozowick.blogspot.com/)

HORDES OF JEW HATERS



Pajama Media has a round up of recent expressions of antisemitism. Meryl Yourish has had two of these recently.


I'm mostly linking to these useful resources for future reference. An intelligent cataloging of items is almost always preferable to Google; that's what I make part of my living from.


It is however interesting to see how things change. Back when I began observing such matters, some 25 years ago, the mantra was that the critics were not antisemites, heaven forbid, they were actually friends of Israel, and all they were doing was a spot of friendly critical engagement. Kritischer Auseinandersetzung, in German, a term I found so peculiar at the time it remains etched in my psyche. I remember once asking one of these critical engagers what made him think his understanding of the situation was so superior to ours that he might have anything useful to say. He looked pained, I remember - though to be fair, his subsequent positions indeed prove that he decided to learn first and condemn either later or not at all.


Nowadays, it seems, the party line is no longer critical friendly engagement, but the need to be even-handed. Here's a German blogger who's having a tiff with the editor of the Sueddeutsche Zeitung; the editor apparently feels vindicated because people from both sides of the story are miffed at her, proving she must be right. A juvenile line of reasoning. This fellow continues to dog the Frankfurter Algemeine Zeitung for their intellectual and professional sloppiness. Lizas Welt is always a nice place to visit if you're feeling glum about the state of the world, and want to hear a German tell you you're right about it. And of course, you shouldn't miss Achse Des Guten (Axis of Good), parts of which are in English, to get a feeling for the malice that swirls round Europe (and elsewhere) these days.


Having said all this, however, I'd like to bring a different, or partially different perspective, sent by e-mail from Bremen. My correspondent is actually mildly surprised, he tells me, by the fact that things aren't all that bad, and he tells of five different reactions he's picking up in the German public sphere.
1. The top politicians. They're mostly silent, but in a pro-Israel way. This is certainly true of Angela Merkl, who indeed has been a pleasant surprise since she took office.
2. The media. He thinks they're not as bad as the Guardian, but admits that's not much of a recommendation.
3. The demonstrators. These are almost exclusively Muslims of this group or that, along with a smattering of far-Lefties (which brings us back to the Guardian...)
4. The handful of Israel's supporters, most of them Jews or nearby - to which I'll add that there's another group, even smaller, of German Left-wingers whose primary impulse is to dislike what mainstream German society does, and who've decided that since mainstream German society is anti-Israel, they're now staunch Zionists. There are such people, I've had occasion to meet hundreds of them, among the 80-million Germans.
5. Finally, so my correspondent, the most surprising group are the vox populi (we might call it "The German Street"). The run-of-the-mill Germans, he tells me, seem mostly neutral about Israel's actions in Gaza, having been convinced that Hamas really did provoke the violence.


Is this happening also elsewhere in Europe? I haven't been to Poland for a number of months, and haven't been trawling Polish media sites. The Iberians and Greeks seem pretty adamant in their hatred.
taken from : Yaacov Lozowick's Ruminations (http://yaacovlozowick.blogspot.com/)

IN THE MAIL : MORE REALITY CHECK


Yesterday I used some statistics supplied by the Economist to posit that perhaps Israel isn't about to collapse.


An anonymous reader pointed out, however, that Israel is much less generous in handing out international aid than the size of its economy warrants, ranking only 98th instead of a much more reasonable 20-something.


Which is true. Moreover, it's not something to be proud of. Israel should do better at assisting the poorest nations (and now that I've read Jeffrey Sachs, I even know what sort of things need to be done with the money). I emphasized that sentence, so as partially to override the next one:


But.


There's often a But. In this case, three. The first is that while Israel's GDP is impressively high, it does have an expense or two most rich countries don't have in comparable proportions. Such as the need to maintain a real army, which I hardly need to explain. According to the Economist book of figures, Israel is 4th in the world in the proportion of its GDP spent on defense, at 7.9%. The first three, by the way, are Myanmar, Oman and Saudi Arabia - interesting, isn't it? In real terms, Israel defense expenditure in 2006 was 17th in the world. Such numbers can put a crimp in your ability to lavish support on countries that are less well off.


It's also curious - or not - to note that with standing armies arranged by size, Israel isn't on the list at all as cited by the Economist. Apparently the IDF aims at prowess based on brain over brawn.


The second reason Israel is too stingy with aid is historical. Back in the 1950s, 60s and early 70s, when the Communist and Arab worlds both made great efforts to harm Israel in any international forum (the communists have desisted of late, I notice), Israel really really wanted friends, and so invested large sums and efforts in assisting mostly African countries. In October 1973, as Israel fought against Syrian and Egyptian attacks dozens of these countries severed their relations with Israel, for whatever reason.


Spitting in the eye of your benefactor is not polite, and if the erstwhile benefactor still remembers the affront many years later, you really only have yourself to blame.

Actually, however, it's not even a 35-year-old-stale story. Of the top 20 aid recipients in 2006, only four are not either African countries who severed their relations with Israel in 1973, or countries that don't have such relations today, or both. If you look at the entire list of 68 countries which receive lots of aid, the proportions aren't much better.


Apparently, many of the poorest countries in the world have no qualms about being anti-Israel. A pity, actually.


---------------------


Computers per 100 people:
Israel is at the top of the list, with 122.1 computers for every 100 people. Canada, second place, is way behind with 87.6.


Mobile phones per 100 people: with 122.7, Israelis have even more mobile phones than computers, but in this case rank only 8th. Lithuania is the first.


Though, come to think of it, more and more mobile phones are computers....


taken from : Yaacov Lozowick's Ruminations (http://yaacovlozowick.blogspot.com/)

ICC'S WRIT DOESN'T RUN TO GAZA



Meryl Yourish has uncovered a fantastic example the limitations of subordinating politics to international law. Apparently the International Criminal Court cannot deal with whatever is happening in Gaza, because Gaza isn't a country or part of one.
taken from :Yaacov Lozowick's Ruminations (http://yaacovlozowick.blogspot.com/)

HANIYEH : NO ISRAEL



The Independent today publishes an opinion column by Ismail Haniyeh, the top Hamas man in Gaza.His relation to truth is a bit cavalier, but we didn't expect otherwise. According to the Israeli media this morning, he and his comrades are near to accepting a cease fire that is effectively an admission of defeat, though of course they'll portray it as a historic victory. What I find significant in his column is the long term goal:

Ultimately, the Palestinians are a people struggling for freedom from occupation and the establishment of an independent state with Jerusalem as its capital and the return of refugees to their villages from which they were expelled. Whatever the cost, the continuation of Israel's massacres will neither break our will nor our aspiration for freedom and independence.
Translation to English: No Israel.
Something to keep in mind.
taken from : Yaacov Lozowick's Ruminations (http://yaacovlozowick.blogspot.com/)

Israel Matzav: Oh joy! Obama to cut $1 billion from Israeli loan guarantees#links#links

Israel Matzav: Oh joy! Obama to cut $1 billion from Israeli loan guarantees#links#links

Israel Matzav: Gaza war ending?#links#links

Israel Matzav: Gaza war ending?#links#links

Israel Matzav: Big rally for Israel in Toronto on Sunday#links#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: Big rally for Israel in Toronto on Sunday#links#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: Another Pallywood video?#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: Another Pallywood video?#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: Pro-Israel and pro-terror demonstrators face off in Boston's Copley Square#links#links

Israel Matzav: Pro-Israel and pro-terror demonstrators face off in Boston's Copley Square#links#links

Israel Matzav: Another Gaza mansion disappears UPDATE along with its occupant!#links#links

Israel Matzav: Another Gaza mansion disappears UPDATE along with its occupant!#links#links

Israel Matzav: Six wounded, two seriously as Grad hits Be'er Sheva#links#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: Six wounded, two seriously as Grad hits Be'er Sheva#links#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: A picture says 1000 words#links#links

Israel Matzav: A picture says 1000 words#links#links

Israel Matzav: 'Palestinians': UNRWA headquarters on fire; UPDATED: 'Palestinians' fired anti-tank missiles from UNRWA HQ#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: 'Palestinians': UNRWA headquarters on fire; UPDATED: 'Palestinians' fired anti-tank missiles from UNRWA HQ#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: From a bunker somewhere in Gaza... Ismail Haniyeh's video blog#links#links#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: From a bunker somewhere in Gaza... Ismail Haniyeh's video blog#links#links#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: Israeli navy turns back S.S. ISM#links#links

Israel Matzav: Israeli navy turns back S.S. ISM#links#links

Israel Matzav: Raw video: IDF attacks multi-story buildings in Gaza City#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: Raw video: IDF attacks multi-story buildings in Gaza City#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: Video: The tunnel diggers of Gaza#links#links#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: Video: The tunnel diggers of Gaza#links#links#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: Video: Critically wounded soldier's father urges government to continue war#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: Video: Critically wounded soldier's father urges government to continue war#links#links#links

Stop Raping Israel: Parshat Shemot: The Eternal Nation

Stop Raping Israel: Parshat Shemot: The Eternal Nation

THE IDF "JEWISH SPIRIT" HAS RETURNED


Fighters' Jewish Spirit Returns
by IsraelNN Staff


An IDF rabbi shared this personal testimony...I had the privilege this week [the week before the ground offensive into Gaza - ed of accompanying the Golani Brigade's Regiment 12 soldiers.

I am the regiment’s rabbi, in reserves, and I was called up to serve just like the all the rest, to “aid Israel at its time of tribulation.”
As a long-time ba'al-teshuvah [returnee to observant Judais, a rabbi in a yeshiva who usually walks around wearing a jacket and hat, I now had a major change of atmosphere: my black “uniform” became one of dusty dark green, the hubbub of the Torah study hall was replaced by not-so-pleasing army slang, and my wife's delicious food was given up for the “delicacies” of the mess hall, most of which I don’t eat because of one stringency or another.

We spent most of the week in wet tents, with the terrible cold preventing me from sleeping at night. (I apparently wasn’t working as hard as the other soldiers, because they fell asleep the second they hit the pillow.)

My work, as an official of the Army Rabbinate, was to give encouragement and strength to the soldiers, give out Books of Psalms [Tehilli and distribute special prayers for those who go out to battle.


Psalms for All


And what did I discover down there in southern Israel? My brothers! The Golanchiks (Golani Brigade soldiers), about to go out to war, want to hold on to the Rock of Israel! There wasn’t a soldier there who didn’t equip himself with a Tehillim in his pocket or combat vest - but the big surprise we had was when we gave out tzitzit [four-cornered shirt with the required ritual fringes attac. Usually only the yeshiva guys take them, but this time, every soldier there seemed to want one!


“Rabbi, bring me some tzitzit, my whole tent wants.” “Hey, achi [my brothe, take one of these, it’s better than the ceramic vest!” These were the types of calls we kept hearing over and over. Every package of tzizit that we opened was snatched up within seconds.


There was one young fighter who came to the synagogue whose face fell when he heard that there were no tzitzit left. He was totally bereft, until one of the officers who wasn’t going out to battle took off his own tzitzit and gave it to him, saying, “Take it, achi (in the Golani you can’t say something without achi), you need it now more than I do.


”Email readers: Click here to watch video on tzitzit distribution in the IDF organized by Kulanuachim


The Ma'ariv evening prayer of Friday night, Parashat Vayigash, was simply unbelievable. The Rabbinate realized that the synagogue was too small to fit all the hundreds of soldiers, and so it turned the soccer field into an impromptu synagogue, with prayerbooks, Holy Ark, and everything else.


Whoever did not take part in that Kabbalat Shabbat [Sabbath Welcomin service, is like one who never took part in a Kabbalat Shabbat service in his life! Almost the entire Golani Brigade, officers and soldiers, yelling out the Kaddish and Tehillim prayers. If it wasn’t for the uniform I was wearing, I could have almost thought that I was at a Yom Kippur service in one of the large yeshivot!


No Questions Asked


Our loving Father, too, was there, enjoying every minute of His sons gathering around Him. Our Father doesn’t ask, “Where have you been until now? Why do you remember Me just when you go out to war?” He welcomes all His children and embraces them with love.


After the Sabbath meal, held in an atmosphere of a great “high,” we were privileged to be able to hold an Oneg Shabbat for the soldiers. Chief IDF Rabbi Avi Ronsky was with us the whole Sabbath, and he warmed our hearts with stories of the Nation of Israel, on compassion, on brotherly love, and more. We sat outside with cake and sunflower seeds in the cold, but inside our hearts it was warm.

During the Sabbath, we had to travel to the places from where the soldiers would leave for Gaza. We arrived and the soldiers were imbued with combat spirit, getting ready, trying to get in a last cigarette. Many soldiers tried very hard not to smoke that Sabbath, after I explained to them the importance of observing the Sabbath. They would come up to me every five minutes and ask if the Sabbath had ended yet.


We prayed Ma'ariv there, recited Havdalah [the Sabbath-ending blessin over grape juice, a lighter [instead of a cand and an orange [in place of spice. And then it was time to go in. The Regiment Commander gathered everyone for last-minute words of strength, and explained to them about the “corrective experience” we were about to impart to the enemy.


When he finished, the Deputy Commander read aloud the prayer before going out to battle. “Repeat after me,” he ordered, and a whole regiment of hundreds of soldiers yelled out, “Ana Hashem hoshia na! Ana Hashem hatzlicha na! [O G-d, save us! O G-d, grant us success” After the prayer, the Deputy Commander asked me to blow the Shofar, just as thousands of years ago when we conquered the Holy Land.


Perfect Coordination


Though I’ve blown the Shofar in public before, this particular time was something that will remain with me my whole life. And then, as if I and the Israel Air Force were in perfect coordination, the very second that I finished blowing the Shofar, our planes bombed the enemy area, as if it were a signal to begin the ground offensive.


The soldiers lined up in two columns, and as I parted from them with handshakes, I thought to myself, “What a special nation we have! This is how a Jewish army looks as it goes out to war – not with boastful ‘We will win’ stickers, but rather ‘We will win with G-d’s help.’”
No Dispute
I will just end by saying that where I live in Modi'in Illit, we have a clever interpretation of the verse ‘G-d’s voice is powerful’ – the word for power is spelled with the letters kaf and chet, which we say are the initials of kova and chalifa [hat and sui, our usual garb. But as of this week, we now know that they are also the initials of the kumta chuma [brown bere worn by the Golani soldiers. There, too, the voice of G-d is heard – and “lo pligi” (there is no argument between the two, both are right).
translated by Hillel Fendel
taken from : B'NAI ELIM (http://bnaielim.blogspot.com/)

Israel does not need your support

Israel does not need your support

Posted using ShareThis

Thursday, 15 January 2009

UNIVERSAL TORAH: SHEMOS

UNIVERSAL TORAH: SHEMOS


By Rabbi Avraham Greenbaum


Torah Reading: SHEMOS Exodus 1:1-6:1; Haftara: Isaiah 27:6-28:13, 29:22-23 (Sephardi ritual: Jeremiah 1:1-2:3).


"AND THESE ARE THE NAMES OF THE CHILDREN OF ISRAEL":ISRAEL ON THE WORLD STAGE


With the beginning of the book of SHEMOS, "Exodus", Israel enters the world stage as a people. Pharaoh himself, their oppressor, recognizes them as "the PEOPLE of the Children of Israel, many and mighty." (Ex. 1:9). Their servitude in Egypt is in fulfillment of the promise given to their founding father, Abraham: "Surely KNOW that your seed will be strangers in a land that is not theirs and they will serve them and they will oppress them. And also the people that they will serve I will judge, and afterwards they will go forth with great wealth" (Gen. 15:13-14).

The Exodus of the People of Israel from Egypt is the pivotal event in the history of mankind, paradigm of all true freedom and liberation, the eternal proof that G-d is not only the Creator of the natural world but also directs and controls all aspects of human affairs with HASHGACHAH PRATIS - "providence in every detail" - for good.


For the sake of G-d's self-revelation to the world, it is not sufficient that He should be known privately to a select few. The climax of G-d's revelation is when "the earth will be full of the KNOWLEDGE of G-d like the waters cover the seas" (Isaiah 11:9). Even those who are turned away from G-d, even those who resist knowing Him, must be forced to admit -- even against their will -- that G-d is King of the whole world.


Thus when Moses first calls on Pharaoh in the name of G-d to release His People, "...and Pharaoh said, 'Who is HaShem that I should listen to His voice. I do not KNOW HaShem." (Ex. 5:2). But in the end Pharaoh himself was forced to send them away: "Go, serve HaShem as YOU said" (12:31); "And Egypt said, let me flee from Israel, for HaShem is fighting for them against Egypt" (14:25).


In Egypt the Children of Israel, G-d's emissaries, were in an upside-down world. "There is an evil that I have seen beneath the sun like a mistake that went forth from before the Ruler: folly is put in many high places while the wealthy [=Israel, Rashi] sit in the low place. I have seen slaves on horses while princes walk like slaves on the ground" (Koheles 10:5-7). Noah cursed the nations of Ham to be "a servant of servants to his brothers" (Gen. 10:25). But now Ham's second-born, MITZRAIM (Gen. 10:6) -- Egypt -- were lording it over the choicest of the line of Shem. It looked as though Pharaoh was the "first-born". G-d's revelation to the world depended upon showing that "My son, My first-born is Israel" (Ex. 4:22). Even the Egyptians saw this when G-d smote all their first-born while saving all the Israelite first-born.


Even the Egyptians had to come to KNOW. Even Jethro -- who tried every religion in the world -- had to admit in the end: "Now I KNOW that HaShem is greater than all the gods." (Ex. 18:11). More than anyone, the Israelites -- who in slavery fell into the false consciousness imposed on them by their oppressors -- had to learn the lesson on their own flesh. The Exodus from Egypt is the pivotal event in the history of the People of Israel, the very brith of the nation. The climax was to come at Mount Sinai, when the entire nation, together and in unity, witnessed G-d's revelation. The revelation at Sinai was a "mass conversion": the Rabbis point out that the three acts associated with conversion -- circumcision, immersion in the Mikveh [the Torah root of "baptism"] and [in Temple times,] a sacrificial offering, were all observed at Sinai.


After introducing us to the "upside-down" world of Egypt in the first chapter of Exodus, our parshah of SHEMOS immediately moves to the concepts of revelation and conversion. When Moses was born, "the whole house was filled with light" (Rashi on Ex. 2:2 "and she saw him THAT HE WAS GOOD" corresponding to "and G-d saw the light THAT IT WAS GOOD" Gen. 1:4). Immediately afterwards, "And Pharaoh's daughter went down to wash by the river" -- "she changed her religion and went to convert" (Baal HaTurim ibid.) In the merit of Batya's compassion for the baby Moses and her act of saving him, she was worthy of being one of the greatest ever converts. Batya's predecessor, Hagar, daughter of the Pharaoh of Abraham's days and mother of Ishmael, "went astray" (Gen. 21:14). But Batya married into the princely tribe of Judah (Sanhedrin 19b on Chronicles I, 4:18). The other prominent convert introduced in our parshah is Jethro.

* * *

THE CONSTRICTION OF THE THROAT


In the upside-down world of Egypt it looks as though not G-d is running the world but Pharaoh. As discussed in the commentaries on Genesis, PhaRaOh is the embodiment of the OrePh, the "back of the neck" of the Creation as opposed to its inner face. Pharaoh is the epitome of worldly power and control, "the great crocodile squatting in his rivers who says 'the river is mine and I made myself' " (Ezekiel 29:3, Haftarah of next week's parshah when not Rosh Chodesh).


Pharaoh "does not know" HaShem: he resists knowing. Thus MITRAYIM is related to the root MEITZAR, the "narrow strait", a place of constriction. In kabbalistic literature, Pharaoh is called "the constriction of the throat" (MEITZAR HAGARON). Through the neck run three narrow channels that are vital to survival: the windpipe, the gullet and the jugular veins (corresponding to Pharaoh's three "officers", the Butler, the Baker and the Captain of the Guard). Life depends upon the free flow of gases, fluids and solids through these channels from the head down into the body, while all our functioning is governed through the most heavily protected channel of all: the spinal column, which extends down from the brainstem into the body via the neck.


The book of Genesis is the "head" of the Torah: BEREISHIS, "at the head". The first word and first verse of Genesis contain the entire creation "in a nutshell" (King Solomon's "garden of nuts"). The first book of the Torah is the head and brain in the sense that it introduces us to all the fundamentals of true religion. The rest of the Torah is the "body". Exodus is the "arms" ("for with a mighty HAND G-d took you out of Egypt" Ex. 13:9). Leviticus is the middle and heart of the Torah: "You shall be holy, for I HaShem your G-d am holy" -- "and love your neighbor as yourself" (Leviticus ch. 19 v. 2 and v. 18). The Book of Numbers is the "legs": the Children of Israel are on the move through the wilderness -- "these are the journeys of the Children of Israel" (Numbers 33:1). Finally Deuteronomy is the "feet" -- Malchus, the lowest level: "the END of the matter, when all has been heard: fear G-d and observe His commandments, for that is the Whole Man" (Koheles 12:13).


With the opening of the book of Exodus, we are at the beginning of the transition from "the head", Genesis, to the "body", the rest of the Torah. We are at the "neck". This is why we must now encounter Pharaoh, the "back of the neck" -- the real Pharaoh, no longer Joseph's "friendly" patron but a wicked tyrant who, to perpetuate his own rule, is hell-bent on keeping the world from KNOWING G-D.


Pharaoh's scheme is to constrict the passage of DAAS from the head and brain down into the body. Whereas the nervous system connects the body with the brain, bringing sensation, awareness and consciousness to all parts, Pharaoh's officers work to constrict the flow of awareness. The Butler and the Baker make us want to eat and involve ourselves in the material world, but our material involvements, although vital for our survival, often tend to distract and separate us from the life of the spirit. We fall into false consciousness, and the battle for physical survival and material gratification becomes paramount. We spend our lives building "store cities for Pharaoh" (Ex. 1:11).


The role of Moses is to bring DAAS, spiritual knowledge and awareness from the "head" down into the "body". It is not enough to know that there is a G-d in our minds. We have to bring that knowledge down into our actual lives and daily activities. "And you shall KNOW TODAY and BRING DOWN INTO YOUR HEART that HaShem is G-d in the heaven above and on the earth below, there is none other" (Deut. 4:39).

* * *

THE KEY IS SHABBOS


Adam was created for the highest mission, to "fill the earth and conquer it and rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the heavens and every living being swarming on the earth" (Gen. 1:28). But Adam fell from his mission, and instead of "tending and guarding" the Garden of Eden (Gen. 2:15), he was driven out to become slave to the earth: "With the sweat of your brow you will eat bread." (Gen. 3:19).


The only way for the Children of Adam to escape this servitude is through the Shabbos, which each week releases man from slavery to the material world and the battle for survival, lifting him above it to the world of DAAS, the knowledge and awareness of G-d.


Thus when Moses first went into Pharaoh, his initial request was that the Children of Israel should have a holiday from their slavery: "Let us please go for a journey of three days into the wilderness, and there we will sacrifice to HaShem our G-d" (Ex. 5:3).


Pharaoh's immediate reaction was to resist the idea: "Why are you disturbing the people from their labors, go back to your tasks. You are causing them to cease from their tasks" (Ex. 5:5). The Hebrew for "you are disturbing" is taPhRiyOO, containing the word PHARAOH -- as if Moses and Aaron are the tyrants. The Hebrew for "You are causing them to cease" is ve-hiSHBATem, containing the word SHABBOS. Pharaoh's scheme for preventing DAAS spreading from the head, Moses, to the Children of Israel, the body, was to make the Children of Israel so busy with this-worldliness that they would not have TIME to be aware of G-d. And indeed the Children of Israel became so wearied by their intensified servitude on the threshold of redemption that "they did not listen to Moses because of shortness of spirit and hard work" (Gen. 6:9).


Moses had to legislate the Shabbos because there is a wicked force in man -- Pharaoh -- that will not allow him to rest from the world until he must by law! Shabbos was the first commandment given to the Children of Israel directly after their entry into the wilderness following the crossing of the Red Sea (Rashi on Ex. 15:25). Shabbos -- SHEVITA, the willful cessation of and resting from MELACHAH, deliberate, manipulative labor -- is the very key to man's freedom from the tyranny of this world.

* * *

THE RIGHTEOUS WOMEN


"In the merit of the righteous women that were in that generation, Israel were redeemed from Egypt" (Sotah 11b).


The Midrashim give many examples of the heroism and self-sacrifice of the women of the period of exile and slavery in Egypt in lifting their husbands' spirits and breeding new generations for a better future.


While our parshah introduces the Savior of Israel -- Moses -- who was a man, it is striking that the most decisive roles are played by women. In Genesis we saw a succession of great women turning and shaping history on their own initiative, such as Sarah, Rebeccah, Rachel, Leah and Tamar. In our parshah this is a recurring phenomenon: four outstanding women take decisive action on their own initiative to bring about redemption: Jochebed, Miriam, Batya and Tziporah.


Thus when Pharaoh wanted to kill the Israelite boys, it was the two midwives, "Shifra" and "Pu'ah" (= Jochebed and Miriam) who cleverly frustrated his plans. When Amram "took the daughter of Levi (=Jochebed)" (Ex. 2:1) from whom he had separated because he did not want to breed children who would be killed, it was on the initiative of Miriam that he relented (see Rashi ad loc.). By drawing Moses out of the water, Batya saved the entire world. The dauntless Miriam went straight up to the king's daughter offering to bring someone to take care of the rescued baby. Batya had the good sense to understood the crucial importance of good nurturing. Jethro's daughters were perhaps too modest to invite Moses home until their father told them -- after all, they thought he was an Egyptian (Ex. 2:19-20). However, Tziporah showed no hesitation when she saw an angel consuming her husband Moses for failing to circumcise Eliezer: she took a flint and performed the bloody circumcision herself, showing that as a true righteous convert, her heart was circumcised to G-d.

In all these cases, examples, the heroism and initiative of these women is bound up with breeding and rearing future generations to know and serve G-d.


Shabbat Shalom!


Avraham Yehoshua Greenbaum


--

AZAMRA INSTITUTE
PO Box 50037 Jerusalem 91500
IsraelWebsite: www.azamra.org

Wednesday, 14 January 2009

RED ZI DER WAND



I while ago one "Beth of use your brains for truth" left what she considered a provocative comment on one of my posts, and wondered if I'd allow it to remain there. I responded that of course I'd let it remain; indeed, I warned Ms. Brainsfortruth, I looked forward to her future comments which I might hold up to public scrutiny for their interesting patterns.


So she didn't walk into any trap unsuspecting. By continuing to comment, she accepted the terms of engagement.


In this post I claimed that Gideon Levy is a sick man, consumed with hatred. I don't think Ms. Brainsfortruth quite understood my thesis, and perhaps I didn't articulate it well enough. Then she goes on to say:


But surely the thought that "any attempt to disband it (Israel) would result in mass suffering of millions of people, and the disruptions of millions of lives." is alarmist and reveals an interesting aspect of your pathology. The Dissbanding of Israel is not a proposal in any UN resolution (nor was it in the minds of the majority of fellow humans across the globe - however recent untenable aggression by Israel (including Lebanon 2006) may be initializing the manifesting of this very paranoid fear).


Quick synopsis: The thought that anyone might want to disband the Jewish state is alarmist and pathological; no-one advocates it; Israeli's irrational fear of this possibility no-one is suggesting makes it unacceptably aggressive.


I don't have to answer her, do I? I'm beaming a light at her not to refute what, alas, needs no refuting, but to demonstrate that there are people out there who manage to have opinions with nary the slightest connections to the relevant facts. While this is not a surprising finding, it never-the-less is an important one which needs never to be forgotten: people don't set out to learn the facts of reality and then try to understand them; on the contrary, they often start out with the understanding and then blithely disregard any facts that don't fit.


Ms. Brainsfortruth also responded to this post, in which I noted that persecution need not necessarily call forth violent revenge, nor long-term hatred: victims make the decision to wallow in hatred, seek revenge, or get on with their lives. One thing she had to say was


A people oppressed are bound to resist. A people disscounted and bullied are bound to avenge their suffering. A people restored of their rightful dignity and sense of home are usually [...] less interested in violence and overblown rhetoric.


(I admit, I pruned her sentence a bit to make it clearer). This is a prefect example of deciding you know what the immutable laws of history are, and fitting reality into them (or not seeing reality at all).


Of course, there are no immutable laws of history, except perhaps that we'll all die and the taxman will help us on our way. History isn't physics, because history is the sum of the actions of people, and people make decisions. Sometimes they act rationally. Sometimes they don't. Sometimes it's impossible to know what rational is or isn't. I mean, look at Juan Cole and Ms. Brainsfortruth, and then look at me. We all live at the same time, but we see different realities and respond differently. How are you going to articulate a law that will explain all our decisions?


So Ms. Brainsfortruth has a weak grasp of historical (and contemporary) facts. She has a touching belief in neat explanations of human history that also serve as guideposts to a better world; behave as the laws indicate and the world will be all fixed. She also has a breathtaking lack of perception of human nature. I had mentioned how the survivors of the Shoah, the world's worst genocide, had jointly decided, hundreds of thousands of them simultaneously, to refrain from revenge and get on with their lives; within a few decades they and their children had even largely forged reasonable relations with the society of their tormentors. To which Ms. Brainsfortruth responded with


Do you think that perhaps the worldwide villification of the nazi regime (and their defeat and removal from power), plus the rightly conducted war crime trials at nuremberg had a hand in tempering the hate against the germans?


From 1945-49 those who had persecuted and inflicted great horrors on fellow human beings were arrested and charged as outrageous criminals, those who had supported them were made to see the error of their ways (and still are to this day), and the jewish people were dignified with the recognition of needing a homeland. (Tho admittedly the way in which this last item was achieved could have been handled much more intelligently)


Well, actually, Ms. Brainsfortruth, no, I don't think that way. Thee are lots of reasons I'm in disagreement with you on this, all of them stemming from knowledge of the facts, but I'll only point out a few of the more obvious.
1. The trials at Nurenberg had nothing to do with the Nazi crimes against the Jews. No one was indicted for murdering Jews, nor was anyone convicted for that particular crime. Go read the historical record. The first Nazi criminal ever put on trial for the Holocaust was Adolf Eichmann, in 1961... in Israel. Much of the world was furious at the time that the Israelis had kidnapped him from Argentina (contrary to international law). Honest.
2. All in all, from 1945 till 2009, the number of Nazi war criminal convicted for murdering Jews in Western countries is lower than 750. Few of them spent much time in jail. The number of Nazis estimated to have participated directly in the Holocaust is well over 100,000.
3. The international recognition of the Jewish right to a homeland, in 1947, was a stingy offer, for a state truncated into three separate sections, surrounded by countries determined to destroy it at day one. Most observers at the time, throughout the world, expected the Arabs wold destroy the Jewish State immediately. In other words, the "jewish people were dignified with the recognition of needing a homeland." as you put it, were being set up to be murdered. In the end they didn't allow that to happen, true, but not for lack of trying by the Arabs, and colusion by the rest of the world that embargoed arms shipments so the Jews woldn't be able to defend themselves. The exception was the almost-Soviet-controlled Czechoslovakia.
4. Read your assertion again. Can your mind hold the thought that hundreds of thousands of people whose entire world had been murdered, and they themselves had been tortured for years, would find solace in "worldwide vilification of the Nazi regime". Mine can't. I think this is because I have greater respect for human beings and their complexity than you do, which is why I took the time to point it out. Your positions regarding Israel, to get back to our original topic, are based on an extraordinary lack understanding of the human condition.


PS. red zi der wand means talk to the wall.


taken from : Yaacov Lozowick's Ruminations (http://yaacovlozowick.blogspot.com/)

FOUR INTERPRETATIONS OF HAMAS




I've organized them by seriousness, stating with the fourth best.


Basim Naim is the Hamas minister of health in Gaza. Since our troops are arguing right now with the thugs of his side, I don't feel the need to argue with him nor to point out the various factual, chronological and logical weak spots of his argument. I'm mentioning it mostly to index for future use that the Guardian hosted him and its readers seem to have welcomed him, and also because youmight want to compare what he says with the next interpretations.


Jonathan Freedland is one of the less worst of the Guardian crop, generally speaking, and today's column fits the pattern. It's fundamentally wrong, it's informed by the man's understanding of the world not the facts, but it's neither as bad as Minister Naim nor as some of his own colleagues at the Guardian. Again, I'm indexing, not engaging. Life is too short to spend it arguing with the Guardian.


So, we move on to the New York Times. Some people I know can't stand them and get all worked up when they don't support Israeli ways of understanding reality; I also argue with them from time to time. But these arguments mostly fall deep within the lines of reasonable differences of opinion. The two columns from today's edition disagree with one another on the basics, but they're both interesting and thoughtful.


Thomas Friedman explains that the war really is (or should be) about the day after the day after the end of the shooting: what each side will have learned, and especially, if Hamas will be detered as Hezbollah has been:


That was the education of Hezbollah. Has Israel seen its last conflict with Hezbollah? I doubt it. But Hezbollah, which has done nothing for Hamas, will think three times next time. That is probably all Israel can achieve with a nonstate actor.


In Gaza, I still can’t tell if Israel is trying to eradicate Hamas or trying to “educate” Hamas, by inflicting a heavy death toll on Hamas militants and heavy pain on the Gaza population. If it is out to destroy Hamas, casualties will be horrific and the aftermath could be Somalia-like chaos. If it is out to educate Hamas, Israel may have achieved its aims. Now its focus, and the Obama team’s focus, should be on creating a clear choice for Hamas for the world to see: Are you about destroying Israel or building Gaza?


Finally, we've got Jeffrey Goldberg. I admit that for the moment I'm precariously close to becoming a Goldberg Fan, which would be bad: I've managed to get through decades of adulthood without long-term membership in anyone's fan club. So next week I'll have to make sure I find something he writes that really aggravates me. But that's next week.


Goldberg speaks Arabic, unlike Freedland and Friedman. Unlike Freedamn, he takes Hamas seriously, and probably unlike Freidman, he really wants to understand them by their own terms. That's why you need to read his findings:


There is a fixed idea among some Israeli leaders that Hamas can be bombed into moderation. This is a false and dangerous notion. It is true that Hamas can be deterred militarily for a time, but tanks cannot defeat deeply felt belief.


The reverse is also true: Hamas cannot be cajoled into moderation. Neither position credits Hamas with sincerity, or seriousness.


The only small chance for peace today is the same chance that existed before the Gaza invasion: The moderate Arab states, Europe, the United States and, mainly, Israel, must help Hamas’s enemy, Fatah, prepare the West Bank for real freedom, and then hope that the people of Gaza, vast numbers of whom are unsympathetic to Hamas, see the West Bank as an alternative to the squalid vision of Hassan Nasrallah and Nizar Rayyan.

Amen.
taken from :Yaacov Lozowick's Ruminations (http://yaacovlozowick.blogspot.com/)

MORE TRAGI-COMIC RELIEF







This is coursing round cyberspace these days. I don't know its provenance, but see no reason to think it's faked. Hating Jews is not an activity only ignoramuses engage in, on the contrary, but also they. Moreover, they are sometimes helpful because their lack of sophistication makes clear what the issues really are.
taken from : Yaacov Lozowick's Ruminations (http://yaacovlozowick.blogspot.com/)

Israel Matzav: Video: IDF carries out night strike against Hamas terrorists#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: Video: IDF carries out night strike against Hamas terrorists#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: Video: Al-Beeb's coverage of Gaza#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: Video: Al-Beeb's coverage of Gaza#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: Hamas using children in combat support roles#links#links

Israel Matzav: Hamas using children in combat support roles#links#links

Israel Matzav: Hamas 'accepts' Egyptian 'cease fire'?#links#links

Israel Matzav: Hamas 'accepts' Egyptian 'cease fire'?#links#links

Israel Matzav: Why Israel can't make peace with Hamas - or Fatah#links#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: Why Israel can't make peace with Hamas - or Fatah#links#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: Monsey firefighters coming to Israel#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: Monsey firefighters coming to Israel#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: Bolivia breaks diplomatic relations with Israel#links#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: Bolivia breaks diplomatic relations with Israel#links#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: Interview with an IAF helicopter pilot#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: Interview with an IAF helicopter pilot#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: Video: Translation of recent Hamas press conference#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: Video: Translation of recent Hamas press conference#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: Raw video: Tunnel inside civilian house in Gaza#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: Raw video: Tunnel inside civilian house in Gaza#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: German police apologize for removing Israeli flag#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: German police apologize for removing Israeli flag#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: Air raid sirens in Jerusalem#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: Air raid sirens in Jerusalem#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: Gaza's true disproportion#links#links

Israel Matzav: Gaza's true disproportion#links#links

Israel Matzav: The real meaning of Hamas#links#links

Israel Matzav: The real meaning of Hamas#links#links

Israel Matzav: Video: Hamas in action#links#links#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: Video: Hamas in action#links#links#links#links#links

For Zion's Sake - My Letter to Canadian PM Stephen Harper




Canada was the only country in the UN to oppose the unfair and unbalanced anti-Israel resolution. Stephen Harper has shown himself to be a great friend of Israel. He can be contact at pm@pm.gc.ca. Here is the e-mail that I sent him:


Dear Prime Minister Harper,


Once again, you have shown yourself to be a man of incredible courage and moral strength by standing up for the right of Israel to defend herself. While most of the world has been very forceful of in their condemnation of Israel, Canada was the only country at the UN to oppose the unbalanced and unfair resolution targeted at Israel. Canada and Israel face the same enemies, the forces of Islamic fascism, whether they are in Afghanistan or in Gaza. Under a constant barrage of over 4000 missiles on southern Israel since 2005, Israel cannot allow such attacks to go unanswered. No other country would have waited for so long to defend its sovereignty and citizens. Mr Harper, your support for Israel makes me incredible proud to be a Canadian.


On June 25, 2006, an Israeli soldier, Gilad Shalit, was kidnapped by Hamas terrorists. He has been held, in unknown conditions, in Gaza for over 3 years, denied Red Cross access and the most basic human rights. Hamas's refusal to allow access to Shalit is a war crime and a violation of international law. As a friend and supporter of Israel and the Jewish people, please do not allow Gilad Shalit to be forgotten. Please do everything in your diplomatic power to ensure that Gilad Shalit comes home. I hope that Canada will raise this issue before the United Nations.


The attacks on Sderot and southern Israel come as a direct result of the Israeli Disengagement from Gaza in 2005, in which 10 000 Jews were expelled from their homes. Learning from this tragic mistake, it is time to bury the so-called "two-state solution". If an Arab terror state was created in Judea and Samaria (the West Bank), every major Israeli city would come under rocket range. One single attack at Israel's international airport would effectively end Israeli tourism, trade and immigration. No friend of Israel can allow such a plan to come about. Judea and Samaria are the ancestral Jewish homeland and belong to the Jewish people by every conceivable religious, historic and political right. Israel cannot survive a terror state carved into its belly. The war in Gaza hopefully will put this terrible plan to rest.


Mr. Harper, you have shown the moral clarity to differentiate between a democratic state and a terror group. Israel is dedicated to peace and freedom while Hamas and the Islamic society which spawned it worships deaths and hatred. This hatred has manifested itself time and time again in NY, the London Tube, in Kabul or in Mumbai. Anti-Israel protesters in Canadian cities such as Montreal and Toronto have screamed such obscenities as "Jews to the ovens" and "Hitler didn't finish the job". This sort of anti-semitic behaviour cannot be tolerated in as civilized a country as Canada. Israel is the canary in the coal mine. It always begins with the Jews but it never ends with the Jews.


Sincerely,


xxx BK


taken from : For Zion's Sake (http://masada1234.blogspot.com/)

Stop Raping Israel: Arabs Live Better under Israeli Rule

Stop Raping Israel: Arabs Live Better under Israeli Rule

IAF Avoids Civilian Casualties

My thanks to Israelgirl67 for recommending me this video

SHOWING ETERNAL HATRED



Earlier this afternoon I was at a meeting connected to the previous chapter of my career, which had to do with history of the Holocaust. During the discussion a thought crossed my mind.


Lots of reporters and pundits are bewailing the fact that Israel's actions in Gaza right now are necessarily going to sow a hatred amongst the Palestinians that will be implacable and eternal: this being a rule of human nature, we're to understand. And also, probably, a reflection at least in some cases of the emotions the pundits themselves harbor.


It ain't necessarily so. You might want to reflect for a moment on the Jews of 1945, who then lived to be the Jews of 1965, some lived until 1985, and some are still with us till this very day. I assure you that the survivors of the Holocaust had more reason to hate the Germans forever than the Palestinians ever will have reason to hate us. I could detail how I know this, but if you need me to it's hopeless anyway, so I'll merely state it and leave it at that.


In spite of all the perfectly rational and reasonable and plausible reasons for hating the Germans forever, it didn't happen. First, in 1945-49, with hundreds of thousands of survivors in Germany itself, there were no suicide bombers, and no blind acts of revenge against the German populace at all. None.


Then, a decade later, the Jewish State already had some relations with the German one (West German one, to be precise). 20 years ofter the Holocaust, West Germany and Israel had full diplomatic relations, and many other relations also. 30 years after the event, one can argue that the relations between Germany and Israel were better than those between Israel and any other European country (which doesn't say too much, does it). By which time the relations between normal Germans and normal Israelis had long since become significantly more normal than it would have been to expect, back in 1945.


Eternal hatred is something one must decide to have, eternally. It isn't a law of nature. It's a decision. Eventually, the decision to bear hate becomes immoral, no matter how it originated.
taken from : Yaacov Lozowick's Ruminations (http://yaacovlozowick.blogspot.com/)

Israel Matzav: Pictures of the IDF you'll never see in the mainstream media#links#links

Israel Matzav: Pictures of the IDF you'll never see in the mainstream media#links#links

Israel Matzav: Arab journalist: 'Israelis value human life more than we do'#links#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: Arab journalist: 'Israelis value human life more than we do'#links#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: Video: Huge IAF airstrike caught on tape#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: Video: Huge IAF airstrike caught on tape#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: Arab governments 'worried' over Hamas' popularity#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: Arab governments 'worried' over Hamas' popularity#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: Video: A mosque full of weapons#links#links#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: Video: A mosque full of weapons#links#links#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: NY Times puzzled by Israelis support the war#links#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: NY Times puzzled by Israelis support the war#links#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: Watch the Hamas 'spokesman' get slammed#links#links#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: Watch the Hamas 'spokesman' get slammed#links#links#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: Why Israel is playing hardball with Hamas#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: Why Israel is playing hardball with Hamas#links#links#links

Stop Raping Israel: HAMAS' Last Stand?

Stop Raping Israel: HAMAS' Last Stand?

Monday, 12 January 2009

Israel Matzav: Russia provoking war to raise oil prices?#links#links

Israel Matzav: Russia provoking war to raise oil prices?#links#links

Israel Matzav: Italian UNIFIL contingent finds plastic explosives near base#links#links

Israel Matzav: Italian UNIFIL contingent finds plastic explosives near base#links#links

Israel Matzav: You can take a Muslim out of Gaza but you can't take Gaza out of a Muslim#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: You can take a Muslim out of Gaza but you can't take Gaza out of a Muslim#links#links#links

ARE CEASEFIRES GOOD ?




The post-WWII international order is changing warfare. In many ways, this is good. Yet it's not unreservedly good. One institution that was certainly meant to be good but in reality is problematic is the internationally imposed ceasefire.


Wars have always been part of the human story, and I see no reason to expect this to change. In the past, wars were fought until one side won by destroying the ability of the other side to fight, or the other side sued for peace, or, rarely, a third side convinced the warring parties to desist. In all three scenarios, someone came away from the war with some achievement: the instigators with what they initially intended, or the defenders having proven to the instigators that they couldn't have what they wanted. I realize this is an oversimplification, but it's essentially true none-the-less. The British didn't want a French-dominated Europe at the turn of the 19th century, so they stopped it from happening. (Whether this was "good" or not, I can't say). The Northern states wanted to retain the Union, so they battled until the South agreed to stay put. The Reds wanted to control Russia and call it the Soviet Union, so they battled the Whites until Soviet domination was solid. And so on and on and on.


Countless millions of people lost their lives in these wars, and the suffering was immeasurable. Yet the clarity resulting from the end of hostilities wasn't always bad. Freed slaves were better off than before the war, no matter how you look at it; within the span of human memory the Union contributed to the defeat of the less nice side in the Great War, and at the very edge of living memory, some children who remembered Gettysburg lived to see VE-Day.


The combination of the United Nations Security Council and modern technology that can bring the horrors of war into faraway living rooms mean that many wars are no longer allowed to rage until one side wins. Not all wars, mind you: the Yugoslav wars of the 1990s were mostly resolved on the ground before the world got around to stopping them; the Russians in Georgia last summer stopped inflicting pain when they felt like it, not when anyone stopped them; and the wars of Africa go on, and on, and on.

Those African horrors demonstrate that the international mechanisms work only when there's a will to enforce them. The case of Israel's wars may hint that sometimes, the international determination to enforce ceasefires actively prolong the conflict, since the Arab side knows that Israel won't be allowed to do what would have been obvious throughout history: decisively win. As Tzipi Livni told Newsweek the other day:



Hamas's strategy is resistance and survival. As long as they survive, this is a victory. When they know the international community is putting pressure on Israel, they can hold out, waiting for Israel to be stopped. It is a pity … [But] I cannot tell you that this is the last operation. If they target us again, we will act again. Strongly.


None of us truly doubt that there will be additional rounds, sometime down the road. After all, what do our enemies stand to lose? Or more accurately, what do they stand to lose that would hurt them enough they won't take the risk?

NUMBERS



Here's a link to a lecture given in May 2002 by Hanoch Marmari, at the time editor-in-chief of Haaretz, at an international conference of media types. It's a bit more self-congratulatory than warranted, but otherwise worth reading, even though it's almost seven years old. He enumerates five fundamental sins of the media reporting on the Mideast: Obsessiveness, prejudice, condescension, ignorance, and the fifth, which he adds at the end, naivete. Nor does he shy away from criticizing the media for their heavy-handed interventions in the events themselves:



One day, historians examining this period of crisis will have to consider the circular process by which the media were transformed from observers to participants. From covering the story to playing a major part in it, to stimulating and sometimes agitating the environment for their own media purposes. The media in this cruel Israeli-Palestinian conflict are like a very rich junkie, who parks his Mercedes on the high street of a slum. You can be sure that in no time at all, everyone will be out there, pushing a whole variety of merchandise.


The reason I'm citing him here, however, beyond the value of his comments, is because of the story with which he opened his talk, the story of one Abu Ali of Jenin who told a gullible European journalist the IDF had killed all nine of his children, even while all nine were still very much alive; the European newspaper which turned this into a two-page story somehow never got around to informing its readers that thankfully, the story actually wasn't true. In case you wonder if Abu Ali might at least have been sincere, though mistaken, Marmari makes it quite clear later on that this couldn't have been true: whoever was there and knew the facts, such as his one anti-Israeli reporter Amira Hass, knew fully well that there had been no massacre.


Which means Abu Ali lied. Me, I'd be superstitious to tell someone about the death of my children, but perhaps that's just me.


----------------------


Those of you old enough to remember the turn of the century may recollect the persistent story, repeated endlessly as an article of faith, whereby the international blockade of Iraq throughout the 1990s had caused the death by starvation of half a million Iraqi children. That's 500,000 children, a large number by any standard.


Then, in 2003, the Americans invaded Iraq, and for a few months it was safe enough for Western journalists to wander around the country, reporting on the lack of WMD and how awful the Americans were. One story that didn't get told was the story of the parents of those half a million dead children. So far as I can remember, there was never a single interview with a single Iraqi parent who told about how their child had starved to death. Moreover, there were no pictures of Iraqi children on the verge of starvation. Nor any stories about the allies rushing large convoys of basic foodstuffs to a famished populace.


The entire story disappeared. I'll go out on a branch here and speculate that it was never true, and was tailored from full cloth by a combination of liars who invented it and malicious ignoramuses who gleefully disseminated it.


If anyone wishes to disprove me, I will of retract this allegation once it has been proven wrong.


The invasion of Iraq in 2003 of course gave birth to a whole industry of unverified and often wrong numbers of casualties. Of course, unlike the previous case, when the Americans and British invaded Iraq in 2003 they set in motion a train of events in which many tens of thousands of Iraqis did die, most of them civilians, and most of them at the hands of their fellow Arabs. Yet Google enables you the opportunity of going back to the media reports of 2003 and 2004, where you'll see that the numbers of the purported dead were significantly higher than the numbers being cited in, say, the horrific year of 2006; an indication that once again some observers were not being careful with their numbers, peculiar as this may sound.


Compared to the true and false numbers bandied carelessly around for Iraq, the numbers of dead in Gaza in this campaign are paltry: not hundreds of thousands, but hundreds, period. Were the real number to be in the thousands, we'd be hearing about it; since the IDF itself says its troops have identified hundreds of fighters they have personally killed in battle, it's likely the total is more or less correct. That some of them, probably even a few hundred, really are non-combatants, most horrifically children, is true. Yesterday, according to the reports, the troops reported they had killed up to fifty armed Hamas fighters.


Yet that number deserves to be looked at again. The IDF and the armed wing of Hamas are engaged in fierce face-to-face combat in a densely built city. Hamas prepared for this battle for quite a while, it dug tunnels, stored explosives in homes, booby trapped schools, a zoo, and many residential buildings - and the number of civilian dead on a typical day of fighting is... Five? Ten? Twenty?


That's what the international tumult is about? Did I miss something?


taken from : Yaacov Lozowick's Ruminations (http://yaacovlozowick.blogspot.com/)

COLONIALISM : WHAT FOR ?



There were compelling reasons for European colonialism, created largely in the 19th century, and peaking in the early 20th. Most of them had to do with money: Smallish European countries exploited much larger tracts of territories elsewhere, taking out minerals, selling in their own industrial products, exploiting cheap labor where this made sense, and eventually recruiting large numbers of natives to fight in the European wars of the 20th century. Of course it was more complex, but I think that's a reasonable synopsis. The British, by the way, at least said they were bringing enlightened modernity to benighted primitives, so they had a moral justification; to an extent, this was demonstrably true. The rest of the European colonials don't seem much to have troubled themselves.


Whenever a post-colonial-guilt-ridden-hate-infused critic of Israel sets off on one of their rants about Israel's colonialism, it might be a good tactic to calm then down and ask them, quietly, to describe what precisely Israel's colonial goals are. Certainly not exploitation of Palestinian mineral resources, of which there are none? Selling Israeli produce? To the Palestinians? Huh? Exploiting cheap labor: For a while we were indeed doing this, and the level of Palestinian economic quality of life rose dramatically, but that was before the 1990s; nowadays Israelis employ very few Palestinians because of the security complications, and the sole losers are the Palestinians themselves; the Israelis have replaced them with Africans, Asians and East-Europeans. As for the idea of recruiting them for our wars, well....


Like the British, however, Israel did have the conceit of improving life for the Palestinians. In one case, for example, Israel refurbished the largest hospital in Gaza, and even built an entire second wing, including a large concrete basement.... Yup, this is going exactly where you thought it might be going:

Hamas leaders hiding in basement of Israel-built hospital in Gaza.


takem from : Yaacov Lozowick's Ruminations (http://yaacovlozowick.blogspot.com/)

A MESSAGE TO THE JEWISH PEOPLE AND THE ENTIRE WORLD

Chronicles I - 16:15-18: "Forever remember His covenant that he commanded forever; That He made with Abraham and swore to Isaac; and confirmed in a decree for Jacob, for Israel, as an eternal covenant; saying to You I will give the Land of Cannan as your alloted heritage"

taken from B'NAI ELIM (http://bnaielim.blogspot.com/)

Sunday, 11 January 2009

The Barnyard: Not a Tear!#links#links#links

The Barnyard: Not a Tear!#links#links#links

The Barnyard: Moonbat Leftards Join Hamas Lovers In Jew Hatred Around The World#links#links

The Barnyard: Moonbat Leftards Join Hamas Lovers In Jew Hatred Around The World#links#links

Israel Matzav: A couple of tips from Israeli intelligence#links#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: A couple of tips from Israeli intelligence#links#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: Video: 'Bombs are more precious than children'#links#links#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: Video: 'Bombs are more precious than children'#links#links#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: Video: Hamas exploitation of civilians as human shields#links#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: Video: Hamas exploitation of civilians as human shields#links#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: Will Jews start to flee England?#links#links

Israel Matzav: Will Jews start to flee England?#links#links

Israel Matzav: Hamas calls on Gaza kids to form a human shield#links#links#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: Hamas calls on Gaza kids to form a human shield#links#links#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: Hamas tried to down IAF plane#links#links

Israel Matzav: Hamas tried to down IAF plane#links#links

Israel Matzav: Breaking: Syrians fire on Israel in Golan!#links#links

Israel Matzav: Breaking: Syrians fire on Israel in Golan!#links#links

Israel Matzav: Who'da thunk it: Geraldo Rivera rips Pali ambassador#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: Who'da thunk it: Geraldo Rivera rips Pali ambassador#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: Sky News: How long can Hamas fight?#links#links#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: Sky News: How long can Hamas fight?#links#links#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: Would you let your kid do this?#links#links

Israel Matzav: Would you let your kid do this?#links#links

Israel Matzav: The oldest hatred comes to... Chicago#links#links

Israel Matzav: The oldest hatred comes to... Chicago#links#links

Israel Matzav: Follow the money....#links#links

Israel Matzav: Follow the money....#links#links

Israel Matzav: German police break into private home to remove Israeli flag that 'offended' Muslims#links#links

Israel Matzav: German police break into private home to remove Israeli flag that 'offended' Muslims#links#links

Israel Matzav: NY Times: Bush refused requests for bunker busters, flyover#links#links

Israel Matzav: NY Times: Bush refused requests for bunker busters, flyover#links#links

INNOCENT CIVILIANS...I DON'T THINK SO !



INNOCENT GAZA CIVILIANS


by Steven Plaut


Innocent Gaza civilians, huh? A three hour ceasefire so that"innocent Gazan civilians" can go shopping today?


Are Gaza civilians really innocent? Let us bear in mind that the years of rocket savagery by the Hamas were a direct result of the vast majority of the residents of the Gaza Strip voting for the Hamas in the elections,such as they were, that were held there.


The vast majority of Gazans brought the Hamas into power with their votes. Those same people, and they are the vast majority, are not innocent. Those who did NOT vote for the Hamas voted for other terrorist groups, like the various wings of the Fat'h. Basically no one in Gaza voted against terrorism.


Democracy is not just majority vote decision making but it is also holding that same majority accountable for how it votes and for the consequences of their votes. People who vote for terrorism are legitimate targets for Israeli arms and bombs. And since virtually all Gazans voted for terrorism, at least those above voting age did, let's stop all the silly talk about them being "innocent civilian bystanders."


That is not a call to bomb civilians. It IS a call to ignore the fact that civilians might get hurt in Gaza when Israel bombs armed terrorists.

German and Japanese civilians got hurt when the Allies bombed Nazi Germany and Imperialist Japan. Gazan civilians are no more innocent than were those German and Japanese civilians.


People who do not like it when Gazan civilians get hurt should not support Palestinian terrorism and savagery and aggression.


Israel's official policy should be: Hide a Hamas terrorist in your building and die.


taken from : B'NAI ELIM (http://bnaielim.blogspot.com/)

Israel Matzav: What goes around comes around - even for terrorists

Israel Matzav: What goes around comes around - even for terrorists

Israel Matzav: Streaming video of Jihadi TV#links#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: Streaming video of Jihadi TV#links#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: Is Hamas falling apart?#links#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: Is Hamas falling apart?#links#links#links#links

Saturday, 10 January 2009

JEWISH ANTISEMITES : MAOMI KLEIN



Of course there are Jewish antisemites. There always have been, and there always will be, just like there will always be antisemites. Somebody should write a book about their sorry history some day.


Naomi Klein is a well-known intellectual of the loony Left, who writes books about the evils of many of the things mankind should rightfully be proud of; being against Israel is simply part of that turf. I don't think we're at the top of her list of things to hate, merely comfortably in the middle.


Today she has published a column calling for a boycott against Israel. (Published also at the Guardian, with a more dramatic title).


The vapidness of her thesis is stated clearly in the very first paragraph:


It's time. Long past time. The best strategy to end the increasingly bloody occupation is for Israel to become the target of the kind of global movement that put an end to apartheid in South Africa. In July 2005 a huge coalition of Palestinian groups laid out plans to do just that. They called on "people of conscience all over the world to impose broad boycotts and implement divestment initiatives against Israel similar to those applied to South Africa in the apartheid era". The campaign Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions was born.


A huge coalition of Palestinian groups? Do you think anyone told Ms. Klein about the split between Hamas and Fatah? More interesting, this movement she tells of, has which goal? Putting an end to the occupation? And it was created when? July 2005? Wasn't that the month before the Israelis dismantled their settlements in Gaza, and pulled out all IDF troops?


So the first thing these boycotters, Ms. Klein among them, ought to work out for themselves is what their goal is. The boycotters of South Africa's Apartheid regime had a clear goal: an end to that regime. I suspect if one were to try to be calm and clearheaded and figure out what Israel's boycotters want, the bottom line would be either an end to Israel, or an end to Israel. It's clearly not about the settlements, as Ms. Klein has so helpfully explained.


A boycott against a country so that it ends itself is ridiculous. A yearning that a country disappear is despicable.


Ms. Klein admits she's a hypocrite:


Why single out Israel when the US, Britain and other western countries do the same things in Iraq and Afghanistan?


Boycott is not a dogma; it is a tactic. The reason the strategy should be tried is practical: in a country so small and trade-dependent, it could actually work.


Nice, isn't it? She's a pragmatist. Israel's no worse than others, but it's more vulnerable so let's go for it. Yet there are other countries that also might be vulnerable: Sri Lanka, for example, repressing it's Tamils with what rather looks like brutality, assuming you're looking. Sudan. The the parties involved in the genocide in the Congo. Pakistanis and Indians in Kashmir (40,000 dead over the past decade or so). Ever ask yourself how these paragons of human rights put together their hate-lists? No connections with human rights, I assure you.


Finally, she offers us a bit of comic relief:


For eight years, my books have been published in Israel by a commercial house called Babel. But when I published The Shock Doctrine, I wanted to respect the boycott. On the advice of BDS activists, including the wonderful writer John Berger, I contacted a small publisher called Andalus. Andalus is an activist press, deeply involved in the anti-occupation movement and the only Israeli publisher devoted exclusively to translating Arabic writing into Hebrew. We drafted a contract that guarantees that all proceeds go to Andalus's work, and none to me. I am boycotting the Israeli economy but not Israelis.


Huh? If Andalus is devoted exclusively to translating Arabic writing into Hebrew, does this mean The Shock Doctrine was written in Arabic? Wow. I'm impressed. I didn't know she had it in her. Anyway, I've got a number of Hebrew books on my bookshelf that are translations from the Arabic, and they're all from mainstream Israeli publishers, who of course have no problem with publishing books by Arabs, assuming they're good books. (And if they're merely internal Arab propaganda, there's always MEMRI). Also, if doing business with Israeli firms while donating the proceeds back to the companies themselves counts as boycotting Israel, I've got a company of my own that would really welcome being boycotted! We're over here, folks! We're staunch Zionists! You've just gotta boycott us! It's a mitzva!
taken from : Yaacov Lozowick's Ruminations (http://yaacovlozowick.blogspot.com/)

"EDUCATING" THE PEOPLE


"PEACE" ???


Israel Matzav: Video Hamas doesn't want you to see#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: Video Hamas doesn't want you to see#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: US abstention a warning to Israel?#links#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: US abstention a warning to Israel?#links#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: Pro-'Palestinian' demonstrators: 'Long live Hitler, put Jews in ovens'#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: Pro-'Palestinian' demonstrators: 'Long live Hitler, put Jews in ovens'#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: The best commentary I've seen on Gaza#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: The best commentary I've seen on Gaza#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: Video: IAF destroys rocket launcher in Gaza schoolyard before it can fire#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: Video: IAF destroys rocket launcher in Gaza schoolyard before it can fire#links#links#links

Israel Matzav: Egyptian minister: 'It's all Hamas' fault'#links#links

Israel Matzav: Egyptian minister: 'It's all Hamas' fault'#links#links

HOW TO UNDERSTAND MIKETZ AND VAYIGASH




Written by: admin


A little late, but really great - a nice Guest Post

The parashiot of Miketz and Vayigash feature some strange language and events that bear closer examination. The way I see things, it’s easier toread between the lines if we accept that the point of the parashiot is that “Kol Israel Arevim Ze LaZe” - all Israel are responsible for one another.Some of the [stronger] points in making this claim are Rashi’s or other commentator’s ideas. Any errors are mine, naturally.For those of you who may find it useful to know, I used The Sapirstein Edition of the Chumash.


The Irresponsible, Disunited Brothers
In Miketz, perek MB/chapter 32, pasouk G/verse 3 reads: “Joseph’s brothers - ten of them - went down to buy grain from Egypt.”
Rashi notes that a moment earlier the brothers had been referred to as Jacob’s sons. His explanation for the reference to them as Joseph’sbrothers is that they regretted his sale and were set on ransoming him. But at the same time, the reference to ‘ten of them’ alludes to their divisionamongst themselves as to how they felt towards Joseph personally - their love and hatred for him varied individually.
A moment later, we read that at surface level, the reference to ten brothers prepares us for Benjamin’s absence from the trip. Jacob’sexplanation is that he is concerned about a disaster occurring. Jacob tactfully avoids recalling the blame that the brothers bear for having his first sonkilled (or so he thinks). But it seems clear that Jacob mistrusts his own children to care for the sole remaining child of his favourite wife.
More interestingly, Jacob uses a weird phrasing to explain his worry, “Pen Ikraenu Ason.” The “nu” suffix suggests that he perhaps meant“lest a disaster befall us,” rather than “lest a disaster befall Benjamin.” The first person singular, “we,” often uses the “nu” suffixin conjugation. Jacob was trying to get the brothers to take responsibility for Benjamin.

Repetitions, Repetitions
The next verse makes things even more unusual. We already know from several psoukim in the preceding perek that Joseph was “the ruler over the land,he was the provider to all the people of the land.” After Joseph had succesfully interpreted Pharaoh’s dreams, he’d been made the country’s administratorwith repeated remarks by Pharaoh to the vastness and fullness of Joseph’s power and responsibility for the country’s welfare.
Why does the Torah repeat itself here?
I’d say that the timing explains things. The repetition comes immediately after the preceding distrustful talk. Where Jacob could not trust his ownchildren to take responsibility for their sibling, Pharaoh trusted Joseph enough to entrust him with his country!
The verse concludes with Joseph’s brother bowing to him. At a superficial level, they recognized his political superiority, but perhapsthey were also acknowledging that he was worthy of their respect as a role model. Here was a man of their own approximate age and he was caring for anation.
For simplicity I’ll just quote the following few verses verbatim. “Joseph saw his brothers and he recognized them, but he acted like a strangertoward them and spoke with them harshly. He said to them, ‘From where have you come?’ And they said, ‘From the land of Canaan to buy food.’ Josephrecognized his brothers but they did not recognize him.
When someone doesn’t recognize their child, we say they’ve disowned them and absolved themselves of responsibility for them.A midrash suggests that Joseph was ready to take care of his brothers, but the reverse wasn’t true.
My take is that Joseph acted coldly to to see whether they had changed since the time they’d sold him into slavery. He wanted to avoid tipping them offand risking getting an answer that aimed to please, but wasn’t 100% true. When they said that they came down to buy food - and ommitted to mentionthat they were looking to ransom their brother - he concluded that they still didn’t take responsibility for their earlier actions.
Spies, Bloody Spies!
Feeling perhaps that his brothers haven’t caught the thrust of where he’s going, and hoping to see that they were ready to take responsibility for him,Joseph then charges his brothers with being spies.
They deny it, and repeat that they’re just in town to buy food. They add that “we are all the sons of one man,” are truthful and have never been spies.Rashi interprets that as them including Joseph in the “we” and now recognizing him as a brother, from a flicker of G-dly inspiration.
Unimpressed, Joseph repeats the charge, to which they answer and highlight that their full brotherhood counts 12 members, “one of which is withour father today and one is gone.”
So they acknowledge that Joseph was once a part of their group but no longer, and they also phrase things to avoid taking personal responsibilityfor his absence. He’s just gone, like he’d gotten into a bad mood one day and run away from home.
Joseph, still not getting through, angrily repeats, “That’s what I’ve been saying to you. You’re spies!”
Rashi here cites a midrash that suggests that the real meaning of the conversation regards the brothers’ ransoming intent. Would they pay an exorbitantprice? Yes, they would. What if he wasn’t for sale? They came to kill or be killed, they said.
At this, we might expect Joseph to be pleased to hear the extent to which his brothers were prepared to go for him. Instead, he pressed home his pointabout the spies and threw his brothers in prison for three days.
As I understand things, the point of the accusation was that spies are fundamentally ungrateful people. They mix with their hosts, who take care of them,then repay them poorly with betrayal. Instead of taking care of those who’ve taken care of them, they forgo responsibility to instead cause harm.This may be a bit far-fetched, but we’ll see that on the whole it’s a tenable argument.
When he released his brothers from jail, Joseph challenged them to bring their youngest brother down to Egypt. The guilt that had been eating at themboiled to the surface and they recognized their responsibility finally, with Reuben says, “I told you so.” You would think he’d learned the lesson.
Just a short stretch later, Jacob is apprised of the situation whereby Benjamin must return to Egypt with his brothers if they are to buy foodagain - Joseph would not see them, otherwise. Reuben offers to be the surety for Benjamin, and should he fail to return his little brother,Jacob can kill Reuben’s two sons. Which offer Jacob promptly dismisses, per Rashi, as irresponsible rashness.
The leader - by age of the brothers - having thus been rebuffed, Judah offers to guarantee Benjamin’s safe passage. His words are interesting:
“Send the lad with me and let us arise and go, so we will live and we will not die, neither we nor you nor our children. I will guarantee him; of myown hand you can demand him. If I do not bring him back to you and stand him before you, then I will have sinned to you for all time. For had we notdelayed, by now we could have returned twice.”
The appeal is to the benefit of the collective. This Jacob accepts and sends Benjamin with his brothers.
Back in Joseph’s court, upon seeing that his brothers had brought their youngest sibling down to Egypt without harming him, Joseph welcomes his guestswith feasts. But he’s not entirely convinced that they’ve learned their lesson.
So he has his staff plant his goblet in Benjamin’s baggage before the brothers are set to leave. As they begin their trip, Joseph’s staff catches upand finds the goblet in Benjamin’s bag. Like spies, they are placed in a situation of doing wrong to people who have done them right (by selling themfood). It is time to take put up or shut up, as they say. Joseph asks that Benjamin remain as his slave.
Fortunately, Judah takes responsibility in Miketz, saying amongst other things, “How can I go up to my father without the youth, lest I see theevil that will befall my father?!” Between Judah assuming responsibility for his brother, thus showing that he and the brothers had changed for thebetter, and the appeal to his father’s welfare, Joseph gets through and succeeds. Joseph finally reveals himself to his brothers and the rest,as they say, is history.
So these parashiot teach us that Kol Israel Arevim Ze Lazeh - All Israel Are Responsible For One Another. With terrorists attacking Israel, thismessage is particularly timely. Aish has an interesting piece, http://www.aish.com/jewishissues/jewishsociety/54_Ways_You_Can_Help_Israel.asppart of which was addressed at last night’s rally here in Montreal. (The Florida Jewish site also has a good article http://www.floridajewish.com/18_ways_to_help_israel.php
When addressing the media, we need to not only criticize them, but praise those who do a good job writing accurately and fairly. I need to commendCNN (link) for example, for their coverage Tuesday night that showed an Israeli city’s police station storing all the exploded rockets that hit the town.Anderson Cooper showed the jagged metal placed around the explosive charge to maximize shrapnel (e.g. exploding junk) injuries.
But that’s not all. Pharaoh didn’t just trusting Joseph with the country - but with a wife and prize possessions etc. There are personal benefitsto demonstrating trustworthiness. Of course, if personal benefit is the only motivation for doing the right thing, chances are you won’t earn thattrust in the first place. But it’s great to know that helping others leaves us with more than just happy feelings.
Gab Goldenberg is an internet marketing expert who writes an SEO blog and provides link building services .
taken from : Tzipiyah.com
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...